logo
Trump should be impeached (again) for his EPIC Epstein betrayal

Trump should be impeached (again) for his EPIC Epstein betrayal

Hey…have you heard that remix of a classic Bob Seger song called Old Time Rock & Roll?
The new version goes something like this…
'Just take those old records off the shelf…
Jeffrey Epstein DIDN'T KILL HIMSELF!'
Bad jokes aside…
It's not my country or president, but if they were, I'd be calling for POTUS Donald J. Trump's coiffed orange head on a stainless-steel spike by now. For more reasons than one.
Trump, and his Attorney-General Pam Bondi – among others – should be impeached for betraying the public, particularly their (MAGA) base, by blatantly covering up deceased convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, client list and blackmail network; an operation allegedly funded by Israel and coordinated by Mossad.
On the campaign trail and since being elected, Trump repeatedly said he would release the Epstein files.
On 21 February this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi was asked by Fox Anchor John Roberts, 'The DOJ (Department of Justice) may be releasing the list of Epstein's clients? Will that really happen?'
She answered, 'It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's been a directive by President Trump.'
Note: She did NOT say, 'Well, there is no actual physical client list from Epstein himself, per se , because…why would Jeffrey Epstein keep a tangible, readable list of all the clients he's blackmailing with a pedo honeypot operation – funded by Israel and coordinated by Mossad – on his bedside table or in his office desk drawer? Duh! It's just a file of the case sitting on my desk.'
No. She didn't say any of that. Instead, she specifically affirmed the existence of a client list…on her desk.
A week after that interview, on 27 February, AG Bondi in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), declassified and publicly released files related to the Epstein case…to a group of around 15 conservative 'influencers'.
Some of them held up the binders to the cameras, which showed that they were labelled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1.'
A review of the released documents found that they included heavy redactions and mostly information that had been previously reported. Many laughingly pointed out that there was more unredacted data on Epstein freely available on the internet than what was in those dossiers.
Nonetheless, if what was in those binders constitutes Phase 1…what happened to Phase 2?
Also on 27 February, just prior to the release of the files by Bondi, political advisor and counsellor to President Trump, Alina Habba was interviewed by the Western political establishment's favourite MSM echo-chamber and sock-puppet shill, Piers Morgan, about the 'imminent unleashing' of the Epstein files.
Morgan asked Habba,: 'AG Pam Bondi says the scale of what happened is far worse than anyone realised – well over 200, 250 victims – and we're going to get information from these files. Can you tell me about that?'
Habba answered: 'In Epstein's case, it is incredibly disturbing. We have flight logs, we have information, names that will come out.'
Piers (ever the fear and gossip monger) then asked: 'Is it going to be shocking?'
'I don't see how it's not shocking,' Habba replied. 'There were so many individuals who were hidden and kept secret and not held accountable. There's a general frustration with accountability, and I really believe now, with Kash (Patel) and Pam, there will be accountability.'
Nobody…least of all Trump's (MAGA) base…could anticipate or believe what happened next.
Last week, on 7 July, Trump's DOJ and FBI released a memo – undated and unsigned – that basically made two statements:
1) There is no Epstein 'client list', and 2) Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide.
It's worth noting that the memo was released on the same day that corrupt, genocidal, Zionist war criminal and illegitimate Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, was visiting President Trump – for the third time in 6 months.
It was also the same day that Bibi presented POTUS with a copy of his letter nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
An obvious question many are asking since the release of the FBI/DOJ memo is this: If there is no client list, why was Jeffrey Epstein prosecuted and jailed, and why is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for sex trafficking?
Elon Musk has been relentless in responding to the memo with a slew of highly critical posts, comments and memes on X.
Responding to the part of the memo that stated: 'There was no credible evidence Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions'. Musk wrote: 'So…then what is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for?'
He added: 'Stuff like this does not improve people's faith in government.'
Ironically, and suspiciously, the one person who insists that there certainly is an Epstein client list is the exact same person saying there is no Epstein client list: pro-Zionist, Israel-apologist, and all-round slimy attorney, Alan Dershowitz.
Ironic and suspicious because Dershowitz himself is reportedly on the flight log of the so-called 'Lolita Express' to Epstein's (Little St James) Island. Although he claims it was to consult with his then-client…Jeffrey Epstein.
When he's not appearing on the Piers Morgan show defending Israel's genocide in Gaza (and being destroyed by Dr Norman Finkelstein for it), Dershowitz has a reputation for getting sweetheart deals for perps (like O.J. Simpson) that would normally end up getting life imprisonment.
Among them, Jeffrey Epstein.
Lest we forget, it was Dershowitz who got Epstein that 'sweetheart deal' with federal prosecutors back in 2008.
Well, Alan Dershowitz just told (among others) News Nation that 'There is no client list and never has been a client list.'
He added, 'A client list suggests that Jeffrey Epstein made a list of people to whom he trafficked women. What there is…is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers.' Dershowitz said.
Back in March, Dershowitz told Sean Spicer in an interview (that Spicer resurfaced on 11 July) that he knows the list of names of alleged clients in the Epstein files.
'I know the names of the individuals. I know why they're being suppressed. I know who's suppressing them,' Dershowitz said.
'But I'm bound by confidentiality from a judge and cannot disclose what I know,' he added, and quickly pointed out that he was 'falsely' named as a client.
So, I think…what dodgy Dershowitz is basically telling us is…there is NO client list…except for the one that wasn't actually physically written down – by Epstein.
Dershowitz is also adamant that, contrary to rumours and allegations, Epstein was NOT an Israel or Mossad agent.
Others beg to differ.
Among them is virtuoso journo, Whitney Webb, who has written extensively – articles and books – about the Epstein saga (and who seems to have a savant-type gift for research and connecting dots), has pointed out in several interviews that Epstein was highly likely a Mossad agent, proxy or patsy.
Tucker Carlson also certainly seems to think Epstein was a Mossad agent (and he's not alone).
Speaking at Turning Point Summit last Friday, Carlson asked the packed room uncomfortable questions about Epstein, like, 'Why was he doing this, on whose behalf, and where was the money coming from?'
Somebody else who is 'a thousand percent' certain Epstein was a Mossad agent is researcher and journalist Ryan Dawson.
What gives credence to the theory that Epstein was being financed by Israel is the fact that he was a humble high-school math teacher one minute, a billionaire the next, who seemingly accumulated his massive wealth out of nowhere.
Ex-British member of Parliament and political commentator George Galloway recently pointed out on his talk show (MOATS): 'It is more than highly likely, it is undeniably true that Jeffrey Epstein was an agent of the Israeli intelligence service. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of Robert Maxwell – a decades-long officer of Israeli intelligence – met whilst Epstein worked in Maxwell's London office.'
Galloway then reminded us: 'Epstein went from being a maths teacher in a state school with no college degree to owning multiple aeroplanes, yachts, the biggest house in Manhattan, ranches in Arizona, villas in Florida, and an entire island in the Caribbean.'
'When you look at the people that he had around him, who gave him hundreds of millions of dollars, all of them are deeply implicated in the sins and crimes of the state of Israel,' he added.
Here's what worries me…
I'm wondering…what do they have in the pipeline…in store for us…to take allll the attention OFF this Epstein saga and put it on something else. Like they've done so many times before.
Like the time US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced to the world that the Pentagon had somehow 'misplaced' two trillion dollars. Remember what date that was?
10 September 2001. Can you remember what happened the next day?
Safe to say, by the next afternoon, no one was thinking or talking about the Pentagon's missing two trillion anymore.
Or the time Prince Andrew decided to make the self-assured but dumb-assed decision to 'clear up' the Epstein allegations made against him by trafficked victim, the late Virginia Giuffre, in that disastrous trainwreck of a BBC interview.
An interview that seriously compromised the royals with a scandal that could plausibly bring down the crown.
Fortunately, for the Royals, something else came along and took all the attention OFF that white-hot scandal and diffused the crown's crisis. It came in the form of a 'killer virus' called… Covid-19.
Go back and check the dates.
Prince Andrew's dumpster fire interview took place 14 November 2019, and was broadcast on the 16th. The virus suddenly allegedly surfaced a month later in December. And the official public declaration of a 'pandemic' by the WHO was 3 months later.
Connected? Coincidence? You tell me…
Regardless, convenient…don't you think? For Prince Andrew, that is. And his 'royal' family.
Incidentally, Prince Andrew settled (out of court) with Virginia Giuffre in February 2022, to the tune of £12 million (R287 million). Tell me…who gives £12 million to someone they've allegedly never met? Especially if that someone is 'falsely' accusing them of rape? What 'innocent' person would agree to that?
And who, after being given £12 million, commits suicide? Especially after, lest we forget, Virginia Giuffre specifically tweeted back in December 2019 that she was not suicidal.
In a recent development, according to Daily Mail , Ghislaine Maxwell, 63, has told sources that she is ready and willing to testify to Congress about her knowledge of Epstein's pedophile network – but the Republican-controlled Congress has not called her to testify.
In addition, on Monday, the DOJ urged the Supreme Court to reject an appeal made by Maxwell earlier this year to review her case.
(I don't get it. If there's 'no client list', why do they want Maxwell to remain in prison for sex trafficking? Trafficking… to who?)
Not to mention, Trump keeps losing his sh*t everytime some reporter asks him about Epstein.
As I write this…the Republicans have just voted to block the full release of the unredacted Epstein files.
Are we learning yet…?
Whether or not Trump will be impeached for this, or that long list of other betrayals, remains to be seen.
But if Trump, his handlers and minions, or the Republicans and Democrats thought this story was going away anytime soon, they were sorely mistaken. In fact, their worst nightmare may have just begun.
Because prolific super-sleuth journo and courageous conservative commentator Candace Owens, who exposed – among other things – the Black Lives Matter fraud, satanic origins of NASA, and the Brigitte Macron deception, has just dropped the first part of her new intensive deep dive series.
It's called The Epstein Files .
And part 1, Dead Men Tell No Tales begins by digging up and parsing the history and dubious legacy of a man named… Robert Maxwell.
Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein: What was their relationship?
Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein: What was their relationship?

The South African

time4 hours ago

  • The South African

Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein: What was their relationship?

Donald Trump's past ties with Jeffrey Epstein are under scrutiny after the US president slammed a Wall Street Journal report that he sent a lewd letter to the infamous sex offender as 'fake news.' Below, a look at the pair's relationship as the Trump administration also faces demands to release all government files on Epstein's alleged crimes and his death. Trump, then a property mogul and self-styled playboy, appears to have known Epstein, a wealthy money manager, since the 1990s. They partied together in 1992 with NFL cheerleaders at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, according to footage from NBC News, which shows the pair talking and laughing. The same year, Epstein was Trump's only guest at a 'calendar girl' competition he hosted involving more than two dozen young women, The New York Times reported. In a display of their close ties, Trump flew on Epstein's private jet at least seven times during the 1990s, according to flight logs presented in court and cited by US media. He has denied this, and in 2024 said he was 'never on Epstein's plane.' In 1993, according to The New York Times, Trump allegedly groped swimsuit model Stacey Williams after Epstein introduced them at Trump Tower – a claim the president has refuted. Separate from his links to Epstein, Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct by around 20 women. In 2023, he was found liable of sexually abusing and defaming American journalist E. Jean Carroll in a civil trial. Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein's main accusers who died by suicide this year, said she was recruited into his alleged sex-trafficking network aged 17 while working at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in 2000. Giuffre claimed she was approached there by Ghislaine Maxwell, who was jailed in 2022 for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls. Trump seemed to be on good terms with Epstein during this time, praising him as a 'terrific guy' in a 2002 New York Magazine profile. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side,' Trump said. In 2003, according to a Wall Street Journal report, Trump penned a letter for Epstein's 50th birthday featuring a drawing of a naked woman, with his signature 'Donald' mimicking pubic hair. His apparent message – Trump dismissed the letter as a 'fake thing' – read: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.' The pair reportedly had a rupture in 2004 as they competed to buy a waterfront property in Florida, which Trump eventually snagged. The two men were hardly seen together in public from that point. Trump would later say in 2019 that they had a 'falling out' and hadn't spoken in 15 years. Shortly after the property auction, police launched a probe that saw Epstein jailed in 2008 for 13 months for soliciting an underage prostitute. He was arrested again in 2019 after he was accused of trafficking girls as young as 14 and engaging in sexual acts with them. Trump, then serving his first term as president, sought to distance himself from his old friend. 'I wasn't a fan,' he told reporters when the charges were revealed. In 2019, Epstein was found hanging dead in his prison cell awaiting trial. Authorities said he died by suicide. Since then, Trump has latched onto and fueled conspiracy theories that global elites including former president Bill Clinton were involved in Epstein's crimes or death. Those same theories now threaten to destabilise Trump's administration, despite his attempts to dismiss the saga as a 'hoax' created by political adversaries. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news. By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse

South Africa reassures on trade ties with Russia amidst looming US tariffs
South Africa reassures on trade ties with Russia amidst looming US tariffs

IOL News

time6 hours ago

  • IOL News

South Africa reassures on trade ties with Russia amidst looming US tariffs

Following Trump's statement that US imports from Russia could face a staggering 100% tariff if peace talks regarding the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict do not bear fruit within 50 days, worries have mounted over what this means for countries engaging in commerce with Russia, including South Africa. The Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (dtic) has sought to allay concerns regarding South Africa's trading relationship with Russia in the wake of US President Donald Trump's recent tariff ultimatum. Following Trump's statement that US imports from Russia could face a staggering 100% tariff if peace talks regarding the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict do not bear fruit within 50 days, worries have mounted over what this means for countries engaging in commerce with Russia, including South Africa. Russia produces 10% of the world's crude, and it has been able to sell oil through discounted sales to China, India, Brazil and Turkey. According to the International Energy Agency Russia earned $192 billion from oil sales last year despite western sanctions. The oil price heading for its first weekly loss in three weeks last week after Trump gave Russia a 50-day ceasefire deadline, with the Brent crude falling by 0.5% to $69.21 per barrel by Sunday. South Africa, a member of the BRICS economic bloc alongside Russia, has already been grappling with the ramifications of heightened tariffs on its exports to the US. With negotiations currently underway concerning 30% tariffs affecting key sectors – from citrus and wines to minerals and automotive exports – the last thing South Africa desires is further complications on the trade front. Despite its modest reliance on Russian imports, the figures tell a nuanced story. South Africa's bilateral trade with Russia has seen only a 7% increase, climbing from $806 million in 2023 to $864m in 2024. In a wider context, Russia ranks as South Africa's 46th largest export destination and the 39th largest source of imports. This limited trade relationship implies that although Russia is an important ally in the BRICS bloc, the economic stakes remain relatively low. The geopolitical battleground may complicate future transactions; however, the South African government remains keenly aware of the need to sustain a stable trading relationship with Russia while juggling the demands of the US market. The dtic indicated that the dissimilarities in trade profile between South Africa and Russia may serve as a buffer against potential US sanctions. South African exports have notably surged by 5%, reflecting the resilience of its agricultural products in Russian markets. Items such as citrus fruits, apples, and even consumer goods like refrigerators have managed to penetrate the Russian economy. This expansion comes at a time when Western sanctions have compelled Russia to pivot towards alternative markets, with increasing reliance on discounted energy sales to nations such as China, India, and Turkey. However, the dtic reiterated that while the unilateral sanctions imposed by the US and EU on Russia did not directly bind South Africa, they carried an extraterritorial effect. This means that South African companies engaging in trade with Russia may face repercussions, including the inability to do business in the US and EU. Notably, some Russian banks have been removed from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, presenting barriers in banking relations and payment infrastructures for South African businesses. The dtic highlighted that despite sanctions affecting various sectors, there remains a segment of legal trade that continues unhindered. This gives South Africa a unique opportunity to bolster its agricultural exports to Russia, particularly at a time when Russia has imposed bans on food imports from several Western nations. 'There are certain products, banks, individuals, and companies that are not under sanctions. The sectors not under sanctions and legal trade can take place include: food, agricultural commodities, medicines and medical supplies,' said Yandeya Mashau, director for Europe trade relations at the dtic. 'The Russian nuclear industry remained exempt from sanctions and the national nuclear company Rosatom remained the largest actor in the international market for nuclear reactor construction (also playing key roles in nuclear fuel supplies, nuclear equipment supplies, and handling nuclear waste) 'Currently, SA banks are reluctant to finance transactions with Russia, even in products and sectors not under sanctions. According to Russia, 70% of bilateral trade takes place via third countries such as Turkey, Azerbaijan, Latvia, UAE, Qatar, etc. 'Therefore, although there are sanctions, trade can still take place. Russia responded with sanctions against several countries, including a total ban on food imports from Australia, Canada, Norway, Japan, the United States, the EU and the United Kingdom. This creates an opportunity for SA to supply agricultural products to Russia.' Michael Hewson, director at specialist African transfer pricing advisory firm, Graphene Economics, said Trump's focus on introducing new tariffs and his swift changes of direction regarding implementation of these tariffs had triggered retaliatory actions from certain trade partners and injected fresh uncertainty into global markets. 'Multinational enterprises (MNEs) that are manufacturing in Africa and then distributing into the USA will need to consider their value chains,' Hewson said. 'For example, imagine a South African company that manufactures automotive components and sells them to its sister company in the United States, which then sells the completed vehicles to American customers. The price at which the South African company sells the parts to its US counterpart is the 'transfer price'. The ripple effects of tariff-driven supply chain realignments and transfer pricing adjustments can be significant for African economies.' BUSINESS REPORT

European powers plan fresh nuclear talks with Iran
European powers plan fresh nuclear talks with Iran

eNCA

time16 hours ago

  • eNCA

European powers plan fresh nuclear talks with Iran

BRUSSELS - European powers plan fresh talks with Iran on its nuclear programme in the coming days, the first since the US attacked Iranian nuclear facilities a month ago, a German diplomatic source told AFP on Sunday. Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, "are in contact with Iran to schedule further talks for the coming week", the source said. The trio had recently warned that international sanctions against Iran could be reactivated if Tehran does not return to the negotiating table. Iran's Tasnim news agency also reported that Tehran had agreed to hold talks with the three European countries, citing an unnamed source. Consultations are ongoing regarding a date and location for the talks, the report said. "Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. That is why Germany, France and the United Kingdom are continuing to work intensively in the E3 format to find a sustainable and verifiable diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear programme," the German source said. Israel and Western nations have long accused Iran of seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has consistently denied. On June 13, Israel launched a wave of surprise strikes on its regional nemesis, targeting key military and nuclear facilities. The United States launched its own set of strikes against Iran's nuclear programme on June 22, hitting the uranium enrichment facility at Fordo, in Qom province south of Tehran, as well as nuclear sites in Isfahan and Natanz. - Kremlin meeting - Iran and the United States had held several rounds of nuclear negotiations through Omani mediators before Israel launched its 12-day war against Iran. However, US President Donald Trump's decision to join Israel in striking Iranian nuclear facilities effectively ended the talks. The E3 countries last met with Iranian representatives in Geneva on June 21 -- just one day before the US strikes. Meanwhile on Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a surprise meeting in the Kremlin with Ali Larijani, top adviser to Iran's supreme leader on nuclear issues. Larijani "conveyed assessments of the escalating situation in the Middle East and around the Iranian nuclear programme", Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said of the unannounced meeting. Putin had expressed Russia's "well-known positions on how to stabilise the situation in the region and on the political settlement of the Iranian nuclear programme", he added. Moscow has a cordial relationship with Iran's clerical leadership and provides crucial backing for Tehran but did not swing forcefully behind its partner even after the United States joined Israel's bombing campaign. - Snapback mechanism - Iran and world powers struck a deal in 2015 called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which placed significant restrictions on Tehran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. But the hard-won deal began to unravel in 2018, during Trump's first presidency, when the United States walked away from it and reimposed sanctions on Iran. European countries have in recent days threatened to trigger the deal's "snapback" mechanism, which allows the reimposition of sanctions in the event of non-compliance by Iran. After a call with his European counterparts on Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Western allies had no grounds for reactivating sanctions. "If EU/E3 want to have a role, they should act responsibly and put aside the worn-out policies of threat and pressure, including the 'snap-back' for which they (have) absolutely no moral (or) legal grounds," Araghchi said on X. However, the German source on Sunday said that "if no solution is reached over the summer, snapback remains an option for the E3". Iran last week said there would be no new nuclear talks with the United States if they were conditioned on Tehran abandoning its uranium enrichment activities. fec/gv By Femke Colborne

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store