
Pakistan urges global social media platforms to block accounts run by banned militant groups
Pakistan urged global social media companies to take action to block hundreds of accounts allegedly run by outlawed militant groups that Islamabad claims spread propaganda and glorify insurgents in the South Asian country.
According to Pakistan's Deputy Interior Minister Talal Chaudhry, groups such as the Pakistani Taliban and the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army — banned by the Pakistani authorities and also designated as terrorist groups by the United States — have been using X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, and Telegram to promote violence in Pakistan.
Chaudhry, who spoke to reporters at a news conference, urged the tech companies to remove or disable these accounts, as well as those run by supporters of the militant groups.
Chaudhry said the identified accounts were being operated under anonymous names and unverified IDs. He noted that all the accounts belonged to terrorist groups and said that Pakistan was unaware of their exact origins.
The government, he said, was seeking information from platform operators to help dismantle these online networks, adding that Pakistan remained a wall between terrorism and the world.
Chaudhry further stated that many proscribed organisations under the UN, US, UK, and Pakistani sanctions were freely using these platforms. Referring to the National Action Plan, he said one of its core points was to act against individuals or entities spreading terrorist propaganda via media and social media.
He noted that hardcore terrorist groups were operating online under the guise of free speech and urged the complete blocking and removal of their accounts.
He outlined three specific demands to social media platforms: first, to block and remove these accounts; second, to implement AI-based measures to prevent the rapid creation of mirror accounts, which often reappear minutes after being removed; and third, to share account holder information, noting that such individuals were effectively part and parcel of terrorist activity. He called for cooperation from all social media operators on these fronts.
Addressing the presser, Minister of State for Law and Justice Barrister Aqeel Malik echoed these concerns, stating that many of the groups involved were not only banned in Pakistan but also designated as terrorist organisations by the United Nations. He said these groups posed a threat not only to Pakistan but also to global peace and stability.
Malik stressed that Pakistan had suffered immensely due to terrorism —not only through loss of life, but also economic and social costs. He said the country had been at the forefront of the global war on terror for over two decades, enduring the loss of more than 90,000 lives.
He added that this ongoing threat had now taken root across a wide range of platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Telegram. It was important, he said, to explicitly name these applications, given their central role in terrorist communication and propaganda.
He added that Pakistan would welcome the establishment of social media company offices within the country to improve coordination and enforcement.
The ministers noted that terrorist organisations had increasingly turned to encrypted messaging services for communication and recruitment. They urged tech firms to implement robust systems for identifying, disabling, and reporting such accounts in line with global counterterrorism efforts.
Malik added that Pakistan was continuing to track additional accounts linked to terror outfits and stressed the need for platforms to assist by blocking and reporting all such activity.
There was no immediate response from any of the social media platforms to Pakistan's request.
The plea comes amid a surge in violence across Pakistan, much of it blamed on the two militant groups, as well as Daesh group.
The Pakistani Taliban are allies but a separate militant group from the Afghan Taliban. However, the Taliban takeover of neighboring Afghanistan in 2021 has emboldened the TTP.
Militant groups also heavily rely on social media platforms to claim responsibility for attacks against security forces and civilians in Pakistan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dubai Eye
7 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
Pakistan says deal made with US on tariffs
The US and Pakistan have struck a deal that will result in lower tariffs for the South Asian nation as well as an agreement in which Washington will help develop Islamabad's oil reserves, the two sides said. "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves," US President Donald Trump wrote on social media on Wednesday. "We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership." Trump's social media post did not provide further details. Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar also confirmed the deal's conclusion on social media, without elaborating further. Trump did not mention any agreement on tariffs. But Pakistan's finance ministry said on Thursday the trade deal "will result in reduction of reciprocal tariffs especially on Pakistani exports to the United States", but did not give details of what the tariffs would be. "This deal marks the beginning of a new era of economic collaboration especially in energy, mines and minerals, IT, cryptocurrency and other sectors," it said. Pakistan faced a potential 29 per cent tariff on exports to the United States under tariffs announced by Washington in April on countries around the world. Tariffs were subsequently suspended for 90 days so negotiations could take place. Last week, Dar said the US and Pakistan were "very close" to a trade deal that could come within days, after he met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday. Dar and Rubio had discussed expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining, both sides said after that meeting. Other Pakistani officials have also visited the US in recent weeks for talks. Under Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. US total goods trade with Pakistan was an estimated $7.3 billion in 2024, according to the website of the office of the US trade representative, up from around $6.9 billion in 2023. The US goods trade deficit with Pakistan was $3 billion in 2024, a 5.2 per cent increase over 2023. Washington has also aimed to build stronger ties with Asian powers in recent years to counter its rival China's influence in the region. Pakistan is designated by Washington as a "major non-NATO ally." Trump also said Washington was still negotiating with Pakistan's rival India on trade after announcing earlier in the day that the US will impose a 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from India starting on Friday.


Campaign ME
7 hours ago
- Campaign ME
The Spin: When mistakes make it to the front page
Those with a keen eye on news and advertisements – or, should we say, errors and mistakes within media and marketing – sent in a couple of interesting submissions to The Spin this month. Several of these submissions, unfortunately, appear on the front page of local news titles, so we've reserved the top spot for them on the last page of this edition. Kicking things off in big, bold font is an inescapable typo on the front page of the Norwich Evening News. Looks like the headline either made the front page in a hurry or the sub-editor might have called in sick on 10 June. Funnier still, we have a typo on the front page of the Irish Examiner that might have escaped notice if it were anything but the name of a certain UK Member of Parliament – who remains quite unpopular in Ireland. Let us know if it tickles you when you read it aloud. Meanwhile, in what seems to be quite the coincidence, Indian newspaper Mid-Day ran a Daddy's Day Out ad by KidZania on its front page, which was prepared well in advance, to advertise an aviation experience for kids. The coincidence: The ad, which shows a portion of an Air India plane popping out of a building, was featured on 12 June – the same day an Air India plane crashed into a building in India. Note to creatives: Maybe, next time avoid any associations between planes and buildings? Speaking of aeroplane-related mishaps in the media, Sky News and The Guardian went live with a howler during their coverage of the Heathrow airport closure. They reported that the British Army's Special Air Service (SAS) cancelled 12 flights to and from Heathrow. However, it was Scandinavian Airlines System (SAS) that actually cancelled its flights. On a a Facebook post, the latter SAS had a field day, saying: 'We get it, Sky News and The Guardian – [we both have the] same initials, both wear uniforms, operate internationally and move fast.' What better way to advertise ways to 'Make You Fluent' than to destroy the language with an ad that reads: 'Say Goodbye to Fear of Speaking New Language.' Looks like this one was custom made for The Spin. We are looking for 10 volunteers who need to start speaking new language this month. No matter what.' If you think about it, what's the point of great copy, if the target audience doesn't understand it anyway? We wind up this edition of the The Spin with an AI-generated Sciatica ad that seems more like a wind up. Is there a better way to get rid of the pain than chopping off the parts of the body responsible for it?


Arabian Post
16 hours ago
- Arabian Post
PM Narendra Modi Has Skillfully Avoided The Issue Of Trump's Claim Regarding Ceasefire
By Nitya Chakraborty Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his long reply to the discussion in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor on Tuesday night skillfully avoided the issue of any mediation by the U.S. President Donald Trump by stating that no world leader told India to stop Operation Sindoor. His refrain was that Pakistan DGMO came begging on May 10 after the dismantling of Pakistan's military infrastructure and India agreed as the objectives of Operation Sindoor had been served. This was half truth. Prime Minister skillfully mentioned only one part of the conversation he had with the U.S. Vice President J D Vance on May 9 – May 10 which was the deciding factor in arriving at the ceasefire decision by the Prime Minister. PM mentioned about his talks with Vance only by mentioning that when Vance said that Pakistan was set to launch an offensive, Modi bluntly told Vance that India would respond fiercely if Pakistan tried to attack. They would pay a heavy price and India would respond to each Pak bullet with a canon, PM told Vance.. This was fine. This was certainly part of the conversation with Vance in that fateful hour. But Vance talked on behalf of the President Trump, he was communicating the message of the dear friend of the Indian PM which was quite stern. The conversation was long. So what other things Vance talked apart from what Modi mentioned that the VP informed of the probability of a big Pak attack. Let us recap the scenario starting from early May 7 to the evening of May 10 when President Trump announced the ceasefire decision claiming credit for that. After the devastating attacks by the Indian side on the terrorist infra on May 7 early hours, Pakistan retaliated but they found that their air surveillance network has been seriously damaged by the Indian system and they could hardly hit the Indian targets due to the super system of India to protect its skies. From May 8 onwards, Pakistani sources spread the reports that the Pakistan Nuclear Board is meeting and a decision would be reached soon. It was deliberately conveyed to Washington by Pak sources. Trump got panicky at the possibility of a nuclear war in South Asia. He asked his trusted officials Marc Rubio and J D Vance to talk to both India and Pakistan Prime Ministers and organize ceasefire within 24 hours. That was how the process started at a breakneck speed on May 9. March Rubio talked to Asim Munir, Pak chief of staff and the most important decision maker relating to this India-Pak war on May 9 night early morning in Islamabad 4-45 AM. He was persuaded .There was little effort on Rubio's part as Pakistan was looking for a face saving formula to wriggle out of the war. Pakistan side was ready. J D Vance took the responsibility of persuading PM Narendra Modi and he did that on May 9 night which Indian PM mentioned. The full details of Vance-Modi talks will reveal what exactly went into Indian PM's decision making process. After Vance's confirmation from PM Modi, Pakistan was told about India agreeing to ceasefire but the Pak DGMO would have to approach first to India with the offer. Accordingly, the Pak DGMO rang up the Indian DGMO at noon of May 10, but the Indian DGMO was in a meeting. Then in the afternoon at 3-35 PM on May10, both the DGMO's agreed to the ceasefire with effect from 5 PM of May 10. Trump was constantly following the developments and as the two DGMO's made it official, Trump made his announcement taking credit much before foreign secretary Vikram Misri announced the ceasefire decision officially in the evening. External Affairs Minister Dr. S Jaishankar tried to defend Prime Minister in Rajya Sabha debate on Wednesday by saying that Trump never talked to Narendra Modi during Operation Sindoor which was correct. Trump spoke to the Indian PM on April 22 after the Pahalgam massacre expressing support for fight against terrorists and then next he talked to the Indian PM on May 17, a week after ceasefire. But the talks carried out by his officials Marco Rubio and J D Vance between May 8 and May 10 were on behalf of their President Trump. The US officials were negotiating at the directive of their boss. So Jaishankar's argument that since Trump did not speak directly to Narendra Modi between May 7 and 10, there could be no Trump role in ceasefire decision, was flawed. As the EAM for long, Jaishankar should have known how directives are passed on to the other heads through the high officials. During the debate, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi demanded that the PM should clear the controversy over ceasefire by saying in Parliament- Donald Trump is lying. He wanted Modi to say 'Trump, you are a liar, you did not make ceasefire and we did not lose any planes'. Indian PM cannot say this but if it was true that if India on its own decided on ceasefire without any US intervention, he at least could have mentioned the name of Trump and said that this Trump statement was not true. Trump has till now claimed this for 29 times. PM Modi was not true to the facts regarding support received by India from international community as against Pakistan. India got full support against terrorist attacks in the country against its people. But regarding Operation Sindoor, that support was not forthcoming as India could not prove in the global forum that Pakistan inspired the attacks. Pakistan is claiming in the UN and in talks with other countries that India had not produced Pakistan links with Pahalgam attackers. The links have to be proved if the campaign against Pakistan has to be made a success. At the international level, India is diplomatically more isolated these days compared to even two years before. Indian diplomats who have been marketing Prime Minister's New Normal doctrine, are getting tepid response from the friendly countries as most of them think that the doctrine emphasizes on perpetual tensions in the India-Pak sub continent. Trump, a friend of Indian Prime Minister has put India and Pakistan together and has gone further by having lunch meeting with the Pakistan Army Chief and now Field Marshall Asim Munir in the White House. Russia has called for talks between India and Pakistan for defusing the tensions. China and Turkey have openly sided with Pakistan, though is talking for bilateral dialogue for resolving the contentious issues. As regards the LoP Rahul Gandhi, he did not show his political maturity by constantly taking an aggressive approach on Pakistan Occupied Kashmir or China. These are issues pending for long and require patient tackling. Playing into gallery by saying that India missed the opportunity of taking over POK does not suit the Congress leader who is aspiring to become the Prime Minister one day. He has been pursuing right policies on domestic issues but on foreign policy issues, his views are still blurred, not mature enough. He has to learn a lot. The long debate has however enabled Narendra Modi to come out unscathed from more bitter opposition attacks as the Vance conversation issue was not vigorously pursued. Prime Minister could get away by focusing on many irrelevant issues including Nehru's name fourteen times but not naming Trump once. It will be seen how the White House reacts to PM's statement in the debate in the coming days. (IPA Service)