National Convention spokesperson clarifies R700m budget as draft for people's dialogue
Image: GCIS
National Convention spokesperson Rev Zwoitwaho Nevhutalu has clarified that the widely discussed R700 million budget for the national dialogue was not a government allocation but a draft figure prepared by the preparatory task team.
The National Dialogue is scheduled to take place on August 15 to 16, 2025, in Pretoria.
Speaking at a media briefing at UNISA on Monday on the state of readiness to host the first Convention on National Dialogue, Nevhutalu stressed that the initiative is a 'people's project' and not solely a government undertaking.
The clarification comes after the estimated R700 million price tag ignited a wave of criticism from trade unions, political parties, academics, and sectors of civil society, especially in a context of austerity measures, service delivery failures, and deepening inequality.
'You see, the budget that people were talking about, the R700 million and so on, it was a budget prepared by the preparatory task team. It's not a government budget,' Nevhutalu said.
He explained that the conceptual funding framework envisages 60% of costs being covered by the government through the fiscus, while the remaining 40% would come from donors in cash and in kind.
He noted that contributions would be sought from businesses, the private sector, and civil society, with organisations such as churches and municipalities providing infrastructure and venues. 'Civil society has already done a lot,' he said.
Nevhutalu said most of the proposed funding would go towards community dialogues, which are planned to take place in every ward across the country.
'It is expected that we're going to have three dialogues per ward for the duration. I think it comes to like 13,600 dialogues,' he said.
These sessions will focus on grassroots discussions about the future vision of South Africa.
He emphasised that the budget remains provisional, with Treasury still in discussions over the government's contribution.
Entities will also be approached and mobilised by the steering committee and eminent persons groups to secure additional support, he said.
'This is a people's project. It's not something that is really a government project,' Nevhutalu said.
The National Dialogue, however has been rocked by the withdrawal of several prominent organisations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation, WDB Foundation, Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group.
In a joint statement issued on Friday, the group said the decision was made with 'deep regret,' but was necessary to protect the process's credibility and integrity.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
They accused the organisers of shifting the initiative away from its citizen-led origins toward government control.
'What began as a citizen-led initiative has unfortunately in practice shifted towards government control,' the statement read.
'In pushing forward for a Convention on August 15, at the will of government officials and against the advice of the Sub-Committee Chairs, we believe that a critical moment in which citizens should be leading will be undermined.'
The group raised concerns about a rushed timeline, inadequate logistics, and a lack of meaningful engagement.
They warned that the Convention, as currently planned, risked becoming more symbolic than substantive.
'The rushed timeline, constrained logistics, and limited interactive design mean that the proposed Convention no longer offers a meaningful platform for engagement,' they said. 'It risks becoming more performance than participation.'
They also cited possible violations of the Public Finance Management Act due to 'emergency procurement' processes and unresolved disagreements within the Planning and Technical Task Team (PTT).
While they have withdrawn from the August 15 event and related planning structures, the Foundations reaffirmed their commitment to the broader goals of the National Dialogue.
They proposed that the Convention be rescheduled for December 15, 2025, allowing for better preparation and ensuring participatory integrity.
'We cannot pursue that goal by cutting corners, centralising power, or rushing the process,' they said.
hope.ntanzi@ol.co.za Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
44 minutes ago
- IOL News
Civil society groups reject President's National Dialogue as exclusionary
Criticism of President's National Dialogue: A Missed Opportunity for Unity Image: X The President's planned 'National Dialogue' is being sharply criticised by civil society groups, who say it is 'neither national nor a dialogue' as it fails to unite the country. In an interview with IOL on Tuesday, Paul Maritz, Free SA Campaigns Director, contended the national exercise is neither truly national nor a meaningful conversation about the country's future. The organisation stated that divisions can only be overcome through honest dialogue and that the current format excludes entire sectors of society, including key political parties. 'South Africans must remain in constant conversation about our shared future. Unfortunately, in this case, the President's planned National Dialogue is neither national nor a dialogue in any meaningful sense. 'Entire sectors of society, including key political parties, were excluded from the outset. That makes this look far more like a PR exercise than a sincere, open conversation about where we are 30 years into democracy and how we move forward together,' said Maritz. Free SA expressed a pattern of disengagement from prominent foundations that had been expected to back the process. The Steve Biko Foundation, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, the Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, the FW de Klerk Foundation, the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Foundation, and the Strategic Dialogue Group have all withdrawn, casting a pall over what many hoped would be a more inclusive national conversation. The organisations cited violations of the dialogue's core principles and called for postponement to ensure adequate preparation, coherence, and participatory integrity. Responding to the withdrawal by the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Free SA noted the importance of former President Thabo Mbeki's role in persuading parties and citizens to engage. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'Former President Mbeki's role is significant, both because of his stature and because he represents a tradition of thoughtful political engagement,' the organisation said. 'His withdrawal, or that of organisations he supports, would be a serious blow to the credibility of this process. If respected voices like his are not fully on board, ordinary citizens will rightly question whether this is worth their time.' The Democratic Alliance (DA), the country's second-largest political party and a governing partner in a national unity framework, is among the groups that have rejected the National Dialogue. Free SA assesses that if a ruling coalition partner cannot be won to participate, the broader public is unlikely to be convinced of the process's legitimacy. 'If you cannot convince your coalition partner to participate, how can you hope to convince the rest of the country? The process loses legitimacy without their involvement before it even begins,' Maritz argued. Meanwhile, The MK Party (uMkhonto weSizwe Party) has condemned the National Dialogue as an expensive political stunt, while services are collapsing nationwide. The party described the Dialogue as a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, bypassing Parliament, and granting the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making without democratic oversight. 'This National Dialogue is a Trojan horse for backroom political deals, not a platform for genuine national problem-solving," the party asserted. The MK Party also highlighted what it calls urgent national failures that deserve attention before any dialogue can yield real progress. It pointed to a litany of service delivery and governance crises across several provinces, arguing that public resources are being diverted to political theatre rather than addressing urgent needs: Free SA and its critics argue that the National Dialogue risks becoming more about optics than addressing root causes such as poverty, inequality, and governance failures. 'From what we can see, it risks being nothing more than a political tool. It does not seriously address the root causes of poverty, inequality, and poor governance. 'A true national dialogue would require a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to make space for voices that may disagree with the President's vision,' Maritz said. IOL Politics
Eyewitness News
44 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
FF Plus 2nd GNU party to pull out of National Dialogue
CAPE TOWN - The Freedom Front (FF) Plus is the second Government of National Unity (GNU) party to withdraw from the National Dialogue, accusing the African National Congress (ANC) of being uncompromising and wanting to hijack the process. Party leader Corne Mulder said that while he firmly believes a dialogue is crucial to finding solutions to the country's myriad problems, the ANC is setting the wrong tone. ALSO READ: AfriForum accuses Ramaphosa of capturing National Dialogue, turning it into ANC monologue The upcoming convention, which starts on Friday, is meant to set the scene for the dialogue. But it's been mired in controversy since several foundations linked to former presidents and struggle stalwarts withdrew from the process last week. Announcing his party's withdrawal from the National Dialogue on Tuesday afternoon, FF Plus leader Corne Mulder accused the Presidency, under the influence of the ANC, of wanting to dictate the direction the National Dialogue will take. Mulder believes civil society should steer the process. "It seems to me that the ANC, with their intent and their utterances, are an obstructive role player in this whole thing." Mulder said recent remarks by the ANC's Secretary General, Fikile Mbalula, that the party is not prepared to back down from its existing policies make the dialogue futile and a waste of money. "There's a need for a dialogue, but perhaps even without the ANC. Because as long as that's the ANC's view, then there's no sense in any other dialogue because they are clearly not prepared to address the challenges." The party said it will send its CEO to attend Friday and Saturday's convention as an observer instead.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
AfriForum accuses Ramaphosa of capturing National Dialogue, turning it into ANC monologue
JOHANNESBURG - Lobby group AfriForum said President Cyril Ramaphosa has captured the National Dialogue and turned it into an African National Congress (ANC) monologue. The group and its affiliate, Solidarity, have withdrawn from this weekend's national convention. From Friday, one thousand delegates will gather at the UNISA building in Pretoria to set the agenda for the dialogue. ALSO READ: But last week, legacy organisations such as the Thabo Mbeki Foundation withdrew from the convention, saying it's been rushed. Afriforum said the dialogue has deviated from being citizen–led. "What we are seeing now is that the president and the ANC are dictating what the agenda should be – they are dictating who should manage the process and the rest of us – the citizens will just have to sit and listen to what their agenda is."
