
Govt mulling independent oversight body to protect whistleblowers
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said during ongoing reforms to the Whistleblower Protection Act, more needed to be done to ensure public confidence, especially in disclosures involving enforcement agencies.
"There have been calls, including from Ayer Hitam MP Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong, for an independent body. I believe that for these reforms to succeed, they must be accompanied by an independent body.
"This will be part of Phase Two, which I hope the government will agree to take forward. Otherwise, people may continue to question whether there is genuine commitment from authorities in protecting whistleblowers," she told the Dewan Rakyat on Monday (July 21).
Dr Wee had asked whether the government would commit to ensuring that whistleblowers are not subject to executive interference in high-profile cases, especially given the current structure where the Attorney General decides on prosecution while the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigates.
"Is there a plan to set up an independent body or ombudsman to monitor transparency and ensure no interference in the process?" he asked.
Azalina stressed that whistleblowers must not only be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (Act 711), but also be eligible for protection under the Witness Protection Act 2009 (Act 696) in serious cases.
"It has to be a '2-in-1' approach. In high-profile cases, if no witness protection is granted, it becomes difficult for whistleblowers to carry on with their lives. So, agencies responsible must evaluate and extend witness protection accordingly," she said.
Azalina said the second phase of reforms would also look into establishing an ombudsman to provide a credible and independent channel for disclosures.
"This is necessary to prevent situations where whistleblowers are reporting wrongdoing within enforcement bodies themselves," she said.
She also revealed that a final report on the proposed separation of powers between the Attorney General and the Public Prosecutor has been completed and will soon be presented to the Cabinet.
"This separation is vital to ensure there is no external pressure on prosecution decisions. When read together with Phase Two reforms and potential amendments to the Act, it will reinforce public trust in the system," she said.
She also addressed public concerns over whistleblowers being prosecuted after going to the media.
"Many ask why whistleblowers who speak to the media end up being charged. The truth is, internationally, whistleblowers must first report to the responsible agencies, not the media.
"This is because those agencies need to verify the authenticity of the information. If they go straight to the media, it creates a 'trial by media' environment — where public opinion reaches a verdict before the legal process begins," she said.
She added that reforms are aimed at preventing abuse of the whistleblowing system, protecting national security, and ensuring due process.
"We want to avoid sensitive national secrets being disclosed irresponsibly. The legal process must be upheld," she said.
The latest amendments also expand whistleblower protection under Section 7 of the Act by making specific reference to the Witness Protection Act.
The Bill to amend the Whistleblower Protection Act has been tabled for the first reading in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6.
Second reading is scheduled to be tabled in Parliament on Tuesday (July 22).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysian Reserve
5 minutes ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Azalina: Proposal for parliamentary committee on MACC chief's appointment requires thorough review
KUALA LUMPUR — The proposal to establish a Parliamentary Special Select Committee (PSSC) comprising both government and opposition representatives to review and assess candidates for the position of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Chief Commissioner requires thorough consideration, said Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said. The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said the proposal needs deliberation and coordination among various stakeholders, taking into account its overall suitability and impact. She noted that there are currently 10 Special Select Committees established by the Dewan Rakyat. 'These committees carry out their functions based on their respective terms of reference set under the Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat and comprise Members of Parliament from both the government and the opposition. 'In the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS) 2024–2028, Strategy 2: Public Accountability includes a sub-strategy to 'Review the appointment and dismissal requirements of the MACC Chief Commissioner and establish an MACC Service Commission' as part of the long-term reform initiatives for the MACC,' she said in a written reply published on the Parliament website. According to Azalina, the appointment of the MACC Chief Commissioner is governed under Section 5 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 696). She was responding to a question from Dr Halimah Ali (PN-Kapar) on whether the government plans to establish a PSSC comprising both government and opposition representatives to review and evaluate candidates for the MACC Chief Commissioner position. — BERNAMA

Barnama
2 hours ago
- Barnama
Amendments To Whistleblower Protection Act A Major Reform
KUALA LUMPUR, July 22 (Bernama) -- The bill to amend the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA) (Act 711), passed in the Dewan Rakyat today, is a major amendment that will boost the effectiveness of the Act. Bangi MP Syahredzan Johan said the WPA was passed in 2010 to provide protection to whistleblowers, but there are several flaws in the Act that severely hampered its effectiveness. 'One major flaw in the Act is that the disclosure made must not be prohibited by any written law. This is found in a proviso in Section 6(1) of the Act. 'Thus, the disclosure of matters covered by the Official Secrets Act 1972, for example, would not attract protection under the Act. 'Consider the offence under Section 203A of the Penal Code of 'disclosure of information'. Under the section, a person who discloses any information or matter which he has obtained in the performance of his duties, or the exercise of his functions under any written law, commits an offence,' he said in a Facebook post today. For example, he said if an individual uncovers improper conduct in a ministry, but that information is classified by the Official Secrets Act (OSA), even if he discloses it to an enforcement agency, he will not be accorded protection under the WPA. Syahredzan said laws such as the OSA and Section 203A of the Penal Code resulted in many whistleblowers and potential whistleblowers not falling under the ambit of protection within the WPA. 'With the amendment today, such disclosures are no longer disqualified. The proviso in Section 6(1) will be removed. In other words, even if the improper conduct is contained in a document classified under the OSA, the whistleblower can still be protected,' he said. He further said that if this bill becomes law after going through the Dewan Negara and the rest of the legislative process, a whistleblower will be protected even though the disclosure is prohibited by law.


New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: Familiar story in AG's Report as billions lost without action
HERE we go again. "Serious irregularities" and "weaknesses" in ministries and government entities are back as national bad news. Our lawmakers must be outraged to hear such misuse of the public purse on the first day of the Dewan Rakyat session. Whatever the year, the Auditor General's Report on government entities bleeding red ink remains very much the same story. There have been years of lessons, yet none learnt. Neither has there been the will to hold errant officers to account. For a nation that is in debt to the tune of RM1.28 trillion and trying hard to pay it off, that is heartbreaking. Why no one has the will to put an end to such systemic failures in the public service has become an annual question. Let's be clear. We are not counting pennies here. We are talking of hundreds of millions of ringgit. Of the five audits conducted over the period of the 11th and 12th Malaysia Plans, the auditors found serious irregularities in three. The first is Felcra Bhd's governance failure in four plantations involving a total of RM241.76 million from 2022 to 2024. Don't fault us for asking: Aren't the top management and board members up to the task? The second, an audit on Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia's tender process, though involving a smaller sum — RM58.45 million — disclosed a mind-bending outcome. There, the Tender Procurement Committee selected companies that were not recommended by the Technical Evaluation, Financial Evaluation and Pre-Tender Committees. One overrides three? There can't be a clearer example of a violation of tender procedures. The culprits must not be spared. The third audit relates to army vehicle contract mismanagement. There, RM162.75 million in penalties for late delivery of Gempita vehicle remains uncollected and RM1.42 million in penalties for service delays has yet to be enforced. If that wasn't enough, RM107.54 million in service procurement was split into smaller packages, circumventing regulations. The other two audits findings were related to subsidised cooking oil programme flaws under the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry and weaknesses in the government's pre-qualification procurement introduced by the Finance Ministry, bringing the total value of the five audits to RM48.873 billion. Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) attributes the systemic breakdowns to three causes: outdated procedures, weak financial oversight and a culture of impunity. In our book, though, the culture of impunity is the root cause. Year after year leakages, wastages, irregularities and weaknesses have been highlighted by the Auditor General's Report, yet we hear little about the guilty being held accountable. Quiet slap on the wrists won't do. The government being transparent doesn't mean merely making the audit reports public, it must also be transparent about accountability. TI-M is right in calling on all implicated ministries and agencies to publicly disclose remedial actions within 30 days, covering recovery of funds, disciplinary measures and procedural reforms, to restore public trust. The Auditor General's Reports mustn't just be treated as something to be read and filed away. It must be a call to action. The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission must spring into action, if it hasn't already. Accountability is the best medicine against the cancer of impunity.