
Restriction zones for domestic abusers ‘a long time coming'
Ministers will seek to introduce 'restriction zones' that will limit where abusers can go, aiming to allow survivors to go about their daily lives without fear of seeing their offender.
Sexual and violent offenders could be restricted to certain locations and tracked with technology, and would face jail time for breaching the conditions under new proposals.
Until now exclusion zones exist to stop perpetrators from going to where their victims live.
Mother-of-two and survivor Leanne said she was 'ecstatic' about the move, adding: 'I hope change is actually going to happen, and it's not just pillow talk, but if it happens, then, yeah, it's a long time coming.'
She said from her experience she would have asked for restriction zones at the school where she would take her children, her local supermarket or near her family's homes.
'These are places where I was confronted, even when he had restraining orders,' the 54-year-old told the PA news agency.
'If I could say those places, and I knew I could go to those places safely, happy days, I'm protected. I've been listened to.'
But she called for ministers to listen to survivors more, adding of the Government approach: 'So far, I'm loving what I'm hearing.
'Would I put a lot of faith in it? Probably not, because I don't like being let down, and I've been let down by previous governments.
'So we can only have hope.'
The measure comes as the Government plans to overhaul the prison system to curb overcrowding, which could see violent and sexual offenders released from jail earlier, and for more criminals to serve sentences in the community.
Tens of thousands of offenders would be tagged, prompting concerns from the victims' commissioner for England and Wales over the Probation Service's ability to cope with rising numbers.
The Government has announced £700 million of funding until 2028/29 for the Probation Service to back up its reforms, as well as recruiting 1,300 new probation officers by March 2026.
For the new restriction zones, probation officers will work with survivors to decide on banned locations for perpetrators, and will carry out detailed risk assessments.
Justice minister Alex Davies-Jones announced the new measure at charity Advance in London on Friday.
The victims minister said perpetrators will be GPS monitored to have real-time data about where they are going, and will be subject to 'virtual boundaries' which if breached could mean they go to prison.
She said: 'We're putting really strong safeguards attached to these so that we can give victims and survivors the confidence to carry on with their everyday lives.
'We're going to be outlining more details on this as well as we're bringing in the legislation in the autumn.'
Speaking at one of Advance's women's centres, director Amy Glover told PA the domestic abuse charity wants to see what the monitoring processes are, and how quickly a probation officer would intervene if a perpetrator was breaching conditions or doing something unsafe.
'What we can sometimes find when new safety measures are introduced for victim survivors, if they don't work all the time, then they can actually create a false sense of security,' she said.
'So we're just really interested to hear a bit more about how they will be rolled out and how we can ensure they're working effectively.'
But of the measure, she added the reaction is 'largely positive' as it flips the current responsibility on survivors on deciding to leave their safe, small exclusion zone area, to perpetrators having more restrictions.
'The aim of these restriction zones, which we really welcome, is to flip that so now he may have a smaller area of movement. She is able to go about her daily life more.'
The charity hosted the justice minister for a round table discussion about the issue, joined by survivors and reality star and campaigner Georgia Harrison.
The Love Island star, who campaigns on violence against women and girls after becoming a victim of revenge porn, backed the plan for restriction zones for offenders if implemented correctly.
'Why on earth should a survivor have to pick an area and stay there for the rest of their life?' she said.
'It makes so much more sense that a perpetrator will be subjected to a restriction zone and a survivor can go wherever they want and feel safe.
'If implemented correctly, it could just mean that not only are they actually physically safe, but they can live every single day feeling safe.'
The Refuge ambassador said that knowing your perpetrator is tagged and they are being monitored is the 'best way possible' if prisons are overcrowded to figure out what works outside of jails.
'This does seem like a really good answer to one of those issues,' she said.
Ms Harrison also pressed the case for social media platforms to be helping and held accountable for needing to do more to prevent abuse online, which also affects victims of domestic abuse.
Ms Davies-Jones said: 'As the victims minister, I get to meet with victims and survivors every single day who have been through the unimaginable, and I want to hear their experiences directly and learn from them so that we can make the system better for them, and finally put them back at the heart of the justice system.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
The tax haven firms given cash by the Scottish Government
Other offshore firms in receipt of public subsidies ditched pledges to create hundreds of jobs, or laid off hundreds of workers just a few years after accepting millions of pounds of taxpayer handouts. This investigation is part of The Ferret's ongoing Money Trail series, in which we are exploring how international wealth flows through Scotland, and how it shapes our politics, public finances, and land and property ownership. Our findings prompted calls from an MSP to give the Scottish Government the means to 'claw back' public funds when firms fail to deliver on promises of jobs and investment. Campaigners and the Scottish Greens want the public funding of tax havens to be banned altogether. READ MORE: 'Absolutely crazy': Scottish jazz artist scores new film by Hollywood director Incorporating a firm offshore does not equate to wrongdoing. But the anonymity afforded to corporate owners in jurisdictions like the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, or the US state of Delaware creates risks of 'corruption and tax abuse', campaigners warned. Transparency International UK argued that companies must be required to reveal their true owners before they are given public money. Scottish Enterprise (SE), the Government's business agency, awards grants and other payments to firms active in Scotland or seeking to set up a base here, incentivising them to invest and create local jobs. The agency's financial support led to more than 9000 Scottish jobs being generated by global companies last year alone, it said. But some subsidised firms collectively promised to create more than 1000 jobs which either failed to materialise, or were cut just years later, while 1150 more are at risk. The Ferret analysed a list of grants, investments and other payments of more than £25,000 that SE made to nearly 2600 companies between January 2020 and December 2024. We identified 18 that were ultimately owned in tax or secrecy havens, and had been given £1m or more in grants by Scottish Enterprise over the investment agency's lifetime. Mangata Networks IN 2022, the Delaware-incorporated satellite maker, Mangata Networks, announced a hub in Prestwick which it claimed would create 575 new jobs. A total of £84m in taxpayer funding was pledged – £54.5m from SE and £29m from the Scottish, UK, and Ayrshire local governments – that was expected to be repaid over 15 years. Files released by the Scottish Government, via a separate FOI request, claim Mangata's boss 'clearly stated' he would only choose Scotland if given 'an incentive package' that exceeded an offer from a rival country. However, Mangata last year scrapped plans to create the jobs, reportedly blaming challenging economic conditions, increased material costs and supply chain issues. Mangata said at the time it would continue its Scottish research and development operations, which were subsidised by a separate SE grant. Mangata has received £4.3m from SE to date. SE stressed that subsidised firms are typically paid in tranches at pre-agreed milestones, and are required to evidence project expenditure before they can claim grant payments. As such Mangata will not receive the full £54.5m originally pledged. LumiraDx IN 2021, SE agreed to provisionally award £15m to LumiraDx – a Cayman Islands-owned health diagnostics firm – to help create 500 to 750 new jobs as part of plans to establish hubs across Scotland. But two years later, the firm had announced 510 redundancies in Clackmannanshire and Stirlingshire. LumiraDx reportedly said it grew its operation to make Covid-19 test kits, and was shrinking back to pre-pandemic levels. LumiraDx, which received £3.6m from SE, is in the process of being liquidated, according to the UK business registry. Spirit AeroSystems SPIRIT AeroSystems, whose parent company is also incorporated in the tax and secrecy haven of Delaware, makes planes and US military aircraft. It opened a hub in Prestwick in 2021, and took nearly £7.9m in SE grants. Then-first minister Nicola Sturgeon making a keynote speech on Scotland's economy at Spirit AeroSystems in Prestwick in 2017First Minister at the time Nicola Sturgeon said then that the facility could create more quality manufacturing jobs. But Airbus is taking over most Prestwick operations from the loss-making Spirit, and promised only to retain the 1150 workers based there in the short-term. Clydeport THE west coast ports, run by Peel Ports and ultimately owned in the Cayman Islands, received £1.1m from SE via their subsidiary companies. A member of Westminster's public accounts committee claimed in 2013 that Peel did 'not pay their fair share of corporation tax' – a claim rejected by the company. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon 'felt like disappearing into North Sea after arrest', excerpt reveals Its billionaire chair, John Whittaker, who is domiciled in the tax haven of the Isle of Man, was last year accused of leaving Ardrossan port to ruin, while he and other shareholders received nearly £300m in dividends. Port director Jim McSporran told The Ferret his firm invested £68m in Scotland in the last three years, which would 'transform the economic prosperity of the west coast' and create 'thousands of jobs'. THE tech firm was given £1.1m by SE. It was part of Work Tech Group – which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (BVI) – until it demerged from the group in January. The BVI is a renowned tax and secrecy haven and Work Tech's latest UK accounts state that the controlling party of the company is 'not known'. Earlier in July, the BVI and several other UK offshore territories failed to meet the final deadline to introduce publicly accessible beneficial ownership registers designed to deter financial corruption. A spokesperson said Work Tech Group was also registered in the UK, requiring it to disclose the same information as UK companies, and pay corporation tax. Both Work Tech and 'met their tax and reporting obligations', they added. HarperCollins THE publishing firm – founded in Glasgow but owned by News Corporation for decades – received nearly £2m from SE to design and install a robotic management system at its Robroyston warehouse. Rupert Murdoch News Corp, owned by the family of billionaire media baron Rupert Murdoch, is incorporated in Delaware. Calls for tighter rules and 'clawback clause' CAMPAIGNERS and MSPs urged SE to demand more transparency from companies about their ownership and tax affairs before awarding public money to them with conditionality attached to grants. Others challenged the investment arm to stop funding tax haven firms altogether. Tom Brake, a former LibDem MP and director of campaign group Unlock Democracy, highlighted that Holyrood blocked Covid-19 relief funds to tax haven firms after parliament backed a Green amendment to a 2020 bill. 'There is a cast-iron case for adopting this policy comprehensively to stop taxpayers' money from disappearing into companies whose tax affairs are a closed book,' he added. The Greens also called on the Scottish Government to adopt the policy 'on a permanent basis'. Labour MSP Paul Sweeney urged SE to write 'a clawback clause' into contracts to recoup public funds if firms 'fail to deliver' on projects, or later slash their Scottish investments. 'There have been too many cases of public subsidies being awarded to projects undertaken by multinational firms that have failed to create the jobs and economic growth that were promised,' he said. READ MORE: 'F***ing slags': Oasis take aim at Edinburgh Council chiefs in first Murrayfield gig Alex Cobham, chief executive of the Tax Justice Network, stressed that while not all firms using secrecy jurisdictions are 'behaving badly', the lack of transparency creates risks of 'corruption and tax abuse'. Any company receiving public funds should be required to disclose their financial affairs in all the jurisdictions where they operate, he argued. Juliet Swann of Transparency International UK also called for tighter rules. 'Requiring companies registered in tax havens to disclose their true owners as a condition of receiving public funding would dramatically improve due diligence,' she said. 'The public has a right to know who ultimately benefits from their money.' A spokesperson for Scottish Enterprise said: 'Global businesses are attracted to Scotland by its collaborative business support environment, access to a skilled workforce, as well as a range of funding packages to develop new, or grow existing, operations here. Scottish Enterprise's focus is on attracting and working with inward investors to invest and create jobs in Scotland. 'As a direct result of our support last year, global companies choosing to locate here generated more than 9000 jobs in Scotland. 'Corporation tax is a matter reserved to the UK Government and decisions around the location of registered offices are made by individual companies and are based on a wide range of factors.' Every company named in this article was approached for comment.

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
More pets to be allowed in military accommodation as ministers cut red tape
Service personnel and their families have previously faced a bureaucratic process to get permission to own a pet if they live in military housing. But from this week they will be allowed to keep up to two dogs, cats or smaller pets without needing permission, with the Ministry of Defence recognising the 'vital role' they play in family life and mental wellbeing. Defence minister Al Carns said: 'As a dog owner and Royal Marine who served for 24 years, much of it in service accommodation, I'm delighted to be making it easier for our dedicated personnel to own family pets.' Other changes introduced this week will see service personnel given more freedom to personalise their accommodation and new, easier processes for their family members to run a business from their home. The changes are part of Defence Secretary John Healey's pledge to 'stop the rot' and improve standards in service accommodation. He said: 'Our armed forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe every day. 'But for too long, military families have lived in substandard housing without basic consumer rights. 'These new measures are a key milestone as we deliver on our consumer charter to stop the rot in military accommodation and ensure our heroes and their loved ones live in houses they can truly call home.' In April, Mr Healey announced a new 'consumer charter' for service accommodation, including more reliable repairs, a named housing officer for every service family and a higher minimum standard for housing. The Government has also brought 36,000 military homes back into public ownership in an effort to reduce costs and improve standards.


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
More pets to be allowed in military accommodation as ministers cut red tape
Service personnel and their families have previously faced a bureaucratic process to get permission to own a pet if they live in military housing. But from this week they will be allowed to keep up to two dogs, cats or smaller pets without needing permission, with the Ministry of Defence recognising the 'vital role' they play in family life and mental wellbeing. Defence minister Al Carns said: 'As a dog owner and Royal Marine who served for 24 years, much of it in service accommodation, I'm delighted to be making it easier for our dedicated personnel to own family pets.' Other changes introduced this week will see service personnel given more freedom to personalise their accommodation and new, easier processes for their family members to run a business from their home. The changes are part of Defence Secretary John Healey's pledge to 'stop the rot' and improve standards in service accommodation. He said: 'Our armed forces make extraordinary sacrifices to keep us safe every day. 'But for too long, military families have lived in substandard housing without basic consumer rights. 'These new measures are a key milestone as we deliver on our consumer charter to stop the rot in military accommodation and ensure our heroes and their loved ones live in houses they can truly call home.' In April, Mr Healey announced a new 'consumer charter' for service accommodation, including more reliable repairs, a named housing officer for every service family and a higher minimum standard for housing. The Government has also brought 36,000 military homes back into public ownership in an effort to reduce costs and improve standards.