Financial redress for LGBT veterans must be sped up, MPs to urge ministers
A group of MPs will push for the redress scheme for veterans who suffered under the so-called 'gay ban' to be rolled out as quickly as possible.
LGBT people in the military were abused, assaulted, and dishonourably discharged without pay, and went on to suffer lifelong consequences when their sexuality was discovered in the pre-2000 era.
The £75 million redress scheme set up in December offers payments of up to £70,000 to each veteran to 'acknowledge the historic wrongs they experienced in the armed forces'.
Some 84 veterans out of the 1,300 who have applied for the financial payment have been paid so far, according to Fighting with Pride, a charity advocating for the veterans.
While the charity has welcomed efforts by the Government to roll out the scheme, it is warning many veterans are now ageing and in poor health and are in need of financial help in their later years.
Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller will lead the Wednesday afternoon Westminster Hall debate on the financial redress scheme for the veterans.
Ahead of the debate the Chichester MP described the matter as a 'crucial issue'.
She added: 'Members of the armed forces who put their life on the line for our country were dismissed in huge numbers for simply daring to be who they are.
'Many faced verbal and physical abuse that stripped veterans not only of their career but of their dignity.
'It's a scandal that the compensation they are rightly owed has been so delayed.'
Peter Gibson, chief executive of Fighting With Pride, said: 'It's vital affected veterans get swift justice.
'Many are in their 60s, 70s and 80s – many with poor mental and physical health. Put simply, they don't have time to wait.
'The debate in Westminster serves as an important reminder to Government to speed up consideration of the applications for financial reparations and improve communications.
'Every submission details someone's painful memories of being shunned by the military family; of bullying, intimidation and in some cases criminal convictions and prison.'
Mr Gibson met this week with veterans minister Al Carns, where he said the charity 'passed on the real experiences and frustrations of veterans'.
A series of recommendations to improve the redress scheme were 'received warmly', he added.
'We're confident – and determined – we'll see improvements which finally deliver the justice impacted veterans deserve,' Mr Gibson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Number of asylum seekers housed in hotels rises 8% on a year ago, shows data
The number of asylum seekers who are being housed in hotels has risen by 8% to 32,059 in a year, according to new data. The data also shows that the government is processing asylum applications much quicker with 71,000 cases awaiting approval, relating to 91,000 people, compared with 134,000 two years ago. The figures come amid growing clamour from councils to block hotels being used to house asylum seekers through legal action, after a court ruled that more than 100 applicants staying in Essex should be removed. The high court judgment has led to ministers bracing for further legal challenges from across the country and pressure on the government to find other places to house people. The latest Home Office data, published on Thursday as part of the usual quarterly immigration statistics, cover Labour's first year in office. There were 32,059 asylum seekers in UK hotels by the end of June, up from 29,585 at the same point a year earlier, when the Conservatives were still in power but down slightly on the 32,345 figure at the end of March. The latest number is still below the peak of 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels at the end of September 2023 under the Tories. For the first time in four years, the asylum applications backlog has fallen below 100,000 people. It is now just over 70,000 cases, relating to almost 91,000 people – down by 18% from a year earlier and its lowest since September 2021. In the year ending June 2025, the Home Office forcibly removed 9,100 people – up a quarter on the previous year. More than half were foreign national offenders who were being deported at the end of sentences. Enver Solomon, the chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: 'Bringing the asylum system back from the brink of collapse is a genuine achievement in the government's first year. The increase in asylum decisions means refugees can begin to rebuild their lives sooner, and the use of costly hotels can be ended faster.' Yvette Cooper MP, the home secretary, said: 'The action we have taken in the last 12 months – increasing returns of failed asylum seekers by over 30%, cutting asylum costs by 11%, reducing the backlog by 18% and our forthcoming plans to overhaul the failing asylum appeal system – are crucial steps to restoring order, and putting an end to the chaotic use of asylum hotels that we inherited from the previous government.' On Tuesday, the Conservative-run authority in Epping Forest won a temporary high court injunction to remove people from the Bell hotel. About 140 migrants must leave the hotel by 12 September after the high court imposed a temporary injunction against them staying there. Labour-run councils Wirral and Tamworth are among more than 10 which are reportedly considering legal challenges to close hotels housing asylum seekers in their area. On Tuesday, Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, named three Conservative councils which are considering legal action in a bid to shut down asylum hotels in their areas. Asked how many Tory councils are considering legal action, he told BBC Breakfast: 'There are certainly a number who are actively considering it. Broxbourne, which is next door to Epping, is one of them. I think Reigate and Banstead is another, Hillingdon is yet a third. 'So, I think there are many up and down the country who are looking at this following the Epping ruling.' Whitehall sources said the government was expected to appeal against the Epping ruling. Charles Falconer, a Labour peer who served as justice secretary under Tony Blair and was previously Starmer's shadow attorney general, urged ministers to appeal. He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme the judgment 'causes great problems' because it 'gives rise to the expectation that some asylum hotels can be closed' but without indicating which ones. 'I very strongly urge the government – I don't know what they're going to do – to appeal and get some certainty, first of all on which should be closed ... and which shouldn't, secondly to deal with the question of a reasonable timescale in relation to this, and thirdly to deal with this very troublesome issue: namely do demonstrations outside these hostels lead it to it being more likely that they will be closed,' he said. Home Office spending on asylum in the UK stood at £4.76bn in 2024/25, down 12% from a record £5.38bn in 2023/24, government figures show. The total covers all Home Office costs related to asylum, including direct cash support and accommodation, plus wider staffing and other migration and borders activity. Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office, which has a legal obligation to provide accommodation to asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, can move people to alternatives such as hotels and large sites, such as former military bases.
Western Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Watchdog urged to probe ‘dangerous shambles' of Afghan relocation data breaches
A freedom of information request by the BBC revealed there have been 49 data breaches in the past four years, including four already known to the public. Seven breaches were serious enough to be reported to the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), three of which had not been made public, the broadcaster reported. Those three included one in 2021 and two in 2022, the same year a major leak prompted the Government to obtain an unprecedented superinjunction barring journalists from reporting it. Sean Humber, a lawyer at Leigh Day, which acts for Afghan citizens affected by previous breaches, said the latest reports are 'shocking' and confirm the MoD 'appears to be institutionally incapable of keeping personal data safe'. He said: 'These data breaches betray a cavalier attitude to keeping such sensitive information safe as well as a complete disregard for the potentially life and death consequences of failing to do so. 'The Information Commissioner's Office must now roll up its sleeves and carry out a thorough and immediate investigation of what appears to be systemic failures of data protection policies, procedures or practices by the Ministry of Defence. This dangerous shambles cannot be allowed to continue. Transparency is not optional; it is critical for protecting individuals, maintaining public trust, and ensuring that lessons are learned to prevent future breaches Adnan Malik, for 1,500 people affected 'All those affected must be notified of the breach of their personal data, including the personal data affected, without further delay and appropriate steps taken to ensure their safety.' Adnan Malik, of Barings Law, which represents 1,500 affected people, said: 'This represents a deeply alarming data failure and the recent 49 Ministry of Defence breaches make clear that the Afghan case was not an isolated error but part of a wider and troubling pattern of negligence. 'Transparency is not optional; it is critical for protecting individuals, maintaining public trust, and ensuring that lessons are learned to prevent future breaches.' The MoD did not provide any details of the nature of each breach. Last month, a High Court judge lifted the gagging order relating to the major breach, which saw the details of 18,714 applicants for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released in 2022. When the breach was discovered more than a year later in August 2023, the MoD was granted an unprecedented gagging order amid fears the Taliban could target would-be refugees for reprisals. It also saw the establishment of a secret £850 million scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), to bring thousands of those affected to the UK. Arap was responsible for relocating Afghan nationals who had worked for or with the UK Government and were therefore at risk of reprisals once the Taliban returned to power in Kabul in 2021. An MoD spokesperson said: 'We take data security extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that any incidents are dealt with properly, and that we follow our legal duties. 'All incidents that meet the threshold under UK data protection laws are referred to the Information Commissioner's Office and any lesser incidents are examined internally to ensure lessons are learned.' The ICO said it continues to engage with the MoD to be 'assured that they have made the required improvements'.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore real tensions
That's not what I wrote. I gave very specific examples: four young Muslim men arrested for shouting homophobic abuse outside a Manchester gay club; the Rochdale grooming scandal, where imported values clashed with ours; and the Netherlands, where the party led by Geert Wilders surged after the murder of Theo van Gogh and years of tension over integration. These are concrete cases where imported cultural attitudes created flashpoints – they are not inventions. READ MORE: Fears over Perth hotel protest as far-right 'emboldened' Ron tries to say prejudice is purely homegrown. Nobody denies Britain has a history of homophobia and racism — I never said otherwise. But to pretend imported values never cause conflict is wilful blindness. The Manchester incident happened. Rochdale happened. The Dutch experience is real. We can debate their implications, but we can't erase them because they are uncomfortable. As for Tommy Robinson, Ron again twists my point. I never endorsed Robinson's message – I said dismissing it as 'pure racism' misses why his reach is growing. When Black men or LGBT people share his content, that does not make his message valid, but it proves his message is finding resonance in places liberals claim it shouldn't. That demands explanation, not denial. Far-right movements thrive when mainstream voices ignore genuine tensions and leave the field clear for them. READ MORE: Humza Yousaf issues 'firebombs' warning over anti-migrant rhetoric Ron says the true danger is 'homegrown' prejudice. Of course it is. But the question I raised – and he dodges – is what happens when imported prejudice and homegrown prejudice reinforce each other? When politicians deny cultural clashes on the ground, it creates exactly the conditions for people like Robinson to exploit. That's what I warned about. Ron dismisses the problem by calling it 'distortion'. But nothing I said was invented. If we can't face facts, we'll never defuse these tensions – and the losers will be both immigrant communities and the minorities caught in the crossfire. James Murphy Bute IN his diatribe against James Murphy (Letters, Aug 20), Ron Lumiere tells us: 'Far-right movements have long sought to co-opt grievances across identity groups. That does not legitimise their message, it shows how far-right narratives adapt to exploit fears.' Isn't that the very tactic adopted by the LGBTQI+ campaign identity he oft quotes himself? Isn't the addition of transgender an example of a cause piggy-backing onto the LGB group creating strange bedfellows, given LGB is a question of sexual attraction and transgender is in itself a conflated dichotomy between the absolute of physical sex characteristic and psychological interchangeable gender, both lumped under the 'T' label. But it doesn't stop there, as the co-option of 'Q', then 'I' expands the grievance community, and as if that is not sufficient, the catch-all '+' allows any group to be added to keep the grievance community pot boiling. READ MORE: African 'king and queen' evicted from Scottish Borders forest The fact is, this all a long way from the original LGB community group, who even now can find themselves at odds with those groups piggy-backing on to them. We've seen how lesbian women have been pilloried for seeking to protect women's rights to safe spaces, for example, and the erosion of their sex status by the gender fashionistas seeking access for male-bodied individuals to women's safe spaces. Perhaps what angers most is how the Ron Lumieres of our society rush to accuse 'white males' of having the temerity to disagree with the mantra they are promoting. It's all our fault, not those who are pushing the boundaries, not with persuasion but vociferous attack, thereby achieving little more than resentment and enhancing the amplification of difference and encouraging any discrimination claimed. The GRR bill should have been subject to a manifesto policy offer before an election. Rather it was a vociferous, tiny minority who grabbed control of the argument within the SNP and the Greens, and rode a coach and horses through political propriety, integrity and common sense. It sought to remove valid protections and encourage impressionable and vulnerable young people to a potentially disastrous and irreversible life-changing course of action. It was never balanced and well-considered legislation. Of course Sturgeon likely believed she was aiding a minority and that no-one would notice. She was wrong. The SNP polled 20 points lower in the election than support for independence currently does. Her party has suffered. Doesn't the hypocrisy of the trans lobby adopting the very co-option strategy for which Lumiere criticised James Murphy's argument beggar belief? Jim Taylor Scotland
