SA tourism industry pushes back on safety amidst crime narrative from Trump admin
President Cyril Ramaphosa meeting US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington D.C. for a working visit.The visit provided an opportunity for the two leaders to deliberate on bilateral, regional and global issues of mutual interest, including trade and investment.
Image: GCIS
The South African tourism industry has come into defense of the country's safety and hospitality levels amidst an ongoing narrative about crime in Africa's most-developed economy.
This comes as a group of 59 Afrikaners recently migrated to the United States after taking up the offer of a refugee status as the US government falsely believes there is an ongoing 'genocide' against them in South Africa.
Recent headlines sparked by a widely publicised exchange between US President Donald Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa have reignited international focus on crime in South Africa.
During the meeting, Trump repeatedly claimed that genocide against white farmers is taking place in South Africa, an allegation denied by Ramaphosa.
'We have many people that feel they're being persecuted, and they're coming to the United States,' said Trump. 'People are fleeing South Africa for their own safety. Their land is being confiscated, and in many cases, they're being killed.'
The latest crime statistics in South Africa show that nearly 10 000 people were murdered between October and December 2024. Of these, a dozen were killed in farm attacks and of the 12, one was a farmer, while five were farm dwellers and four were employees, who are likely to have been black.
The Southern Africa Tourism Services Association (Satsa) on Thursday said much of the coverage of these issues has leaned toward sensationalism, lacking the nuance needed to understand the real experience of travellers to the country.
Satsa CEO David Frost said while crime was a concern and continued to be addressed by government and civil society, incidents involving international visitors remained extremely rare.
'South Africa isn't perfect. Like every country, we face challenges. But what we don't have is a crisis that justifies global panic or distorted narratives,' Frost said.
'What we do have is millions of tourists arriving safely every year, and leaving with stories that have nothing to do with fear and everything to do with awe.
'We don't pretend crime doesn't exist. But context matters. The suggestion that tourists are at significant risk is dangerous misinformation that serves political agendas rather than public interest.'
South Africa has been in the crosshairs with the Trump administration since it passed the Land Expropriation Act, while issues of undermining the US foreign policy have been resurfaced by the country taking Israel to the International Court of Justice over the genocide in Palestine.
Ramaphosa did acknowledge that there was "criminality in our country... people who do get killed through criminal activity are not only white people, the majority of them are black people".
He said that he hoped Trump would listen to the voices of South Africans on this issue of the perceived genocide against white Afrikaners. Ramaphosa pointed out the white members of his delegation, including retired golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, and South Africa's richest man, Johann Rupert.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
31 minutes ago
- IOL News
South Africa's groundbreaking repatriation initiatives for Khoi and San remains
Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture, Gayton Mckenzie held a press briefing to provide an update on two important national initiatives dedicated to remembrance, restorative justice, and the dignified return of South African ancestors and liberation heroes. Image: GCIS The Ministry of Sport, Arts and Culture has taken significant steps towards healing historical injustices by announcing two transformative projects: the reburial of Khoi and San ancestral human remains, and the second phase of the Exile Repatriation Project. These initiatives not only aim to restore dignity to ancestors but also honour the memory of those who sacrificed everything for the nation's freedom. Minister Gayton McKenzie emphasised the need to correct historical wrongs, saying: 'These are acts of justice, remembrance, and healing.' The minister acknowledged the individuals whose lives were marked by dispossession and erasure. 'Today we gather not only to give an update but to honour the memory of those whose dignity was stolen through centuries of injustice.' The first initiative focuses on the reburial of 58 ancestral remains originating from the Northern Cape. These remains, belonging to South Africa's First Peoples - the Khoi, San, and other indigenous groups - were treated as mere objects, displayed in museums or studied in laboratories, often without consent. The reburial process is led collaboratively by significant partners including Iziko Museums of South Africa and the South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), under the guidance of the Northern Cape Reburial Task Team. This team represents the Nama, Griqua, Korana, and San communities, ensuring that the process is respectful and reflective of cultural practices. The minister highlighted the profound significance of this act. 'It is not just about returning remains to the soil. It is about restoring dignity and fulfilling cultural and spiritual obligations,' he said. In a move to expand these efforts, discussions have begun with the Hunterian Museum at the University of Glasgow, seeking to return more Khoi and San remains to South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The second initiative, the Exile Repatriation Project, aims to bring home the thousands of South Africans who were forced into exile during the liberation struggle, many of whom were never able to return and were buried in unmarked graves. The foundation for this initiative was laid with a request from Military Veterans in 2019, later recognised through Cabinet's approval of a National Policy aimed at the Repatriation and Restitution of Human Remains and Heritage Objects in 2021. This policy establishes a clear framework to bring home and honour those who died in exile, reflecting on their immense sacrifices. Looking ahead, a technical mission is set to commence soon, with a delegation travelling to Angola, Lesotho, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. This mission will involve inspecting cemetery records, mapping graves, and conducting historical and archival research to facilitate the repatriation process. The ministry has called on the public to assist in this effort. Families of former exiles are encouraged to share any relevant information, including names, photos, and dates that may aid in locating those lost to history. Emphasising the importance of national healing and the restoration of dignity for both the deceased and the living, the minister urged all South Africans to participate in this path of remembrance and nation-building. Cape Times
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
PPC: Why is it so expensive to produce cement in SA?
Calls on government to find out – and says it must also address public safety and unfair competition concerns. JSE-listed cement and building materials producer PPC believes the government should pay attention to why it's so costly to produce cement in South Africa – despite its confidence that the new R3 billion cement plant it's building in the Western Cape will enable the company to increase its competitive edge against cement imports. PPC CEO Matias Cardarelli on Monday (9 June) said the government also needs to address the outsourcing of cement blending to independent blenders from a public safety and fair market competition perspective. Cardarelli mentioned that it's very costly to produce cement in SA compared to other countries, which is the reason cement has consistently been imported into the country for many years. ALSO READ: Treasury bans use of imported cement on all government-funded projects Levelling the playing field Referring to the government, he said it should play a role in creating a level playing field for local cement producers against importers, adding that more than one million tonnes of cement has been imported into the country in recent years, however, he emphasised that imported cement is not PPC's priority. 'We are becoming more modern and efficient and we are sure that we are going to compete going forward.' According to Cardarelli, the South African cement sector hasn't benefitted from the designation of cement for infrastructure projects, as it has not seen 'the infrastructure plan by the government unfold'. He approves of the planned R1 trillion infrastructure investments by the government and is confident the government of national unity will get the ball rolling, but 'so far they have not executed that plan'. ALSO READ: PPC to sell lime business for R515 million Competition He said international players are entering the South African market and two Chinese international companies have bought assets into the country, with rumours that a third player may be joining them soon. Apparently, this company will bring in new technology and change the market landscape. This is a reference to Mamba Cement, which is jointly owned by the Jidong Development Group and the China-Africa Development Fund – as well as the acquisition of Natal Portland Cement (NPC) by China-based Huaxin Cement. Cardarelli said PPC's plans include replacing its two old plants in the Western Cape with a new plant in two years' time, which means the company will own the two newest and most modern plants in SA – while its third plant is also 'pretty modern'. He added that its two old plants are unable to run efficiently from a cost margin and environmental perspective, and that the imminent project is focused on lessening PPC's environmental impact while increasing its financial outcomes. However, Cardarelli said the decision to build the plant was also influenced by the fact that someone else would eventually have taken the initiative, which would affect PPC's position in the market. He added that it's a perfectly valid process worldwide to blend cement with extenders – and that PPC and NPC have their own blending plants. ALSO READ: PPC highlights impact of cement imports on itself and the economy A public safety risk However, he said PPC studies have routinely shown that in some cases that blended cement produced by independent blenders, which is then distributed into the market, has low standard strength. Cardarelli stated that this is a public safety risk. 'If you are not producing cement at the standard required by South African legislation and worldwide designation, there is a real risk that cement will not have the strength for the uses they are giving to that cement. 'I'm not saying that all blended cement shows that low strength standard, but some have consistently shown that,' he said. 'When you sell cement under the strength needed, the cost of that cement is going to be cheaper, and that is why the sector is facing unfair competition from independent blenders.' ALSO READ: Cement industry facing improved operating environment PPC on upward trajectory Despite a 1.9% decrease in revenue to R9.87 billion in the year to end-March, PPC on Monday reported a 28% increase in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) to R1.59 billion. PPC's Ebitda margin improved in the year to 16.1% from 12.3%. Headline earnings per share grew by 110.5% to 40 cents from 19 cents. An ordinary dividend per share of 17.6 cents was declared, which is more than 28% higher than the 13.7 cent dividend declared in the previous year. Awakening the giant Cardarelli said implementing phase one of PPC's 'Awaken the Giant' strategic turnaround plan has resulted in a step change in the group's margins, profitability, and cash generation, which are the highest since its 2018 financial year. 'This early success is largely as a consequence of a fundamental change in our strategic direction, the organisational culture, and an absolute focus on our core competencies,' he said. Cardarelli is increasingly confident about the outlook for PPC. He said optimising PPC's competitive position in the current markets will better prepare the company for market changes and that it remains cautiously optimistic about the construction market uplift in South Africa, but does not know the base or scale. 'So our plans are based on a scenario of low to no growth in demand while we keep fully ready to capture any growth opportunity when finally this long negative construction cycle comes to an end – and it will come to an end. 'At the same time, we will continue to implement price adjustments. Market share for us does not come at all costs and, through [a] competitiveness strategy, we naturally create the conditions for market share recovery.' This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Mail & Guardian
an hour ago
- Mail & Guardian
Dybul's dangerous fantasy: South Africa is not ready to transition off Pepfar support
Elon Musk reportedly pushed to secure a licence to operate Starlink in South Africa. Photo: Starlink The Oval Office encounter between South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump was no ordinary diplomatic engagement. It was a geopolitical theatre — a collision of clashing narratives, one anchored in misinformation, the other focused on sustaining economic opportunities. Yet beneath the theatrics lay deep tectonic shifts in the global order. If we reframe from spectacle to substance, this moment is not an anomaly, but a strong signal of change. Like a clarion call for transforming not just a bilateral relationship, but the paradigms that govern diplomacy in a fractured world. The spectacle and the system Trump's invocation of the 'white genocide' and 'land expropriation' myths, conspiracy theories rooted in post-apartheid disinformation, transformed the Oval Office into a theatre of post-truth politics. In stark contrast, Ramaphosa anchored his response in evidence and historical nuance. Yet, he was flanked by elites representing a narrow, privileged slice of South African society, many of whom continue to benefit from both apartheid-era structures and the post-1994 democratic order. Ironically, their presence inadvertently bolstered Trump's narrative, leaving Ramaphosa politically and rhetorically isolated. The dissonance in perspectives, most of which were tangential to the pressing structural issues, laid bare a deeper epistemic fault line in international diplomacy. A few days later, this collision of spectacle and geopolitics became more visible, more public and more fraught, as Elon Musk, a South African-born billionaire, reportedly exerted influence over South Africa's domestic ownership laws. His push to secure a license to operate These events expose a critical question — will global relations continue to be shaped by the ideological distortions of dominant powers or can emerging middle powers like South Africa assert a sovereign, historically grounded and futures-oriented voice in shaping global narratives? But to fixate solely on the leaders' exchange is to miss the forest for the trees. This encounter should be situated within four converging systemic dynamics: 1. Weaponised misinformation: The Oval Office moment reflected a global trend in which misinformation becomes diplomatic currency, supplanting evidence-based policymaking with political spectacle. 2. Colonial afterlives : Trump's selective empathy for lower-middle-class white South Africans, while erasing the structural violence of apartheid and ongoing economic inequality, mirrored America's own unfinished racial reckoning. Both nations remain haunted by colonial legacies that continue to shape contemporary power dynamics. 3. Land reform in South Africa: It is central to addressing the enduring legacies of apartheid and colonial dispossession. The government's approach, as embedded in The manipulation of public discourse through misinformation further constrains the potential of land reform to serve as a vehicle for equitable economic empowerment. 4. Geopolitical realignment: As the US recedes into transactional nationalism, South Africa is recalibrating its alliances, deepening its ties with Brics and the Global South. The Oval Office tension is not merely interpersonal; it is symptomatic of a world undergoing seismic geopolitical reordering. Creating pathways out of tension Futures thinking compels us to move beyond linear forecasting toward systemic foresight. How might South Africa and the US transform this tension into opportunity? Rather than reverting to business-as-usual diplomacy, this is a chance to craft pathways — not just to each other, but to the systemic crises unfolding across climate change, technology access, energy transitions and legitimacy: 1. Institutionalise reparative diplomacy: South Africa should move beyond extractive and exploitative trade arrangements, such as exporting unprocessed critical minerals to the US, which disproportionately fuels US industrialisation, towards reparative partnerships grounded in mutual benefit, innovation and structural equity. This shift calls for a Such initiatives should facilitate technology transfer, build local capacity and advance shared economic objectives. A reparative framework would also support greater symmetry in global power relations. South Africa's exports of critical minerals enable the US to secure its supply chains for strategic sectors, including artificial intelligence and military technologies. These partnerships must, however, also foreground South Africa's economic development priorities. At their core, they should promote domestic mineral beneficiation and intra-African value-chain development, imperatives to reducing dependency and advancing economic sovereignty. 2. Defend transparent land reform: The South African government's land reform programme should continue evolving with clear legal frameworks, such as the Expropriation Act, ensuring fairness and promoting inclusive economic development. Redistributing land is only the first step; beneficiaries need title deeds, financial, technical and infrastructural support to make land productive and sustainable while reassuring investors that land reform will not undermine agricultural productivity or economic stability. Crucially, unutilised state and rural land under the jurisdiction of traditional authorities should be integrated into a broader national strategy. Land reform and economic development are not mutually exclusive but mutually reinforcing. 3. Embrace post-Western multilateralism: The US should engage South Africa not as a subordinate but as a co-architect of new governance frameworks, particularly in frontier arenas such as AI ethics, climate and trade diplomacy and global financial architecture reform. Equally, South Africa should guard against surrendering its agency to a declining hegemon operating through outdated diplomatic paradigms. A truly post-Western multilateralism requires that all governments adapt and engage as equals in shaping more just and future-fit international systems. A call for courage and imagination The Oval Office confrontation was not merely a diplomatic rupture; it was a symptom of decaying systems and a crucible of possibility. Futures thinking reminds us that crises are not endpoints, but inflexion points. Here, futures studies are defined as a systematic, transdisciplinary approach to exploring, anticipating and shaping more favourable outcomes by embracing complexity and a plurality of possible trajectories. The Retrofitting established policy frameworks to accommodate Musk sets the stage for a global order where misinformation thrives, alliances fracture and diplomacy is reduced to viral spectacle. But this future is not inevitable. It is a choice. The central question shaping South Africa-US relations is no longer merely whether the two nations can afford to collaborate. Rather, it is how South Africa can most effectively navigate a shifting geopolitical landscape, one increasingly defined not by binary choices, but by the rise of multipolarity, multi-alignment and strategic autonomy. As US diplomacy contends with internal challenges and fluctuating global influence, countries like South Africa and others are exploring other partnerships, such as Brics, opening a spectrum of diplomatic possibilities. These range from deepening ties with the US to expanding South–South cooperation through Brics, to crafting a nuanced foreign policy that engages multiple partners without becoming beholden to any single bloc. A sovereign-respecting relationship between South Africa and the US would depart from the legacy of asymmetrical engagement. Instead, it would reflect the emergence of a multipolar global order in which both countries act as autonomous agents defined not by subordination or rivalry, but by mutual respect, flexible cooperation and a recognition of shared and divergent interests alike. To thrive in an increasingly multipolar global economy, South Africa cannot afford isolation. It needs a diverse portfolio of allies and partnerships. The challenge now is whether Ramaphosa will pivot to the gravitational pull of Trump-era theatrics and Musk's techno-capitalist demands or whether he can seize this moment to reset the terms of engagement with the US on the foundations of sovereignty, foresight and shared prosperity. Letitia Jentel is the senior programme manager and researcher with the Futures programme at the , an independent public policy think tank.
