SA tourism industry pushes back on safety amidst crime narrative from Trump admin
President Cyril Ramaphosa meeting US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington D.C. for a working visit.The visit provided an opportunity for the two leaders to deliberate on bilateral, regional and global issues of mutual interest, including trade and investment.
Image: GCIS
The South African tourism industry has come into defense of the country's safety and hospitality levels amidst an ongoing narrative about crime in Africa's most-developed economy.
This comes as a group of 59 Afrikaners recently migrated to the United States after taking up the offer of a refugee status as the US government falsely believes there is an ongoing 'genocide' against them in South Africa.
Recent headlines sparked by a widely publicised exchange between US President Donald Trump and President Cyril Ramaphosa have reignited international focus on crime in South Africa.
During the meeting, Trump repeatedly claimed that genocide against white farmers is taking place in South Africa, an allegation denied by Ramaphosa.
'We have many people that feel they're being persecuted, and they're coming to the United States,' said Trump. 'People are fleeing South Africa for their own safety. Their land is being confiscated, and in many cases, they're being killed.'
The latest crime statistics in South Africa show that nearly 10 000 people were murdered between October and December 2024. Of these, a dozen were killed in farm attacks and of the 12, one was a farmer, while five were farm dwellers and four were employees, who are likely to have been black.
The Southern Africa Tourism Services Association (Satsa) on Thursday said much of the coverage of these issues has leaned toward sensationalism, lacking the nuance needed to understand the real experience of travellers to the country.
Satsa CEO David Frost said while crime was a concern and continued to be addressed by government and civil society, incidents involving international visitors remained extremely rare.
'South Africa isn't perfect. Like every country, we face challenges. But what we don't have is a crisis that justifies global panic or distorted narratives,' Frost said.
'What we do have is millions of tourists arriving safely every year, and leaving with stories that have nothing to do with fear and everything to do with awe.
'We don't pretend crime doesn't exist. But context matters. The suggestion that tourists are at significant risk is dangerous misinformation that serves political agendas rather than public interest.'
South Africa has been in the crosshairs with the Trump administration since it passed the Land Expropriation Act, while issues of undermining the US foreign policy have been resurfaced by the country taking Israel to the International Court of Justice over the genocide in Palestine.
Ramaphosa did acknowledge that there was "criminality in our country... people who do get killed through criminal activity are not only white people, the majority of them are black people".
He said that he hoped Trump would listen to the voices of South Africans on this issue of the perceived genocide against white Afrikaners. Ramaphosa pointed out the white members of his delegation, including retired golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, and South Africa's richest man, Johann Rupert.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
‘Transformation is not a favour, it's a necessity,' Says Ramaphosa as Starlink fight heats up
President Cyril Ramaphosa, reiterating government's stance on economic transformation policies despite huge backlash from opposition parties. Image: ANC/X President Cyril Ramaphosa has once again defended South Africa's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Act and the Employment Equity Act, saying the country must reject the 'false notion' that it must choose between economic growth and transformation. Ramaphosa's remarks, made in his weekly newsletter on Monday, after weeks of controversy over a policy proposal by Communications and Digital Technology Minister Solly Malatsi to ease B-BBEE requirements for satellite communication services such as Elon Musk's Starlink. The proposal sparked backlash from opposition parties, including the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, which argued that it would allow foreign companies to bypass empowerment laws. EFF described the proposal as a 'backdoor for foreign multinationals' to exploit Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs) to sidestep B-BBEE compliance. The MK Party called it a 'treacherous blueprint' to dismantle state capacity and strike deals with foreign tech oligarchs. Despite this, Ramaphosa stood by the policy, arguing that B-BBEE is not just a policy preference but a constitutional imperative. He invoked the 70th anniversary of the Freedom Charter, which proclaimed that 'the people shall share in the country's wealth.' 'Our Constitution reflects the promise we made to one another and to future generations to redress the injustices of our past and realise the full potential of our country,' Ramaphosa wrote. 'For this reason, we reaffirm that broad-based black economic empowerment is not just a policy choice but a constitutional imperative.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Ramaphosa said the world is currently in a 'polycrisis,' characterised by global conflict, economic stagnation, mistrust in institutions and environmental degradation, challenges that South Africa is not immune to. He argued that this is not the time to backtrack on empowerment but to double down. 'We must make our empowerment policies more meaningful,' Ramaphosa said. 'Economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion, and transformation without growth is unsustainable.' He emphasised that South Africa has made measurable progress since 1994 through a 'robust legislative framework' anchored by the B-BBEE Act and the Employment Equity Act. 'We have seen real changes in ownership patterns, including more businesses owned by women. We have seen changes in management control, enterprise development and skills development,' he wrote. According to Statistics South Africa, between 2006 and 2023, real household income increased by 46% for black Africans, 29% for coloured households, and 19% for Indian households. However, Ramaphosa acknowledged that, on average, white households still earn nearly five times more than black African households. 'This is the gulf we must close through deliberate and sustained efforts to expand opportunity,' he said. 'Transformation is not a favor, it is a necessity.' Ramaphosa criticised those who continue to benefit from historical privilege while challenging B-BBEE in the courts, calling for national unity on the issue. 'We must dispense with the false notion that we must choose between growth and transformation,' he said. 'B-BBEE is not a cost to the economy; it is an investment in it.' He said this commitment underpins government programs like the Black Industrialists Programme and the newly established Transformation Fund, aimed at supporting innovative black-owned enterprises. 'There is a critical need for black-owned businesses to access funding on affordable terms,' he said. He called on private banks to review their lending practices. 'They have the resources to make the greatest impact.' Ramaphosa said the Public Procurement Act must be used to expand opportunities for businesses owned by women, youth and persons with disabilities. 'Transformation must reach into every sector, whether it is mining, construction, energy, IT or agriculture,' he said. 'The private sector should use their supply chains far more deliberately to empower more black-owned businesses, not just to improve their B-BBEE scorecard, but to grow and diversify their supplier base.' As the country develops infrastructure, green industries and localized manufacturing, transformation must remain central, he added. 'The transformation we seek is not about ticking boxes. It is about building a resilient, just economy for generations to come,' he wrote in the newsletter. 'I call on all South Africans, and in particular the private sector, to recommit to economic transformation.' Meanwhile, Starlink, owned by Musk's SpaceX, does not currently hold an operating license in South Africa. Its efforts to obtain one reportedly failed after Musk rejected the requirement that foreign telecommunications companies sell a 30% stake to historically disadvantaged South Africans in order to operate. In February, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at isolating South Africa, citing allegations of anti-white policies and accusing the government of harboring hostility toward the US and its allies, including Israel. This action was widely viewed as part of Musk's pushback against South Africa's empowerment regulations. In response, Ramaphosa led a delegation to Washington on May 21 in an attempt to salvage key trade agreements and attract new investment amid the diplomatic tension. IOL Politics
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Newspaper headlines from around the world - Monday, 9 June 2025
A bundle of newspapers on the table. Image: The South African/CANVA Here are the stories that made headlines on the front pages of newspapers worldwide on Monday, 9 June 2025. The New York Times front page reported that Russia's spies have a name for China: 'the enemy'. The Wall Street Journal front page reported that police and LA protesters clashed after Trump mobilised the National Guard. The Hindustan Times' front page reported that Manipur was rocked by more violence and that a curfew had been imposed. China Daily's front page reported that trade in services among nations is accelerating. Daily Mail's front page reported on a visa scam that makes a mockery of the Prime Minister's pledge on migration. The Guardian front page reported that Trump had deployed the National Guard on the streets of Los Angeles in a dramatic escalation. If you wish to stay up-to-date – for FREE – on the latest international and South African news, then bookmark The South African website for all that plus the latest in the world of finance, sport, lifestyle – and more. Did we mention it was 100% free to read …?
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
NPA's Leadership Crisis: Eroding Legal Integrity in Favour of Political Expediency
Calls intensify for National Director of Public Prosecutions Shamila Batohi's removal as the NPA faces accusations of incompetence and strategic missteps in the wake of a deepening crisis in the criminal justice system. Image: Henk Kruger/ Independent Newspapers Clyde N.S. Ramalaine On 3 June 2025, the Free State High Court in Bloemfontein ruled that the extradition of Moroadi Cholota from the United States to South Africa was unlawful. This landmark judgment has not only released the state's key figure in the high-profile R255 million asbestos corruption case but also cleared the way for the prosecution of others involved. Still, it has also exposed deep procedural and constitutional failings within South Africa's prosecutorial regime. Her unlawful extradition from the United States and subsequent release by the Free State High Court reveal more than just procedural oversight, they expose systemic dysfunction, a repurposing of primary objectives of the NPA as articulated in its strategic ethos within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and unravels the credibility of South Africa's anti-corruption drive. The Ruling A Blow to Prosecutorial Credibility Presiding over the matter, Judge Phillip Loubser was unequivocal: "The prosecution has not found reasonable doubt, or at all, that there was a valid or lawful request from South Africa for the extradition of Ms Cholota from the United States. It follows that if there was no valid extradition request, then the extradition itself was without any basis and, therefore, unlawful." The National Prosecuting Authority's (NPA) failure to adhere to the legally mandated process in the extradition request of Moroadi Cholota reveals not merely a procedural blunder, but an institutional failing. By initiating the extradition request instead of the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, as explicitly required by law, the NPA not only invalidated its case but compromised the integrity of South Africa's justice system on the international stage. The NPA will contend that this is not the first time it has led to extradition cases and that this is the first instance in which a case has been registered in this regard. It will furthermore argue that it is appealing the Schultz case, which constitutes a legal precedent. Notwithstanding this counter, the NPA cannot deny that this deviation from legal protocol suggests either gross incompetence or a willful disregard for constitutional processes, raising serious ethical questions about accountability within the NPA. Moreover, by allegedly providing misleading or incomplete information to U.S. authorities, the South African state stands accused of deception — a charge that, if substantiated, undermines its moral authority and diplomatic credibility, and reveals a prosecutorial body more concerned with performance politics than with the pursuit of justice. The unlawful handling of Cholota's extradition reflects a disturbing pattern in which the state weaponises legal instruments while bypassing constitutional safeguards. This erosion of legal integrity in favour of political expediency suggests the NPA, whether by design or acquiescence, has become a tool in internal power struggles rather than a guardian of justice. In failing to uphold the rule of law and misleading an international partner in the process, the NPA exposes a justice system teetering between institutional collapse and captured governance. The court's ruling on the lack of jurisdiction underscores a foundational pillar of constitutional and international law, that the legitimacy of a trial is inseparable from the legality of the accused's presence before the court. In Moroadi Cholota's case, the unlawful initiation of the extradition process rendered her transfer to South Africa constitutionally defective, thereby stripping the court of jurisdiction to try her. Any attempt to prosecute her under such conditions would not only violate Section 35 of the Constitution, which guarantees fair trial rights and due process but also contravene international legal norms governing extradition and state sovereignty. This ruling affirms that procedural integrity is not merely a technicality, but a substantive requirement of justice; the state cannot bypass lawful channels to secure an accused and still claim the authority to prosecute. To do so would be to legitimise executive overreach, dismantle legal safeguards, and invite the erosion of the rule of law under the guise of criminal justice. Moroadi Cholota giving evidence at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture. Last week the Bloemfontein High Court ruled that her extradition from the United States was unlawful. Image: Independent Newspapers archive Systemic Indictment of the NPA The judgment handed down by the Free State High Court should not be read in isolation; it must be understood as a judicial demand for accountability, procedural discipline, and institutional humility. The NPA's failed prosecution of Ms Moroadi Cholota is, regrettably, not an isolated mishap. In a 2023 article co-authored with Paul M. Ngobeni (available at: " we called for the NPA leadership to be held accountable as we critically examined eight high-profile cases pursued by the NPA under the rubric of its 'state capture' prosecutions. Our analysis revealed a pattern of endemic institutional failures, particularly under the leadership of the current National Director of Public Prosecutions, Advocate Shamila Batohi. Among the most pressing concerns were the following: Politicisation of Prosecutions The NPA's alignment with factional battles in the ANC undermines its credibility. Its selective use of the Zondo Commission's findings, non-binding and inadmissible in court, has raised alarms about the weaponisation of commissions of inquiry to serve political ends. Strategic Misuse of Evidence The collapse of cases like the Estina Dairy Farm prosecution revealed the dangers of substituting public rhetoric for admissible evidence. The NPA has repeatedly stumbled in converting politically sensational findings into courtroom success. Selective Disclosure and Narrative Framing The NPA has routinely withheld countervailing evidence, especially in asset forfeiture cases such as Optimum Coal, to curate a prosecutorial narrative while undermining procedural fairness. Civil society organisations such as Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch have raised repeated concerns about this trend. Institutional Inefficiencies Structural deficiencies, ranging from poor leadership and resource mismanagement to political interference, continue to plague the NPA's capacity to lead credible prosecutions. These points not only relate to individual accountability but also to the need for institutional redesign. The location of the NPA under executive control remains a structural vulnerability. Lack of Accountability and Transparency The NPA has consistently deflected public criticism, painting itself as the victim of attacks rather than accepting legitimate concerns about its performance. This erodes public confidence and corrodes prosecutorial independence. Calls for an independent oversight body to scrutinise prosecutorial decisions have gained renewed urgency. NPA's Compulsive Overreliance on Appeals – Default Mechanism As expected, the NPA informed South Africa that it intends to appeal the court's findings. While the doctrine of appeal is a constitutional provision, it is important to appreciate the context and primary intentions of the state in pursuing such an appeal. A fundamental yet under-examined pathology within the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is its compulsive reliance on appeals, not as a last resort for justice, but as a default mechanism to shield prosecutorial ineptitude. At the heart of this phenomenon lies a psychology unmoored from accountability: senior prosecutors and executive leadership pursue prolonged legal contests not at their own personal or professional expense, but through the seemingly bottomless reservoir of the public fiscus. This distance between institutional action and individual consequence fosters a culture of indifference towards both fiscal prudence and judicial efficacy. The decision to appeal, often against the weight of legal reasoning and precedent, is thus less a matter of legal necessity than a strategic deflection—an effort to postpone institutional reckoning, preserve internal reputations, and obscure prosecutorial failures. There appears to be little regard for the economic burden imposed on the state, the rights of the accused whose lives are held in indefinite legal limbo, or the broader erosion of public trust in the justice system. In the Cholota case, this is strikingly evident: despite the court's scathing findings, the NPA has signalled its intention to appeal, oblivious to the potential litigation costs should the state be sued for unlawful detention or rights infringements. This illustrates a prosecutorial psychology that prioritises institutional face-saving over constitutional integrity, emboldened by the knowledge that the price of legal misadventure will not be borne by those who authorise it. In the final analysis, the National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Advocate Shamila Batohi, can no longer be exempt from the dismal performance of the NPA. She, together with her senior executive team, must be held accountable for the institution's persistent failures, including the frivolous pursuit of appeals and plausible wasteful expenditure incurred in cases that consistently collapse in court.
