Strathclyde professor helps create human rights 'toolkit'
The toolkit outlines how a human rights-based approach can act as a "problem-solving" method to tackle global development issues and help achieve the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Read more: 'Mon the Tech': Strathclyde University win varsity sporting competition
It is intended to serve as a guide for UNDP Country Offices, helping them enhance their execution of development programmes and their pursuit of the SDGs.
The document introduces a framework called PLANET (Participation; Link; Accountability; Non-discrimination and equality; Empowerment and capacity development; Transparency) for implementing the human rights-based approach.
Professor Miller, who serves as a senior independent expert with the UNDP Crisis Bureau, said: "A human rights-based approach involves a 'whole of society' approach, where different interests around the table all have a stake in the matter, and you establish the framework in which sometimes competing sets of rights and interests are reconciled with one another.
"As a problem-solver, the toolkit can help to find an agreed way forward to enable sustainable development.
"It can also have a preventative role where things happening in a country could give rise to conflict, huge poverty or displacement of individuals and communities if the problems are not addressed."
The toolkit is linked to a matrix of recommendations made to member states following the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of each UN member state's human rights record.
Professor Miller is collaborating with the Scottish Government to devise proposals which may include the matrix as a component of a 'tracker tool'.
This tool would assess performance in fulfilling international human rights obligations, as well as the possibility of linking these to relevant policy areas and SDGs.
Read more: 'Lots to learn': International manufacturing conference to take place in Glasgow
In their co-written forward, UNDP Assistant Secretaries-General Shoko Noda and Marcos Neto, stated: "Utilising HRBA in development programming can help UNDP improve how it delivers for populations and governments around the world.
"It can be an enabler of progress, engaging whole of societies, systems and unpacking development challenges whilst providing solutions pathways and helping us to anticipate, prevent and manage risks.
"At UNDP, we believe that human rights can be a preventive, protective and transformative force, guiding societies towards stability, prosperity and equality."
Professor Miller's co-authors of the toolkit are UNDP officials Julie van Dassen, Sarah Rattray, and Seán O'Connell.
Arifur Rahman and Brian Migowe provided coordination and research support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Met Police's use of live facial recognition is 'unlawful', equality watchdog warns
The use of live facial recognition by Britain's biggest police force is 'unlawful' and not compatible with human rights laws, the equalities watchdog has said. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has claimed Scotland Yard's rules and safeguards fall short of standards and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when deployed at protests. Live facial recognition (LFR) is set to be deployed by the force at Notting Hill Carnival over the August bank holiday weekend. More than one million people are expected to converge on the streets of west London for the annual celebration. And Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has already sought to reassure campaign groups that the technology will be used without bias. And a spokesman from the force said it believes its use of the tool is 'both lawful and proportionate, playing a key role in keeping Londoners safe.' The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in an upcoming judicial review over LFR, brought by privacy campaigner Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo and anti-knife crime community worker Shaun Thompson. They are seeking the legal challenge claiming Mr Thompson was 'grossly mistreated' after LFR wrongly identified him as a criminal last year. EHRC chief executive John Kirkpatrick said the technology, when used responsibly, can help combat serious crime and keep people safe, but the biometric data being processed is 'deeply personal'. 'The law is clear: everyone has the right to privacy, to freedom of expression and to freedom of assembly. These rights are vital for any democratic society,' he said. 'As such, there must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. 'We believe that the Metropolitan Police's current policy falls short of this standard. The Met, and other forces using this technology, need to ensure they deploy it in ways which are consistent with the law and with human rights.' The watchdog said it believes the Met's policy is 'unlawful' because it is 'incompatible' with Articles 8, right to privacy, 10, freedom of expression, and 11, freedom of assembly and association of the European Convention on Human Rights. Big Brother Watch interim director Rebecca Vincent said the involvement of EHRC in the judicial review was hugely welcome in the 'landmark legal challenge'. 'The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today,' she said. 'Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we've seen in Shaun's case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities.' 'Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police's investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.' It comes as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended plans to expand LFR across the country to catch 'high-harm' offenders last week. Last month, the Metropolitan Police announced plans to expand its use of the technology across the capital. Police bosses said LFR will now be used up to ten times per week across five days, up from the current four times per week across two days. A Met spokesman said the force welcomes the EHRC's recognition of the technology's potential in policing, and that the Court of Appeal has confirmed police can use LFR under common law powers. 'As part of this model, we have strong safeguards in place, with biometric data automatically deleted unless there is a match," they said. 'Independent research from the National Physical Laboratory has also helped us configure the technology in a way that avoids discrimination.'
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Met Police's facial recognition policy ‘unlawful', says human rights watchdog
The Metropolitan Police's policy on live facial recognition technology is unlawful because it is incompatible with human rights laws, the equalities watchdog has said. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the UK's biggest police force's rules and safeguards over using the tool 'fall short' and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when used at protests. The Met is set to use LFR, which captures people's faces in real-time CCTV cameras, at the Notting Hill Carnival over the August bank holiday. Sir Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has already sought to reassure campaign groups that the technology will be used without bias. A Met spokesman said the force believed its use of the tool was 'both lawful and proportionate, playing a key role in keeping Londoners safe '. The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in a forthcoming judicial review over LFR, brought by Silkie Carlo, the Big Brother Watch director, and Shaun Thompson, an anti-knife crime community worker. They claim Mr Thompson was 'grossly mistreated' after LFR wrongly identified him as a criminal in 2024. John Kirkpatrick, the EHRC chief executive, said the technology could help combat serious crime and keep people safe but the biometric data being processed was 'deeply personal'. 'The law is clear: everyone has the right to privacy, to freedom of expression and to freedom of assembly. These rights are vital for any democratic society,' he said. 'As such, there must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. 'We believe that the Metropolitan Police's current policy falls short of this standard. The Met, and other forces using this technology, need to ensure they deploy it in ways which are consistent with the law and with human rights.' The watchdog said it believed the Met's policy was incompatible with articles eight, on right to privacy, 10, on freedom of expression and 11, on freedom of assembly and association of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 'Most pressing human rights concern' Rebecca Vincent, the Big Brother Watch interim director, welcomed the involvement of the EHRC in the judicial review. 'The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today,' she said. 'Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we've seen in Shaun's case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities. 'Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police's investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.' Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, defended plans to expand LFR across the country to catch 'high-harm' offenders last week. In July, the Metropolitan Police announced plans to expand its use of the technology across the capital. Police bosses said LFR would now be used up to 10 times per week across five days, up from the current four times per week across two days. A Met spokeswoman said the force welcomed the EHRC's recognition of the technology's potential in policing, and that the Court of Appeal has confirmed police can use LFR under common law powers. 'As part of this model, we have strong safeguards in place, with biometric data automatically deleted unless there is a match,' she said. 'Independent research from the National Physical Laboratory has also helped us configure the technology in a way that avoids discrimination.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Metropolitan Police's policy over live facial recognition ‘unlawful'
The Metropolitan Police's policy over live facial recognition (LFR) technology is 'unlawful' because it is 'incompatible' with human rights laws, the equalities watchdog has said. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has said the UK's biggest police force's rules and safeguards over using the tool 'fall short' and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when used at protests. The concerns come as the Met is set to deploy LFR, which captures people's faces in real-time CCTV cameras, at this year's Notting Hill Carnival over the August bank holiday weekend. Metropolitan Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has already sought to reassure campaign groups that the technology will be used without bias. The EHRC has been given permission to intervene in an upcoming judicial review over LFR, brought by privacy campaigner Big Brother Watch director Silkie Carlo and anti-knife crime community worker Shaun Thompson. They are seeking the legal challenge claiming Mr Thompson was 'grossly mistreated' after LFR wrongly identified him as a criminal last year. EHRC chief executive John Kirkpatrick said the technology, when used responsibly, can help combat serious crime and keep people safe, but the biometric data being processed is 'deeply personal'. 'The law is clear: everyone has the right to privacy, to freedom of expression and to freedom of assembly. These rights are vital for any democratic society,' he said. 'As such, there must be clear rules which guarantee that live facial recognition technology is used only where necessary, proportionate and constrained by appropriate safeguards. 'We believe that the Metropolitan Police's current policy falls short of this standard. The Met, and other forces using this technology, need to ensure they deploy it in ways which are consistent with the law and with human rights.' The watchdog said it believes the Met's policy is 'unlawful' because it is 'incompatible' with Articles 8, right to privacy, 10, freedom of expression, and 11, freedom of assembly and association of the European Convention on Human Rights. Big Brother Watch interim director Rebecca Vincent said the involvement of EHRC in the judicial review was hugely welcome in the 'landmark legal challenge'. 'The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today,' she said. 'Live facial recognition surveillance turns our faces into barcodes and makes us a nation of suspects who, as we've seen in Shaun's case, can be falsely accused, grossly mistreated and forced to prove our innocence to authorities.' 'Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police's investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.' It comes as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended plans to expand LFR across the country to catch 'high-harm' offenders last week. Last month, the Metropolitan Police announced plans to expand its use of the technology across the capital. Police bosses said LFR will now be used up to 10 times per week across five days, up from the current four times per week across two days. The Metropolitan Police has been contacted for comment.
