
Puducherry residents want strict enforcement of rules prohibiting meetings along main roads
In the recent days, several places in the town have witnessed road blockages due to holding of political events. With political activity gathering steam ahead of 2026 Assembly elections in the Union Territory, residents believe that lack of administrative intervention at this juncture would lead to more such violations in the days to come.
Residents say most political parties are breaking the tradition of holding meetings in designated areas such as in an open ground or a convention hall. The political parties, supporters of leaders and organisations are conveniently organising meetings on main roads after blocking a stretch, unmindful of the difficulties that may arise to road users.
Recently, the Airport Road was witness to two major events, one as part of the birthday celebrations of a Youth Congress leader and the other relating to the induction of a former Congressman into the ruling All India N R Congress fold. While the birthday celebrations were held at Jeeva Colony junction on an evening, the induction ceremony was organised near Navalar High Secondary School in the morning hours.
'On the day when the birthday celebrations happened, I had to take a circuitous route to reach my home at Avvai Nagar. After I crossed Pakkamudayanpet and entered Lawspet Main Road, I was asked to take the ECR road and reach Latha Steel junction to reach my residence. Several students and office goers were put to undue hardship because of the road block,' Ravikumar, a resident said.
The induction ceremony saw an even worse traffic hold-up as it happened during peak hours on a stretch that houses several schools and government colleges. As the main road was closed near the Navalar School junction, people had to travel through bylanes of residential areas to reach their destination.
'We don't know who gave permission to block a main road for holding a political event, that too during peak hours when hundreds of people travel on the stretch to reach educational institutions and offices. The road is not even closed for such a long time when a VIP arrives at the Airport. Even during VIP visit, a particular route will only be blocked for a few minutes for the movement of cavalcade. On Monday, the entire road was blocked for two hours for the political event,' he said.
In both the political events, according to a shop owners on Airport Road, the top leaders of the parties were present when the traffic diversions and blockage happened on the stretch.
According to another resident, the road in front of Cluny School has turned into an accident-prone stretch. 'Despite the road being narrow, the supporters of the leader were allowed to put party flags after digging holes on either side. A good part of the road is taken up for putting party flags. If this trend is allowed, political meetings will continue to be held on thoroughfares blocking movement of vehicles,' the resident said.
As the Union Territory is heading towards another election, the administration should immediately stop political parties and organisations from organising events by causing disturbance to road users, residents demanded.
ends

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
13 hours ago
- The Hindu
India stands strong and united, says Bitta lauding nation's security response after Pahalgam attack
India's firm retaliation following the Pahalgam terror attack has restored national security and demonstrated the country's uncompromising stance against terrorism, said Maninderjeet Singh Bitta, chairperson of the All India Anti-Terrorist Front (AIATF). Former national president of Youth Congress, Mr. Bitta hailed Prime Minister Narendra Modi's anti-terrorist policies while interacting with mediapersons in Thrissur. He was here for Ayurveda treatment at the Sitaram Beach Retreat, Nattika. He said, 'Pakistan was forced into silence after India's strong counteractions. Claims that India fired at Pakistani aircraft are baseless. This is a clear victory for Mr. Modi and a result of a united national stance.' Mr. Bitta, who has survived over 14 assassination attempts during the peak of terrorism in the 1990s, has long stood as a symbol of resilience against extremism. Reflecting on his past, he said, 'I have turned down several positions. My life itself is a bonus. I don't seek power or positions anymore.' 'No Khalistan' Mr. Bitta, who heads the AIATF, an organisation actively supporting war widows and victims of terrorism, reiterated his strong opposition to separatist movements. He said, 'Khalistan will never be created. It was never made and will never be. If it is to be built, it will be only over our corpses. India is one and will always remain united.' He pointed out that the Khalistan movement, which claimed over 36,000 lives in Punjab during the 1980s and 1990s, was successfully subdued by combined efforts of the Centre and the State. Today, he said, the movement is weak within India, though ISI-backed terrorists continue to operate from foreign soil, particularly Canada. Credits ayurveda Mr. Bitta credited ayurveda for his physical revival, noting remarkable improvements after receiving traditional treatment for injuries sustained in past bomb attacks. 'I suffered severe leg injuries. For decades, walking was painful. After receiving treatment at Sitaram, I can now walk without a stick. I am now a devotee of ayurveda and its healing power,' he said. This was Mr. Bitta's third visit to the Nattika retreat, and he expressed his desire to return again in the future. 'Ayurveda has given me my health back. The world must recognise its potential,' he added.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Yathindra's comparison of CM Siddaramaiah with Krishnaraja Wadiyar kicks up row
Mysuru/Bengaluru: A political controversy erupted Saturday after Congress MLC Yathindra, son of chief minister , claimed the Congress govt led by his father had done more for Mysuru than Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar—the widely revered Maharaja of the erstwhile Mysore princely state. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If you look at the grants released by Siddaramaiah for Mysuru, no one else has ever done so much for it. The amount of development Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar has done for Mysuru, a matching grant has been released by the Congress govt led by Siddaramaiah for the city," Yathindra had said in Mysuru. The statement triggered strong backlash from the erstwhile royal family of Mysuru, opposition BJP functionaries, and others. While Siddaramaiah appeared to distance himself from the comparison, the remarks ignited sharp criticism. Mysuru MP and scion of the family, Yaduveer Krishnadatta Wadiyar said, "When someone gets power, it is meant for serving people. Coming to power is not a game. Whether it was Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar or the elected govts after independence of the country, all have had responsibilities towards the people. No one sets a target to outdo others. What is more important is that we have to live up to the expectations of people. " Senior Congressman-turned-independent MLC AH Vishwanath also condemned Yathindra's comparison, calling it arrogant. "The statement that Siddaramaiah's govt has done more work than Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar is the height of arrogance. Siddaramaiah calls himself bigger than former chief minister late Devaraj Urs and now his son terms his father towering over the Mysuru Maharaja. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It seems arrogance is running in their blood. " Opposition leader in the legislative assembly, R Ashoka of BJP, dismissed the remark as a poor joke. "Can there be any comparison between Krishnaraja Wadiyar and Siddaramaiah? Siddaramaiah hops from one party to another for power. This comparison has no meaning at all." Ashoka also highlighted Krishnaraja Wadiyar's enduring legacy. "The Krishnaraja Sagar dam, improvements of the irrigation system, introduction of electricity in the state — a first in India — and the foundations for higher education and industrialisation were all achieved by the Maharaja. If there was anyone who worked towards social justice in Karnataka, it was the Mysuru Maharaja whereas Siddaramaiah is creating rift between castes," he said. Siddaramaiah avoided mentioning the late Maharaja and instead turned his attention to political rivals. "We have done more work than BJP. The saffron party has done nothing, but we have done more," he told the media at Arsikere in Hassan district, when asked about Yathindra's comments.


India Today
2 days ago
- India Today
Why BJP old guard in Punjab, national leadership aren't buying the SAD reunion talk
When Sunil Jakhar stood before the media and declared it was time for the BJP to rejoin hands with the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), many in the party's Punjab unit heard not a call to action but an echo from a past they have been trying to leave former Congressman-turned-BJP state chief framed the idea as essential for preserving communal harmony in Punjab, but those who've spent decades in the trenches of the state's politics—BJP old-timers, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) swayamsevaks and ideological foot soldiers—felt a creeping dj vu they had hoped was long July 7, BJP national president J.P. Nadda appointed Pathankot MLA Ashwani Sharma as the state unit's working president. Punjab was the only state, along with Manipur, that couldn't complete the organisational elections to elect unit chiefs for mandals and districts, which forced the appointment of Sharma as working president, not a full-fledged one. However, days later, the party high command conveyed to Sharma to complete the process and get the regular elections done. These weren't ordinary developments but the party returning to its trusted years ago, the party high command had experimented by appointing Jakhar to lead the state unit, but the decision backfired. Jakhar could neither read party old-timers' pain points not was aligned to the BJP and Sangh's core ideology. For the generation that built the BJP in Punjab through the eighties and nineties, mostly as a junior partner of the dominant SAD, there is little romance in that alliance. Sharma was party chief twice during the alliance and among the leaders who felt suffocated during those days. The biggest signal from the party high command of admission of a past goof-up came with the return of Sharma, who had been removed mid-term to accommodate BJP leaders in the state argue that the experiment with Jakhar had failed because he couldn't understand the DNA of the party and the Sangh's value system. 'Whatever Jakhar has conveyed are his personal views. The decision of alliance or no alliance [with SAD] will be taken by the party leadership,' said a top BJP leader from old-timers in Punjab argued that the central leadership, while handing back the state unit reins to Sharma, had conveyed that there was no scope for any re-alliance with SAD. 'The party will grow organically as well as inorganically on its own merit,' said a BJP leader in Delhi with a grip on Punjab voters in Delhi voted for a BJP contesting without any alliance with SAD. In Punjab, the challenge is to build the structure and communication lines in the countryside—the boroughs dominated by Jat Sikhs. In the past, SAD would come in handy. The BJP tried to do the same with Jakhar, a Hindu Jat from the rural pockets.A BJP leader in Punjab said the erstwhile alliance with SAD was an arrangement that suited the Badals more than the BJP. 'The Akalis dictated terms, took the lion's share of seats and kept the BJP confined to urban pockets,' the leader said. Even then, the BJP had to tiptoe around the Akali line on everything, from religious issues to rural politics. Over time, it became clear to the BJP that this wasn't a coalition of equals but one tilted steeply in favour of the BJP-SAD alliance finally broke in 2020, triggered by the contentious central farm laws, it wasn't just a political divorce—it was a moment of liberation for many within the BJP in Punjab. For the first time, the party could test its real strength in the state. They argue that SAD has no ground presence left, and the Sukhbir Badal faction is no comparison to the erstwhile panthic party, enjoying neither credibility nor the core voter base. 'We don't see all factions of the Akali Dal realigning under the Badal family anytime soon,' said a BJP modest results in the assembly elections in 2022 hinted at long-term potential. More significantly, the 2024 Lok Sabha polls delivered some validation. The BJP may not have won any Lok Sabha seat, but it led in 23 assembly segments and came a close second in around 10 more—without SAD help. The BJP got around 19 per cent of the votes while SAD's share slipped below 12 per cent. In 65 assembly segments, the BJP got more votes than SAD. And this when radicalisation was at its peak and residual anger of the farmer unions was against the leaders who had once campaigned under the suffocating weight of Akali dominance, this was a breakthrough. There was finally space to articulate a nationalist, development-focused Hindutva pitch that didn't have to pass through SAD's panthic filter. Many in the party's older generation now believe that rekindling the SAD alliance would be akin to trading away their hard-earned autonomy for a partner in terminal under Sukhbir Badal's stewardship, is a pale shadow of its former self. Credibility has eroded across constituencies—from rural Malwa to the urban fringes. The party's handling of the sacrilege incidents, its back and forth on farm law politics, and reputation as a dynastic, insular outfit have all contributed to the steep fall. SAD won just three assembly seats in 2022, its worst performance ever. In the 2024 general election, its vote share stagnated and its appeal among younger Sikhs seemed even more all this, Jakhar's push to renew the alliance has come with a sense of urgency. He argued that communal amity in Punjab was best served by a SAD-BJP partnership. But in the backrooms of BJP offices in Patiala, Amritsar and Ludhiana, that logic is being questioned—not just on ideological grounds but political arithmetic.A senior BJP leader from the Doaba region, who's been part of the organisation since the Atal Bihari Vajpayee era, put it bluntly: 'We've finally started talking to Sikh voters without SAD as the interpreter. Why would we give that up now?' Indeed, for this generation of BJP leaders, the goal isn't just to win elections—it's to build a political identity that resonates with Sikhs independently of the Akali evolution aligns with the RSS's long-term view. Over the past decade, the Sangh has deepened its outreach to Sikh scholars, institutions and cultural bodies not only in the state but nationally and internationally. The aim has been to engage in ideological dialogue, not transactional but certainly, Sangh leaders—in Punjab and nationally—have fostered spaces for Sikh voices that are both devout and nationalist, without leaning on SAD as the intermediary. These include scholars working on Sikh history with a national lens, Dera leaders with social service platforms and even local granthis open to engaging with Sangh-linked the past, SAD and its leaders took credit for work done by the central government. A top BJP leader in Delhi argued that the Modi government, in its first two terms, had erased the list of 'blacklisted Sikhs' who were denied entry into India, worked with the Pakistan government to open the Kartarpur Sahib corridor, besides adhering to Sikh sensibilities, such as allowing Amritdhari Sikhs to carry kirpans on domestic flights. To take the messaging down to the grassroots was ally SAD's job. 'But because of their credibility crisis, the party (SAD) still finds it challenging to convince Sikhs in the state,' said a BJP reacting to Jakhar's statement, said that elections in Punjab were far away and his party would align only with those who stand for the cause of Punjab. Akali Dal insiders list their demands as including the release of convicted Sikh militants, but BJP leaders point out that the Modi government, in its first term, had released some Sikh militants, yet their party got no BJP and Sangh leaderships, over the past five years, have intensified engagement with the Sikh leadership in social, political as well as religious spheres. The engagement is bearing fruit. The rise and decline of figures such as Amritpal Singh, the weak showing of Khalistan-aligned candidates in Canada's 2024 elections, and the broader disinterest among Punjab's youth towards separatist narratives suggest that de-radicalisation is underway. It's slow and uneven, but unmistakable. The vacuum left by this decline offers space—not to SAD but to a BJP that can speak clearly, confidently and respectfully to Sikhs without hiding behind old changes are visible, such as the state BJP taking a stance in favour of actor-singer Diljit Dosanjh over the controversy erupting from his movie Sardaar Ji 3 featuring a Pakistani actress opposite him. Radical Sikh groups were using the issue to rile against the central government as well as Hindutva elements. The BJP effectively curtailed it by backing Dosanjh instead of indulging in precisely why many in the BJP view Jakhar's suggestion as a step backward. 'This is old medicine for a new disease,' said a party leader from Bathinda. 'Jakhar wants to treat Punjab 2025 with the formulas of Punjab 1995. It doesn't work anymore.' Even those who respect Jakhar's political instincts see his idea as a reaction to short-term electoral anxiety, not a strategy rooted in ground also growing belief that SAD no longer brings votes to the table. If anything, an alliance with them might drag the BJP down with the baggage of past controversies and declining credibility. 'We've spent years distancing ourselves from their misgovernance,' said another senior BJP hand from Amritsar. 'Why would we want to share a stage with them again now?'Instead, there's a growing push within the BJP to design its own political matrix for Punjab—from scratch. This means looking at caste equations anew, building alliances with backward classes, reaching out to ex-servicemen and traders and expanding in regions where neither the Congress nor the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is Majha, for instance, the BJP sees potential among the border villages and Hindu-Sikh mixed constituencies. In Doaba, NRIs and Dalit voters are increasingly open to hearing a non-Akali nationalist pitch. In urban Malwa, BJP leaders are betting on middle-class fatigue with both AAP and a BJP leader explained, Jakhar's nostalgia for the old alliance may come from his days in the Congress, where broad-based coalitions were the default. But the BJP's DNA in Punjab is different. It has been forged through ideological struggle, often against the grain, and with long-term vision rather than short-term now, senior BJP leaders are choosing not to confront Jakhar publicly. But their message is clear: the BJP must not outsource its Sikh outreach to SAD again. The future lies not in reviving tired partnerships but in forging fresh connections—one village, one dera, one scholar at a to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch