Helicopter tour company flights grounded after deadly crash in Hudson River
The FAA said the emergency order to ground New York Helicopter Charter was issued in part because the company's director of operations had been fired.
The Bell 206 helicopter crashed into the Hudson River at 3:17 p.m. Thursday, officials said.
Siemens executive Agustín Escobar; his wife, Merce Camprubi Montal; their three children; and pilot Sean Johnson were killed.
New York Helicopter Charter had voluntarily shut down flights after the crash, the FAA said.
The investigation continues.
The FAA said it is also conducting a review of the company's operations, known as the Certificate Holder Evaluation Program.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
The 'Dog Days' Of Summer Are Not Causing Boeing To Sweat
EVERETT, WA - FEBRUARY 14: Boeing 777 passenger planes in various stages of completion factory in Everett, Washington. (Photo by) Getty Images Boeing continues to consolidate its gains as production of its key moneymaker, the 737MAX, neared its monthly production cap and progress on other programs was evident, despite an ongoing strike in its defense unit. Since the first of the year, the company's stock has risen 37%, and aircraft deliveries are outpacing analyst estimates. In July, Boeing delivered 37 MAXes. The FAA has mandated a production cap of 38 per month for safety and quality concerns. This compares to an average of 35 per month over the previous three months of June, May and April. Boeing intends to move to a rate of 42 per month later in the year, pending FAA approval. "Our fundamental changes to strengthen safety and quality are producing improved results as we stabilize our operations and deliver higher quality airplanes, products and services to our customers," said Kelly Ortberg, Boeing president and chief executive officer during a 2nd quarter earnings call. In first half of August, Boeing delivered 17 aircraft according to Cirium, an aviation data company. These included 15 MAXes, one 777 freighter and one 787-9, indicating sustainability of assembly operations and supply chain performance. Included in the MAXes were three deliveries to Chinese airlines (China Southern, China Eastern and Shanghai Airlines). Despite the tariff turmoil, bans on delivery of aircraft were lifted by the US administration in June of this year with a 90 day suspension. That suspension expired on August 11, but was renewed for another 90 days. It is now set to expire on November 11, and during that time a 10% reciprocal tariff remains in effect. China is a key market for Boeing, and several Chinese airlines are hoping to rely on Boeing to expand their fleets. At the end of July, Boeing's backlog stood at 6,572 aircraft. Ten percent of that backlog is slated for delivery to Chinese airlines. Another important milestone was reached in the 777X program with the fifth 777-9 completing its first flight. Boeing is hoping to conclude its testing and certification requirements by end of the year, allowing first deliveries in 2026. Originally scheduled for 2020, the program is now six years behind schedule with an unfilled backlog of 551 aircraft. For the first half of the year the company's revenues have increased 26% following a shutdown of operations after a near fatal door blowout on an Alaska Airlines 737MAX in January 2024. That incident resulted in the firing of the Commercial Airplanes unit CEO and Boeing company CEO, who was replaced by Ortberg a year ago. Although the company is still losing money, operating cash flow turned positive in the second quarter at $227 million versus a nearly $4 Billion negative figure in the same period in 2024. RENTON, WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 13: A strike sign is pictured outside a Boeing factory. (Photo by) Getty Images These positive developments were offset by a continuing strike in its St Louis based defense unit. The strike by 3,200 members of International Association of Machinists unit 837 entered its second week with no clear signs of progress. Although endorsed by labor management, the rank and file rejected the initial offer of a 20% wage increase and a $5,000 acceptance bonus. After a two week 'cooling off' period, the strike commenced earlier in August and Boeing has not showed any immediate effort to resolve the impasse. The company has rescinded the $5,000 bonus offer and Bryan Bryant, President of the national union is urging 'the Boeing Company to return to the bargaining table to negotiate a good faith agreement commensurate with the skills and dedication of this workforce.' He has also asked for lawmakers to intervene to end the strike. Boeing's stance indicates a growing confidence in the ability to weather business and labor challenges. It resolved a longer strike in November of last year that affected 33,000 workers in their Commercial Airplanes unit in Seattle, after a month long work stoppage. Although global trade turmoil and political tensions will continue, the largest exporter for the US is on a steady, upward course.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
We Think You Should Be Aware Of Some Concerning Factors In Fabasoft's (ETR:FAA) Earnings
Explore Fabasoft's Fair Values from the Community and select yours Fabasoft AG's (ETR:FAA ) stock didn't jump after it announced some healthy earnings. Our analysis showed that there are some concerning factors in the earnings that investors may be cautious of. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. A Closer Look At Fabasoft's Earnings In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF. That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking. For the year to June 2025, Fabasoft had an accrual ratio of 0.28. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, which is hardly a good thing. To wit, it produced free cash flow of €5.8m during the period, falling well short of its reported profit of €9.21m. Fabasoft shareholders will no doubt be hoping that its free cash flow bounces back next year, since it was down over the last twelve months. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part. See our latest analysis for Fabasoft That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates. The Impact Of Unusual Items On Profit Unfortunately (in the short term) Fabasoft saw its profit reduced by unusual items worth €2.4m. In the case where this was a non-cash charge it would have made it easier to have high cash conversion, so it's surprising that the accrual ratio tells a different story. It's never great to see unusual items costing the company profits, but on the upside, things might improve sooner rather than later. We looked at thousands of listed companies and found that unusual items are very often one-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. If Fabasoft doesn't see those unusual expenses repeat, then all else being equal we'd expect its profit to increase over the coming year. Our Take On Fabasoft's Profit Performance Fabasoft saw unusual items weigh on its profit, which should have made it easier to show high cash conversion, which it did not do, according to its accrual ratio. Having considered these factors, we don't think Fabasoft's statutory profits give an overly harsh view of the business. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. For example - Fabasoft has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. Our examination of Fabasoft has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape: Here's who wins
During a press conference in late 2024, President Donald Trump vowed to 'slash massive numbers of job-killing regulations' in his second term and pledged to eliminate 10 old rules for every new one. Now he's bringing that deregulation drive to commercial space, ordering federal agencies to streamline launch licensing, fast-track spaceport development, and clear out the Federal Aviation Administration's industry advisory board. 'Inefficient permitting processes discourage investment and innovation, limiting the ability of U.S. companies to lead in global space markets,' he stated in an Executive Order signed August 13. The order directs the Department of Transportation (DOT) to cut 'outdated, redundant, or overly restrictive' rules that govern launch and reentry licenses. It also instructs the Federal Aviation Administration, which is housed under the DOT, to eliminate or accelerate environmental reviews, ease the path to building new spaceports, and to appoint a 'senior executive' charged with fostering 'innovation and deregulation.' The Commerce Department also has been ordered to stand up a new process for authorizing 'novel space activities,' like in-space manufacturing or satellite refueling, that don't fit neatly into existing licensing regimes. The executive order came the same day transportation secretary and acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy dismissed every member of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC), a long-standing industry advisory board inside DOT that shapes spaceflight rules and priorities. For companies that have spent years mired in environmental reviews and licensing delays, the order was a welcome sign that future bids would experience shorter timelines and more regulatory clarity. The Commercial Space Federation, an industry trade group whose members include SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and a dozen others, applauded the executive order for providing 'regulatory relief to unleash the U.S. commercial space industry.' Indeed, commercial players are poised to gain a lot under this new regime. Launch companies could benefit from faster permitting and streamlined environmental reviews. State-backed spaceport operators, like Space Florida, may also be aided by provisions that accelerate new site development. Creating a mission authorization framework for 'novel' space activities is equally consequential: startups like Varda Space Industries or Orbit Fab, which are developing technologies to manufacture pharmaceuticals in space and in-orbit refueling, respectively, may gain an advantage by a regulatory approach led by Commerce. Environmental rule sticking point Not everyone is celebrating the order. The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that has challenged the FAA's approval of SpaceX's Starship program in Texas, called the order 'reckless.' 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way. This is clearly not in the public interest,' senior attorney Jared Margolis said. For groups like CBD, environmental reviews are not 'overly complex,' as the Order charges – they are often completely insufficient. In 2023, environmental groups including the CBD alleged that the FAA's environmental assessment of SpaceX's south Texas plans were inadequate and in violation of the National Environment Policy Act. SpaceX has separately waged an increasingly public campaign against 'superfluous' regulations and environmental analyses that have hindered a speedier test campaign. There are still some unknowns. Legal challenges to the order could slow progress, and the new COMSTAC members, who have yet to be appointed, will inform the future of space rule-making. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
