Trump says he wants Musk and his companies to thrive in US
The remarks follow a public clash with his former close ally over his tax bill. In July, the space and automotive billionaire announced the formation of a new political party, saying Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill would bankrupt America.
'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the US Government. This is not so!' Trump said in a social media post.
'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE.'
In a post on X, Musk said the 'subsidies' Trump was talking about simply do not exist.
SpaceX won the Nasa contracts by doing a better job for less money, he added. 'Moving those contracts to other aerospace companies would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much!'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The president's social media post came on the heels of Musk's warning to Tesla investors on Wednesday that US government cuts in support for electric vehicle makers could lead to a 'few rough quarters' for the company.
Though Musk has often said government subsidies should be eliminated, Tesla has historically benefited from billions of dollars in tax credits and other policy benefits because of its business in clean transportation and renewable energy.
Sweeping tax and budget legislation approved by Congress, and signed by Trump, will halt US$7,500 tax credits for buying or leasing new electric vehicles on Sept 30, as well as a US$4,000 used EV credit, that have helped spur their sales in recent years.
Before the relationship soured, Musk had spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to help Trump win November's presidential election and led the Department of Government Efficiency's chaotic effort to slash the budget and cut the federal workforce.
The Tesla CEO left the administration in late May to refocus on his tech empire.
Trump and Musk fell out shortly afterward when Musk openly denounced the Republican president's tax-cut and spending bill, leading to threats by Trump to cancel billions of dollars worth of federal government contracts with Musk's companies.
A week after the June spat, Reuters reported the White House had directed the Defence Department and Nasa to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies.
Musk's SpaceX had been considered a frontrunner to build out Trump's US$175-billion Golden Dome missile defence shield and remains a natural choice for key elements of the project.
But sources familiar with the matter told Reuters this week that the administration is expanding its search for partners to build Golden Dome as tension with Musk threatens SpaceX's dominance in the programme. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
4 hours ago
- International Business Times
Federal Watchdog Probes Ex-Special Counsel Jack Smith Over Possible Hatch Act Violation
A U.S. federal agency is formally investigating former Special Counsel Jack Smith over whether he violated the Hatch Act while overseeing criminal investigations into former President Donald Trump. The Office of Special Counsel (OSC), an independent agency that monitors federal employee conduct, confirmed the probe on Friday. The move follows a request from Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who accused Smith of acting with political motives to interfere in the 2024 election. Cotton said Smith's actions were designed to damage Trump's campaign, describing him as "a political actor masquerading as a public official" on social media platform X. Smith, a former war crimes prosecutor, led two criminal cases against Trump—one over the alleged mishandling of classified documents and another related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Both cases were eventually dropped after Trump's 2024 election win, citing Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Although OSC cannot bring criminal charges, it can issue disciplinary recommendations. This investigation adds to a growing list of actions taken by Trump allies against individuals involved in past legal actions against him. Smith resigned in January and issued a report stating that there was sufficient evidence to convict Trump, had the cases gone to trial. Trump has denied any wrongdoing and continues to frame the prosecutions as politically motivated. (With inputs from agencies)
International Business Times
4 hours ago
- International Business Times
Tesla Ordered to Pay $200 Million Over Fatal Florida Crash Linked to Autopilot
Tesla has been ordered by a Miami federal jury to pay over $200 million in damages for a 2019 crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and seriously injured Dillon Angulo in Florida. The jury found Tesla's Autopilot system partly responsible for the collision. The court awarded $200 million in punitive damages and $43 million out of $129 million in compensatory damages. Tesla is now liable for nearly two-thirds of the total payout. The case marks a significant legal blow to Tesla's driver-assist technology. The crash occurred when driver George McGee ran a stop sign, flashing lights, and a T-intersection at 62 mph, slamming into a parked Chevrolet Tahoe. McGee admitted fault during the trial, stating he trusted the car to alert him and brake. "I trusted the technology too much," he testified. Tesla pushed back strongly, calling the ruling "wrong" and claiming it could slow progress in automotive safety. A spokesperson said the driver was distracted and speeding, which violated Tesla's safety instructions. The company also emphasized that drivers are told to stay alert and keep their hands on the wheel. Plaintiffs' attorney Brett Schreiber argued Tesla's branding, especially the use of the word "Autopilot," misled users. He said the company allowed the system to work on roads it wasn't designed for, and failed to disable it when drivers were distracted. Schreiber also accused Tesla of losing or hiding critical crash data. Tesla's defense insisted that McGee was solely at fault for dropping his phone and ignoring safety guidelines. They noted that he had driven through the intersection 30–40 times before without incident. Financial analyst Dan Ives commented that the ruling is a serious setback for Tesla and could impact the wider industry. Legal experts say the case could inspire more lawsuits against Tesla, as similar cases have often been settled or dismissed before trial. This ruling could lead to increased scrutiny of how Tesla markets its driver-assist features and raise pressure on the company as it moves forward with plans for fully autonomous vehicles.
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Opec+ makes another large oil output hike in market share push
[LONDON] Opec+ agreed on Sunday (Aug 3) to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, the latest in a series of accelerated output hikes to regain market share, as concerns mount over potential supply disruptions linked to Russia. The move marks a full and early reversal of Opec+'s largest tranche of output cuts plus a separate increase in output for the United Arab Emirates amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4 per cent of world demand. Eight Opec+ members held a brief virtual meeting, amid increasing US pressure on India to halt Russian oil purchases – part of Washington's efforts to bring Moscow to the negotiating table for a peace deal with Ukraine. President Donald Trump said he wants this by Aug 8. In a statement after the meeting, Opec+ cited a healthy economy and low stocks as reasons behind its decision. Oil prices have remained elevated even as Opec+ has raised output, with Brent crude closing near US$70 a barrel on Friday, up from a 2025 low of near US$58 in April, supported partly by rising seasonal demand. 'Given fairly strong oil prices at around US$70, it does give Opec+ some confidence about market fundamentals,' said Amrita Sen, co-founder of Energy Aspects, adding that the market structure was also indicating tight stocks. The eight countries are scheduled to meet again on Sep 7, when they may consider reinstating another layer of output cuts totalling around 1.65 million bpd, two Opec+ sources said following Sunday's meeting. Those cuts are currently in place until the end of next year. Opec+ in full includes 10 non-Opec oil producing countries, most notably Russia and Kazakhstan. The group, which pumps about half of the world's oil, had been curtailing production for several years to support oil prices. It reversed course this year in a bid to regain market share, spurred in part by calls from Trump for Opec to ramp up production. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The eight began raising output in April with a modest hike of 138,000 bpd, followed by larger-than-planned hikes of 411,000 bpd in May, June and July, 548,000 bpd in August and now 547,000 bpd for September. 'So far the market has been able to absorb very well those additional barrels also due to stockpiliing activity in China,' said Giovanni Staunovo of UBS. 'All eyes will now shift on the Trump decision on Russia this Friday.' As well as the voluntary cut of about 1.65 million bpd from the eight members, Opec+ still has a 2-million-bpd cut across all members, which also expires at the end of 2026. 'Opec+ has passed the first test,' said Jorge Leon of Rystad Energy and a former Opec official, as it has fully reversed its largest cut without crashing prices. 'But the next task will be even harder: deciding if and when to unwind the remaining 1.66 million barrels, all while navigating geopolitical tension and preserving cohesion.' REUTERS
