Patchwork protest at PU: Student unity frays over affidavit row
2
3
4
5
6
Chandigarh: A shared cause but scattered protests marked the day at Panjab University on Thursday, as student outfits opposed the new affidavit rule for freshers — which mandates prior permission and designated spots for demonstrations.
Once again, despite the university's repeated claims of restricting outsider involvement, non-students were seen participating in at least two of the three protest sites.
Despite agreeing that the affidavit restricts democratic expression on campus, protests played out in scattered slots, revealing the very divisions that have increasingly come to define student politics at PU. In late-night WhatsApp group discussions, multiple parties initially planned a joint action — only for arguments and familiar turf wars to resurface before sunrise.
At 11 am, a handful of NSUI members, including PUCSC vice-president Archit Garg, some from PSU Lalkaar and few others assembled outside the Administrative Block with placards and slogans. Two hours later, PUCSC president Anurag Dalal arrived with another small group outside the vice-chancellor's office, and also present were some former ABVP members expelled earlier this year, SATH members, PSU Lalkaar and some others.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
유일한 공식 무료 SOC 게임! 설치도 없습니다!
경복의 바다
게임 플레이
Undo
ABVP itself had protested earlier in the morning, also outside the VC office — but independently, and later moved to two internal campus roads where they pushed aside traffic barricades and cones installed for a one-way system operational from 9 am to 5 pm.
Outsiders were spotted at the VC office protest by Dalal and in ABVP group who were putting aside barricades — drawing murmurs but no official response.
VC Prof Renu Vig maintained that the focus of the affidavit was procedural rather than punitive, "The affidavit is meant to ensure protests happen in a structured and non-disruptive manner, with prior approval and at notified sites."
Former dean student welfare Prof Jatinder Grover offered a cautionary perspective on affidavit row. "Yes, university work and functioning must not be obstructed. But peaceful protest is a democratic right, especially in academic spaces where ideas must be challenged and tested. To curb that through legal affidavits is a step backwards. Students should be educated and engaged in such a way — with confidence, political awareness, and dialogue — that they don't rush to protest, not scared into silence through paperwork.
"
Memorandums were submitted on both fronts: Archit handed over one to the VC, while Dalal submitted demands to DSW Prof Amit Chauhan, who came out to receive them in person.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
St Xavier's cancels Stan Swamy lecture after ABVP objects
MUMBAI: St Xavier's College in Mumbai cancelled its annual Stan Swamy Memorial Lecture, scheduled for Saturday, following protests by the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), the student wing of the right-wing Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Stan Swamy (HT Archives) (Diwakar Prasad/ Hindustan Times) The lecture, organised by the college's Department of Inter-Religious Studies (DIRS), was to be delivered virtually by Fr Prem Xalxo, associate lecturer at the Faculty of Theology in Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome. The topic this year was 'Migration for Livelihood: Hope Amidst Miseries'. In a letter to the college principal, the ABVP demanded the event's cancellation, objecting to it being held in memory of Father Stan Swamy, a Jesuit priest accused in the Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad case and charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Swamy was among several human rights activists, scholars, intellectuals and others jailed for alleged naxal activities as part of the case. A tribal rights activist, Swamy was arrested in 2020 and died in custody in July 2021 while awaiting trial. The ABVP alleged that Fr Swamy had links with banned organisations and said that honouring him through an academic platform could 'glorify' a person accused of anti-national activities. 'It is unfortunate that reputed institutions like St Xavier's are seen promoting such narratives,' said ABVP Mumbai Secretary Prashant Mali. 'We have immense respect for academic freedom, but when such events are used to whitewash the image of someone accused of working against the nation, it becomes unacceptable.' Mali added that the ABVP was not opposing the topic of the lecture but the choice of dedicating it to Swamy's memory. 'We have no objection to discussions on migration or livelihood challenges. But associating these discussions with the name of someone accused of aiding banned organisations sends the wrong message to students. Educational institutions must remain neutral and not allow themselves to be platforms for any ideology that goes against national interest,' he claimed. Following warnings from the student body, the college decided to cancel the lecture. Responding to the criticism, college rector Father Keith D'Souza said the DIRS was an extracurricular unit on campus that organises a variety of lectures and events throughout the year. He said the department's core aim was to promote dialogue and mutual respect. 'The underlying motive of the DIRS is 'respecting the other', in keeping with a foundational Indic civilisational attitude,' he said. Father D'Souza also stressed that Fr Stan Swamy had been accused but never convicted. 'As per Indian criminal jurisprudence, a person is innocent unless proven guilty. While we respect other perspectives and concerns, we hope to elicit a reciprocal attitude of respect from others as well,' he said.
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
St. Xavier's College cancels annual Stan Swamy Memorial Lecture after protest by ABVP
St. Xavier's College on Saturday called off its annual Stan Swamy Memorial Lecture after the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) protested against the event, alleging it glorified a person who was an accused in the Elgar Parishad–Bhima Koregaon case. The decision came days after the right-wing students' group wrote to the college administration. The lecture, hosted by the department of inter-religious studies (DIRS), was to have been delivered virtually by Fr Prem Xalxo, associate lecturer, faculty of theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University. He was scheduled to speak on the topic – 'Migration for Livelihood: Hope Amidst Miseries.' But, earlier this week, the ABVP wrote a letter to the college administration, strongly opposing the event, and demanded action from the state government against the event. 'This lecture glorifies a person who was declared as the main accused in the Elgar Parishad-Bhima Koregaon case, and against whom charges have been filed under Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967,' said the letter. Father Stan Swamy was a Jesuit priest and a tribal rights activist based in Jharkhand. He was arrested by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on October 7, 2019, and stayed in state custody till he died at a Mumbai hospital in 2021. Stating that these lectures are usually held on August 9 on the occasion of World Indigenous Day, Rector Fr. Keith DSouza, from St. Xavier's College, said, 'Our annual Stan Swamy memorial lecture has been delivered by reputed scholars who have done research in the area of history and development of indigenous peoples across the globe. The topic this year was on the theme of migration. While the lectures are on several themes related to indigenous life—which no one has objected to—we understand that the contentious issue is mainly about the nomenclature of the lecture series, named after Stan Swamy. However, from a Jesuit point of view, Fr Stan Swamy was an Indian citizen who was accused, but not as yet convicted of his alleged crimes till his demise. As per our Indian criminal jurisprudence, a person is innocent unless proven guilty.' Highlighting that the underlying motif of the DIRS is 'respecting the other', Fr D Souza further said, 'While we respect other perspectives and concerns, we hope to elicit a reciprocal attitude of respect from others as well. A controversy like this does not augur well for international higher educational relations.'
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Clash at JNU canteen over hygiene, bill row
New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University was once again at the centre of controversy over food on Friday night after a confrontation at the Mughal Darbar canteen spiralled into allegations of poor hygiene, physical altercation and political rivalry. The incident led to JNU Students Union joint secretary Vaibhav Meena locking the canteen, demanding immediate administrative intervention. Mughal Darbar owner Tausif Alam later issued a letter to JNU students apologising for the staff's conduct. The JNU administration refused to comment on the incident. A video of the incident went viral on social media. According to initial accounts, the dispute began over the payment of food bills but quickly expanded into complaints about the quality of food served. Students alleged that the canteen was serving three-day-old vegetarian and non-vegetarian dishes. The verbal spat intensified, and members of ABVP and Left-backed AISA also arrived at the scene, adding a political dimension to the row. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi Meena alleged that "intoxicated" staff at the canteen misbehaved with students, snatched mobile phones and assaulted them before fleeing the spot. He claimed that the canteen had no operational licence and was using university resources without adequate authorisation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Before Dying, My Husband Said, I'm Sorry. I Asked For What. You'll See. Then This Happened Novelodge Undo "We will not allow this or any other dhaba to reopen until the administration inspects licences, hygiene standards, and rate lists," Meena said, accusing JNUSU president Nitish Kumar of siding with the staff. Kumar, however, countered that ABVP-linked students were eating at the canteen and a payment dispute led to the altercation, in which three staff members were injured, though none required hospitalisation. "Meena and his supporters locked the canteen and hurled abuses. We demand a fair inquiry and will ensure the canteen is reopened. ABVP's strong-arm tactics will not be allowed on campus," Kumar said. Alam wrote in his letter that he didn't support the misbehaviour of his staff. "Strict action will be taken and such incidents will not recur. This has no communal angle. I follow all JNU administrative guidelines. I was unwell and could not be present," he wrote. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
