logo
Mass. lawmakers reach deal to seed MBTA with $535 million from ‘millionaires' surtax spending package

Mass. lawmakers reach deal to seed MBTA with $535 million from ‘millionaires' surtax spending package

Boston Globe16-06-2025
The bill also would set aside $248 million to help cover
The bill largely spends surplus revenue that the state collected from the surtax on annual income exceeding roughly $1 million. The revenue is constitutionally mandated to go toward transportation and education initiatives, though the agreement released Monday tips more toward transportation ($716 million in funding) than education ($593.5 million), according to lawmakers.
Advertisement
Legislators could shuttle the bill to Governor Maura Healey's desk as early as Wednesday, when both chambers have formal sessions scheduled.
In a joint statement, state Representative Aaron Michlewitz and state Senator Michael Rodrigues, the chambers' respective budget chiefs, said the agreement 'makes critically important investments in education and transportation in the face of continued uncertainty.'
Advertisement
The MBTA's own spending plans already lean heavily on state largesse. The agency's board of directors last week
The T's approved budget calls for hiring more than 1,000 positions to increase the agency's headcount to 8,030 employees. The T is also seeking some cost-cutting measures, such as reducing overtime costs,
The MBTA has faced long-standing
The T has also struggled with drawing back riders. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, fare revenue covered about
To address this, the Legislature offered vastly different visions. The surtax spending bill the Senate passed last month would have dedicated $370 million to the MBTA, including $200 million to replenish the agency's budget reserve. The House, on other hand, sought far more, setting aside nearly $800 million for the T, most of which — $700 million — was tabbed for the agency's reserve and deficiency funds.
Advertisement
The bill released Monday falls in the middle. It would dedicate $300 million for the T's spending reserve, plus offer $175 million for workforce and safety funding. Another $40 million would go toward infrastructure upgrades, and $20 million would help fund the MBTA's low-income fare program.
The gap between the chamber's plans for the T was even wider when combined with their annual state budget proposals, with the House seeking about $1.4 billion for the T between the two bills and the Senate $820 million.
How Monday's deal would affect what the agency receives in the annual state budget plan is unclear. The chamber's leaders are still negotiating the details of that roughly $61.5 billion bill, which is designed to cover the fiscal year that starts July 1.
Both chambers also included an array of earmarks in their surtax spending bills, ranging from
Legislators had yet to release the full text of the final version Monday afternoon.
The surplus surtax bill is, by design, supplemental, offering lawmakers a huge windfall to fund priorities that they perhaps wouldn't have been able to otherwise through the regular budget process.
Still, the Legislature is likely to find itself in a similar position next year, too. Entering May, the voter-approved surtax had already
Advertisement
That type of financial cushion is welcome. President Trump has withheld or cut
Companies have also
Matt Stout can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to get Mass. to embrace YIMBYism
How to get Mass. to embrace YIMBYism

Boston Globe

time44 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

How to get Mass. to embrace YIMBYism

Massachusetts voters rightly Advertisement By contrast, ending exclusionary zoning across the state would greatly increase housing construction and Advertisement Extensive research by economists and other scholars finds that I grew up in Massachusetts — where my parents and I arrived as poor recent immigrants in 1980 — and owe much to the opportunities the state has to offer. Curbing exclusionary zoning would help ensure that more people of all backgrounds could access those opportunities. Exclusionary zoning also damages our economy as a whole by preventing people from moving to where they would be more productive. A Zoning is often viewed as a tool to protect the interests of current homeowners, many of whom support 'NIMBY' ('not in my backyard') restrictions on building. But many homeowners would Advertisement Current property owners would also benefit from having the right to use their land as they see fit. Advocates of local control of land use should embrace YIMBY zoning reform unites experts across the political spectrum. Supporters range from progressives such as There is much room for zoning-reform progress in Massachusetts. The National Zoning Atlas recently surveyed the state's zoning rules and Governor Maura Healey's Unlocking Housing Production Commission recently issued Advertisement The state should either ban exclusionary zoning outright — except in rare cases where it's needed to prevent a serious threat to public health and safety — or make it a 'per se' taking, under which property owners would automatically be entitled to compensation, thereby incentivizing state and local governments to use exclusionary zoning only in rare circumstances. In a Exclusionary zoning isn't the only factor driving up housing costs. President Trump's massive tariffs and deportations

California Bill Aims to Protect Illegal Immigrants' Children by Easing Guardianship Rules, But Critics See Risks
California Bill Aims to Protect Illegal Immigrants' Children by Easing Guardianship Rules, But Critics See Risks

Epoch Times

time3 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

California Bill Aims to Protect Illegal Immigrants' Children by Easing Guardianship Rules, But Critics See Risks

A bill making its way through the California state Legislature would make it easier for children to be temporarily placed under the care of guardians other than their parents. Assembly Bill 495, also called the Family Preparedness Plan Act of 2025, is aimed at protecting children of illegal immigrants and allowing 'nonrelative extended family members' to act as caregivers if parents are unavailable due to immigration issues. Critics argue the bill has gaping holes that put children—and parental rights—at risk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store