logo
What is the Special Operations Group Tasmanian police unit?

What is the Special Operations Group Tasmanian police unit?

What led to the fatal shooting of Tasmania Police Constable Keith Smith will be pieced together over coming days or weeks, with investigations continuing.
The involvement of the Special Operations Group, which was at the property, will form part of that.
Tasmania's Special Operations Group, or SOG, is similar to other highly-trained tactical police units around Australia.
The Tasmanian SOG has been a full-time unit, with 20 members since 2024, stationed in the south and the north.
Prior to this, the SOG consisted of three part-time units.
The group performs a wide range of functions including helping breach buildings, attending sieges, drug lab searches, and other high-risk jobs.
Police Minister Felix Ellis said the move to full-time has "significantly bolstered" the ability to respond to high-risk situations.
Police Association of Tasmania (PAT) president Shane Tilley told the ABC SOG members were the "elite" of Tasmania Police.
"They are highly trained individuals who are trained in less lethal capabilities — they are trained to use long arms, pistols."
"They may not be required to go into an address, [they could] … simply just run a little bit of security around the perimeter," said Mr Tilley.
Commissioner Adams said the SOG had attended over 800 jobs in 18 months as part of its "frontline response" work.
"Now, that we have a permanent Special Operations Group, we can deploy our Special Operations Group in a wider, broader manner," she said.
She said they assisted police officers with "routine duties", including the response to retail crime.
Mr Tilley said a "good portion" of the 800 jobs the group had attended would have been searches, often involving the drug squad.
"Some would be high-risk searches, others would have a lower level of risk attached to them," he said.
He said it was a "blessing" to have the SOG on the ground being used more often now.
He said the officers who picked up a job would normally approach the SOG "if they thought that there was potential for things to develop", and that they would attend "if they thought they could help".
Thus far, Tasmania Police has not revealed much about why the specialist tactical group were at the North Motton property on Monday, as officers delivered a court-issued warrant.
"There are lots of questions that we all have as a result of the incident, and that's why we need to be really methodical in our investigation," Commissioner Donna Adams told reporters in Devonport.
Commissioner Adams said the SOG had been requested for the job and had waited at the bottom of the driveway, while two officers, including Constable Smith, approached the house.
She said they had responded after Constable Smith was shot.
"They were also threatened by the offender, and they shot the offender in the hand before making an arrest."
She told ABC Hobart Mornings that "had it not been for their presence I think we would have been confronted with a number of other deaths".
She did not provide any information on why they had been requested, or why there may have been a heightened level of concern about the job.
A police spokesperson said they weren't able to respond to questions regarding SOG methodology for "operational reasons".
Mr Tilley said it was his understanding this was not an "authorised SOG job" and that they were there as support.
"Those members from the SOG were simply there to act as backup units and assistance if it was required," he said.
He said the SOG crew responded "within seconds" to the situation.
"There will be opportunities down the track, as part of this investigation, to see what those assessments came to but clearly the resource was in the area at the time and able to attend the address."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defence zeros in on lack of motive
Defence zeros in on lack of motive

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Defence zeros in on lack of motive

Prosecutor Dr Nannette Rogers SC finished her closing address, telling the jury there was a final alleged deception by Erin Patterson: how she allegedly deceived the jury from the witness box. The defence then stepped up, with Colin Mandy SC presenting a type of anti-motive and arguing that Erin Patterson had plenty of reasons to not kill her lunch guests. If you've got questions about the case that you'd like Rachael and Stocky to answer in future episodes, send them through to mushroomcasedaily@ - It's the case that's captured the attention of the world. Three people died and a fourth survived an induced coma after eating beef wellington at a family lunch, hosted by Erin Patterson. Police allege the beef wellington contained poisonous mushrooms, but Erin Patterson says she's innocent. Now, the accused triple murderer is fighting the charges in a regional Victorian courthouse. Investigative reporter Rachael Brown and producer Stephen Stockwell are on the ground, bringing you all the key moments from the trial as they unravel in court. From court recaps to behind-the-scenes murder trial explainers, the Mushroom Case Daily podcast is your eyes and ears inside the courtroom. Keep up to date with new episodes of Mushroom Case Daily, now releasing every day on the ABC listen app.

Linq Buslines accused of safety breaches over Hunter Valley disaster
Linq Buslines accused of safety breaches over Hunter Valley disaster

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Linq Buslines accused of safety breaches over Hunter Valley disaster

A bus company linked to the deadly 2023 Hunter Valley bus crash, and its directors and managers, are being prosecuted for alleged heavy vehicle law breaches. Last year, Brett Andrew Button was jailed for at least 24 years over the crash which killed 10 people returning from a wedding in the Hunter Valley in June 2023. The court found the high concentration of opioid Tramadol in Button's system at the time would have impaired his driving ability. The coach was operated by Linq Buslines Pty Ltd. The company's directors and two managers had matters heard in Gosford Local Court on Tuesday. They're accused of heavy-vehicle safety breaches, including alleged failed drug testing policies between November 2022 and June 2023. Fines of up to $1.7 million can be imposed for the most serious offences. Manager Rodney Parker was accused of two breaches of duty under national heavy-vehicle laws and two counts of breaching the duty of an executive of a legal entity. Mr Parker is accused of contravening his duty by allegedly failing to ensure he didn't cause or urge drivers, like Button, to contravene heavy-vehicle laws. According to the charge sheet tendered in court today, Mr Parker is accused of "disclosing to Mr Brett Button that drug testing was to take place on 6 February 2023," four months before the crash. Button started working for Linq Buslines in November 2022 and the court documents alleged Mr Parker had not contacted any prior employer. "He failed to exercise due diligence by not making reasonable enquiries of a person authorised by Mr Brett Button's prior employer as to any matter impacting upon his capacity to perform the role and to safely drive buses," the documents said. Area Manager Katie Parker, who was responsible for scheduling and directing the local fleet of 16 buses, was also charged. "[She] failed to ensure as far as reasonably practicable drivers were not driving under the influence of substances that rendered their driving unsafe by implementing regular random drug testing of drivers," the documents said. Directors Anthony John Royle and Christopher Terrence Fogg are also accused of three counts each of breaching national heavy-vehicle laws. "[The pair] failed to exercise due diligence to ensure the company complied with its duty, contrary to the law, and it contravened its duty, contrary to heavy-vehicle national law," according to the court documents. It is further alleged that the company had a duty to minimise or eliminate risks posed by drivers. It was alleged the company, "failed to ensure it had procedures and policies to prevent drivers driving under the influence of substances that rendered their driving unsafe." Linq Buslines is separately charged with similar offences. The matter will return to court in September.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store