logo
Ted Cruz is finding distance from Trump — and eyeing his political future

Ted Cruz is finding distance from Trump — and eyeing his political future

Yahoo10-04-2025

Sen. Ted Cruz stuck out his neck to critique Donald Trump's actions on tariffs, warning they could have resulted in a political 'bloodbath' for the party had the president not partially reversed course Wednesday. But it's not the first time since Trump's return to office that the Texas Republican has broken ranks to advance his own agenda.
Since becoming chair in January of the Senate Commerce Committee, Cruz — who has signaled abiding presidential ambitions — has found ways to assert his own priorities, even if it involves breaking with Trump and other Republicans in the process.
Four months in, Cruz has already angered the White House by promising to go after Big Tech CEOs with whom the administration is cozy, and irked Commerce Committee Republicans who refused to give Cruz unilateral subpoena power to haul in those CEOs and other high-profile witnesses.
He has pledged to pursue bipartisan priorities on the traditionally cooperative panel, like aviation safety legislation, reauthorization of the U.S. Coast Guard and standardizing rules for how college athletes are paid. But Cruz has also presided over cross-the-aisle shouting matches, prompting the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington, to bemoan, 'I don't want to turn into the House.'
His decision to venture some criticism of Trump's trade war — despite the president's efforts to clamp down on public opposition from within the party — was another sign of Cruz's swashbuckling pursuit of his agenda, however uncomfortable.
'I am doing everything I can to urge the president to listen to the voices of the angels and not the devils,' said Cruz, adding that he engaged with the White House on the matter and was in frequent contact with Trump.
It all adds up to the conclusion that Cruz could be preparing to make another go for the White House in 2028 after finishing as runner-up to Trump in 2016. And while he's tied himself closely to Trump since then, he is now using the committee gavel to set himself apart with aggressive oversight of tech companies, skepticism about tariffs and even a record of working across the aisle.
This strategy might not change many opinions about Cruz. He has a history of being widely reviled and mocked on the left and rubbing his Republican colleagues the wrong way, too, with his showboating style. He's the man who read 'Green Eggs and Ham' during a filibuster on the Senate floor in 2013 to protest funding the government without defunding Obamacare and who spends significant time most weekdays recording a podcast that builds his personal brand.
In an interview Wednesday, Cruz demurred on whether he's looking at a future presidential bid that could pit him against a former colleague, Vice President JD Vance, saying he's now focused on his work in the Senate.
'We have an enormous amount of work in front of us right now,' Cruz said. 'We just had a presidential election in which President Trump won an incredible mandate from the American people. … And my focus right now is 100 percent on rolling up my sleeves and doing the hard work to deliver on the promises he made and to deliver on the mandate for voters.'
If Cruz is indeed looking to carve out his own political lane, it's clear his tariff message resonated positively with some Republican committee members: Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas, who signed onto legislation to limit presidential tariff authority, said in an interview that Cruz's comments were 'very helpful.'
Commerce is not a "perfect platform for president because it's not high-profile" and grapples with "nerdy policy issues," said Texas-based GOP political strategist Matt Mackowiak. Tariffs, furthermore, don't fall under the committee's authority.
"But given his keen sense of policy and politics, he will find ways to raise the profile of the committee and get into some things that they haven't done before,' Mackowiak said. 'He doesn't shy away from being a partisan figure.'
Cruz, in an interview, touted his committee as a center of activity: "I am focused like a laser on jobs, jobs, jobs. The Senate Commerce Committee has jurisdiction over roughly 40 percent of the US economy. … There are very few positions in all of government that can have a greater impact than chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee.'
He said he plans to do that, in part, by developing policies to help 'America to lead in the development of [artificial intelligence] and to reap the productivity and job creation benefits that will come from that.'
To get those things done, though, Cruz will need cooperation from committee members — and he has frequently pursued a go-it-alone approach that hasn't always gone smoothly.
Cruz's efforts to get his colleagues to give him unchecked subpoena power earlier this year backfired when Republicans chafed at the suggestion they break with longstanding precedent and give their chair the ability to compel witness testimony and documents without first securing a full committee vote.
The White House also didn't want committee Republicans to give Cruz more power, fearing he planned to use his blanket privileges to haul in major tech companies with which the administration has had a rapport.
In interviews with multiple GOP committee members at the time of the conflict, none sided with Cruz over Trump, either saying they would be open to hearing the White House out or declining to comment. Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) would only say 'we'll see' when asked if she supported Cruz in his quest.
Cruz defended himself in an interview, saying he still plans to crack down on Big Tech with all the tools at his disposal: 'I view big tech censorship as the single greatest threat to free speech in America, and the single greatest threat to free and fair elections in America. We're going to engage in vigorous oversight, and if there is resistance, the committee will use compulsory processes to enforce compliance.'
When asked to explain the breakdown earlier this year, Cruz deferred to the White House, which did not respond to a request for comment.
Another flashpoint on the committee could be over allowing the federal government to auction off wireless airwaves for commercial use. Cruz argues it will create jobs and keep America competitive with China, while Pentagon officials and some GOP lawmakers call it a national security risk.
But Cruz is calibrating where he breaks with Trump and where he works to endear himself to the president. Early Commerce hearings this year were designed to bolster Trump's arguments for taking control of Greenland and the Panama Canal. He also presided over the panel's advancement of legislation championed by first lady Melania Trump that would crack down on AI-generated revenge porn, which has since passed the Senate and could soon clear the House.
And many Republicans are happy with Cruz's leadership. Sen. Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), a new member of the panel, pointed to his 'snappy' sense of humor, while Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) called him 'a breath of fresh air.'
Some Democratic committee members are eager to find common ground with Cruz, too.
'Ted and I get along well,' said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). 'His move on the subpoenas was an unforced error. But other than that … there are always opportunities in Commerce to work in a bipartisan way.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel
Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel

WASHINGTON — Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy is pushing back against efforts to reinstate Biden-era policies directing the Defense Department to reimburse costs for service members who travel across state lines to obtain an abortion. During an appropriations hearing on Thursday, Maloy rejected an amendment seeking to implement a 2022 policy allowing for reimbursements for abortion-related travel and attach it to legislation funding the Defense Department for the 2026 fiscal year. Maloy argued the proposal runs afoul of the Hyde Amendment, a federal statute passed in 1976 prohibiting federal funds from going toward abortion costs, with few exceptions. 'The Hyde Amendment is a clear federal ban on abortion funding, except in the cases of rape, incest and life of the mother,' Maloy said in her remarks. 'It's been in place every appropriation cycle for 40 years. And I've been here, I've heard a lot of talk about partisanship and how this should not be a partisan bill, but this is a completely partisan amendment, whereas the Hyde Amendment has been a bipartisan consensus for four decades.' The amendment, proposed by a Democrat during the appropriations hearing, was ultimately rejected. The DOD issued a policy shortly after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 that would allow military members to receive travel reimbursements and approved leave for abortion-related reasons. That policy was largely approved to allow service members in states where abortion was banned locally to travel across state lines if needed. That provision was criticized by Republicans and was rescinded shortly after Donald Trump took office in January and signed an executive order enforcing the Hyde Amendment and restricting taxpayer dollars from being used for any abortion-related reasons. Maloy pushed against reinstating that policy, arguing it forces taxpayers to fund travel and lodging costs for a procedure they may disagree with. 'The federal government must exercise restraint and respect diverse moral values of American people,' Maloy said. 'This amendment is not in the spirit of that neutrality, not in the spirit of the Dobbs decision or the Hyde Amendment.' 'This would allow the DOD to make federal abortion policy that isn't in keeping with what Congress has done through the Hyde Amendment, and that's a path that I don't think we should start to go down,' she added. 'Federal abortion policy should be uniform like it has been for 40 years through bipartisan consensus in the Hyde Amendment. Abortions, including abortion travel or enhanced leave policies designed to facilitate abortions, have no place in this bill.' Republicans overwhelmingly rejected the amendment and the House Appropriations Committee advanced the larger bill, the Fiscal Year 2026 Defense Appropriations Act. The legislation seeks to provide more than $830 billion to the Defense Department and includes policies to increase pay for military personnel, modernize weapons systems, codify some DOGE suggestions to cut 'waste, fraud and abuse' within the department, and more.

Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song
Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Last year, a lot of indie-music fans—including myself—got someone else's packing list stuck in their head. I'd walk around muttering 'Milk thistle, calcium, high-rise, boot cut / Advil, black jeans, blue jeans'—lyrics hissed out by the art-punk legend Kim Gordon on a song called 'Bye Bye.' The track led off her album The Collective, one of the most acclaimed releases of 2024. Over hard hip-hop beats and snarling guitar distortion, Gordon stammered about daily banalities, reframing modern life as a psychological war zone. Now the 72-year-old co-founder of Sonic Youth has released a new version of the song, called 'Bye Bye 25.' The music is largely the same, but the lyrics are new, and they start like this: mental health electric vehicle Gulf of Mexico energy conversion gay bird flu These are among the terms that the Trump administration has tried to minimize from public life. PEN America has assembled a list of at least 350 phrases that federal authorities have, this year, scrubbed from government websites and materials (including school curricula), flagged as necessitating extra review in official documents and proposals, or discouraged the use of among staffers. The attention paid to these words reflects Trump's crusade against diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as his team's stances on policy issues such as energy and vaccines. Gordon picked some of these words to rework 'Bye Bye'—making her, somewhat curiously, one of the few established musicians to release music directly inspired by Trump's second term. For all the chaos and consternation caused by the president this year, the entertainment world's response has been relatively muted. Bruce Springsteen, that liberal stalwart, kicked off his tour with an anti-Trump sermon; stars such as Doechii and Lady Gaga have made awards-show speeches in support of immigrants, trans people, and protesters. But outright protest music responding to recent events has been rare. 'I think people are kind of mostly just still stunned and don't know what to do,' Gordon told me in a video chat earlier this week. The memory of what happened the last time around might be contributing to the hesitation. Trump's rise to power in 2016 spurred a quick response from popular culture, resulting in diss tracks (Nipsey Hussle and YG's 'FDT') and provocations from luminaries (remember Madonna wanting to explode the White House?). The indie-rock world united for a compilation called Our First 100 Days: one track released for each of Trump's first 100 days in office. But today, many of those efforts feel like either artifacts of a bygone movement—the pink-hatted #Resistance—or simply inconsequential. When I spoke with Gordon, she said, with a laugh, that she had no memory of contributing to the Our First 100 Days project. The new version of 'Bye Bye' caught my attention because it's deadpan funny, and because it avoids some of the pitfalls that await many anti-Trump protest efforts. The president and many of his supporters seem to use liberal outrage as fuel, which means strident criticism has a way of backfiring. Steve Bannon's stated strategy to 'flood the zone with shit'—to stoke multiple incendiary media narratives every day—can make knowing what to protest first difficult. The firing of human-rights workers? The extrajudicial deportations? The dehumanization of trans people? The bid to turn Gaza into a resort? How do you pick? Gordon's song cuts across topic areas by highlighting the dark absurdity of an ascendant political tactic: controlling policy by controlling language. It also doesn't sloganeer; instead, it presents a patently ridiculous jumble of terms for listeners to reflect on. (Theoretically, a MAGA loyalist might even enjoy the sound of diversity-related jargon becoming a heavy-metal hit list). 'I wanted to have some really mundane, weird words in there like allergy or measles or tile drainage,' she told me. 'It's unrealistic to think they could actually ban these words, because everyone uses them every day. But I think if they had their ultimate fantasy, maybe.' Gordon and her former band, Sonic Youth, emanate the kind of inscrutable hauteur that might seem at odds with outright protest. But this is not her first such effort in this vein. Sonic Youth arose out of the punk-rock underground of the 1980s that was boiling with outrage against Ronald Reagan. In 1992, their song 'Youth Against Fascism' featured Thurston Moore—the band's other singer, and Gordon's now-ex-husband—sneering, 'Yeah, the president sucks / He's a war pig fuck.' That same year, the Gordon-led 'Swimsuit Issue' skewered male chauvinism, a topic she returned to with the hilarious 'I'm a Man' on The Collective. Talking with her, I remembered that though Gordon is often associated with Gen X disaffection, she's really a Baby Boomer who came of age attending Vietnam War protests and listening to folk music. The video for 'Bye Bye 25' splices images from the recent anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles with shots of her holding cue cards in the style of Bob Dylan's 'Subterranean Homesick Blues' video. She told me her favorite protest song is Neil Young's 'Ohio,' which decried the state violence at Kent State University in 1970. Young, she suspected, didn't intend to write an out-and-out rallying cry. 'Those lyrics were describing a time,' she said. 'That's what I hope I'm doing with my music and my lyrics—really describing what's going on.' Article originally published at The Atlantic

Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'
Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'

Talk show host Tucker Carlson broke with President Donald Trump on Iran on Friday, writing in a scathing commentary in his daily newsletter that the United States should 'drop Israel' and 'let them fight their own wars.' 'If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases,' Carlson wrote of Israel's preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'But not with America's backing.' Trump, for his part, has endorsed Israel's attacks, which he called 'very successful,' and underscored in an interview with Fox News on Thursday night that the U.S. would defend Israel if Iran retaliates. He also warned that the situation 'will only get worse' if Iran does not agree to a nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left.' TRUMPS TAKE Trump to Fox News: U.S. will defend Israel if Iran retaliates Read more In recent days, Carlson has argued that fears of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon in the near future are unfounded and said that a war with the Islamic Republic would not only result in 'thousands' of American casualties in the Middle East but 'amount to a profound betrayal of' Trump's base and effectively 'end his presidency.' Carlson reiterated that claim in his newsletter, accusing Trump of 'being complicit in the act of war' through 'years of funding and sending weapons to Israel.' Direct U.S. involvement in a war with Iran, he said, 'would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first.' 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency,' he concluded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store