True cost of rent as many people spend half their salary on it
Two-fifths of people spend nearly half their salary on rent. The average tenant now forks out more than 40% of their take-home salary on rent, with one in seven spending more than half their pay packets on rent.
The survey by tenant and landlord services provider Canopy revealed one in 20 renters are forced to pay more than 80% of their salary each month on housing. Typically, spending 40% of take-home salary is considered the very upper limit of affordability, with many facing this financial predicament.
On average, tenants now spend £846 per month on their share of the rent - up from £822 this time last year. In the first three months of 2025, tenants spent 5% more of their salary on rent than this time in 2024, with rental affordability apparently rising across the country.
Canopy analysed data from nearly 100,000 individual renters, measuring average take-home salary of employed tenants against their share of rental costs creating a rent-to-income ratio. London topped the list of priciest places to live with the average Londoner spending 47.3% of their salary on rent.
Five London boroughs see the average tenant spending more than 50% of their take-home wage on rental payments. Enfield (55.5%) is the least affordable London borough, with Haringey (52.9%), Brent (51.5%), Redbridge (51.5%), and Barking and Dagenham (50.8%) all similarly pricey.
Hot on London's heels was Brighton with 46.2% followed by Oxford with 45.2%. At the other end of the scale, and country, Doncaster is crowned the city with the best rental affordability, with tenants spending less than a third (31.8%) on accommodation.
Hull (32.2%) and Durham (32.3%) slugged it out for the next coveted spot - being ranked second and third respectively. While Doncaster is the cheapest city, the cheapest local authority area is Chesterfield in the East Midlands.
Tenants there spend just 29.1% of their take-home salary on the rent, leaving more than 70% of their money free for other essentials and fun. Gen Z are taking the biggest hit to their wallets, with the average younger tenant spending almost half (48%) of their wage on rent.
Chris Hutchinson, CEO at Canopy, said: "Our latest index shows that rent affordability continues to elude many, with a large portion of UK renters now spending more than 40% of their take-home salary on rent. Wage growth continues to be slow and those spending a higher proportion of their salary on rent can be expected to struggle to pay essential bills and have little left to spend on hobbies and leisure time.
"The problem is that rising interest rates, increased regulation and a growing tax burden are all making property investment less attractive. This makes it more likely that more landlords will exit the market altogether.
"The more landlords that leave the market will also make it more likely that rental affordability will worsen, with fewer properties to meet demand."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Oxfam HQ could be turned into lab space and office
Plans have been submitted to turn Oxfam's headquarters into an office and lab Investments Limited have applied to Oxford City Council for planning permission to turn the building on John Smith Drive, Oxford Business Park, Cowley into a life science or office facility and "create a significant number of job opportunities".The charity said it had signed the lease for a new workplace within the ground floor of a smaller building on the same site, to help reduce Saj Malik, who represents Temple Cowley on the city council, has raised concerns about the knock-on effect of creating new science and tech jobs on the city's housing shortage. Oxfam's HQ moved to Oxford Business Park from Summertown in July 2005, and the building was sold to Sutton Council in was put on the market for £60m in 2023 and sold to a private investor for £37.1m in April lease on the building ran out in for the move include adding an extra floor to the building, as well as a gym and café area on the ground floor and a row of columns outside the comes after the charity announced it was trying to save £10.2m in wages, and that 265 jobs were at risk of to the planning statement the proposal will "create a significant number of new job opportunities" and the plans would "positively contribute to Oxford's role as a leading hub for research and development and life sciences within the UK".It adds the building could be used by multiple tenants and connectivity to the business park would be improved by upcoming plans for the Cowley Branch Mr Malik said many Cowley residents felt "it's too much, too quickly and gentrification is being imposed on communities without thought of the impact"."While I fully encourage investment into Cowley, this kind of development often doesn't benefit the people who live here in terms of job opportunities," he said."Already we have a shortage of housing in Oxford meaning teachers and nurses have to live elsewhere causing recruitment and retention difficulties."A spokesperson for Oxfam said they hope to move in July. "The new office space is smaller and will support us to reduce our costs," they added. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Morris Motors boss may have inspired Tolkien villain
The fascist-sympathising founder of Morris Motors was demonised as a soulless industrialist in an unknown story by JRR Tolkien that is to be published for the first time. William Morris, Viscount Nuffield, is thought to have inspired the Lord of the Rings author to create a villain for a satirical fantasy in which he vented his loathing for the motor car and its devastating impact on his beloved Oxford. Morris made his fortune by mass-producing small cars at affordable prices and, although he donated millions to worthy causes, he also supported Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists. Morris Motors became the major employer in the region during Tolkien's lifetime, providing a pull for workers and businesses supporting the car industry. A dramatic rise in Oxford's population between the wars was driven partly by the growth of the industry. The businessman is thought to be the inspiration for a character known as the Daemon of Vaccipratum in the never before published story, The Bovadium Fragments. It is thought Tolkien also took inspiration from a planning controversy that erupted in the 1940s, when he was the University of Oxford's Professor of English Language and Literature at Merton College. A bid to alleviate traffic by building a dual carriageway across Christ Church Meadow, an ancient open space in the heart of Oxford, sparked a protracted public debate well into the 1960s, when the plan was eventually aborted. The Bovadium Fragments reflects Tolkien's mastery of Latin. Bovadium was the Latinised name for the village of Oxford, and the Daemon of Vaccipratum translates as 'the demon of the cow pasture', or Cowley – where Morris had established his motor manufacturing plant. In one passage of the unearthed story, Tolkien writes: 'But it came to pass that a Daemon (as popular opinion supposed) in his secret workshops devised certain abominable machines, to which he gave the name Motores.' The Bovadium Fragments was among Tolkien manuscripts either donated or deposited posthumously by his estate to Oxford's Bodleian Library. It will be published in October by Harper Collins. Chris Smith, the Harper Collins publishing director, described it as 'a sharply satirical account of the perils of allowing car production and machine-worship to take over your town, where things ultimately all go to hell, in a very literal sense'. Tolkien's son and literary executor, Christopher, had edited the text before his death in 2020. The book will include an essay by Richard Ovenden, Bodley's librarian, who has conducted extensive research into the planning controversy, having established its inspiration for Tolkien's story. Mr Ovenden said it is about a scholar in the future looking at evidence of a society that is now lost, having 'worshipped the motor car', adding: 'Tolkien was deeply affected by the way that the motor industry was changing his city, and that shines through.' Asked why The Bovadium Fragments had not been published before, Mr Ovenden said: 'Christopher's priority in publishing his father's unpublished works was on the Middle Earth-related material. This material didn't really fit with that or with his father's more scholarly pieces, and so it got left. 'I would visit Christopher and his wife Baillie in France every year. On one of those visits, he drew this to my attention and said, 'What's all this about, what do you think the background of this was?'' Mr Ovenden described it as 'a contribution to environmental literature and the conservation of historic cities'. 'It was written in the late 1950s and 1960s, but it has this extraordinary contemporary resonance,' he said.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
GB News is starting to challenge the BBC for ratings – we should be worried
Listen to Laurence 'Lozza' Fox's dog whistle: 'You cannot hate them enough,' he posted on Elon Musk's X, in reaction to a carefully neutral breaking Sky News story about a car ploughing into Liverpool fans. And then: 'You cannot loathe or despise the state propaganda arm @ I understood Lozza to be signalling to his 600,000 followers that an establishment cover-up was happening in front of their eyes. 'They' were about to lie about the perpetrator. 'What is coming next is inevitable,' he posted moments later. I think he was anticipating riots on the streets. The man eventually charged with driving into the crowd is 53, white, and a former royal marine. Neighbours have been quoted calling him a 'nice family man'. There have been no riots. Park any thoughts of Lozza for the moment, and let us consider a major speech delivered at Oxford recently by Sir Paul Marshall. It was titled 'Reflections of a Reluctant Media Owner' and it sought to explain why an ultra-wealthy hedge fund manager ended up creating GB News, along with Unherd, a commentary platform, before acquiring the Spectator. His views command attention, if only because of his prediction that by 2028, the UK will have only two dominant news channels: the BBC and his own GB News, in which he has a 40 per cent stake, and which has lost more than £100m to date. Sir Paul's speech was a conventional-enough analysis of the British media landscape. He has noticed that most national newspapers tilt to the right. He shares the belief of those on the right that the BBC tilts to the left. It's all a bit tribal for him. He believes The Times, alone among newspapers, presents opinion pieces each day 'from all sides of the political spectrum.' This may surprise some its readers. His favourite word is 'heterodox'; his least favourite adjective is 'metropolitan.' When it comes to the BBC he believes that BBC Verify, a fact-checking unit, 'is frankly an abuse of taxpayer money and should be shut down.' In an ideal world the entire BBC – which he describes (just like Lozza!) as 'the propaganda arm of the state' – should be sold off. Failing that, it should be broken up. For Marshall, the BBC began to lose its way when – under Blair! – it stopped playing the national anthem on a daily basis: 'This is the point at which patriotism was quietly erased from its mission.' There are frustrating lacunae in the speech. Sir Paul does not, for instance, reflect on whether an ultra-wealthy hedge fund manager is well-placed to make fine judgements about impartiality or bias. If it is not to be hedge-fund managers, then who? But the most striking thing missing from Sir Paul's lecture is the gap between his analysis of what's wrong with the media and his answer: the creation of GB News. Here is a man who hates tribalism; says he likes his own biases to be challenged; and admires the 'open-minded centrist ground' represented by the Times. And who then thinks the answer is to create a monocultural TV channel representing every political view on a spectrum from Jacob Rees-Mogg to Lee Anderson via Nigel Farage and the Reclaim Party's 'leader', Laurence Fox? If you think the BBC is a bit lefty and iffy with the facts then why would you reach out for a cast which included the whacky cleric, Rev Calvin Robinson, Dan Wootton, Darren Grimes, former Reclaim candidates Leo Kearse and Martin Daubney, Brexit's Michelle Dewbury and climate change rubbisher Neil Oliver? What is the societal problem you're trying to fix with your investment in British television of tens of millions of pounds? Sir Paul is pleased with the ratings, which – as a rolling news channel with an energetic social media wing – sometimes nudge the BBC. I wonder if he's ever looked at surveys of trust, which regularly show the hated BBC outperforming all others – and trouncing GB News? YouGov in 2023 scored the BBC at net plus 23 compared with GB News on minus 15. Another YouGov poll the following year found 41 per cent trusting the BBC 'a great deal or a fair amount' against 24 per cent for GB News. The Reuters Institute Digital News Report finds that the BBC, at 62 per cent, is easily the most trusted news brand in the UK. GB News scores 29 per cent. Are all these people who trust the BBC's approach to journalism deluded? Is Sir Paul the only one who can see clearly? If he truly wished for better-informed citizens did he consider other uses for his riches? Has he, for instance, noticed the local newspaper industry gasping for breath as towns and neighbourhoods across the UK threaten to turn into news deserts? Did he really think hiring Laurence Fox (later sacked for misogyny) was the best response to the age of information chaos? As it happens, I get a name check in Sir Paul's speech. I am, apparently, one of the 'biggest advocates of censorship and control narrative' - up there with Hillary Clinton, Plato and the EU's Ursula von der Leyen. I take it this is because I'm a member of Meta's Oversight Board, which aims to protect free expression online while balancing it with possible harms. In most of our decisions, we actually vote to restore content to Meta's platforms that, in our view, has been mistakenly removed, but no matter. There are people who call themselves free speech absolutists, for whom any restraints amount to censorship. Elon Musk sails under that flag, as does Lozza. Sir Paul doesn't quite pinpoint where he himself sits. At one point he muses on the dangers of truth being sacrificed in favour of conspiracy theories and tribalism. And yet it feels that the point of GB News is precisely its tribal nature. One of the recent decisions by the Oversight Board related to the aftermath of the Southport killings when social media was widely used to spread disinformation about the ethnicity, religion and asylum status of the killer. More than that, it was used to whip up mob violence and hatred against Muslims. Real violence, real hatred. One of the posts which Meta left up called for mosques to be smashed and buildings where 'migrants,' 'terrorists' and 'scum' live to be set on fire. Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Northampton councillor, was controversially jailed for 31 months for posting something similar. Is it actually 'censorship' to want Meta to remove such posts? Is that an example of biased metropolitan elitism? The 'we-know-best' brigade? Or is it a responsible instinct for there to be limits on extremists who, in crowded theatres, shout 'Fire!' And Sky News and the BBC, with their restrained let's-stick-to-the-facts approach. Is that really (per Lozza) loathsome and despicable? Do you (per Sir Paul and Lozza) really think the BBC is the 'propaganda arm of the state' and should be sold off; or that BBC Verify is an 'abuse' and should be closed down? Who should make judgments about impartiality – ultra-wealth hedgies, or Ofcom? Who is in touch with the 'common sense centre ground' here, and who isn't? I do not wish to be mean about Sir Paul. I'm glad he founded Unherd. The Spectator remains a great magazine. He is a generous philanthropist. But, by his own account, he is on course to be a mini-Murdoch in the not-too-distant future. His views matter. But some of those views range from unformed to unsettling. Keep an eye on him.
