
As Trump seeks a deal with Putin, will Western companies return to Russia?
One of the many questions raised by discussions between Moscow and Washington on ending the war in Ukraine is whether the corporate exodus from Russia in opposition to the February 2022 invasion may be reversed.
As long as broad Western sanctions on Russia remain in place, that looks unlikely, but should US President Donald Trump's administration seek to ease restrictions, it could open the door for some companies to return to what was once a high-growth market.
Here is a rundown of the situation.
More than a thousand companies from McDonald's (MCD) to Mercedes-Benz have left Russia in the last three years by selling, handing the keys to existing managers or abandoning assets. Others like Danone and Carlsberg had their assets seized and a sale forced through.
Western companies have acknowledged losses totaling $107 billion, including lost revenue, according to a Reuters analysis in March 2024. Kirill Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund, says US companies have lost $324 billion by leaving Russia.
When exiting, companies such as McDonald's, Renault and Henkel agreed options to buy the assets back. France's Renault sold its majority stake in Russian carmaker Avtovaz in May 2022 for reportedly just one ruble, but with a six-year option to buy it back.
Some food and healthcare companies, including Procter & Gamble (PG), PepsiCo (PEP) and Mondelez (MDLZ), say they stayed on humanitarian grounds to continue supplying Russian consumers with basic goods.
After the highest-level US-Russian meeting since the start of the Ukraine war began this week, Dmitriev said, without giving further details, that he expects a number of UScompanies to return as early as the second quarter.
The most likely to return are those operating outside sanctions, such as retailers and food producers, rather than those in sectors such as energy and finance.
Dmitriev said he believed major US oil companies that had been successful in Russia would 'at some point' return.
Senior Russian lawmaker Anatoly Aksakov this week said he thought Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) would soon restore payment services. The two companies said their Russia suspensions remained in place.
Hundreds of Western companies including Carlsberg and Unilever (UL) issued statements condemning Russia's aggression against Ukraine in the days and weeks after the invasion, framing their exit from the country or suspension of operations in moral terms.
Should a deal be reached that rewards Russia with Ukrainian territory, companies that have criticized Moscow risk reputational damage by returning.
Companies involved in supplying goods that have both civilian and military applications are bound by Western restrictions.
Boeing (BA) and Airbus, for example, halted the supply of planes and spare parts to Russia. Other examples include semiconductors, telecoms equipment and electronics. Speculation is rife on whether the US-Russia talks could yield a softening of sanctions, but no concrete proposals have yet been made.
Meanwhile, the European Union agreed Wednesday the 16th package of anti-Russia sanctions.
Sanctions prohibit providing Russia with financial or energy-related services, and Russian officials' statements that they expect Western companies to return look for now like wishful thinking.
Some of the world's most popular brands from Starbucks (SBUX) to Ikea and Levi's (LEVI) have been replaced by Russian imitations. The more than 800 McDonald's restaurants in Russia now operate under the brand Vkusno & tochka (Tasty & that's it). Starbucks sold its business to restaurateur Anton Pinskiy and rapper Timati. The business is now known as Stars Coffee.
Recapturing the market may be particularly hard for Western carmakers, as Chinese competitors have gained a more than 50% market share, up from less than 10% three years ago. It is not clear how willing Russia would be to support the return of European carmakers at the expense of Chinese ones, especially given the 'no-limits partnership' between Moscow and Beijing as trade between the two countries has ballooned.
Moscow has long promised to retaliate for what it views as the theft of Russian assets abroad, and has seized companies in Russia through presidential decrees and the courts.
Russia currently controls a handful of Western companies through the guise of 'temporary management' and is ramping up asset seizures from companies with foreign ownership links. Most companies exiting Russia were forced to sell at huge discounts. Convincing investors to dip their toes back into the Russian market may take time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
11 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Says Musk Will Face ‘Very Serious Consequences' If He Backs Democrats
President Donald Trump on June 7 warned that Elon Musk could face 'serious consequences' if he decides to back Democratic political candidates in upcoming elections. While Musk campaigned for Trump's 2024 presidential run and was a key member in the Trump administration's fight against fraud and waste, the two were involved in a public spat this week, apparently fueled by their disagreements over Trump's budget priorities in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Trump-Musk feud shows danger of handing the keys of power to one person
After a year of effusive praise and expressions of love for each other, Elon Musk and Donald Trump exploded their political partnership in dramatic fashion this week. The highly public split included, among other highlights, the world's richest person accusing the president of the United States of associating with a notorious sex offender. Trump said Musk had 'lost his mind'. As Musk and Trump traded insults, each on his own social network, they also issued threats with tangible consequences. Trump suggested that he could cancel all of Musk's government contracts and subsidies – 'the best way to save money', he posted – a move that would have devastating consequences not only on the tech billionaire's companies but also on the federal agencies that have come to depend on them. Musk responded by announcing that he would begin decommissioning the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft that Nasa relies on for transport missions, although he later reversed the decision. While the ongoing episode had the tenor of sensational reality TV, the fight between Trump and Musk once again exposed the danger of putting key public goods in the hands of private companies controlled by erratic billionaires. It highlighted how something like space travel, once a vaunted and collective national enterprise, can now be almost entirely derailed by the emotional whims of a single person. Musk and Trump's partnership had already fueled months of concern about corruption and calls for investigations into the Tesla CEO's use of his position in government to benefit his companies. The breakup has highlighted another risk of Musk's deep ties with the government, where the services that he provides can now become collateral damage in interpersonal disputes. Tens of billions of dollars hang in the balance of their fight. The messy, public way that the clash has played out also serves as a reminder of how unpredictable their decision-making can be. Musk's vow to sideline SpaceX's spacecraft and his reversal, without which the US would have immediately been prevented from reaching the International Space Station (ISS), appeared, for instance, as an emotional lash-out amid a string of other insults against Trump, and it was nearly impossible to discern whether he was serious. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted without warning on Thursday. 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon,' Musk followed up less than a day later, responding to an anonymous user with about 5,000 followers who said he should 'cool off and take a step back for a couple days'. If Musk and Trump's fight ends up disrupting government services or further turning them into political leverage, it will not have come without warning. Ever since Musk refused in 2023 to let Ukraine use Starlink in Crimea to launch a surprise attack against Russian forces, governments have dealt with the uncomfortable reality of Musk's control over global infrastructure. Musk's claim that he could hobble Ukraine's 'entire front line' by turning off Starlink caused a diplomatic incident earlier this year. Meanwhile, European governments have recently rushed to find alternatives to Starlink amid concerns over Musk's unpredictability. While Musk provoked foreign governments and acted as an unaccountable global power broker, the US has by contrast continued to hand him contracts and increase its dependence on his companies. Space operations in particular have become practically synonymous with Musk. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds Since SpaceX won its first Nasa contract in 2006, the government has awarded about $15bn worth of contracts to the company and has come to depend on it for ferrying astronauts and cargo into space. Nasa has also contracted SpaceX for its planned crewed mission to the moon, as well as a mission to explore one of Saturn's moons. Last year, the agency turned to SpaceX when it needed to rescue two astronauts stuck on the ISS. The government's reliance on Musk's empire also extends beyond Nasa. The Pentagon has extensive contracts with Musk, using SpaceX to launch intelligence satellites. SpaceX was also the frontrunner in the Trump administration's plans to build a 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield, which has become a US national defense priority. Starlink, Musk's satellite communications service, had also made inroads into the government to the point that it was installed this year at the White House. Musk is still accountable to market forces and the investors backing his companies, as was made evident on Thursday after Tesla's shares plunged roughly 14% during his dustup with Trump. Musk has previously stated that he is willing to lose money over his ideology, however, and his immense wealth somewhat insulates him against even large shocks to his companies. When Tesla's shares dropped on Thursday, it wiped about $34bn off his total net worth in a single day – yet he remained the world's richest person by a gap of more than $90bn. The extensive reliance on Musk and the privatization of government services has always drawn criticism from ethics watchdogs and some aerospace and defense industry experts, but it appears especially risky now that Musk has threatened to hold certain services hostage. It has also served as a counterpoint to the project of slashing and privatizing the federal government that Musk spent his tenure with the Trump administration carrying out. Musk has furiously campaigned against bureaucracy, courts and regulators as impediments to getting things done, but these also exist as a bulwark against exactly the kind of unaccountable personal power and erratic whims that both he and Trump put on display during their clash.