Stellantis Follows Ford's Lead, Starts Offering Employee Pricing Because Of Trump's Tariffs
Stellantis — like many other automakers — is in survival mode right now as President Trump's tariffs wreak havoc on the global supply chain and the U.S. automotive industry. In an effort to boost sales and keep prices somewhat manageable for buyers, the trans-Atlantic company is offering employee discounts to the general public. It's a similar move to what Ford did last week and a worrying sign that the auto industry is on the brink of something catastrophic.
Discounts are being implemented across the board on most 2024 and 2025 Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge and Ram models with the exception of of the Ram 1500 RHO and Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 392, according to Automotive News. If you're buying one of those trucks, you probably don't need the extra savings anyway. Right now, there's no word on exactly how deep the discounts will be. Here's what Stellantis told the outlet:
"This week we launched aggressive and consistent incentive and marketing support for April, including an exciting and competitive enhancement that will allow our customers 'America's Freedom of Choice' between employee price or current cash incentives," a Stellantis spokesperson said[.]
The move follows Trump's brand new 25 percent tariffs on all imported vehicles that started on April 3. Analysts believe this action could end up raising the average new vehicle price by thousands of dollars, AutoNews reports. It also sure looks like this is just the beginning, too. The same 25 percent tariff is set to be lobbied on major components like engines and transmissions starting on May 3. I'm sure that will be its own self-inflicted disaster for the world economy.
Read more: These Cars Are Police Magnets
Stellantis is being hit particularly hard by these tariffs even though it's technically sort of an American company. It produces a ton of vehicles and parts in Mexico, including the electric Jeep Wagoneer S, the Jeep Compass, Ram Heavy Duty trucks and the Ram ProMaster van. It also builds its twin-turbo Hurricane straight-six motor and its 6.4-liter Hemi V8 in the country.
Not to be left out of the fun, Canada also produces some of Stellantis' most key vehicles: the Pacifica minivan (Chrysler's only product) and the immensely important all-electric Charger Daytona. Both of those vehicles are built in Windsor, Ontario. All in all, about 60 percent of the vehicles Stellantis sells in the U.S. are built domestically. That's a hell of a lot less than the 80 percent of vehicles Ford builds here.
This all comes just a day after Ford launched a very similar program called From America, For America. It will give any customer access to thousands of dollars in discounts for just about everything Ford makes other than the Expedition, Super Duty pickups and the Lincoln Navigator.
To be fair, employee discounts to drum up sales aren't exactly anything new. Ford famously used them in 2009 to get sales up during the... oh God... oh no.... Great Recession. History doesn't always repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What it would take to convert a jet from Qatar into Air Force One to safely fly Trump
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump really wants to fly on an upgraded Air Force One — but making that happen could depend on whether he's willing to cut corners with security. As government lawyers sort out the legal arrangement for accepting a luxury jet from the Qatari royal family, another crucial conversation is unfolding about modifying the plane so it's safe for the American president. Installing capabilities equivalent to the decades-old 747s now used as Air Force One would almost certainly consign the project to a similar fate as Boeing's replacement initiative, which has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told lawmakers Thursday that those security modifications would cost less than $400 million but provided no details. Satisfying Trump's desire to use the new plane before the end of his term could require leaving out some of those precautions, however. A White House official said Trump wants the Qatari jet ready as soon as possible while adhering to security standards. The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide details on equipment issues or the timeline. Trump has survived two assassination attempts, and Iran allegedly also plotted to kill him, so he's well aware of the danger he faces. However, he seems willing to take some chances with security, particularly when it comes to communications. For example, he likes to keep his personal phone handy despite the threat of hacks. He boasted this week that the government got the jet 'for free,' saying, 'We need it as Air Force One until the other ones are done.' Here's a look at what it would take to make the Qatari plane into a presidential transport: What makes a plane worthy of being Air Force One? Air Force One is the call sign for any plane that's carrying the president. The first aircraft to get the designation was a propeller-powered C-54 Skymaster, which ferried Franklin D. Roosevelt to the Yalta Conference in 1945. It featured a conference room with a bulletproof window. Things are a lot more complicated these days. Boeing has spent years stripping down and rebuilding two 747s to replace the versions that have carried presidents for more than three decades. The project is slated to cost more than $5.3 billion and may not be finished before Trump leaves office. A 2021 report made public through the Freedom of Information Act outlines the unclassified requirements for the replacement 747s under construction. At the top of the list — survivability and communications. The government decided more than a decade ago that the new planes had to have four engines so they could remain airborne if one or two fail, said Deborah Lee James, who was Air Force secretary at the time. That creates a challenge because 747s are no longer manufactured, which could make spare parts harder to come by. Air Force One also has to have the highest level of classified communications, anti-jamming capabilities and external protections against foreign surveillance, so the president can securely command military forces and nuclear weapons during a national emergency. It's an extremely sensitive and complex system, including video, voice and data transmissions. James said there are anti-missile measures and shielding against radiation or an electromagnetic pulse that could be caused by a nuclear blast. 'The point is, it remains in flight no matter what,' she said. Will Trump want all the security bells and whistles? If the Qatari plane is retrofitted to presidential standards, it could cost $1.5 billion and take years, according to a U.S. official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide details that aren't publicly available. Testifying before Congress this week, Meink discounted such estimates, arguing that some of the costs associated with retrofitting the Qatari plane would have been spent anyway as the Air Force moves to build the long-delayed new presidential planes, including buying aircraft for training and to have spares available if needed. In response, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said that based on the contract costs for the planes that the Air Force is building, it would cost about $1 billion to strip down the Qatar plane, install encrypted communications, harden its defenses and make other required upgrades. James said simply redoing the wiring means 'you'd have to break that whole thing wide open and almost start from scratch.' Trump, as commander in chief, could waive some of these requirements. He could decide to skip shielding systems from an electromagnetic pulse, leaving his communications more vulnerable in case of a disaster but shaving time off the project. After all, Boeing has already scaled back its original plans for the new 747s. Their range was trimmed by 1,200 nautical miles, and the ability to refuel while airborne was scrapped. Paul Eckloff, a former leader of protection details at the Secret Service, expects the president would get the final say. 'The Secret Service's job is to plan for and mitigate risk,' he said. 'It can never eliminate it.' If Trump does waive some requirements, James said that should be kept under wraps because 'you don't want to advertise to your potential adversaries what the vulnerabilities of this new aircraft might be.' It's unlikely that Trump will want to skimp on the plane's appearance. He keeps a model of a new Air Force One in the Oval Office, complete with a darker color scheme that echoes his personal jet instead of the light blue design that's been used for decades. What happens next? Trump toured the Qatari plane in February when it was parked at an airport near Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort. Air Force chief of staff Gen. David Allvin was there, too. The U.S. official said the jet needs maintenance but not more than what would be expected of a four-engine plane of its complexity. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, an Illinois Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said it would be irresponsible to put the president and national security equipment aboard the Qatari plane 'without knowing that the aircraft is fully capable of withstanding a nuclear attack.' 'It's a waste of taxpayer dollars,' she said. Meanwhile, Boeing's project has been hampered by stress corrosion cracks on the planes and excessive noise in the cabins from the decompression system, among other issues that have delayed delivery, according to a Government Accountability Office report released last year. Boeing referred questions to the Air Force, which said in a statement that it's working with the aircraft manufacturer to find ways to accelerate the delivery of at least one of the 747s. Even so, the aircraft will have to be tested and flown in real-world conditions to ensure no other issues. James said it remains to be seen how Trump would handle any of those challenges. 'The normal course of business would say there could be delays in certifications,' she said. 'But things seem to get waived these days when the president wants it.' ___ AP writer Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report.
Business Insider
18 minutes ago
- Business Insider
How to dismiss a high-profile employee without a Trump-Musk-style meltdown
Star talent can be hard to retain — and even harder to let go. The public fallout between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk this week may be an extreme example of a hotshot's exit going off the rails, but leadership experts said it underscores just how dicey it can be to part ways with a high-profile team member. "These are folks with big egos," Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, told Business Insider. "Most of the time they end up in court." Saying goodbye to a prominent employee doesn't have to be dramatic. But don't assume a beefy severance package and a non-disparagement agreement are enough to leave a company unscathed. "If people want to hurt you, they'll find a way to do it," Cappelli said. "Ask divorced couples." How to sever ties with a high-profile recruit When pushing out a high-flyer, employers should frame the person's departure as business as usual, said Ronald Placone, a communications professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Tepper School of Business "You try to normalize it," he said. "Things happen, people move on." Trump initially followed conventional wisdom in how he went about booting Musk from Washington last month. The president orchestrated a warm and fuzzy public send-off, thanking Musk for his service and providing a sensible explanation for his departure—in this case, that the billionaire was going back to focusing on his work at the multiple companies he helms. More common explanations are that the fired individual has decided to pursue other career opportunities, spend time with family, or engage in philanthropic endeavors. This tactic is aimed at protecting both the departee's reputation and that of the employer showing him or her the door. "They come up with a story," said Anna A. Tavis, chair of the human capital management department at New York University's School of Professional Studies. The goal is to avoid hurting the outgoing hotshot's chances of landing a new gig and the company's ability to find a replacement. "It's a question of, how do we save face?" she said. Give people something else to talk about Employers should also aim to draw people's attention elsewhere, Placone said. "One of Trump's strategies that often works is you just flood communication channels with other stuff, stuff you perceive is more favorable to your organization," he said. "You try to take some control by giving as many potential stories as possible so people don't home in on one." Trump did make some big announcements this week, including travel bans on several African countries, but leadership experts say the president also erred by openly rebuking Musk's harsh criticism of his signature tax bill on X. This kicked off the back-and-forth squabble that captured the world's attention on Thursday. "There's no need for that," Placone said. "In these high-profile situations, you want to say as little as possible. You don't want to add weight to the argument the other is putting forth." If Trump instead kept quiet, Musk would have been more likely to stick with critiquing the bill rather than upping the ante by accusing the president of illicit behavior, he said. "It would've eventually fizzled out," Placone said. Why some A-list hires don't last Employers most commonly end up quickly sacking flashy new recruits because they aren't as talented as advertised or they insist on working in a way that doesn't align with a company's culture, Tavis said. It even happens at the very top of the corporate ladder. For example, in recent years, the chief executives of Barnes & Noble, Starbucks, and CNN were pushed out of their jobs after brief tenures. "A lot of times they're overestimating their value," she said of people with a reputation for being above the fray, adding that due to the current tight labor market, notable departures are likely to increase. Sam Faycurry, CEO of artificial-intelligence and nutrition startup Fay in San Francisco, can relate. Last year, he hired a well-known rainmaker after a lengthy courtship only to quickly conclude that the person wasn't a good fit. To avoid bad blood, Faycurry said he tried making it seem as if it was the individual's decision to leave by pointing out how much they disagreed on core principles. "This person ended up exiting themselves" without any hard feelings, Faycurry said, adding that he was relieved because his main concern was being able to refill the position with a better-aligned A-list professional. "If the person is influential in a talent pool you want to recruit people from in the future, there's no benefit to having a relationship fall out," Faycurry said. "You're never truly parting ways."
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Circle Spirals Upward in $1 Billion IPO
Circle raised more than $1 billion in its NYSE debut yesterday, and that's not a round-ing error. The stablecoin issuer's shares opened at more than double their $31 IPO price to peak above $100. Circle — which issues USDC, the No. 2 stablecoin behind Tether — joins a short-list of crypto-only companies that have gone public, including Coinbase, Mara Holdings, and Riot Platforms. This is Circle's second attempt at going public, after its reverse SPAC in 2022 sputtered under regulatory scrutiny. Circle is benefiting from better vibes this time as the US government, businesses, banks, and retail traders clamber aboard the crypto train. READ ALSO: Tariffs Deliver Record Drop in US Trade Deficit and NBA Finals Kick Off With an Old (Footwear) Friend Bitcoin's price is hovering above $100,000, and the Senate is pushing through a stablecoin bill as the two digital assets — which are generally seen as more reliable than, say, fartcoin — stand at the vanguard of President Trump's pro-crypto era. Vice President JD Vance spoke at a bitcoin conference last week, saying the administration would continue to push forward pro-crypto policies. Trump, whose family crypto venture (World Liberty Financial) launched a stablecoin in March, boasted at last year's conference that he'd make the US the world's 'crypto capital.' Big banks are following the government's lead: JPMorgan Chase is planning to start accepting crypto ETFs as loan collateral, Bloomberg reported Wednesday, and begin including crypto assets in its net-worth calculations of clients (which could help determine borrowing limits). Translation: One of the biggest banks will treat crypto more like stocks or art. Morgan Stanley is said to be exploring adding crypto-trading to its E*Trade platform next year after rolling out bitcoin ETFs to clients last year. Coin Toss: Brookings published a report Monday raising red flags about the potential risks to the public that could come with the pro-crypto era — including fraud, as well as volatility in retirement plans as big banks embrace crypto. Regulatory confusion is also brewing: The SEC is said to have walked back its approval last week of two crypto ETFs after questioning whether the firms behind them counted as investment companies by its definition. Still, Circle's IPO shows crypto hype is running hot and isn't likely to be tempered too quickly by a few red flags. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
