On New Zealand Based USA FBI Enforcement Office
New Zealand Government may, for the first time, be demonstrating they are getting realistic about their statements of – 'We are going to get tough on organised crime'.
As a New Zealand citizen it is reassuring to hear the announcement today that the USA FBI has the go ahead from New Zealand government to set up an 'FBI Enforcement Office' to be based in Wellington, New Zealand.
The USA and most likely the United Kingdom, must have recognised the need for New Zealand to have a helping hand to establish, implement and monitoring the threats arising from organised and trans-national crime.
An examination of New Zealand's infrastructure to adequately fight, monitor or report on such crimes is, almost, non-existent. In other words, New Zealand Government is well-behind in its knowledge-base and technology systems to adequately protect its citizens or guide the Pacific Island nations, on how to manage the risks from organised crime and transnational crime.
The announcement by USA FBI Chief, Kash Patel, confirmed the focus of this NZ based FBI unit was to ensure stability and peace in the Pacific Island region. There was mention of the need to manage monitoring of risks arising from the increasing presence of State China and State Indo-China in the Pacific Islands region. Mr Patel aligned these risks to narcotics trafficking and other type trans-national crime offending.
The objectives of this unit will be positive news to the people of the Pacific Island communities. Hopefully the NZ-USA FBI Unit will also capture New Zealand across its web of countries that it starts monitoring and enforcing against. This would be a significant benefit to New Zealand's citizens.
But there are many questions that sill need answering. What laws in New Zealand will this NZ-USA FBI Unit draw its powers from? Where will its data servers be based? How will citizen privacy information be managed and sharing of information from NZ to the USA government led unit?
Let's see what eventuates but I am confident this news today is positive for all law abiding New Zealanders and the community members in the Pacific Island region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Autocar
28 minutes ago
- NZ Autocar
Government to replace petrol tax with electronic RUCs
Cabinet is working to transition New Zealand's 3.5 million light vehicles to paying for our roading network through electronic road user charges. This will replace the petrol tax, says Transport Minister Chris Bishop. 'The abolition of petrol tax, and the move towards all vehicles (whether they be petrol, diesel, electric or hybrid) paying for roads based on distance and weight, is the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years,' Mr Bishop says. 'Right now, New Zealanders pay Fuel Excise Duty (FED, or petrol tax) of about 70c per litre of petrol every time they fill up at the pump with a petrol car. Diesel, electric, and heavy vehicles pay Road User Charges (RUC) based on distance travelled. 'This revenue is funnelled into the National Land Transport Fund which funds the building of new roads and maintaining our existing ones. 'For decades, petrol tax has acted as a rough proxy for road use, but the relationship between petrol consumption and road usage is fast breaking down. For example, petrol vehicles with better fuel economy contribute less FED per kilometre towards road maintenance, operations, and improvements. 'We are also seeing a fast uptake of fuel-efficient petrol hybrid vehicles. In 2015, there were 12,000 on our roads, while today there are over 350,000. 'As our vehicle fleet changes, so too must the way we fund our roads. It isn't fair to have Kiwis who drive less and who can't afford a fuel-efficient car paying more than people who can afford one and drive more often.' 'This is a change that simply has to happen. The government has recognised reality and is getting on with the transition. 'The Government's plan will eventually see all vehicles pay based on actual road use (including weight) regardless of fuel type. 'The transition will happen in stages, beginning with legislative and regulatory reform to modernise the current RUC system and enable private sector innovation. 'The current RUC system is outdated. It's largely paper based, means people have to constantly monitor their odometers, and requires people to buy RUC in 1000km chunks. 'We're not going to shift millions of drivers from a simple system at the pump to queues at retailers. So instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers. 'A handful of E-RUC companies already do this for about half of our heavy vehicle fleet and there are several companies, both domestic and international, with innovative technology that could make complying with RUC cheaper and easier.' Key legislative changes the Government is progressing include: 'The changes will support a more user-friendly, technology-enabled RUC system, with multiple retail options available for motorists,' Mr Bishop says. 'Eventually, paying for RUC should be like paying a power bill online, or a Netflix subscription. Simple and easy. 'I expect to pass legislation in 2026, followed by an updated Code of Practice for RUC providers. We will also engage with the market in 2026 to assess technological solutions and delivery timelines. In parallel, NZTA and Police will upgrade their systems to support enforcement in a digital environment. 'By 2027, the RUC system will be 'open for business', with third-party providers able to offer innovative payment services and a consistent approval process in place. 'At this stage, no date has been set for the full transition of the light vehicle fleet. That's a deliberate choice, as we're focused on getting the system right rather than rushing its rollout. 'This is a once-in-a-generation change. It's the right thing to do, it's the fair thing to do, and it will future proof how we fund our roads for decades to come.'
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality
By Phil Mattingley , CNN US President Donald Trump delivers remarks on reciprocal tariffs during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, DC, on April 2, 2025. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski Analysis : President Donald Trump's relentless use of tariffs to coerce foreign counterparts into favourable deals is about to run headlong into the limits of geopolitical reality. Trump's willingness to dramatically escalate the long-running US economic warfare in response to Russia's war on Ukraine is real, advisors say. His threat to accelerate sweeping tariffs on India is certain to come to fruition, they insist. But he also faces the backdrop of a looming deadline to extend a trade truce with the world's second-largest economy that requires a degree of caution as White House deliberations come to a head. "He's pissed," one person close to Trump said of his rapidly deteriorating view of Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. "But he's also aware of the competing priorities here." Trump faces a unique challenge balancing all of his simultaneous demands: He is threatening punishing sanctions on the Russian energy production that serves as the financial linchpin of Putin's war machine at the same moment he is seeking leverage in trade talks with India while maintaining a fragile trade détente with China. The convergence of conflicting priorities has driven intensive discussions inside the West Wing about the range and scope of the options Trump could trigger as soon as today - and put a significant amount of weight on the meeting between Putin and Steve Witkoff, his trusted foreign envoy , underway in Moscow. Trump has threatened sweeping secondary sanctions on Russian energy that would primarily hit China and India, the two largest purchasers of Russian energy . But he's also considering more tailored options, including sanctions that target specific tankers - known inside the government as the "shadow fleet" - that are utilised to skirt the existing Western sanctions regime in the transport of Russian oil, two US officials with the knowledge of the matter said. Russia's President Vladimir Putin Photo: AFP The Biden administration's evolving sanctions actions found success in blacklisting the vessels critical to Putin's sanctions evasion efforts. Secondary sanctions tailored specifically to India in some form have also been discussed, the officials said. Trump feels empowered to trigger those secondary sanctions that were long weighed by his predecessor, but never deployed due to soaring inflation and concerns about a significant increase in domestic gas prices. That is a problem Trump simply doesn't have right now, as waning global demand and a steady increase in output by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies have mitigated the concern about the energy price spikes that bedevilled the Biden administration. For the Trump administration, that has created leverage as frustration with Putin's refusal to come to the table has dashed Trump's envisioned quick end to the three-plus year conflict. Those dynamics also played directly into the recent breakdown in long running and intense trade negotiations between the US and India, advisors say. While there is obvious overlap between Trump's escalating threats targeting Russia and his explicit warnings about India's energy purchases , the dispute with the world's fifth-largest economy is specific to the trade talks, the officials say. "We consider a wide range of options, but this is a situation more of convenient coincidence than overarching strategic long-game," one of the officials said. Donald Trump and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi has soured compared with this warm embrace in February 2020. Photo: Mandel Ngan / AFP Trump has acknowledged as much. "The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high," Trump said in an interview on Tuesday with CNBC. Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, has called India as "the Maharaja of tariffs," underscoring a long-running view that India's expansive protection of its domestic markets has been a significant frustration for Trump and his trade team. As the clock ticked toward Trump's 1 August "reciprocal" tariff deadline and foreign partners offered significant concessions on US market access, India was a notable exception, officials said. "The president wanted deals that substantially opened markets - everything or near everything," a senior administration official said. "They were interested in opening some of their markets, but not nearly ambitious enough to meet the president's view of what would constitute a good deal." So while India's purchases of Russian energy and Russian military equipment was well known on the periphery, Trump elevated those friction points to the forefront as he sought to pressure Indian negotiators, the official said. Any large-scale effort to trigger secondary sanctions, however, would crash directly into the delicate maintenance of US-China trade talks which have seen both countries utilise economic statecraft, sanctions and export controls to exert or ease pressure on the bilateral relationship over the course of months. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned his Chinese counterparts directly, during the third round of face-to-face talks last week, that Trump was serious about secondary sanctions and it was something Chinese officials needed to prepare for in the weeks ahead. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent at the White House. Photo: MANDEL NGAN/AFP But as US and Chinese officials have quietly continued discussions over the technical details of an agreement to extend their existing trade truce, the concern about the impact secondary sanctions would have on those dynamics has been a factor inside the administration, officials say. Trump has yet to officially sign off on an extension, even as his top advisors made clear it was only a matter of time before Trump blesses it. For Trump, who has operated throughout his second term in a perpetual state of running deadlines, that clock is ticking concurrently with his deadline for Putin. The decision on the latter now weighs heavily on the status of the former. -CNN
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Trump plans to meet with Putin as soon as next week
Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. Photo: Olga MALTSEVA and SAUL LOEB / AFP US President Donald Trump plans to meet in person with Russian President Vladimir Putin as early as next week, the New York Times reported, citing two people familiar with the plan. Trump then plans to meet with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the newspaper reported, adding that the plans were disclosed in a call with European leaders on Wednesday. The White House did not immediately respond to the report but earlier on Wednesday (local time) Trump acknowledged that he spoke with European leaders after US envoy Steve Witkoff's "highly productive" meeting with Putin in Russia . While noting that "great progress" was made during the meeting, Trump wrote on Truth Social: "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come." Trump, who promised to end Russia's war in Ukraine on "day one" during his presidential campaign, has held several phone calls with Putin and has met with Zelensky since returning to the White House in January. However, in recent weeks, he has become increasingly frustrated with Moscow over a lack of progress towards ending the three-year conflict. - Reuters
