Saudi Arabia Rolls Out Custom Mobile McDonald's for Trump Visit
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
It's well known that President Donald Trump loves a Big Mac. During his first term, he famously served fast food at White House banquets, and during the 2024 campaign he wore an apron and handed out fries at a McDonald's stop staged for cameras.
As the Saudis work to impress Trump during his trip to Riyadh this week, they're focusing on even the smallest details—like his fondness for the Golden Arches—by setting up a custom-built mobile McDonald's truck designed to support the presidential visit and the throng of journalists in tow.
The Context
Trump's four-day trip across the Middle East marks his first major international mission since returning to office. Landing in Riyadh on May 13, he was greeted personally at the airport by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman—a ceremonial gesture reserved for close allies.
Far from a traditional diplomatic tour, Trump's second-term kickoff is saturated with real estate contracts, defense procurements, and eye-popping investment pledges. The president has thrown out numbers ranging from $500 billion to $2.5 trillion in potential investments.
What To Know
As part of a carefully choreographed and unusually personal welcome, Saudi officials rolled out a full-size, mobile McDonald's truck ahead of Trump's arrival—a nod to his well-documented preference for the fast-food chain.
The glossy, double-staircase trailer—branded in Arabic and English—was parked outside a media hub called "Media Oasis," where journalists were hosted amid video screens showcasing Saudi mega-projects like the futuristic NEOM city and the upcoming 2034 FIFA World Cup.
It was unclear if the president was planning to eat from the truck.
A mobile McDonald's, still shuttered, sits in the parking lot of the 'Media Oasis' set up for journalists.
A mobile McDonald's, still shuttered, sits in the parking lot of the 'Media Oasis' set up for journalists.
X / Mordechai Wagenheim
"Yes, it's a mobile McDonald's here in Riyadh," i24 journalist Mordechai Wagenheim posted on X, sharing footage of the truck.
Trump's reception was filled with symbolic detail. American and Saudi flags fluttered throughout the capital, and an all-American fleet of police vehicles formed a visible security perimeter around key sites. Most notably, Trump was greeted on the tarmac by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman himself—a rare diplomatic honor.
Typically, foreign leaders are received by lower-ranking officials unless a message of alliance is intended. The crown prince's decision to meet Trump personally stood in stark contrast to President Joe Biden's 2022 visit, when a provincial governor met Air Force One.
In the tightly controlled Saudi press, the visit was hailed as a new chapter in U.S.-Saudi relations. The White House released a press release announcing a $600-billion commitment from the Saudis to invest in the United States.
What People Are Saying
President Donald Trump, during a brief appearance with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the start of a bilateral meeting, said: "I really believe we like each other a lot."
Khalid al-Falih, Saudi investment minister, said at a Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum: "Our bilateral relationship is one of the world's most significant geostrategic bonds, with economic cooperation and business partnerships at its core, and serves as a force for peace and global prosperity."
Mona Yacoubian, Director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), told Newsweek: "Trump's trip to the Gulf is a harbinger of this administration's foreign policy over the next four years: transactional rather than transformative, personality-driven, and crowned by headline-grabbing economic deals."
What Happens Next
After his first stop in Saudi Arabia, President Trump is scheduled to visit Qatar and the United Arab Emirates—two of the richest nations in the world—to sign what he hopes will amount to over $1 trillion in investment and trade agreements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is the A.I. Sell-off the Start of Something Bigger?
Andrew here. The Trump administration is reportedly considering taking stakes in semiconductor companies — beyond Intel — that were granted money as part of the CHIPS and Science Act, in a major shift toward industrial policy. Cabinet members have said that U.S. taxpayers should have received shares in exchange for funding chipmakers. But there's some important missing context: At the time, companies like TSMC probably wouldn't have taken CHIPS Act money if they had to give up equity. The law was meant to persuade such companies to do something that they believed wasn't economical, namely building factories in the U.S. But the landscape has changed amid President Trump's tariffs, which has made producing chips abroad much more expensive — and made CHIPS Act money more valuable. It appears that the administration's approach has been more stick than carrot. What are the implications? Will U.S. companies take government money in the future? And will this approach get the right results? Tell us what you think. Is the A.I. pendulum swinging again? For years now, investors have clambered to get a piece of the action in artificial intelligence. That's pushed up valuations to nosebleed-inducing levels, even as some market observers (and Sam Altman) warn that things are getting out of hand. For now, private-market investors still appear to be eager to bid up the value of A.I. start-ups. But on Tuesday's market moves suggest that public investors are getting more jittery, raising at least some questions about the future of the tech boom. Things still look bubbly for privately held start-ups — including OpenAI, which is in talks to let current and former employees sell about $6 billion worth of stock at an astonishing roughly $500 billion valuation. That's nearly twice the market capitalization of Salesforce. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'
Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) criticized President Trump for claiming to be a war hero in the wake of the Iran strikes, arguing it is offensive to those who have served in combat. 'Yeah. I mean, look, this is just nuts. This is nuts. And they're going to find — his people are going to find a way to justify this,' Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic, told CNN's Erin Burnett on Tuesday. 'Listen, when they were putting out something honoring the Army's 250th anniversary, they put out a picture of Donald Trump in his military academy uniform, which has nothing to do with the military except they drill you.' Kinzinger, who retired from Congress in 2021 and is now a senior contributor on CNN, was asked to weigh in on Trump's recent remarks on 'The Mark Levin Show.' 'He's a war hero because we work together. He's a war hero,' Trump told conservative radio host Mark Levin, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'I guess I am too.' 'Nobody cares, but I am too. I mean, I sent those planes,' he added, just months after the U.S. bombed three nuclear facilities near Tehran in defense of Israel. Kinzinger, who served in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, pressed back against the rhetoric but added that he hopes the president is able to facilitate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. 'You can like what he's done. That's fine. I hope he gets a resolution in Ukraine,' he said. 'But to put himself on the same level of people that have actually gone out and served this country, not claimed bone spurs, is an offense to anybody who served.' 'And frankly, you just take somebody that served, calling themselves a war hero, even that would be inappropriate,' the former GOP lawmaker, who said recently that he feels closer to a Democrat nowadays, told CNN. 'For a guy that never served to say it, it's nuts.' Kinzinger added, 'But somebody, they'll defend it, they'll find a way.' The comments come as Trump is looking to facilitate a Russia-Ukraine peace deal after meeting with both leaders and seeking another ceasefire in the Middle East between Isreal and Hamas.
The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Palestinians deserve a state now for the same reasons Jews did in 1948
Soon, the Palestinian people will be recognized as a sovereign nation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank by most countries. They now have the political and moral momentum toward achieving this goal. The world owes Palestinians independence and sovereignty for the same reasons it granted the Jews living in British Mandatory Palestine their independent state in 1948, only a few years after six million Jews had been gassed to death in German concentration camps. This will happen despite an expected U.S. veto next month in the United Nations, and in spite of the political alliance between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump is pragmatic; he will come to support the creation of a Palestinian state, as most Americans already do. This is because the case for Palestinian independence has been getting clearer and more urgent with every Israeli bombing of mostly innocent Gazans, and with every death from starvation caused by Israel's withholding of food. Most countries now recognize a sovereign Palestinian state. In total, 147 members of the United Nations, or 76 percent of its members, have already recognized the Palestinian state. And of the five members with power to reject Palestinian independence, China and Russia are already known supporters. France and the United Kingdom said they will support sovereign Palestine next month before the U.N. votes on the matter. The lone veto is expected from the U.S., but Trump is likely to change his mind. Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister from 2006 to 2009, supports an independent Palestinian state. A large segment of Israelis already supports the creation of an independent Palestine, though such support has has declined as the war has progressed. Hundreds of high ranking past members of the Israeli government, the Israeli Parliament, and Israel Defense Forces support Palestinian independence. And for the first time, Israeli human rights organizations such as B'Tselem, and medical associations are calling on the international community to stop the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians by the Israel's Defense Forces. The Arab League of twenty-two Arab nations has called Hamas to disarm and relinquish the Gaza Strip to make peace possible. According to recent Gallup poll, 55 percent of Americans and 41 percent of Republicans support an independent Palestine. And according to The Times of Israel, President Trump recently said that the destruction, killing, and starvation of Palestinians in Gaza were done by Benjamin Netanyahu to keep him in office. This points to a likely U.S. backing of independence. Furthermore, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — a ardent Trump supporter — recently characterized Israel's actions against the Palestinians in the Strip as genocide. Netanyahu himself is partly responsible for the expected creation of an independent Palestinian state because of his increasingly brutal tactics and strategies against the Palestinians. For example, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's actions have violated the Genocide Convention and issued a warrant for Netanyahu's arrest. Israel had worldwide sympathy and empathy when Hamas invaded its territory and savagely murdered 1,200 Israelis. That action led to a declaration of war against Hamas. But the situation has since changed. The war quickly devolved into a war against all Palestinians in the strip. If the strategy were to get rid of them through indiscriminate killing and mass starvation of innocent people, I am not sure what they would be doing differently. Netanyahu's failure has led much of the world community to believe that that the war in Gaza is no longer a retaliation against Hamas for the atrocities of October 2023, but rather a war to do away with a whole people. The world community in the U.N. will soon reject such behavior and vote to grant independence to Palestine. It is about time for the U.S. to join such cause.
