Trans people, local governments and educators face rising anti-LGBTQ hate, GLAAD report finds
There were 932 anti-LGBTQ incidents across the United States over the past year — from hate speech and bomb threats to fatal violence — with more than half of these acts targeting transgender and gender-nonconforming people, according to a new report from the LGBTQ advocacy group GLAAD.
The report found a year-over-year increase in incidents targeting transgender and gender-nonconforming people, state and local governments, and educators and librarians. It also found a decrease in incidents targeting drag performers and pride symbols.
'This really goes toward showing these kinds of shifting tides in hate and what extremists like to focus on at the moment,' Sarah Moore, an analyst of anti-LGBTQ extremism at GLAAD, told NBC News. 'They really are kind of beholden to the new cycle of the day.'
This is the third year GLAAD has published an annual report based on its Anti-LGBTQ Extremism Reporting Tracker. The 932 incidents tracked in this latest report occurred between May 1, 2024, and May 1, 2025. This is a 20% drop from last year's 1,173 incidents and an 80% increase from the 521 incidents tracked in its inaugural report in 2023.
GLAAD defines anti-LGBTQ incidents as both criminal and noncriminal 'acts of harassment, threats, vandalism, and assault motivated by anti-LGBTQ hate and extremism.' Incidents are tracked through self-reports, media reports, social media posts and data sharing from partner organizations and law enforcement and then validated by a team at GLAAD.
Moore cautions that the incidents tracked in the report are 'just a drop in the bucket in terms of what is actually happening when it comes to anti-LGBTQ hate.'
'This is more of a snapshot of what the lived experience of LGBTQ people is, as opposed to being an exact accurate representation of every incident of hate in the U.S.,' she said.
One of the most surprising findings from this year's report, Moore said, was the sharp decrease in incidents targeting drag performers, which dropped to 83 tracked incidents from 185 the year prior.
'This really goes to show the resilience of the drag community, and that we've seen them take all of these amazing steps toward protecting their own personal safety, protecting the safety of their audiences and working with community security organizations,' she said.
Coinciding with this decrease in anti-drag incidents is an increase in incidents targeting local and state governments and educators and librarians.
'We saw a number of our incidents, actually, going after city council officials, going after political candidates who are either LGBTQ or who support the community, going after legislators at the state level who are trying to protect or enshrine LGBTQ rights and going after educators and librarians that are offering safe spaces for LGBTQ youth in their classrooms and in their libraries as well,' Moore said.
Anti-LGBTQ incidents take place more frequently in June, according to the past two years of reporting by GLAAD's Anti-LGBTQ Extremism Reporting Tracker.
'That is most likely attributed to the fact that June is Pride Month, and that's when we're going to have the biggest number of LGBTQ events and the most visible events,' Moore said. 'This June, for example, D.C. is holding WorldPride, which is going to be a really massive event and really massive showing of support for the LGBTQ community in the U.S. and globally.'
When asked if GLAAD has safety tips for those planning to attend Pride Month events this year, Moore noted that one of the hallmarks of the LGBTQ community is its 'resilience and strength.'
'This hate, unfortunately, is not new to us. We have been dealing with persecution, with oppression, with these acts of hate against our community for centuries,' she said, adding that the first Pride marches were protests held on the first anniversary of the 1969 Stonewall uprising.
'So I think just really carrying on those legacies of pride as a form of protest, pride as a form of resistance, pride as a refusal to allow others to define us and to legislate our bodies and tell us that we have to be kept in private spaces and not display our true authentic selves to the rest of the world.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Religion cases spark both unanimity and division at Supreme Court
Religious rights are sparking both unanimity and deep divisions on the Supreme Court this term, with one major decision still to come. On Thursday, all nine justices sided with Catholic Charities Bureau in its tax fight with Wisconsin. But weeks earlier, the court's 4-4 deadlock handed those same religious interests a loss by refusing to greenlight the nation's first religious charter school. Now, advocates are turning their attention to the other major religion case still pending this term, which concerns whether parents have the First Amendment right to opt-out their children from instruction including books with LGBTQ themes. 'The court has been using its Religion Clause cases over the past few years to send the message that everything doesn't have to be quite so polarized and quite so everybody at each other's throats,' said Mark Rienzi, the president and CEO of Becket, a religious legal group that represents both the parents and Catholic Charities. The trio of cases reflect a new burst of activity on the Supreme Court's religion docket, a major legacy of Chief Justice John Roberts' tenure. Research by Lee Epstein, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis, found the Roberts Court has ruled in favor of religious organizations over 83 percent of the time, a significant jump from previous eras. The decisions have oftentimes protected Christian traditions, a development that critics view as a rightward shift away from a focus on protecting non-mainstream religions. But on Thursday, the court emerged unanimous. The nine justices all agreed that Wisconsin violated the First Amendment in denying Catholic Charities a religious exemption from paying state unemployment taxes. Wisconsin's top court denied the exemption by finding the charity wasn't primarily religious, saying it could only qualify if it was trying to proselytize people. Catholic Charities stressed that the Catholic faith forbids misusing works of charity for proselytism. Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored Thursday's majority opinion finding Wisconsin unconstitutionally established a government preference for some religious denominations over others. 'There may be hard calls to make in policing that rule, but this is not one,' Sotomayor wrote. The fact that Sotomayor, one of the court's three Democratic-appointed justices, wrote the opinion heightened the sense of unity. 'She's voted with us in several other cases, too, and I think it just shows that it is not the partisan issue that people sometimes try to make it out to be,' said Rienzi. However, Sotomayor's opinion notably did not address Catholic Charities' other arguments, including those related to church autonomy that Justice Clarence Thomas, one the court's leading conservatives, endorsed in a solo, separate opinion. Ryan Gardner, senior counsel at First Liberty Institute, which filed a brief backing Catholic Charities, similarly called the unanimity an 'encouraging' sign. 'If they can find a way to do that, they want to do that. And that's why I think you have the opinion written the way that it was. It was written that way so that every justice could feel comfortable signing off on it,' said Gardner. Supporters and critics of the court's decision agree it still poses repercussions on cases well beyond the tax context — and even into the culture wars. Perhaps most immediately, the battle at the Supreme Court will shift from unemployment taxes to abortion. The justices have a pending request from religious groups, also represented by Becket, to review New York's mandate that employers' health care plans cover abortions. The regulation exempts religious organizations only if they inculcate religious values, meaning many faith-based charities must still follow the mandate. And for the First Liberty Institute, it believes Thursday's decision bolsters its legal fights in the lower courts. It represents an Ohio church that serves the homeless and an Arizona church that provides food distribution, both embroiled in legal battles with local municipalities that implicate whether the ministries are religious enough. Thursday's decision is not the first time the Supreme Court has unanimously handed a win to religious rights advocates. In 2023, the First Liberty Institute successfully represented a Christian U.S. Postal Service worker who requested a religious accommodation to not work on Sundays. And two years earlier, the court in a unanimous judgment ruled Philadelphia violated the Free Exercise Clause by refusing to refer children to a Catholic adoption agency because it would not certify same-sex couples to be foster parents. 'People thought that was a very narrow decision at the time, but the way it has sort of been applied since then, it has really reshaped a lot of the way that we think about Free Exercise cases,' said Gardner. It's not always kumbaya, however. Last month, the Supreme Court split evenly on a highly anticipated religious case that concerned whether Oklahoma could establish the nation's first publicly funded religious charter school. The 4-4 deadlock meant the effort fizzled. Released just three weeks after the justices' initial vote behind closed doors, the decision spanned one sentence. 'The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court,' it reads. Though the deadlock means supporters of St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School are left without a green light, they are hoping they will prevail soon enough. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump's third appointee to the court, recused from the St. Isidore case, which many court watchers believe stemmed from her friendship with a professor at Notre Dame, whose religious liberty clinic represented St. Isidore. But Barrett could participate in a future case — providing the crucial fifth vote — that presents the same legal question, which poses consequential implications for public education. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court still has one major religion case left this term. The justices are reviewing whether Montgomery County, Md., must provide parents an option to opt-out their elementary-aged children from instruction with books that include LGBTQ themes. The group of Muslim, Roman Catholic and Ukrainian Orthodox parents suing say it substantially burdens their First Amendment rights under the Free Exercise Clause. At oral arguments, the conservative majority appeared sympathetic with the parent's plea as the court's three liberal justices raised concerns about where to draw the line. 'Probably, it will be a split decision,' said Gardner, whose group has filed a similar lawsuit on behalf of parents in California. But he cautioned, 'you never know where some of the justices will line up.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different
In the 45 years since graduating from Harvard University, Laura Hastings has never been to a reunion. 'I've always felt that Harvard didn't need me,' Hastings said. However, like many of her classmates, when she saw the escalating battle between her alma mater and the Trump administration, she realized this year was the moment for her to 'show up.' The alumni day had a record of 9,000 attendees this year, a speaker said. A sea of maroon Harvard regalia coated the Cambridge streets as some men walked around with tophats and suits, and others waved reunion flags. Shrieks bounced off the brick buildings as classmates saw each other and young children in oversized Harvard merch clung to their parents. Read more: Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University The event comes only a few hours after the institution amended one of its lawsuits against the federal government on Thursday evening and asked for a temporary restraining order. Those actions were in response to President Donald Trump's issuance of a proclamation this week declaring that the school's foreign students would not be allowed into the country. Harvard has been a leader in resisting — through multiple lawsuits — the Trump administration as it attempts to cut billions of dollars from the university in addition to research funding. In one of the cuts, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it was due to 'continued failure to address anti-Semitic harassment and race discrimination.' 'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the department said. Hastings said she has had some embarrassment about going to Harvard as an elite institution. 'Elite universities, by their very definition, suggest exclusion,' she said, adding that she had a privileged upbringing. While higher education can be the thing that can help people advance to higher-paying and more prestigious careers, the federal government has tapped into a segment of the population who feels excluded by higher education, said Hastings, who is a professor at Georgia State University. One Harvard alum who spoke with MassLive on Friday traveled across the United States border to come to the reunion, despite his fears of being let in — or out — of the country. MassLive isn't using his name because he isn't a citizen of the United States and fears retaliation from the federal government. 'As a non-citizen and non-[permanent resident] you have no procedural rights at the border, meaning that they could ask to see my phone, my messages, my WhatsApp history, anything that they would take that is politically not congruent with what they want they could use that as a basis to deny me entry,' he said. 'I was worried that that would happen. So I scraped my phone of messages that would indicate a political leaning that was contrary to what the administration would be putting out there,' he said. As Harvard fights against the federal government, alumni are doing the same. Members of Crimson Courage, a community of Harvard alumni whose mission is to stand up for academic freedom, urged alumni to wear stickers of support and sign on to a legal document, also known as an amicus brief, in support of Harvard's second lawsuit against the Trump administration focused on international students. 'It's just absolutely incredible. I've never seen this type of mobilization,' said Evelyn Kim, a Harvard alum and Crimson Courage organizer. Kim said the backing of Crimson Courage is helpful for Harvard to know that their community supports them. 'We are not just fighting for Harvard,' Kim said. 'We are fighting for every higher education institution's right to be able to pursue the research they want to do, teach what they want to teach, admit the students that they want to admit. This isn't just about Harvard, it's about all higher education,' she said. Crimson Courage is aiming to have other campuses create their own chapters to back their institutions in the face of cuts or other actions from the federal government. Lisa Paige, an alum and organizer with Crimson Courage, said the organization has around 300 volunteers and has continued to grow. Hastings, who handed out Crimson Courage stickers on Friday to alums, said that while there is overwhelming support, resistance from alums is also apparent. She said many people said they didn't want to talk about the Trump administration's actions against Harvard — instead wanting to enjoy their reunion. One alum who told her he stopped giving money to Harvard because it has become 'too liberal.' Much of what the Trump administration has critiqued about Harvard has focused on campus antisemitism, race discrimination and a lack of political diversity. All of the alums MassLive spoke with on Friday said they don't believe these explanations are why the federal government is going after Harvard. Hastings, for instance, said she thought Harvard leaned too conservative in its beliefs when she was a student on campus. And, as a Jew, she thinks the claim of antisemitism is ultimately being used as a 'scapegoat' for the administration to go after Harvard. The government going after universities is a 'red flag for a democracy' which could harm freedom of thought and speech, according to Olumide Adebo, a Harvard graduate school alum. At the same time, Adebo, along with many other alumni, has criticisms of how Harvard has reacted since the Trump administration shined a light on Harvard. One is the cancellation of affinity graduations — which was something he enjoyed when he graduated from Harvard. 'Whatever criticisms I can offer to Harvard are fairly similar to what I offer to our society in terms of how we embrace diversity and equity in general,' he said. Adebo pointed to the university not backing former president Claudine Gay, who stepped down in early 2024 after about six months on the job, and defending her against the attacks claiming that she had plagiarized scholarly work. 'That seems to me to be a very short leash for anybody in leadership. Frankly, regardless of the missteps. Especially since she was fully vetted before being hired for the role,' he said. Read more: What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump To the alum who is not a U.S. citizen, the debate about the future of higher education, funding between public and private higher education and research funding are all 'welcomed.' There are valid critiques about the 'historical injustices' of who is allowed into an institution like Harvard and who isn't — even if the university has been working to address those issues, the alum said. However, the efforts to dismantle Harvard and higher education by the federal government go beyond what is necessary into something that is dangerous, the alum said. As the senior grant manager at Mass General Brigham, a Harvard affiliate, Mary Anne Fox, said she has seen firsthand the attempts at dismantling her alma mater — and the consequences of that. It has been a 'shock' as the attacks against Harvard have emanated into research which won't just hurt the institution but the international research infrastructure, she said. She said she came today to show her support for the institution. 'Now I'm really proud to be from Harvard,' she said. 'I didn't know people hated Harvard so much in the country,' she said. Fox prominently wore a keffiyeh, a traditional headdress worn by people in the Middle East that has taken on a greater symbol of resistance in the United States in support of Palestinians. She said she wore it on that day because many students at Harvard can't — and there is little the university can do against her in response. 'What are they going to do? Suck the degree back out of my head?' she said. Peter Coccoluto, joined by his wife, said he came on Friday to Harvard for his 70th reunion in part due to the actions taken toward the university. 'I feel we are being besieged by an ignorant man who also has the bad quality of seeking revenge on anyone who crosses his path,' Coccoluto said. 'I am here to support Harvard and to urge them to fight, fight, fight, because we fight not only for Harvard, but for all of the other free institutions of learning, higher learning,' he said. Casey Wenz stood outside the Harvard Yard on Friday morning with a finger brace holding up a wooden sign that read 'Harvard Thank You For Your Courage.' While she doesn't have an affiliation with the university, as a Cambridge resident, she said she wanted to show her gratitude to the university for 'standing up for themselves' and ultimately 'standing up for all of us.' She said she has friends who are international students and work at Harvard and that the federal government's actions against Harvard are hurting the country's economy. 'He's knee-capping innovation. And I think undoing that will take years — possibly decades,' she said. 'We might be losing a week or a month for every day that we lose in the research lab,' she said. What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US 'Singling out': Harvard president says Trump admin is retaliating against institution 'Government vendetta': Harvard fights back after Trump blocks its foreign students from US Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University Read the original article on MassLive.
New York Post
40 minutes ago
- New York Post
New Yorkers searched web for ‘Free Palestine' info more than any other state, study finds
New Yorkers scoured the web for information on Palestine-related phrases more than any other state in the US, a new study found. Since the start of the year, the Empire State averaged 8,260 searches per month for phrases including: 'Palestine protests,' 'Free Palestine movement' and 'free Palestine flag' — more than any other place in the country per capita. For every 100,000 people in the state, there were more than 41 searches for the 'free Palestine'-related phrases, the analysis of Google Trends data conducted by Ladah Law found. Advertisement Protesters descended on Times Square in April to call for the release of Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil. James Keivom The most popular phrase in New York, with 3,600 searches, was 'Free Palestine,' followed by 'Palestine protest,' with 1,600 searches. NYC's Columbia University was the epicenter of violent anti-Israel protests last year, with similar ones taking place throughout California and across the country. Advertisement Other Google entries part of the study included, 'free Palestine stickers,' 'free Palestine posters' and 'is Palestine free?' Vermont took second place with nearly 34 searches per 100,000 residents and California followed with just under 32, according to the Las Vegas-based firm. New Yorkers searched online information on Palestine more than any other state. Thaspol – For every 100,000 of California's nearly 40 million residents, there were approximately 12,570 searches for info on the movement, which spread across the nation following Hamas terrorists' deadly Oct. 7, 2023 attacks on Israel and subsequent anti-Israel protests. Advertisement Behind the Green Mountain and Golden states were Massachusetts, Oregon and Connecticut. Arkansas saw the fewest searches related to the conflict, according to the findings.
