US Senate permits arms sales to Qatar, UAE amidst controversy over jet gifted to Trump
Arms sales to Qatar and the United Arab Emirates have been given the go-ahead after a Democratic Party-led effort to halt them failed in a US Senate vote on Wednesday.
The resolutions failed 39-56, allowing the deal to proceed.
Democrats had introduced legislation in the Republican-controlled Senate to block weapons sales to the two Gulf states over allegations of corruption.
Lawmakers alleged that the Pentagon's acceptance of a $400m Qatari jet and an Emirati firm's recent investment in a Trump-affiliated cryptocurrency had compromised the integrity of the sales.
The resolutions sought to stymie a $1.9bn weapons sale to Qatar and a $1.3bn weapons sale to the UAE.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The Qatar sale consisted of eight MQ-9 Reaper drones, a model previously employed by the US in Gaza and Yemen, along with Hellfire II missiles and 227-kg bombs.
The second resolution opposed the sale of six Chinook helicopters to the UAE.
Arms sales to the UAE have previously faced criticism over the UAE's support for the Rapid Support Forces, a Sudanese faction accused by some, including the US State Department, of committing acts of genocide.
Corruption accusations
Democrats say the weapons sales are tainted with corruption.
Qatar recently gifted the Pentagon a $400m jet, which will be refurbished to serve as Air Force One before being retired to US President Donald Trump's presidential library.
The jet had become the centre of political controversy after Democrats likened the gift to a bribe.
How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East Read More »
Additionally, last month, an Emirati firm invested $2bn in a Trump-affiliated cryptocurrency.
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, who backed the resolution opposing the arms sales, alleged that these deals compromised the integrity of the sales.
'My case is that so long as the relationship is corrupted by the gifts to Trump, we can't move forward on these arms sales… there are legitimate underlying policy debates on the two sales, but my case here is you should look beyond the merits of the sale and really focus on the corruption,' Murphy stated earlier this week.
The resolutions to block the arms sales failed, however, with five Democrats joining Republicans to support the sales.
Senate Republicans dismissed the resolutions as political theatre, with Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair Jim Risch saying they 'make arms sales to some of our closest allies in the Middle East about partisan politics'.
Republican Senator Rand Paul voted "present" on the resolutions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
14 minutes ago
- The National
Fate of Iran nuclear talks in doubt as Israel continues to attack
The US hopes that talks with Tehran about its nuclear programme will continue, despite Israel's attacks on Iran that have called into question the merit of negotiations. Following Friday's strikes, Iran said it was withdrawing from the sixth round of nuclear negotiations that were due to take place in Oman on Sunday with US Special Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff. The talks were supposed to forestall military action against Iran by forcing it to give up all uranium enrichment capabilities and abandon its drive to obtain a nuclear weapon. For weeks, US President Donald Trump sounded optimistic that a deal could be reached, while also threatening dire consequences for Iran if it didn't make an agreement. Ultimately, Israel rendered the thrust of those talks moot by launching a 'pre-emptive' strike against Iran's military leaders and its nuclear sites. Despite those actions, Mr Trump insisted Iran possibly has a 'second chance' to come to the negotiating table. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian empire. No more death, no more destruction, just do it, before it is too late,' he wrote in another post on Truth Social. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Iran will make Israel regret its attacks. 'The Iranian nation and the country's officials will not remain silent in the face of this crime, and the legitimate and powerful response of the Islamic Republic of Iran will make the enemy regret its foolish act,' Mr Pezeshkian said in a video statement aired on state TV. Mr Trump later told Reuters that the US still has nuclear talks planned with Iran on Sunday but that he is not sure if they will take place. 'I tried to save Iran humiliation and death,' Mr Trump said, adding he is not concerned about a regional war breaking out as a result of Israel's strikes. A US official told The National that Washington is planning for talks to continue. 'We still intend to have talks,' the official said, without specifying when these might occur. When asked by NBC News why he thinks Iran would still want to hold talks, Mr Trump said Iranian representatives were calling him to suggest they still wanted a deal. 'The same people we worked with the last time … Many of them are dead now,' he told the network. Alex Vatanka, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said Iran might continue talks, provided the country's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is willing to do so. 'He has to make a decision' about how much he wants to respond, Mr Vatanka said. 'If he wants to step down, the obvious thing to do is to go back to the negotiations, to look for a way to either give up enrichment, temporarily or for good, or find a compromise somewhere between,' Mr Vatanka said. 'If you can avoid humiliating Ali Khamenei, if you think you … he's going to stay in power, then don't humiliate him. Find a way for him to find it easy to come back and negotiate'.
Middle East Eye
36 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's attacks on Iran amount to crime of aggression, legal scholars say
Israel's attacks across Iran on Friday, which targeted "dozens" of sites including nuclear facilities, military commanders and scientists, are manifestly illegal, leading scholars of international law have said. Accusing the government in Tehran of beginning to build nuclear warheads, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attack was aimed at "rolling back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival", adding that it would take "many days". "We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme," Netanyahu said in a recorded televised address. "We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile programme." Netanyahu's decision is premised on "preventive self-defence" arguments, which justify the use of force against another state to prevent an anticipated future attack. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, such an argument is inconsistent with the rules governing the use of force under international law, including the limited justifications for the use of force established by the United Nations Charter and the prohibition of the crime of aggression. The use of force is only lawful if it seeks to repel an imminent attack or one that is underway, experts have explained. International law scholar Marko Milanovic said that the stated goals of Israel this time are about preventing a future nuclear attack by Iran. It is not a response to an attack that has started, or one that is imminent. Iran has yet to obtain any nuclear weapons. Therefore, there was no threat of an imminent attack justifying preemptive self-defence. 'It cannot reasonably be argued that Iran would imminently attack Israel, or that using force was the only option to stop that attack' - Marko Milanovic, legal scholar There are three positions with respect to the right to self-defence under international law, explained Milanovic in an article for Ejil Talk. The first is that states can use preventive self-defence to deflect future anticipated threats, in particular those perceived to be existential. The second is that states can use force with the aim of preempting future attacks that are imminent, and the third is that states can only resort to the use of force when attacks have already occurred. According to Milanovic, the use of force to prevent a future attack, as used by Israel in its Friday operation, is considered 'legally untenable' by the majority of international lawyers. "Israel's use of force against Iran is, on the facts as we know them, almost certainly illegal," he wrote. Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter prohibits "the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state". 'No self-defence at all' The only justification for the use of force is outlined in Article 51 of the UN Charter, which is to respond to an attack that is underway. "Unless Israel is able to provide substantially more compelling evidence than is currently publicly available, it cannot reasonably be argued that Iran would imminently attack Israel, or that using force was the only option to stop that attack," said Milanovic. "Israel is therefore using force against Iran unlawfully, in violation of Article 2(4) of the Charter. It is committing aggression." The crime of aggression is one of the four core international crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), alongside genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It refers to the planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of an act of aggression, or use of force in violation of the UN Charter, by a person in a leadership position, such as a head of state or senior military commander. Other scholars on Friday also accused Israel of committing the crime of aggression. Professor Kevin Jon Heller of the University of Copenhagen said: "Few acts are more unequivocally illegal than preventive (non-imminent) self-defence. So Israel's attack is both unlawful and criminal - the crime of aggression." "Israel's attack on Iran is not simply a violation of the UN Charter. It is a manifest violation of it," he wrote on X. Sergey Vasiliev of the Open University of the Netherlands also qualified the attack as falling under the crime of aggression. "This operation is an unlawful use of force," he wrote. "Iran presented no imminent threat to Israel that would justify such an attack. This is an act of aggression." Netanyahu's justification for Friday's attack is similar to arguments made by Russia to justify its invasion of Ukraine, said Milanovic, or those used by the US to justify the use of force against Iraq. "The problem with this approach is that it is so boundless that it completely eviscerates the prohibition on the use of force - a state could act whenever it perceives an existential threat," argued Milanovic. "In short, this 'preventive' form of self-defence is simply not self-defence at all." According to Jon Heller, while the US has taken the same position as Israel only occasionally, "Israel is the only state that has unequivocally endorsed the right of preventive self-defence."
Middle East Eye
36 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel attacks Iran: Tehran's residents fearful and angry after strikes
At roughly 3:30am the first Israeli missiles rained down across the Iranian capital Tehran. "Both my husband and I were thrown from our bed. The explosions didn't stop. We had no idea what was happening," said Samira, a resident of the northern Tehran neighbourhood of Kamranieh. The windows of the entire apartment had shattered and the chandelier had crashed to the floor. "We got up from the ground in fear and realised the apartment across from ours had been bombed," she told Middle East Eye. Samira - not her real name - lives directly opposite the residence of Ali Shamkhani, an advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, who was among the senior Iranian officials reportedly killed in Israeli air strikes oi the early hours of Friday morning. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Describing her survival as a "miracle," she said the dining table in her living room was blown to pieces by the force of the blast. Soon after, the sound of warning sirens and emergency vehicles rushing to extinguish fires could be heard resonating across the city. Onlookers gather in front of a building damaged in an Israeli strike on Tehran on June 13, 2025 (AFP) Shamkhani was Tehran's representative at talks with the US over a new deal to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities and ease tensions in the region. His death - which the Iranian government is yet to confirm - alongside the deaths of senior figures in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), senior military leaders, scientists and countless civilians, has obliterated hopes for a diplomatic solution. Now Israel is saying that its operations against Iran, which have heavily targeted its nuclear facilities and reportedly killed 78 people in Tehran alone, could last for more than two weeks. The most brutal attack to hit the capital since the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988 has left the city's residents reeling, angry and fearful of what could come next. Panic and fear Bahram, a 45-year-old architect living in the Pasdaran neighborhood in northeastern Tehran, was also jolted awake by the blasts. He lives near the Shahid Rajaei complex, one of the main targets of the Israeli strikes. At first, he thought the sound was thunder, but when the explosions continued, he got out of bed and saw smoke rising from the window. 'I stepped onto the balcony, and the entire area smelled of gunpowder,' he said. Friday's attacks are not the first targeting the capital in the past year. In July 2024, Israel killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh after attending the swearing-in of Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian in Tehran. Middle East Eye reported that witnesses believed Haniyeh was killed by a projectile fired at a guesthouse controlled by the IRGC. 'I stepped onto the balcony, and the entire area smelled of gunpowder' - Bahram, Tehran resident But Friday's attacks have marked a severe escalation, excarbated by their open-endedness. Danial, 39, lives in the Marzdaran district in western Tehran - another area reportedly targeted by Israel. He says he woke up in shock from multiple blasts, disoriented and frightened. 'All the car windows on my street were shattered,' he said. "And the tires had blown out.' Just hours after the strikes, panicked residents rushed to petrol stations to fill lines formed across fuel stations in the capital. The mix of anger, confusion, and uncertainty was etched on the faces of locals. Some, however, are hoping the attacks will remain limited to military and official targets. Mixed feelings The Israeli and Iranian governments have been enemies for a long time, with both regularly threatening the other regimes' destruction. Among ordinary Iranians, however, views are somewhat more mixed - while some are angry at Israel over its attacks on Iranian soil, others are critical of the Iranian government, which has become increasingly unpopular over a mix of heavy-handed repression, economic failure and corruption. 'Finally, someone took revenge on these criminals,' said 21-year-old Mahsa, a university student. 'Things can't get worse than they already are. We've suffered so much. Let it be done with - death once, mourning once. Whatever happens, it can't be worse than this.' 'Finally, someone took revenge on these criminals' - Mahsa, student 41-year-old Farzaneh, who works in sales at a private auto parts company, said that while she was "scared and worried" she also wanted to "stay hopeful." "Hopeful that in a not-so-distant future, we can live freely and peacefully without cruel people like those who rule over us now," she explained. The war on Gaza, which began in October 2023, has had a polarising effect on a lot of Iranians. While the government and much of the populace has been supportive of the Palestinians, some opposed to the Islamic Republic are sympathetic to Israel and its opposition to a regime they see as a tyranny. Danial, for his part though said Israel "only understands force." "It's naive to think this will be the end of it," he said . "They've attacked our land, and they must be answered with decisive force.' Until 'there is nothing left' The sense of optimism that had permeated Iran after the signing of the 2015 nuclear deal is a distant memory. In his latest comments on the Truth Social network on Friday afternoon, US President Donald Trump warned that Iran should sign a new deal with the US before Israel launched further attacks and "there is nothing left" of the country. Israel's attack on Iran prompts widespread support and alarm at home Read More » Ryan Costello, Policy Director with National Iranian American Council, told MEE that prospects for a new deal were looking bleak. "While we hope that the war will not spread out of control, Iran will not negotiate a nuclear deal when under active bombardment," he said. "Diplomatic efforts need to pivot to ending the bombing and keeping the US out of the war. Unfortunately, Trump's initial remarks after the strikes do not seem grounded in that reality, and risk ensuring the US is a target in any reprisals." Iranian officials have vowed a 'strong and unforgettable' retaliation against Israel, already having launched around 100 (largely intercepted) drones on Friday. The scale of that response - and Israel's counter-response - will likely shape the lives of tens of millions of people, both inside Iran and across the Middle East, and Tehran's residents are waiting with bated breath.
