
‘A chance to take a break': McEntee defends length of school summer holidays
Helen McEntee acknowledged that it was a challenge for parents in need of childcare, and any decision on changing the length of the school year would require a considered approach.
Advertisement
There has been some commentary in recent weeks that the length of the school holidays – three months for secondary schools and two months for primary – are out of date, as Ireland has some of the longest school breaks in Europe.
Visiting a Clondalkin primary school on Thursday, where children were taking part in a summer programme for two weeks, Ms McEntee said: 'I'm here in a school where you have principals, teachers, SNAs, who are working and supporting children throughout the summer.
Education Minister Helen McEntee at St Mary's Junior National School in Clondalkin, Dublin (Grainne Ni Aodha/PA)
'We've always had a particular time period for school holidays.
'What we find, particularly for our secondary schools, is that they're actually coming back earlier now, in August, so the Leaving Cert results will be out from the 22nd, some students are actually in that week and, in fact, the following week is when a lot of schools are coming back.
Advertisement
'Our teachers work hard, our schools are very active throughout the year. I think the time that's taken throughout the summer gives everybody a chance to take a break.'
The children at St Mary's Junior National School learn literacy and numerical skills, and how to bake, as part of the summer programme, which gives educational support to children, including those with special educational needs.
They can also paint in the school's outdoor wooden classroom, called the sun room, which was funded by the Arts Council.
Ms McEntee said 1,800 schools are taking part in the summer programme this year, including 80 special schools, a 16% increase on last year.
Advertisement
Helen McEntee (seated centre) acknowledged that it was a challenge for parents in need of childcare (Grainne Ni Aodha/PA)
Asked if the activity of the summer programme suggested the summer break was too long, she said the programme initially began 'with a particular emphasis on special education'.
'For children with additional needs, to have that structure and to have that focus, is really, really important.
'And I think there was an acknowledgement that to have that extra support throughout the summer is something that would be hugely beneficial, not just for the students, but also for the parents.
'It's obviously since expanded, it's not just a focus on special schools or additional needs, it's a focus on our DEIS schools, making sure that where children – and it's not all children that access the programme – but if there is that need there to have that extra support, that structure throughout the summer, it's there.
Advertisement
'It's also fun.
'I do acknowledge, I have to say, the challenges for parents when it comes to childcare, when it comes to the fact that in many households you have both parents working now full time, so the summer does pose challenges.
'But you know, I think any changes to summer breaks, any changes to holidays, that's something that would always have to be considered in engagement and consultation with schools, with teachers, with parents, with families overall.'
Ms McEntee also announced a National Convention on Education, to inform a long-term strategy for primary and secondary education in Ireland.
Advertisement
Professor Anne Looney, who will chair the convention, said in a statement she was looking forward to being involved in ensuring 'we give our learners and those who work with them the best opportunities to flourish and succeed'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
China-backed centres at UK universities under threat from new free speech laws
Confucius Institutes at universities across England are under threat from new free speech rules, setting off urgent talks between ministers, vice-chancellors and regulators over the fate of the China-backed language and culture centres. Universities fear that the new regulations imposed by the Office for Students (OfS) this month will cause legal headaches with their Chinese partners, including the government in Beijing, and could lead to some being closed. University leaders claim they have been left in the dark by England's regulator over whether or not they are breaking the new rules, which bar foreign governments from vetting staff employed at the institutes. The 20 Confucius Institutes operating in England – including at the universities of Manchester, Coventry and Liverpool – are partnerships between each university, a Chinese university, and an arm of the Chinese state that provides funding. They offer Mandarin classes and promote cultural events but critics allege they also act as a Trojan horse within the education system. The Department for Education (DfE) said it 'welcomed a range of international partnerships with UK higher education' but that they had to comply with UK laws and regulations. 'It is for individual higher education providers to assess whether the criteria of existing arrangements would have the effect of restricting free speech and take steps to address that,' the DfE said. Jacqui Smith, the skills minister, said the government wanted to ensure that universities were 'places of rigorous debate' for all views. Smith said: 'Any attempt by a foreign state to intimidate, harass or harm individuals in the UK will not be tolerated. The government has robust measures in place to prevent this activity, including updated powers and offences through the National Security Act. 'We are also working directly with the Office for Students to support universities in safeguarding free speech and tackling any form of harassment on campus.' China's embassy in London did not respond to a request for comment. The new guidance is likely to force the universities to rewrite agreements with the institutes or face sanctions for breaching the OfS's free speech regulations in England, particularly new rules that punish universities involved with 'a foreign-funded institute [that] imposes an ideological test' as a condition of employment. One critical group, UK-China Transparency, says Chinese staff applying to work in the institutes have been asked to provide references to their 'political attitude' and be vetted by a committee of China's ruling Communist party. A spokesperson for the OfS said: 'Where universities or colleges enter into agreements with any country, they must ensure that they continue to uphold freedom of speech within the law and academic freedom. Where they cannot do this, they should immediately take all necessary steps to amend or terminate the agreement. 'Our guidance is clear, for example, that the imposition of any kind of ideological test as a condition of employment would be unacceptable.' Several universities contacted by the Guardian declined to comment publicly. But university leaders said they have asked the OfS for more time to investigate and negotiate with their partners. A spokesperson for the OfS said: 'Any institution not meeting their free speech obligations should take urgent action.' A spokesperson for Lancaster University said: 'Lancaster University is fully committed to upholding the right to freedom of speech for all staff and students. Along with our sector colleagues, we are carefully considering if there are any potential implications in the new guidance for our Confucius Institute, which plays an important role in our internationally diverse academic community.' One university said that the situation was complicated by the OfS refusing to indicate which arrangements would be allowed under the new regulations. A spokesperson for Universities UK, which represents vice-chancellors, said: 'UK universities are committed to upholding free speech and academic freedom. They work hard to protect these fundamental freedoms and meet significant legal duties in this area set out by the Office for Students. 'This commitment extends to the partnerships universities have with institutions around the world, which bring important economic and social benefits to the UK.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Friday briefing: Has the recognition of a Palestinian state gathered an unstoppable pace?
Good morning. It started in the Caribbean: Barbados and Jamaica recognised a Palestinian state in April 2024. Trinidad and Tobago and the Bahamas followed weeks later, meaning that all Caribbean Community states had recognised Palestine. At the end of May 2024, Ireland, Spain and Norway formally recognised Palestine. Then it spread. Last month, France became the first G7 country to announce it would follow suit, pledging recognition this September. Malta, the UK and Canada have signalled they could do the same, though London and Ottawa attached conditions. Other countries, including Andorra, Australia, Finland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal and San Marino, have signed a declaration that indicates they may be next. The shrinking number of countries refusing to recognise Palestine has played a significant role in this surge. It's a club few now want to be part of. So too has a landmark ruling from last year's International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel. Not the case examining whether Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, which will take years to conclude, but the one on the legality of Israel's nearly six-decade-long occupation of the Palestinian territories. To understand how this ruling has galvanised recognition as well as growing calls for boycotts and sanctions against Israel, I spoke to Haroon Siddique, the Guardian's legal affairs correspondent. That's after the headlines. Gaza | At least 91 people have been killed and 600 wounded while waiting for aid in Gaza over the past 24 hours, as the US envoy, Steve Witkoff, visits Israel for ceasefire discussions and to inspect food distribution. NHS | Nine out of 10 nurses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have rejected their 3.6% pay award and have warned that they could strike later this year unless their salaries are improved. Science | The world's 'oldest baby' has been born in the US from an embryo that was frozen in 1994, it has been reported. US news | US president Donald Trump has signed an executive order imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on imports from dozens of trade partners in his latest attempt to reshape the global economy. Hong Kong | Former Hong Kong politician and prominent democracy campaigner Carmen Lau has accused British police of requesting she 'self-censor' and retreat from public life. Hold your breath, but we'll need to start with a little history lesson – specifically the events of 1967. After the six-day war between Israel and four Arab states, Israeli forces took control of East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, as well as the Golan Heights and Sinai, in a series of rapid military advances. This reshaped the balance of power in the region. The war later opened the door to peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan, but it also marked the start of a decades-long occupation of what the international community recognises as the Palestinian territories: East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. With the peace process long stalled and illegal settlements in those areas continuing to expand, the situation has hardened into a brutal, prolonged and unresolved impasse. Mainstream Israeli politics includes voices asserting that Israel has a rightful claim to all the occupied territories, and harder-line positions calling for the expulsion of Palestinians have also influenced government policy in recent years, as Benjamin Netanyahu moved further right to retain control of his coalition. In 2022, the Palestinian delegation at the UN asked the general assembly to seek an advisory opinion from the ICJ on whether Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories complied with international law, the legality of the settlements, and how other states should respond. The request passed with majority support, Haroon told me. 'The judgment that followed was historic because of how unequivocal and wide-ranging it was.' The question of apartheid This time last year, the ICJ ordered Israel to immediately end its occupation of the Palestinian territories and pay full reparations to Palestinians. The advisory opinion concluded that Israel had violated international law in several ways, including denying Palestinians their inalienable right to self determination and inflicting policies that amounted to apartheid. Perhaps most importantly, the court advised that other states are obliged not to recognise the occupation as lawful and not to aid or assist it. 'It also said Israel needed to make full reparations for wrongful acts and essentially concluded that what Israel was doing violated international law,' Haroon said. 'Some people interpreted the judgment as saying there was apartheid, and to me it seemed explicit. They said settlers and Palestinians are treated differently and that's enshrined in Israeli law and other measures. There is almost complete separation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem between Israeli settlers and Palestinian communities,' Haroon said, explaining that the court said Israel was in breach of article 3 of the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination (CERD), which condemns racial segregation and apartheid. The court found multiple breaches of international law, including forcible evictions, widespread demolitions, settlement expansion, failure to curb settler violence, restrictions on water access, exploitation of resources, and the extension of Israeli law to the West Bank and East Jerusalem. A clear message to other states There was also a lot in the court's opinion about other states' relations to Israel, Haroon said. 'The court said other states shouldn't render aid or assistance that entrenches the occupation. For example, they shouldn't do trade or economic activity with settlements.' How did the UK respond? During the hearings, the Conservative government argued that the ICJ should not issue an advisory opinion at all. Now, under Labour, the position is even less clear. 'Last year, the Labour government simply said, 'We'll take this in and get back to you,' but they haven't issued any substantial response since. This has caused concern and anger among groups advocating for Palestinians. The only comment the UK government has made is that they don't disagree with the central findings of the advisory opinion. That's vague: it doesn't say what they're doing about it,' Haroon said. He notes that Britain, for instance, does not ban the import of goods produced in Israeli settlements. 'Earlier this year, a group of 62 MPs and peers wrote to the trade secretary saying they should ban those imports, citing the ICJ judgment, but nothing's happened.' Last month, Caabu (the Council for Arab-British Understanding) sent a letter signed by 112 parliamentarians demanding that the UK government publish a response to the ICJ ruling. A separate letter followed from 16 civil society organisations, 'The government said it's a complex ruling, but a year on, it feels like foot-dragging, and it makes people think it's political,' Haroon said. Others have mobilised into action. In April, Ireland unveiled a bill to ban imports from the occupied Palestinian territories in the first move by an EU member to curtail trade in goods produced in Israeli settlements illegal under international law. Ireland based the legality of its move on the ICJ ruling. Israel's response For its part, Israel didn't participate in the case (though it's worth noting they did participate in the genocide case against them). 'Israel later called the opinion 'fundamentally wrong and one-sided,' saying it was trying to push a political settlement on them, but that settlements could only be reached by negotiations,' said Haroon. 'They also submitted a written argument, saying the questions put to the court were prejudiced and failed to recognise Israel's rights and duty to protect its citizens or its security concerns.' The 'Montevideo Convention' So how does the ICJ case relate to recognition of a Palestinian state? 'The court said that the violations, such as the occupation and the settlements, were preventing the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. They said Israel abused its position as an occupying power,' Haroon said. 'I would say the recent French recognition of a Palestinian state is very much in keeping with what this judgment was saying, because it was about ending the occupation. The court said Israel should withdraw immediately. Anything that pushes towards a Palestinian state, including recognition, is consistent with the ruling.' The UK announcement of recognising a Palestinian state has been met with furious pushback. Those against recognition now warn that it goes against International law. They note that under the Montevideo Convention, a state must have a permanent population, defined territory, government, and the capacity to engage with other states. The peers argue that Palestine may not meet these criteria. The UK government have dismissed this argument. It is worth noting that some advocates for Palestinian rights also criticise recognition. Hussein Agha and Robert Malley argued in a forceful opinion piece that it amounts to little more than a symbolic gesture and will not halt the deaths and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza caused by Israel's siege and war. Either way, what happens at the UN general assembly this September in relation to the two‑state solution will be written into the history books. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion A couple's dispute you couldn't make up: Is it acceptable to drink from a water bladder during sex? 'A water bladder is not for the bedroom'. A definite win for the prosecution? Phoebe Major corporations are arguably the biggest winners in Gaza, concludes a report by UN special rapporteur Francesca Albanese. It is 'hypocritical' for companies like Google to support Israel, says Katrina vanden Heuvel. Anandita Abraham, newsletters team I find it both depressing and surprising that we don't have bottle returning schemes all over the place. I loved reading about this inspiring scheme from the Netherlands - and hope it can spread! Phoebe Intrigued by this What we're reading piece on books enjoyed in July, because Welsh is on the mark about Seán Hewitt, who is a real force to be reckoned with. Definitely need to check out 'Hunted' by Abir Mukherjee. Anandita Interesting piece from Larry Elliott on the one-sided EU-US trade deal and how it's a historic admission of weakness for Europe. Phoebe Cricket | Gus Atkinson and Josh Tongue took two India wickets apiece on day one of the fifth Test before Chris Woakes was forced off for England. The 36-year-old was scheduled to have a scan on Thursday evening, with his ability to take an active part in the remainder of the game to be assessed overnight. Rugby | Blair Kinghorn and James Ryan will start for the British & Irish Lions in their third Test against the Wallabies in Sydney on Saturday. Ryan replaces Ollie Chessum, who has been named on the bench. Athletics | After the sorrow of 2021, world indoor 400m champion Amber Anning talks about her determination to race at the World Athletics Championships in Tokyo in September. 'The gold is always the goal,' she says. 'The mathematics of starvation: How Israel caused a famine in Gaza,' is the lead story on the Guardian today. Also focusing on the conflict in Gaza, the i says: 'No negotiation with terrorists: Starmer defends ultimatum to Israel - but won't issue one to Hamas.' 'Record number of foreign sex offenders in British prison,' is the splash at the Daily Express, while the Times says: '1 in 8 of all prisoners were born overseas. ''Labour bid to silence migrant hotel critics', is the lead story over at the Telegraph, while the Mail runs with, 'Proof Starmer's smash the gangs campaign's a joke.' 'Drug crisis scared me to death and I'm going straight,' is the splash on the Daily Record. Meanwhile the FT highlights the latest in tech news with the headline: 'Microsoft market value touches $4tn as US tech stocks surge to fresh highs.' Finally the Mirror with: 'Man, 76, arrested 'poisoned' at summer camp.' Our critics' roundup of the best things to watch, read, play and listen to right now TVThe Assassin | ★★★★★ A menopausal assassin has been a long time coming, even though there is literally no more perfect pairing in the world than a woman rapidly emptying of oestrogen and a gun. The Assassin is perfectly crafted preposterousness. It is stylish, witty, tightly written, even more tightly paced and takes the job of massively entertaining us at every turn with the proper amount of seriousness. Lucy Mangan Film My Beautiful Laundrette | ★★★★★ Now getting a 40th anniversary rerelease, this classic British comedy from screenwriter Hanif Kureishi and director Stephen Frears has for me the jaunty spirit of Ealing. It is a sharp, smart picture, with English eccentricity, sly quirk and political subversion, that represents a brilliant and almost unique engagement with contemporary history in 80s British cinema: a satire of Mrs Thatcher's Britain which involved playing Toryism at its own game. Peter Bradshaw Art and designAndy Goldsworthy: Fifty Years | ★★★★★ Rural life hits you in the face like the stink of cow dung as soon as you step into the Royal Scottish Academy. This is the Clarkson's Farm of art retrospectives, plunging today's urbanites into the raw sadness and beauty, the violence and slow natural cycles of the British countryside. Goldsworthy may love nature but he doesn't sentimentalise it. It is our connection with nature he wants to reawaken, not in a quiet contemplative way but as a shock. Jonathan Jones Music Tyler, the Creator: Don't Tap the Glass | ★★★★☆Musical reference points are deployed with an evident love and understanding of the source material, never feeling like box-ticking or pastiche; the hooks work with enviable efficiency. It's all funky enough that you imagine even the selfie-obsessed pocketing their phone and throwing themselves around if it came booming from some big speakers. Alexis Petridis Did lead poisoning help create a generation of serial killers? The Pulitzer prize-winning author Caroline Fraser grew up in Seattle in the 1970s, a decade that has the highest crime rates in recent US history. At that time the US was entering a peak era of serial killers, and Fraser tells Michael Safi what it was like, especially for a woman, to grow up with violent men like Ted Bundy and the Green River Killer operating locally. A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad In a rare moment of glory for AI, which is usually in the news for taking jobs or helping kids skip homework, the first AI-run NHS physio clinic has halved the waiting list for back pain and musculoskeletal services. This successful pilot was accessible to 2,500 patients in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough - where wait times were as long as 18 months. One patient described the AI physio as 'intuitive.' Although the root cause of long waiting lists, recruitment freezes stopping (human) physiotherapists from entering work, remains, and an app-based interface may be inaccessible - this seems like a welcome innovation for some who need imminent care. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply


Daily Mail
9 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Pauline Hanson exposes the disturbing question her grandson asked after coming home from school
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson has accused Australian schools of 'feeding innocent kids lies' about gender and has blamed the lessons for confusing her grandson. 'Innocent kids are being fed lies in classrooms, lies about their bodies, their identity, and their families,' Ms Hanson said. 'Children as young as four are being told they can choose whether they're a boy or a girl. That biology doesn't matter. That parents are wrong, and feelings are truth,' she said. Ms Hanson said her seven-year-old grandson had been left unsettled by lessons. 'My seven-year-old grandson recently came home from school and asked his mother, "Where's your penis?" - "What do you mean?" she asked, reminding him that she is female and females do not have a penis. 'My grandson then asked his mother where his vagina was. Troubled, my daughter asked him where these questions were coming from and why. "From school," he said. 'He said, "School told me that you can choose if you want to be a boy or a girl," and then added that he wanted to know when he gets to choose. 'Let's think about that for a second. He wanted to know when he gets to choose. All his life up to the age of seven years, he's been told he's a boy. 'He was reared as a boy, he looks like his father and his brother, he knows he's not like his mother, and now he gets to choose. 'Now he knows he's a boy - his parents told him that - because biological sex can't change because of words or an operation. I wonder if the school is also teaching him, if he then says he has a vagina, how he has a baby.' She argued that 'this isn't education' but 'ideological indoctrination, smuggled into schools under 'inclusion' programs and hidden from parents.' 'I want to give some examples to parents of what is being taught to their children. She claimed schools were teaching that a person's gender couldn't be determined by their genitals, that someone could be born male but feel like a girl inside, and that the sex assigned at birth could change. 'These are just a few examples of the perverse rubbish our children and grandchildren as young as four are being taught at schools in Australia. 'Schools and departments call it "sexual education". It is part of the Australian national curriculum, promoting diversity and inclusion. The Victorian curriculum teaches that gender is shaped by social and cultural factors, a concept included in the Health and Physical Education curriculum under Relationships and Sexuality. Tasmania's Growing Up Program covers identity, respectful language, growth and change, wellbeing, and respectful relationships - helping children understand themselves, respect diversity, and develop healthy relationship skills. In NSW, the Safe Schools program was ended in 2017 after opponents criticised it for teaching that gender and sexuality are fluid, that heterosexuality is not the norm, and that sex is arbitrarily assigned by a doctor at birth. 'It is all the same: transgender ideology which is pressuring our children and causing great distress and long-term harm,' Ms Hanson said. 'In many cases, no prior consent or permission is obtained from parents to teach this curriculum, and in some cases parents are denied access to or visibility of the content when requested. 'Let's be honest: the goal is to separate children from their families, from biological truth, and from anything solid enough to push back. If they can confuse them young, they can control them for life.' The outspoken senator also lashed out at the Liberal Party, accusing it of inaction. 'And where is the so-called opposition? The Liberals know it's happening. They've seen the curriculum. They've seen the consequences. But they're too weak, too captured, and too gutless to act,' she said. Ms Hanson insisted One Nation was the only party 'willing to stand up and say enough.' 'We've been raising the alarm for years, and we will not stop. Because you can't fix this by hoping. You fix it by fighting. And One Nation is the only party fighting to protect your kids from this madness. 'Our schools are being perverted into turning our kids into fodder for gender clinics where they are drugged and butchered.' She said many families no longer trust the education system and are choosing homeschooling as their only option. In Queensland, the number of homeschooled children increased by 229 per cent between 2009 and 2014, Ms Hanson claimed.