logo
Technology use may be associated with a lower risk for dementia, study finds

Technology use may be associated with a lower risk for dementia, study finds

CNN15-04-2025
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
CNN —
With the first generation of people exposed widely to technology now approaching old age, how has its use affected their risk of cognitive decline?
That's a question researchers from two Texas universities sought to answer in a new meta-analysis study, a review of previous studies, published Monday in the journal Nature Human Behavior. The query investigates the ' digital dementia hypothesis,' which argues that lifetime use may increase reliance on technology and weaken cognitive abilities over time.
'We say a really active brain in youth and midlife is a brain that is more resilient later,' said Dr. Amit Sachdev, medical director of the department of neurology and ophthalmology at Michigan State University, who wasn't involved in the study.
But the authors discovered that the digital dementia hypothesis may not bear out: Their analysis of 57 studies totaling 411,430 older adults found technology use was associated with a 42% lower risk of cognitive impairment, which was defined as a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, or as subpar performance on cognitive tests.
Forms of technology included computers, smartphones, internet, email, social media or 'mixed/multiple uses,' according to the new study.
'That these effects were found in studies even when factors like education, income, and other lifestyle factors were adjusted was also encouraging: the effect doesn't seem just due to other brain health factors,' co-lead study author Dr. Jared Benge, associate professor in the department of neurology at the University of Texas at Austin's Dell Medical School, said via email.
The authors searched eight databases for studies published through 2024, and the 57 chosen for their main analysis included 20 studies that followed participants for about six years on average and 37 cross-sectional studies, which measure health data and outcomes at one point in time. The adults were age 68 on average at the beginning of the studies.
While technology use was generally linked with a lower risk of cognitive decline, the findings for social media use were inconsistent, the authors said.
None of the 136 studies the authors reviewed overall reported an increased risk of cognitive impairment correlated with technology use — a consistency that is 'really quite rare,' said co-lead study author Dr. Michael Scullin, professor of psychology and neuroscience at Baylor University, via email.
The research is 'a really well-organized and -executed meta-analysis of essentially the entire field over the last 18 years or 20 years,' said Dr. Christopher Anderson, chief of the division of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Anderson wasn't involved in the study.
But if you're thinking the study's findings mean you're free to use technology to your heart's content since your brain will be fine anyway — not so fast.
'Our findings are not a blanket endorsement of mindless scrolling,' Benge, who is also a clinical neuropsychologist at UT Health Austin's Comprehensive Memory Center, said. 'They are instead a hint that the generation that gave us the internet has found ways to get some net positive benefits from these tools to the brain.'
And despite the study's significance, there are still many uncertainties about the relationships between various aspects of technology use and brain health.
Technology use and the brain
One of the study's limitations is that it doesn't have details on how people were using technological devices, experts said. As a result, it's unclear whether participants were using computers or phones in ways that meaningfully exercised their brains, or what specific way may be most associated with cognitive protection.
Lacking information on the amount of time technology was used means it's also unknown whether there is harmful threshold or if only a little time is needed for cognitive benefits, Anderson said.
These questions are difficult 'to try to answer, because the sheer volume of technology exposures that we have to navigate is so high,' Sachdev said. 'To isolate one technology exposure and its effect is difficult, and to measure just a whole ecosystem of technology exposures and … their aggregate effect is also a challenge.'
Additionally, 'the amount that we can extrapolate from this study towards future generations is very unclear, given the ubiquity of technology today that people are exposed to and have been exposed to from their birth,' Anderson said.
'When you think about the kind of technology that this cohort would've been interacting with earlier in their lives, it's a time when you had to really work to use technology,' Anderson added.
Their brains were also already well formed, Benge said.
The study may support the alternative to the digital dementia hypothesis, which is the cognitive reserve theory. The theory 'contends that exposure to complex mental activities leads to better cognitive well-being in older age,' even in the face of age-related brain changes, according to the study.
That technology may reduce risk of cognitive decline by helping us be more neurologically active is possible, Sachdev said. Technology use can also foster social connection in some instances, and social isolation has been linked with greater odds of developing dementia.
It's also possible that older adults who are using technology may already have more active and resilient brains, explaining their engagement with technology.
Managing your technology use
Inferences on best practices for technology use in consideration of cognitive health can't be drawn from the study since it didn't have specifics on participants' use habits, experts said.
But 'it does support that a healthy mix of activities is likely to be the most beneficial, and that fits with other literature on the topic as well,' Anderson said. 'What this probably does more than anything else is provide some reassurance that there's no association between at least moderate use of technology and cognitive decline.'
Engaging in moderation is best, Sachdev said. And that should largely bring joy, genuine connection, creativity and intellectual stimulation to your life, experts said.
'It should be productive in some way,' he added, and entertaining yourself can sometimes meet that requirement. But if you're experiencing eye or neck strain from sitting in front of a screen, that's a sign you're using technology too much.
'Too much of anything can be a bad thing,' Sachdev said. 'Identifying the purpose and the duration and then executing along those lines is how we would advise for most topics.'
Some older adults have avoided technology use, thinking it's too difficult to learn. But Scullin and others have found even people with mild dementia can be trained to use such devices, he said. Though sometimes frustrating, the difficulty 'is a reflection of the mental stimulation afforded through learning the device,' Scullin added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HPV vaccine could prevent thousands of cervical cancer cases each year. A doctor explains
HPV vaccine could prevent thousands of cervical cancer cases each year. A doctor explains

CNN

time2 hours ago

  • CNN

HPV vaccine could prevent thousands of cervical cancer cases each year. A doctor explains

Imagine if there were a vaccine for breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, uterine cancer, ovarian cancer or any of the most well-known cancers that sicken and kill so many people. Every year, there are an estimated 48,000 new cases of cancers associated with the human papillomavirus, or HPV, in the United States, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But in the case of HPV, there actually is a vaccine. Yet public awareness remains low. Over one-third of American adults are unaware of HPV or the HPV vaccine, according to a new research letter published Thursday in JAMA Oncology. In some states, the numbers are significantly higher. That's why people need to know about HPV, the cancers linked to the virus, and the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine. To help with these questions, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen. Wen is an emergency physician and adjunct associate professor at George Washington University. She previously was Baltimore's health commissioner, and she is the mother of two young children. CNN: What is HPV, and what cancers is it linked to? Dr. Leana Wen: HPV is a virus that can infect humans. There are over 100 types of HPV. Most HPV infections aren't linked to cancer, but some are. The specific types of cancers associated with HPV infection are cervical cancer, cancers of the vagina, vulva, penis and anus. Some oral and throat cancers are also associated with HPV infection. Of the cancers linked to HPV, cervical cancer is the most common. Each year in the US, there are about 13,000 new cases of cervical cancer. About 4,000 American women die of this cancer annually. However, as referenced in the new report, it's not just cervical cancer — there are as many as 48,000 new cancer diagnoses linked annually to HPV. It's important for people to understand the association between HPV and cervical cancer as well as the link to other cancer types, including the link to oropharyngeal cancers. CNN: Do people know if they have HPV — do they have symptoms at the time? Wen: Some types of HPV cause warts. These tend to be what's called low-risk HPV, meaning HPV that is not linked with cancer. Infections with high-risk HPV do not cause symptoms at the time of infection; symptoms can develop later when precancerous and cancerous cells develop. According to the National Cancer Institute, HPV infection is very common — so common that nearly all sexually active people become infected with HPV within a few years of becoming sexually active. As much as half of HPV infections involve high-risk HPV. Most HPV infections are cleared by the body and do not result in cancer. However, some high-risk infections can persist. Over the course of many years, it can lead to the development of precancerous and then cancerous cells. CNN: How is HPV spread? Wen: The most common way for HPV to spread is through sexual intercourse. The virus can also spread during close skin-to-skin contact during intercourse. It's crucial to understand just how widespread HPV is and how high-risk HPV is spread by asymptomatic people. Condoms can lower the risk of spreading HPV, but because HPV can infect areas that condoms don't cover, they don't fully protect against HPV. This is why vaccination is so important, to protect against HPV-causing cancers down the line. CNN: How effective is the HPV vaccine? Wen: The HPV vaccines have very high efficacy — close to 100% — for the prevention of cervical cancer in women, according to the CDC. The vaccines have also been found to have very high efficacy in men who have sex with men in preventing anal cancer. The vaccines also reduce the likelihood of developing genital warts. CNN: When is the vaccine recommended to be given? Wen: The CDC recommends that preteens receive the first dose of the vaccine at age 11 or 12, though it can be given as early as age 9. For most people 9 through 14, a two-dose series is recommended, with the second shot given six to 12 months after the first. A three-dose series is recommended for people who begin vaccination at ages 15 through 45 and for immunocompromised individuals. The second shot is given one to two months after the first and the third about five months later. CNN: I have heard some parents say that they don't want their children to get the shot because it may encourage them to have sex earlier. How do doctors and public health experts respond to that concern? Wen: They would point to the data. A large study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine compared over 21,000 vaccinated girls with nearly 186,000 unvaccinated peers and found 'no evidence of increased unsafe sexual behavior.' Other studies have found no association between HPV vaccination status and age of first sexual encounter or number of sexual partners. Because high-risk HPV is so widespread, protecting against the cancers it can cause is essential. We are fortunate to have a vaccine that is so effective. Giving the vaccine is not about encouraging a particular behavior, but about giving protection in case someone becomes exposed to a virus someday. CNN: What is your takeaway from this latest report? Wen: Awareness of HPV and the HPV vaccine remains dangerously low among the general public. In seven states, more than 40% of adults were not aware of HPV; in 13 states, more than 40% were unaware of the vaccine. In 45 states and Washington, DC, more than 60% did not know that HPV could cause oral cancers. The authors concluded that 'there is a critical need to enhance HPV awareness among adolescents, young adults, parents or caregivers, and pediatric and adult health care professionals.' I agree. Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.

Geoffrey Hinton Says AI Needs Maternal Instincts. Here's What It Takes
Geoffrey Hinton Says AI Needs Maternal Instincts. Here's What It Takes

Forbes

time3 hours ago

  • Forbes

Geoffrey Hinton Says AI Needs Maternal Instincts. Here's What It Takes

'If it's not going to parent me, it's going to replace me,' Geoffrey Hinton, known as the godfather of AI, said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas this week. He was, of course, talking about AI. More specifically, the AI he helped pioneer, but which he now believes poses an existential threat to humanity. Hinton doesn't think the solution to this threat is to force AI to submit to humans. Instead, he suggests building "maternal instincts" into AI models so that they genuinely care about us humans and therefore won't want to wipe us out. Following my Forbes article on how Alan Turing, known as the father of AI, laid the foundation of AI by building a digital 'child-machine', Hinton's call for 'super-intelligent caring AI mothers' raises an intriguing question: Is the entire AI industry made up of fathers and godfathers trying to build an AI family of artificial children and mothers? And what would it take for them to succeed? 1. Geoffrey Hinton As God, Not Godfather In an interview on CNN, a reporter asks Hinton how easy it is from a technological perspective to build motherly instincts — 'is there an example of that being done at all?' Hinton's answer provides a rare insight into how he and AI developers like him understand themselves and the work they do: 'The only real example we have is evolution. Evolution obviously made a pretty good job with mothers.' Hinton says that the reason we lack technological examples is because AI developers haven't tried to build artificial maternal instincts – yet: 'They have been focusing on making these things more intelligent. But intelligence is just one part of a being. We need to make them have empathy towards us. And we don't know how to do that yet. But evolution managed and we should be able to do it too.' So that's the idea: If evolution can do it, so can we. But what does this idea imply? And who are the 'we' who can accomplish the same as evolution? Hinton is known as the godfather of AI, but the achievement he talks about seems to require a god rather than a godfather. Who else would understand themselves and the work they do as on par with evolution? 2. AI Shaped By Pain, Confusion, And Worry In addition to a god, rather than a godfather, it takes some work to get from the lying AI we know today to the caring 'AI mother' Hinton calls for. What does this work look like? And where do we start? While making AI intelligent has required computer scientists like Hinton to study and simulate neural networks, giving AI maternal instincts requires studying something entirely different. Maternal instincts are neither innate nor learned (neither part of the child brain/program nor the educational process, Turing set out to simulate). They arise during pregnancy, are embodied at birth, and evolve throughout motherhood. From the outside, maternal instincts may be most associated with care and compassion. But from the inside, the development of these instincts through pregnancy, birth, and parenting is just as much about pain, confusion, and worry. And that's just it. Maternal instincts develop from the inside. From a place nobody – not even the mother herself – is able to define and describe. How does Hinton and an industry of fathers and godfathers plan to study and simulate that? 3. Humans Stop Being Human In a LinkedIn post commenting on Hinton's CNN interview, another AI godfather, Meta's Yann LeCunn, says that 'simple, low-level hardwired guardrail objectives' like "don't run over people" and 'don't flail your arm if there are people around, particularly if you are holding a kitchen knife,' would be the AI equivalent of instinct or drive in animals and humans. This suggests that the fathers and godfathers of AI may have a chance to succeed in building an AI family of artificial children and mothers. All it takes is for children and mothers to stop being influenced by pregnancy, birth, and upbringing and start following simple, low-level hardwired guardrail objectives. That would allow the AI industry to say they were able to do what evolution did: create AI mothers who have the same maternal instinct as human mothers. Not because AI starts behaving like human mothers. But because human mothers start behaving like AI. Unfortunately – or fortunately, depending on how you look at it – that is unlikely to happen. Just as Geoffrey Hinton says we need AI mothers rather than AI assistants because 'an assistant is someone you can fire, you can't fire your mother,' the pain, confusion and worry that come with pregnancy, birth, and upbringing is not something we can get rid of. So maybe that's what the AI fathers and godfathers should be focusing on: not how to create artificial children, mothers and maternal instincts, but how to use their paternal instincts to build AI that gives way to humans, for better or worse?

Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'
Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Alien worlds may not necessarily need water, scientists find: ‘We just opened a Pandora's box'

Water may not be essential to support life, and an entirely different type of liquid could do the same in alien worlds, a new study claims. Until now, water has been considered a requirement for life on other worlds, with scientists defining the habitability of other planets based on its presence. However, a new lab experiment suggests salts existing in liquid form at lower temperatures in other worlds may host life, though unlike anything resembling Earth's water-based beings. Such liquid-salts, called ionic liquids, can exist below about 100 degrees Celsius and remain stable enough in the fluid state at wider conditions to be a hospitable environment for life-signature molecules like proteins, say researchers from the Massachussets Institute of Technology. The study, published in the journal PNAS, theorises that even planets that are too warm, or those with atmospheres at pressures too low to host liquid water, could still support pockets of ionic liquid. 'We consider water to be required for life because that is what's needed for Earth life. But if we look at a more general definition, we see that what we need is a liquid in which metabolism for life can take place,' says Rachana Agrawal, an author of the study from MIT. 'Now if we include ionic liquid as a possibility, this can dramatically increase the habitability zone for all rocky worlds,' Dr Agrawal said. On Earth, such ionic liquids are mainly only made for industries, and do not occur naturally – except for one natural case. One liquid salt is generated from the mixing of venoms produced by two rival species of ants. In the new study, scientists sought to understand the broad conditions under which ionic liquids can be naturally produced, including the range of temperatures and pressures. They started by mixing sulphuric acid with 30 different nitrogen-containing organic compounds across several temperatures and pressures. Researchers then observed whether an ionic liquid formed when they evaporated away the sulphuric acid in various vials. This work was based on previous work suggesting that some of these chemicals, considered ingredients associated with life, are surprisingly stable in sulphuric acid. Scientists also mixed the ingredients onto basalt rocks, which are known to exist on the surface of many rocky planets. 'We were just astonished that the ionic liquid forms under so many different conditions,' says Sara Seager, another author of the study. 'If you put the sulphuric acid and the organic on a rock, the excess sulphuric acid seeps into the rock pores, but you're still left with a drop of ionic liquid on the rock. Whatever we tried, ionic liquid still formed,' Dr Seager says. Researchers found that their reactions produced ionic liquid at temperatures up to 180 degrees Celsius and at extremely low pressures – much lower than that of the Earth's atmosphere. The findings suggest ionic liquids can naturally form on other planets where liquid water cannot exist, under the right conditions. 'We're envisioning a planet warmer than Earth, that doesn't have water, and at some point in its past or currently, it has to have had sulphuric acid, formed from volcanic outgassing,' Dr Seager says. 'This sulphuric acid has to flow over a little pocket of organics. And organic deposits are extremely common in the solar system,' she explained. Scientists hope to conduct further studies to see what life-signature molecules might survive and thrive in ionic liquids. 'We just opened up a Pandora's box of new research. It's been a real journey,' Dr Seager said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store