
US rooftop solar companies say Republican House bill would be a major setback
May 15 (Reuters) - Companies that put solar panels on U.S. homes say a Republican budget bill advanced in Congress this week would deal a massive blow to the industry by eliminating a generous subsidy for homeowners that had buttressed the industry's growth.
The bill would scrap a 30% federal credit for taxpayers who put up rooftop systems, stifling an industry that has grown ten-fold over the last decade and which now employs more than 100,000 workers, industry players said.
"It certainly is a giant setback," said Charlie Hadlow, president of EnergySage, an online solar marketplace. "I have solar installers in our large network passing around the contact information for bankruptcy attorneys. That's not alarmist, that's happening."
Many of the biggest residential solar markets are in states that voted for President Donald Trump, including Texas, Florida and Arizona, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association trade group.
The House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee voted this week to allow the 25D tax credit to expire at the end of this year, nine years earlier than planned, as part of a Republican effort to roll back subsidies from former President Joe Biden's signature climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act.
A spokesperson for Republicans on the committee did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The bill still has several hurdles to clear before getting a broad package of tax cuts, spending hikes and safety-net reductions through Congress.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump wants to undo federal regulations and programs introduced by Biden that are aimed at expanding clean energy and combating climate change.
More than half of residential installations qualify for the 25D tax credit, according to EnergySage, which estimates that rooftop systems will be about $8,000 or $9,000 more expensive without it.
The subsidy has been critical for small installers whose customers pay cash or take out loans and then claim the credit on their tax returns.
For panels that are owned by a third party, such as a bank, and leased to homeowners, system owners are able to claim a separate tax credit that the House bill would leave in place until 2032 but start to phase out in 2029.
That market is dominated by large players like Sunrun.
"You want to just place a larger burden on the regular Joe who pays taxes? It doesn't seem fair," said Jack Ramsey, CEO of Altsys Solar in Tulare, California.
Ramsey anticipates cutting his nine-person staff to four or five people if the credit is eliminated.
At the end of 2024, the U.S. boasted 36 gigawatts of residential solar capacity, up from 3 GW in 2014 and a level equivalent to a third of the nation's nuclear power capacity.
Rooftop solar accounts for more than a third of solar industry jobs, according to the Interstate Renewable Energy Council.
Rob Kaercher, CEO of Absolute Solar in Lansing, Michigan, has 24 employees and wants to hire more, but will not if the credit goes away.
"I strongly urge the credits to be maintained, because it would do a tremendous amount for local businesses just like ours to be able to continue to hire and grow," Kaercher told reporters.
The move to eliminate the credit caught many in the industry off guard.
Thomas Clark, the owner of Northstone Solar in Whitefish, Montana, met with staff from his state's Congressional delegation in Washington earlier this year and came away from the meeting feeling the credit was safe.
"Obviously this happening so quickly after those meetings really hurts as a constituent," Clark said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Amy Coney Barrett faces backlash from MAGA after Trump appointment
A new analysis appears to confirm conservative fears that Donald Trump-appointed Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has often swung to the left in her rulings. Many allies of the president have even referred to the justice - who has seven children, including two adopted from Haiti - as a 'DEI hire' and there are reports Trump himself has complained about Barrett's rulings. The associate justice was chosen by Trump and rushed through confirmation by Senate Republicans in 2020 ahead of the November presidential election. But since her appointment to replace liberal hero Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Barrett has joined her liberal colleagues on several occasions for rulings that have hampered Trump and his second term agenda. GOP outcry toward Barrett includes her judging against the blocking of foreign aid and against delaying Trump's sentenced on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records just days before his inauguration. That has led the liberal New York Times to call Barrett: 'One of the few people in the country to check the actions of the president.' A new study of Barrett's first half-decade on the court prepared for the paper finds those worries may not be out of tune with her record from the bench. Several law professors determined that Barrett doesn't come close to conservative icon Antonin Scalia and 'is showing signs of leftward drift' as she plays 'an increasingly central role on the court. They cite her agreeing with liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, specifically, 82 percent of the time during her second term, up from 39 percent in her first. Her central role includes writing her rulings separately from the other justices more frequently. Not only has she aligned 'more frequently with liberal majorities,' she is the Republican 'least likely to support Trump' in cases that involve the president himself. She has voted with liberal majorities 91 percent of the time while voting with conservative majorities just 84 percent of the time, though given the 6-3 conservative bend of the court, there are more conservative than liberal victories. Mike Davis, a Trump ally and conservative legal activist, is greatly disappointed in Barrett. 'We had too much hope for her. She doesn't have enough courage,' said Davis, who was criticized by phone earlier this year by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch for Davis' comments about Barrett on Steve Bannon's podcast. Davis called Barrett 'scared of her own shadow.' 'She is a rattled law professor with her head up her [expletive],' Davis, a former clerk to Gorsuch, told Bannon. He also blasted her as 'weak and timid' to NBC News. Right-wing influencer Eric Daugherty attacked the justice in a series of tweets as an 'anti-Trump judge' and a 'big problem.' 'Barrett deceived people into thinking she was a reliable constitutionalist. The power has gone to her head. It happens with frightening regularity the last half century,' posted conservative radio host Mark Levin. Megyn Kelly went off on her on her podcast as 'a little squishy.' 'As a female who leans right, I'm kind of sick of like, the female conservatives who get appointed to the Supreme Court, Sandra Day O'Connor, now Amy Coney Barrett, like being too squishy,' she ranted. 'Get somebody with some rhetorical balls who will hold as fiercely to conservative principles in the judiciary as the left wing does,' she added. However, Noah Feldman, a friend of Barrett's and a Harvard law professor, claim the hype of Barrett's left leanings are overstated by both sides. 'It's a mistake by ignorant conservatives and wishful liberals to believe she's moderating,' Feldman said. 'She's exactly the person I met 25 years ago: principled, absolutely conservative, not interested in shifting.' In January, Barrett was among the same five-justice majority that ruled against Trump's request to halt him being sentenced on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records just days before his inauguration. But Barrett has also been a swing vote siding with conservatives as well. She was in the majority which overturned Roe v Wade in 2023. She was also in the 6-3 conservative majority last June that ruled presidents have some immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office. Trump nominated Barrett to replace late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court after she passed away in September 2020. In announcing her nomination, Trump said Barrett was going to be 'fantastic.' 'No matter the issue, no matter the case before her, I am supremely confident that Judge Barrett will issue rulings based solely upon a fair reading of the law,' the president said at the time. Despite refusing to confirm an Obama Supreme Court nominee ahead of the 2016 election, Senate Republicans in the majority ramped through Barrett's confirmation. The move solidified a conservative supermajority on the country's highest court just weeks before Joe Biden won the election and Democrats flipped the Senate.


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Donald Trump not seeking ceasefire but wants ‘a real end' to Iran's nuclear programme
Donald Trump has said he is not seeking a ceasefire in Israel's war on Iran but instead wants to see 'a real end' to Iran's nuclear programme, with Tehran abandoning it 'entirely'. The US president predicted Israel would not let up in its bombing campaign and suggested a decisive moment in that campaign was imminent, though he made clear he expected Israel to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities without US help. 'You're going to find out over the next two days … Nobody's slowed up so far,' he told CBS News, after abruptly abandonning a G7 summit in the Canadian Rockies, saying he was returning to the White House to deal with the conflict. Speaking to reporters on the way back to Washington, Trump said he was seeking 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire'. That would involve a 'complete give-up' by Iran, he said. Trump's negotiating position before the Israeli attack was that Iran should stop uranium enrichment entirely, and he blamed Tehran for not accepting that proposal. Trump also stressed that any Iranian attack on Americans or US bases, something that Iran has threatened, would be met with overwhelming force, saying 'we'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off.' Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Iran was open to resuming talks with the US about its nuclear programme. 'If President Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential,' Araghchi said in a statement. Asked whether he would dispatch envoy Steve Witkoff or the vice-president, JD Vance, for direct talks with Iran, Trump was noncommittal, however, saying it would depend 'on what happens when I get back'. He later said: 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' Benjamin Netanyahu was also dismissive of the idea of diplomacy. 'Of course they want to stop. They want to stop, and to keep producing the tools of death. We gave that a chance,' the Israeli prime minister said, laying out a new, expanded set of war aims. 'We want three central results: eliminating the nuclear programme, eliminating the ability to produce ballistic missiles and eliminating the axis of terror. We will obviously do what we must to achieve these objectives, and we have been coordinating well with the United States.' On his Truth Social online platform overnight, Trump was even more threatening than the Israelis, declaring: 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!', after an Israeli evacuation order to part of northern Tehran affecting a third of a million people, warning of the imminent bombing of the district. The Israeli online order was modelled on those routinely issued to Palestinians in Gaza, where bombing by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has flattened entire residential neighbourhoods over the course of a 20-month conflict. The Israeli ultimatum on Monday said the bombing of Tehran would be aimed at 'military infrastructure', but one of the targets hit was a state television station, killing three staff and ending live broadcasts. Israel has also been bombing Iran's oil and gas installations, and Iran has retaliated with strikes on Haifa, damaging a power station and a refinery in the Mediterranean port. Israeli airstrikes killed at least 24 Iranians across the country on Tuesday morning, bringing the toll since Friday's surprise attack to at least 224 people dead and more than 1,400 injured, its health ministry said. The scale of destruction and the threats from the IDF and Trump triggered an exodus of Tehranis jamming the roads out of the capital overnight. In Israel, the death toll by Tuesday morning was 24, with about 600 injured. Iran fired a total of 20 to 30 missiles on Tuesday morning, according to the IDF, lightly wounding five people, marking a significant drop in the tempo of its attack compared with the previous few days. The IDF said Iran has used 370 missiles in eight salvos out of a US-estimated arsenal of 3,000 ballistic missiles. The IDF further claims to have destroyed 200 of Iran's missile launchers, half the total, and to be hunting the remainder, continually constricting Tehran's ability to retaliate. Sign up to First Thing Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Israel has also struck a severe blow to Iran's chain of command, killing at least 11 top generals, and in some cases, their replacements. On Tuesday, the IDF said it had killed the acting armed forces commander, Maj Gen Ali Shadmani, who had been in the post just four days, after his predecessor was targeted in the first wave of strikes on Friday morning. 'Iran is completely naked and we have full freedom of action. This is an unprecedented achievement,' an IDF general staff officer told the newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth. If IDF claims of its dominance are borne out, it will leave Iran with few cards to play. The Iranian parliament has prepared a bill that would withdraw Iran from the 1968 nuclear non-proliferation treaty, so that it would no longer be legally bound to forgo nuclear weapons, but the government insists it remains opposed to all weapons of mass destruction. State TV has also aired calls from hardline politicians suggesting that Iran block the strategic Strait of Hormuz, potentially stopping the passage of more than 17m barrels of oil a day, and producing a dramatic spike in world oil prices and global inflation. Trump's abrupt departure from the G7 summit in Canada, coupled with the eastward deployment of significant numbers of US military aircraft, had provoked speculation that Trump was contemplating US participation in the offensive, contributing bombers and huge penetrating munitions that experts say are necessary to destroy deeply buried Iranian uranium enrichment plants. When asked about US involvement, Trump responded that the Iranian nuclear programme 'is wiped out long before that'. A White House spokesperson, Alex Pfeiffer, denied reports of US participation in Israeli offensive operations. 'American forces are maintaining their defensive posture, and that has not changed. We will defend American interests,' Pfeiffer wrote.


Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
KFC parent Yum Brands names insider Chris Turner as CEO
June 17 (Reuters) - Yum Brands (YUM.N), opens new tab on Tuesday named its chief financial officer Chris Turner as its chief executive officer, replacing company veteran David Gibbs.