Council tenants keep social housing for life – even if they earn £100k
A Labour-run local authority has brought back lifetime tenancies for council house residents after a botched Tory crackdown.
Westminster City Council has announced it is bringing back lifetime contracts for all its new and existing tenants, and scrapping fixed-term five-year tenancies.
It means council house residents will have an automatic right to keep their home regardless of how much they go on to earn.
Lifetime tenancies, also known as secure housing placements, are offered as the default by almost all local authorities after the previous Conservative government's bid to scrap them in 2015 was shelved.
The town hall said the move would tackle 'housing insecurity' and develop stronger communities in the central London borough.
But critics warned that people who go on to become 'high earners' would be able to continuing to live in taxpayer-subsidised homes permanently.
Although councils usually conduct income checks on housing applicants, they are typically allowed to earn more after being approved for a property.
Westminster's new policy recommends providers offer accommodation for life following a 12-month introductory period, replacing five-year fixed-term tenancies.
After the death of a council house tenant, a property can be passed down to the council by their spouse, child or another member of the family.
Paul Swaddle, the Conservative leader of Westminster council's opposition, warned that the move 'risks turning council homes into a permanent asset for the few, rather than a vital safety net for those who need them'.
However, campaigners welcomed the revelation as a 'positive step'.
Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at Shelter, said: 'Once a family moves into a social home, they should have the peace of mind that they can plan for their future without having to worry about their housing situation changing suddenly.'
Council house tenants will be given a lifetime guarantee that they can remain in a property, so long as they meet the conditions of their tenancy agreement, such as meeting rent payments and not engaging in anti-social behaviour.
Cllr Swaddle said: 'Westminster has some of the longest housing waiting lists in the country.
'We should be helping those most in need [and] not creating a system where high earners can hold onto council homes for life, regardless of changing circumstances while others wait for years in temporary accommodation.'
In 2012, a coalition government gave local authorities the discretion to not offer lifetime tenancies. However, take-up among councils was low.
The Conservatives went further by trying to scrap them altogether in 2015, but eventually shelved the plans.
It remains the predominant form of council housing today. Lifetime tenancies made up 89.9pc of new council lettings in the year ending March 2024, according to official figures.
Meanwhile, the borough – which Labour won control of for the first time in 2022 – is embarking on a radical shake-up of its housing policy.
Residents who are second home owners were recently hit with double council tax, while owners of long-term empty properties must now pay 300pc higher tax bills. An average Band D property in Westminster currently pays £1,017 a year in council tax.
Separately, the council is lobbying ministers for greater powers to take possession of properties that have been empty for six months or longer and use them as council housing. Local authorities must currently wait two years before they can begin the legal process of possessing an empty property.
Adam Hug, the leader of Westminster City Council, said: 'We're giving our residents the long-term security they deserve.
'A safe, stable home is the foundation for building a stronger community – and this change ensures tenants can plan for their futures with peace of mind.
'There will be no changes to rent, tenancy rights or the services residents receive and the council will work with tenants to ensure a smooth transition.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nato was a victory for Starmer on the global stage, but now he's at war with his own MPs
Sir Keir Starmer seemed chipper as he boarded the plane home from the Nato summit on Wednesday evening. He cheerily thanked hacks in the travelling press delegation for what he said had been a great two-day trip to The Hague. And looking at Nato alone, it had been a success. Across the board, allies signed up to a historic increase in defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. After briefly wavering on his commitment to Article 5, even Donald Trump fell in line. And following a public love-in with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – who unnervingly, dubbed him the 'daddy' between the two warring nations of Iran and Israel – the US president conceded that the alliance was no longer a 'rip off', saying he is with is his European friends 'all the way'. Meanwhile, Starmer was able to pitch Britain as a leader on the world stage by cosying up to Mr Trump and purchasing 12 new F-35A fighter jets, massively ramping up Britain's nuclear capabilities. But what was left unsaid when the PM briefly greeted the media sharing the plane with him was that he was flying back into the most significant rebellion of his premiership – a revolt which threatens to shake the foundations of the historic majority he won just 11 months ago. Speaking at a press conference about Britain's contribution to defence spending at the Nato summit just hours earlier, the prime minister was forced to deny suggestions that he might be forced out of office before the next election. 'Many people predicted before the election that we 'couldn't read the room' we 'hadn't got the politics right' we 'wouldn't win an election after 2019' because we lost so badly. "We got a landslide victory. So I'm comfortable with reading the room and delivering the change the country needs', Sir Keir insisted. But at home, his MPs are much less convinced. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed an amendment which would kill off the government's flagship £5bn welfare reforms entirely. And there is a growing feeling that the prime minister has failed to listen to them, after he used part of his Nato presser to dismiss the rebellion as 'noises off'. 'No 10 sees MPs as irritants and fodder', one Labour MP with her name on the amendment said. 'We're all working hard and this is how they treat us. It goes back to the point about how arrogant and out of touch they are.' The prime minister's comments at the Nato press conference displayed a real lack of empathy for his own MPs, and ironically, a distinct failure to read the room. It would be hard to argue the prime minister is a wholly unempathetic person. An in-depth profile of the prime minister in the New Statesman published earlier this month showed how deeply he feels the weight of sacrifices made by individuals putting their lives on the line to serve their country. But in his first year in office, it has become increasingly clear that the prime minister is much more comfortable navigating foreign diplomacy than he is with dealing with angry backbenchers. It is in this area that Sir Keir seems entirely unable to empathise. He is known for being pragmatic rather than ideological, and appears to be bored by political manoeuvring. At times, this can provide a refreshing break from the Westminster bubble. But, taken too far, it can be the opposite. Starmer seems to have lost sight of the fact that in some scenarios, political manoeuvring is more than just self-serving posturing. Sometimes, it's a fight for hundreds of thousands of disabled people who are scared of losing vital financial support. The prime minister is now frantically meeting with leading MPs involved in the amendment to try to secure their backing by offering concessions. But the fact that it was allowed to get this far in the first place has angered those who would naturally be inclined to back the prime minister. Many are now threatening to dig their heels in until the bill is dead in the water. As Starmer returns from what was a strong showing at Nato, he must now display some of the empathy and political nous that he so effectively shows on the global stage. If he is unable to do so, he may well lose the domestic battle – and it could be catastrophic for his authority.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trans books for toddlers are an outrage
But let's move away from the brazen attempts to brainwash little children for just a moment and settle down in the story corner for today's educational tale (with apologies to Eric Carle), The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner. One day a tiny and very publicity-hungry campaigner, who wanted to be a big deal, hatched a plan to recruit pre-school allies. He had guessed, quite rightly, that toddlers were the only demographic likely to believe his guff that anyone can change sex if they just pop on a frock and get furious about pronouns. On the first day, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner gobbled up one publishing deal. On the second day he wrote two books explaining that girls who play with trains are probably boys and boys who like pink should be taken to a doctor and diagnosed as transgender. On the third day, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner bullied women writers who did not agree with his crackpot notions. On the fourth day he slapped a great big Stonewall Award sticker on a book about a sister becoming a brother. On the fifth day, he ate a wheelbarrow of oranges and threatened to cancel anyone who said they were not the only fruit. Then on the sixth day, he disseminated a library of kids' books in which gender transitioning turned out to be the twinkly secret of a happy-ever-after. On the seventh day, he devoured every last scrap of bonkers gender ideology he could find and disappeared off to digest it. Some time later, The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner emerged looking like an extra from RuPaul's Drag Race and announced he was now a biological woman. The Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigner banged on about his lived experience (of about a week). It was tempting to get very cross indeed. But then the Supreme Court decided that references to 'sex', 'man' and 'woman' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex and after that, nobody cared what he said, safe in the knowledge it was now illegal for him to manspread in the ladies' changing room or beat women to a pulp in the Olympics. The End. If only it were. I thought we were done with all this nonsense – Martine Croxall we salute your eye roll at the witless term 'pregnant people' – and I for one have no desire to give Very Publicity-Hungry Campaigners any more of the attention they so desperately crave. Fighting dirty But new research into the publishing industry carried out by UK pressure group Sex Matters and its US equivalent, SEEN in Publishing, has revealed that a 'shiny, sparkly world of trans identities' is being promoted to young readers, with 'many aimed at toddlers'. Now that really is fighting so dirty I have to speak up: how dare publishers literally mess with little children's minds in this way? Here in north London having two mums is commonplace, two dads is no biggie; small kids aren't that interested in their parents' sexual preferences, they are interested in being loved, nurtured and protected. Growing up is hard enough work, which is why it's utterly immoral to draw toddlers, who haven't even mastered the potty, into the adult world of human identity politics. What next? Assisted dying and late-stage abortion? At this age, most of our collective offspring still believe Paw Patrol is real and the moon follows them home, for pity's sake. Sowing the seeds of doubt about their biological sex is outrageous, indefensible and, let's be honest, exceedingly creepy. Let our littlest citizens learn tolerance, fairness (yes even to women) kindness (ditto) and consideration. But they also deserve to know they have the right to ask questions and press for answers – anathema to the militant trans lobby who prefer to shut everyone down in case they bring up uncomfortable truths like biology. This new audit of the publishing industry found that of 21 publishers surveyed, a fifth of their output on transgender-related products was targeted at children, leading the report to raise concerns that the message in the early-reader books was often that becoming transgender will 'resolve bodily hatred and create enduring joy in the form of 'trans euphoria''. Crikey, if that were the case we'd all be at it. But it's not. Take a look at the shouty trans forums online and I've got to say that enduring joy doesn't feature nearly as often as spittle-flecked misogyny.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's US accuses UK of backing ‘state-subsidised suicide' after assisted dying bill passes
The Trump administration criticised the UK's recently passed assisted dying bill, labelling it as 'state-subsidised suicide'. The US State Department 's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labour stated that the 'western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death' in response to the legislation. The Terminally Ill Adults Bill, introduced by MP Kim Leadbeater, passed the House of Commons by a narrow margin of 23 votes. The bill would permit terminally ill individuals with less than six months to live to apply for assisted death, pending approval from two doctors and a panel of professionals. The legislation is now advancing to the House of Lords for further review, and this marks the second instance of the US State Department criticising Britain under Sir Keir.
