
The Reluctant Exit Of A Constitutional Nationalist
Jagdeep Dhankhar's resignation may be effective immediately, but the echo of his voice in rulings and sharp interventions will remain in Parliament's conscience for years to come
The sudden resignation of Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, citing health reasons, marks the end of a short but influential chapter in Indian constitutional life. At 74, Dhankhar has stepped down midway through his six-year tenure, joining the ranks of only two other vice presidents, VV Giri and R Venkataraman, who resigned before completing their terms, albeit for different reasons.
But unlike his predecessors who left to assume the higher office of the president, Dhankhar's exit is one of necessity, not political ambition. It is a moment of reflection for the Indian polity, especially for those who value articulation, constitutional clarity, and nationalist conviction in the upper echelons of public life.
Jagdeep Dhankhar's career arc has been anything but conventional. A lawyer by training and a farmer's son by identity, his rise through the political ranks was not driven by dynastic entitlement or ideological posturing. His greatest visibility came not during his years in Parliament or Cabinet, but as Governor of West Bengal. It was there, in the volatile political landscape of Bengal, that Dhankhar found his voice as a constitutional sentinel, one not afraid to call out the excesses of Mamata Banerjee's regime. Where many governors chose silence or discretion in dealing with regional satraps, Dhankhar spoke with legal precision and unapologetic nationalism. His insistence on constitutional accountability rattled the state government and often set the tone for the national debate.
'kisan putra" with deep knowledge of the Constitution and legislative procedure. It was no mere ceremonial endorsement. In a house that often witnesses theatrical opposition and walkouts, Dhankhar brought a lawyer's rigour and a patriot's candour. His ability to maintain order, invoke constitutional provisions with ease, and push back gently but firmly against unruly conduct made him a chairman who did more than wield the gavel. He wielded moral authority.
In many ways, Dhankhar's presence was the ideological complement to the BJP-led government's legislative agenda. Not in the sense of partisanship, he remained constitutionally non-aligned in his conduct, but in his understanding of India's civilisational values and constitutional ethos. When the Opposition accused the government of undermining institutions, it was Dhankhar who reminded them often with surgical clarity of constitutional roles and responsibilities. He was not afraid to confront the 'constitutional illiteracy" of some members of Parliament and frequently used the Rajya Sabha pulpit to educate, not just adjudicate.
What sets Dhankhar apart is that he was never a mere bureaucratic custodian of his office. He was an institution in motion, a living embodiment of the Constitution's intent to have checks and balances enforced with wisdom and resolve. Whether it was upholding parliamentary decorum or questioning judicial overreach, he spoke with an intellectual sharpness that kept both Houses of Parliament and courtrooms on their toes. He famously said that the 'basic structure doctrine" must evolve through discussion, not dogma, provoking necessary conversations about the limits of judicial supremacy.
His resignation letter, while graceful and full of gratitude, conceals the weight of disappointment many constitutionalists and nationalist thinkers will now carry. The timing, too, is poignant. That Dhankhar administered oaths to new Rajya Sabha members earlier in the day, only to step down hours later, shows the deep sense of duty with which he served till the very end. It was not a quiet exit, but a dignified one.
It is important to note that his resignation comes amidst recurring health issues, including a recent cardiac episode and a public fainting spell. This reminds us that even the most committed public servants are human and vulnerable. Prioritising health is not weakness; it is wisdom. Still, one cannot help but sense that his resignation has left unfinished the mission he seemed destined to carry forward: to redefine the role of vice president from being ornamental to being meaningfully constitutional.
In an age where identity politics dominates the discourse and shouting matches often substitute for debate, Jagdeep Dhankhar brought to public life a rare blend of clarity, conviction, and constitutional rectitude. He never wore nationalism like a badge for electoral optics; it was embedded in his vocabulary, his decisions, and his worldview. He spoke not for votes but for values. For that alone, he will be missed.
As India looks to find a successor, the bar he has set will be a difficult one to reach. The next vice president will inherit not just an office, but a legacy, one of fearless constitutional articulation, deep respect for India's civilisational heritage, and a refusal to bow before political expediency.
In Jagdeep Dhankhar, the country saw a vice president who was more than a chairperson of the Upper House. It saw a guardian of the Constitution, a sentinel of propriety, and above all, a nationalist who believed that the rule of law is the bedrock of Bharat's destiny. His resignation may be effective immediately, but the echo of his voice in speeches, rulings, and sharp interventions will remain in Parliament's conscience for years to come.
The writer is a technocrat, political analyst, and author. He pens national, geopolitical, and social issues. His social media handle is @prosenjitnth. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
About the Author
Prosenjit Nath
The writer is an Indian technocrat, political analyst, and author.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
From aspiration to agency: India redefines its global role
India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy without submission, trade without compromising sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology read more It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. File image/ AP In the rapidly shifting global political architecture, few nations stand at as pivotal a juncture as India, caught in the confluence of normative aspirations, strategic autonomy, economic opportunity, and diplomatic realignment. From international tech rule‑setting to high‑stakes trade negotiations, from balancing sanctions pressure to recalibrating relations with China, the past few weeks have made clear that it's India's real moment. This is not mere reactivity but about India stepping forward to set the narrative, even under the weight of great power tensions and domestic imperatives. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Take the sharp warning from Nato Secretary‑General Mark Rutte, a diplomatic salvo that carries real consequences. In statements delivered in Washington and to Congress, Rutte emphasised that 'secondary sanctions', including tariffs up to 100 per cent, could be deployed against major economies like India, China, and Brazil should they continue to trade with Russia. The intent: leverage global economic ties to pressure Moscow toward a peace settlement over Ukraine. The declaration is a clear signal that India's commercial engagements are being scrutinised through the lens of Western security priorities. Delhi's swift rebuke, citing 'double standards' and asserting its sovereign right to conduct its trade, reveals India's determination to resist external dictates, even as it shoulders the complexity of geopolitical entanglements. Yet, this episode does not simply reflect Indian defiance. Rather, it underscores a rare and consequential exercise of normative sovereignty. India is not tethered to any bloc; it takes pride in being a multi-aligned and principled actor. Domestic energy security demands, its long‑standing commitment to global South solidarity, and cautious calibration with both West and East place it in a strategic sweet spot or jeopardy, depending on perspective. When Rutte urged these countries to 'make the phone call to Vladimir Putin' or face sanctions, he emphasised pressure, but India refused to be boxed into Western frameworks, opting instead for a calibrated diplomacy. This is not a retreat; this is self‑definition in action. World Trade Organisation (WTO) reform, gaining traction ahead of the Cameroon Ministerial, is another arena where India is quietly influencing multilateral rules. Talks now hinge on thorny compromises: easing 'consensus' gridlocks, demanding proof for industrial subsidies, and revisiting the special status of countries like India and China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pushed by the US and Europe to revive a stalled WTO, these shifts could undermine developing country carve-outs. While India remains restrained, its backroom diplomacy is active. The challenge lies in securing meaningful exceptions without stalling reform, testing not just India's trade stance but also its broader role in global rule-making. This is more about realigning trade with development than resistance. At the same time, New Delhi finds itself on the cusp of a potentially transformative bilateral trade agreement with the US, ahead of a hard August 1 US tariff deadline. An article of faith in India's political economy has been bilateralism as an antidote to protectionism, and Washington has signalled expansiveness: from high‑tech to supply‑chain resilience. Yet this is no yawning liberal fixture; it is a negotiation circumscribed by domestic concerns on both fronts. For India, offering tariff concessions or regulatory liberalisation might invite debate around industrial policy and food sovereignty; for the US, access to Indian markets must be matched by deeper procurement commitments and intellectual property standards. If last week's Nato‑sanctions episode underscores Indian autonomy, this trade narrative highlights its readiness to play a constructive, collaborative role, so long as reciprocity and national interest underpin any deal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, India's pivot toward China, marked by Jaishankar's first visit to Beijing since the 2020 standoff, is a calculated move. At the SCO summit, his meeting with Wang Yi focused on de-escalation, a border resolution, and reviving trade minus 'restrictive measures'. China called normalisation 'hard-won', underscoring mutual interest in quiet diplomacy and regional stability. Beneath the optics, India is asserting agency: addressing boundary disputes, restoring critical supply chains, and preserving open trade. It's a calibrated framework—friendship without illusion, cooperation without compulsion. Now, juxtapose these developments with India's stealth campaign in global AI norm‑setting. While less visible to the world's press, New Delhi has been earnest, partaking actively in the Unesco‑led 2025 AI Action Summit and championing inclusive, transparent, and sustainable AI frameworks. Internally, the government's Shinrin hush, its hallmark IndiaAI mission, has enabled the creation of the India AI Safety Institute and the public‑sector BharatGen model, announced earlier this year. This reflects a coherent, outward‑looking narrative: one where India is not merely a consumer of Western AI but a producer and ethical interlocutor in its own right, framing a normative trajectory for the Global South. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This junction of AI, trade, sanctions, and diplomacy reveals an Indian posture defined by complexity rather than simplification. India is neither a protectable emerging market nor a fearful collateral of competition; it is instead a multifaceted actor shaping its lane, steering norms, and anticipating friction. If India is being squeezed by trade reform at the WTO, by diplomatic pressure over Russia, and by bilateral negotiations with large economies, it is responding with a choreography of normative offers, negotiation discipline, and diplomatic nuance. Strategic autonomy is no longer a slogan; it is a tactical posture. India's message comes across loud and clear: we will trade responsibly, not opportunistically; we will engage in global initiatives, not deflect them; we will assert our interests, not surrender them. This posture is especially critical because India's multilateral footprint is expanding with institution‑shaping spaces. In 2025, it has convinced even sceptics that its voice is consequential and its initiatives, from AI safety to trade alliances, are worth centralising. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD None of this is without strain. The geo‑economic environment is a maze of competing pressures: pressure to align with Western sanctions regimes, to commit to bilateral trade deals, to accelerate AI governance, and to stabilise border diplomacies. But India seems to have resolved a complex arithmetic: diplomacy that does not buy influence with submission, trade that does not cost sovereignty, tech engagement that does not sacrifice agency, and multilateralism that negotiates interest, not ideology. The key test lies ahead: can India engineer a degree of coherence across ministries, Commerce, Finance, External Affairs, and IT? Can it manage stakeholder friction between business communities aligned to greenhouse tech corridors and those tied to legacy energy relations with Russia? Can it maintain credibility on the world stage while cultivating domestic legitimacy? These questions are not rhetorical; they are strategic deadlines directed at policymaking systems, where alignment and execution define success. Ultimately, this is more than policy choreography; it is India redefining its global centre of gravity. When the US Congress debates whether India is aligned enough to merit exemption from sanctions, Delhi's internal coordination across diplomatic, economic, and strategic lines becomes part of its national security calculus. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When WTO multilateralism teeters, India can offer constructive reform, leadership or resistance. When AI norm debates emerge, India doesn't merely have a seat; it has proposals. India projects the kind of policy confidence few states of its standing enjoy. India stands assertive, multi‑alignment‑centric, normatively engaged, and institutionally responsive. It is not the India of aspiration alone; it is the India of agency, reframing between autonomy and engagement, between principle and pragmatism. Amal Chandra is an author, political analyst and columnist. He posts on 'X' at @ens_socialis. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ashok Gajaputi Raju sworn in as 22nd governor of Goa
PANAJI: Former union minister Pusapati Ashok Gajapati Raju was sworn in as the 22nd governor of Goa on Saturday in the presence of a host of officials and dignitaries. Ashok Gajaputi Raju. (File Photo) The chief justice of the Bombay high court, Justice Alok Aradhe, administered the oath of office to the governor. Speaking after his swearing-in, Gajapati Raju said he was looking forward to working with the people of Goa. 'I am delighted to be in Goa and delighted to swear by the constitution of India to serve the people of the country but Goans in particular. We all work as a team. I'm really delighted. I don't know the local language, but this is my first assignment at this state office,' he told reporters after the ceremony. 'I am looking forward to working with you. We want everyone to work united, and when we unite, we are second to none in the world,' he added. The oath ceremony was attended by chief minister Pramod Sawant along with the council of ministers, members of Parliament, MLAs and various dignitaries including Union minister for civil aviation K Rammohan Naidu, Union MoS, Shripad Naik, Speaker of Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly Chintakayala Ayyannapatradu, minister for women and child welfare, Andhra Pradesh, Gummidi Sandhya Rani, Rajya Sabha member Sadanand Shet Tanawade, other political leaders, and others. 'On behalf of the Goa government and the people of Goa I welcome him. He has vast experience in governance and administration. I will enjoy working under his guidance. He will be useful for us,' Goa chief minister Pramod Sawant said. Gajapathi Raju served as Union minister for civil aviation during the first tenure of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In 1978 he became MLA for Vizinagar constituency in Andhra Pradesh and later became a cabinet minister.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-UK FTA: Trade deal offers tariff safeguards; domestic industry gets protection buffer
India has secured the right to impose temporary trade safeguards under its newly signed free trade agreement (FTA) with the United Kingdom, the commerce ministry confirmed on Saturday. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The mechanism allows India to raise import tariffs or suspend duty concessions if a sudden spike in British imports causes or threatens serious harm to domestic industries. The India-UK trade deal was signed in London on Thursday in the presence of senior leaders from both nations, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his UK counterpart Keir Starmer. 'In this agreement, there are bilateral safeguard measures,' the ministry said in an official statement, as per news agency PTI. 'It allows India to temporarily increase tariffs or suspend tariff concessions on certain goods if there is a significant surge in imports from the UK that causes or threatens to cause serious injury to Indian domestic industries.' The safeguard provisions are initially valid for up to two years but may be extended for another two years if a formal investigation finds that continued protection is necessary for the affected domestic sector to recover and adjust. 'Thus, the total maximum duration of a bilateral safeguard measure is four years,' the ministry said. According to the agreement, if India applies these safeguards only for two years, the UK cannot take retaliatory measures. However, if extended to four years, Britain will have the right to respond. The pact also includes a provision for provisional safeguards in urgent or emergency situations. 'Provisional measures can be used in critical or emergency situations to prevent irreparable harm to domestic industry,' the ministry said, adding these can be enforced for up to 200 days based on preliminary findings, but must be followed by a comprehensive investigation. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has emphasised that India has safeguarded all sensitive sectors, including dairy, rice, and sugar, during the negotiations. 'We have protected all the sensitive sectors of India... we have not opened for the UK (those areas).... Zero compromise and extensive benefits make it a phenomenal free trade agreement (FTA),' Goyal said, as per PTI. The minister also highlighted that the agreement would give a significant boost to exports of labour-intensive sectors like footwear, textiles, and gems and jewellery.