Labour gives update on sickness and disability benefit reforms as spending cuts expected soon
Labour has given a major update on planned reforms to the benefits system as chancellor Rachel Reeves says she 'will not hesitate to act' to cut back on welfare spending.
Her comments come ahead of propsals which are set to outline how the government will overhaul sickness and disability benefits in the UK.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has said more details on the plans are coming in Spring when a green paper on the plans is released – but the chancellor has revealed that more detail will come as soon as this week.
Sharing her plans in the Sun on Sunday, Ms Reeves said she will 'expose how the Conservatives lost complete control of the benefits bill – with a project overspend of more than £8 billion and no action taken to address that.'
'That includes looking closely at the rising cost of health and disability benefits,' she adds. 'This is an urgent problem. It can't be ignored. We can't walk around it, as the Tories did. We've got to grip it, once and for all.'
The chancellor will be making a speech on Wednesday in Oxfordshire, sharing her plans to boost economic growth, with changes to pensions and news on the possible Heathrow airport expansion rumoured. Her latest comments may indicate that the much-anticipated detail on benefit changes will also make the agenda.
The planned changes are understood to focus largely on disability benefits with aims to bring down the number of people who are claiming them. There are now 3.7 million people of working age receiving health-related support – 1.2 million more than in February 2020.
Labour argues that these numbers are untenable, with £56.4 billion forecast to be spent on these benefits for working-age adults in 2024/25 according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has said his government will be 'ruthless' in cutting this expenditure if needed to balance spending.
Changes to the work capability assessment are understood to be central to these plans. This is the key way claimants are found fit or unfit for work, entitling them to benefits at different levels.
The Treasury has committed to match a target made by the previous Conservative government to save £1.3bn through the assesssment reforms. Under those plans, an estimated 450,000 fewer people would have qualifed for health-related benefits, although Labour has said it will re-consult on the detail of the changes.
Also rumoured are changes to the personal independence payment (PIP) and greater DWP powers to tackle benefit fraud.
Disability charities and campaigners have pushed back against Labour's stance on health-related benefits, with a recent report from Pro Bono Economics and anti-poverty charity Z2K finding that the economic value of disability benefits for those in need far outweighs the public cost.
Ayla Ozmen, Director of Policy and Campaigns at Z2K, said: "Removing or reducing hundreds of pounds of vital financial support for disabled people would have a devastating effect. Already over 88 per cent of low-income households on disability benefits can't afford the basics, including food, energy costs, prescriptions and transport to medical appointments. Further cuts will inevitably push people deeper into poverty and leave people in worse health.
"What we need is investment in our social security system, not further cuts to an already threadbare system."
The chancellor's recent comments come after a new review was launched by the DWP to explore how ill and disabled people can be helped to find employment. Led by former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, its findings will be published a few months after Labour shares its plans for disability benefits in the Spring.
Work and Pensions Secretary, Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP, said: 'Millions of people have been left without support to get into work and on at work, and completely held back from reaching their potential for far too long, and the record-high cost of long-term sickness benefits is evidence of that fact.
'That's why I am pleased to have Sir Charlie leading this review, bringing a wealth of experience and helping us to get people into work, and most importantly keep them in work, so we can boost living standards and get our economy growing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
43 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Labour government reveals talks with SNP ministers over 'trans-inclusive' conversion therapy ban
Ministers at Holyrood and Westminster have held talks over plans to ban conversion therapy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The UK government has held talks with SNP ministers over a 'trans-inclusive' ban on conversion therapy with Labour vowing to press ahead with completely abolishing the practice. The Scottish Government shelved its plans for legislation to outlaw conversion therapy despite previously committing to do so. Instead, First Minister John Swinney said SNP ministers will work alongside Westminster and implement a proposed law for England and Wales in Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Trans rights protesters in Edinburgh (Picture: Jeff) The UK government has pledged to bring forward legislation to end conversion practices by the end of the parliament in 2029. Labour ministers are yet to publish a draft Bill on banning conversion practices. Campaigners have called for a full ban to be dropped, claiming that young people could be put at risk of pursuing a medical pathway that will damage their bodies. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Calls to drop a full ban have ramped up following the Supreme Court ruling that defined a woman in the Equality Act as referring to a biological woman, despite the ruling explicitly stating the decision was not 'a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another'. Trans people can legally change gender with a gender recognition certificate. Labour Equalities Minister, Nia Griffith, told MPs that 'conversion practices have no place in today's society', adding that the UK government was 'committed to bringing forward trans-inclusive legislation to ban these outdated and abusive acts'. Scottish Liberal Democrat MP Christine Jardine warned her party has 'been concerned' about the lack of draft legislation, but stressed she was 'relieved to hear' the UK government remains committed to a full ban on conversion therapy. Christine Jardine MP She added: 'Given the amount of fear and anxiety that there is among the trans community in this country, can she reassure the House that when the Bill comes forward, it will be UK-wide to overcome the Scottish Government's withdrawal of their proposals?' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dame Nia said that the UK government is 'in talks with officials in the Scottish Parliament' for the legislation to apply across the UK. She added: 'I also assure her that we will be bringing this legislation forward very soon, and that there will be a proper opportunity for that pre-legislative scrutiny, which I know she will want to take part in.' A memorandum of understanding, signed by groups including NHS Scotland and the Royal College of GPs in 2017, agreed that 'the practice of conversion therapy, whether in relation to sexual orientation or gender identity, is unethical and potentially harmful'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dame Nia said: 'Our draft legislation on conversion practices will be trans-inclusive. It is crucial that trans people are safe, included, and protected from harm and discrimination. 'The previous government repeatedly broke their promises to deliver on the issue of conversion practices and allowed the debate to become ever more toxic and divided.' Kaukab Stewart | PA Speaking in Holyrood last month, SNP Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart pointed to an 'intention to work with the United Kingdom government to fully explore legislation that would cover England, Wales and Scotland'.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Fifth of academics do not feel free to teach controversial topics, survey shows
The Office for Students (OfS) gave examples of how universities and colleges should respond to scenarios surrounding freedom of speech in its guidance published on Thursday, including around protests, investigating staff and student complaints and ensuring speakers are not stopped from expressing their ideas or opinions. It comes as the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, passed under the previous Conservative government in 2023, imposes a duty on institutions to secure and promote freedom of speech so long as it is lawful – a duty which comes into force in August. In its guidance, the OfS said: 'Higher education providers and constituent institutions should have a high tolerance for all kinds of lawful speech. 'There should be a very strong presumption in favour of permitting lawful speech.' The guidance stated: – Academic staff should not be constrained or pressured in their teaching to endorse or reject particular value judgements. – Policies that regulate protests and demonstrations should not restrict these activities because they express or support a particular viewpoint so long as it is legal. – Institutions should not encourage students or staff to report others over lawful expression of a particular point of view. – The starting point of investigating any complaint relating to speech should be that lawful speech will not be punished because of a viewpoint that it expresses. – Providers must take steps to secure freedom of speech for visiting speakers. A speaker who has been invited to speak should not be stopped from doing so on the grounds of their ideas or opinions. The OfS made clear that it 'will not protect Holocaust denial'. The guidance was published alongside a survey, conducted on behalf of the watchdog by YouGov, which revealed a fifth of academics (21%) feel 'not very free' or 'not at all free' to discuss challenging or controversial topics in their teaching, with almost a quarter (24%) of those citing fear of physical attack. The percentage of those who do not feel free to teach controversial topics rises to a third for academics from ethnic minority backgrounds while female academics are more likely than their male counterparts to say they do not feel free discussing such topics in their teaching, research, speaking engagements or on social media. The survey, undertaken by 1,234 respondents between March 15 and April 19 last year, also showed that the most common topic academics feel restricted in discussing is sex and gender, followed by race and racism. Twenty-eight per cent of participants said their university has become less tolerant of a range of viewpoints during their tenure. Just under half (46%) think their university would prioritise freedom of speech over not causing offence, while two-thirds (67%) believe their university would prioritise staff and/or students feeling safe over freedom of speech. Arif Ahmed, director for freedom of speech and academic freedom at the OfS, said: 'The core mission of universities and colleges is the pursuit of knowledge. Free speech and academic freedom are fundamental to this purpose. 'Students need to know that they can freely share lawful views and opinions, and be prepared to hear a range of views as part of their studies. This includes things that they may find uncomfortable or shocking. 'By being exposed to a diversity of academic thought, students will develop their analytical and critical thinking skills.' OfS chairman Professor Edward Peck, told MPs earlier this year that the watchdog's role in defending freedom of speech on campuses is 'absolutely crucial'. 'Universities, colleges and other providers should be places where ideas can be explored, examined, challenged, or disagreement can be facilitated. Where new viewpoints can be discovered,' he said. 'It's crucial – without that I don't think we'd have a university sector which would be the envy of the world as it is now. So that's my starting point.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
MP who first blew whistle on child rape gangs was smeared as a racist, says son
Labour peer Lord Cryer said those who were complicit at the time and knew of the child abuse by a group of older men from the Pakistani community, but chose to cover it up, should face prosecution. He was speaking after a nationwide inquiry was announced by the Prime Minister into grooming gangs following a major review by Baroness Casey. Baroness Casey (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA) Her report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials had dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. The Government has accepted all 12 recommendations made by Lady Casey, including the establishment of a national inquiry. Mrs Cryer was MP for Keighley when she was alerted to the problem in her constituency by a group of concerned mothers, who said their young daughters were being sexually exploited by a group of older Asian men and the police and social services were refusing to act. After going public she faced accusations that she was a racist and also received threatening notes and phone calls, leading police to install a panic alarm in her house. She stood down as an MP in 2010. In the years since, a series of high-profile grooming scandals have been exposed, including in Rotherham and Rochdale. All followed a similar pattern with the large-scale exploitation of mainly white girls by groups of men of predominantly Pakistani heritage, which the authorities failed to tackle. Responding to a ministerial statement on the Casey review, Lord Cryer said: 'I rise to speak principally because the first person who raised the issue of the rape gangs, in other words the first whistleblower, happens to be my mum, Ann Cryer MP, who started raising this in 2003. 'She was then smeared and attacked, particularly by Labour figures, I've got to say, for being a racist. 'I'm not talking about ministers in the then government, many of whom actually supported her, and in the case of David Blunkett, as then home secretary, went out of his way to make sure that prosecutions happened, which they did. 'I'm talking about councillors, councils and other institutions who went on the attack and lied and smeared about the rape gangs.' He added: 'I think some of them were complicit. Some of them knew it was going on, and they decided to cover up. 'And in those cases, if there is evidence to that fact, then they should be brought before the courts and prosecuted.' In reply, Home Office minister Lord Hanson of Flint said: 'Can I pay tribute to his mother. I served in Parliament with Ann and I know she raised these matters and faced extreme difficulties locally as result, and took a very brave stand at that time.' Stressing the need to address the issue, he added: 'My party hasn't been in government for 14 years, but we have been in control of some of the councils. 'My party wasn't in control of government when a lot of these issues happened, but I have still got a responsibility to look at making sure we deal with these in an effective way.' Earlier, he told peers other recommendations made by Lady Casey would be implemented 'in very short order'. These included making it mandatory to collect ethnicity and nationality data of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases, a change in the law so all adult sex with under-16s would be considered rape, and a review of the criminal records of exploitation victims.
