
‘Why did HR ghost me after my job interview?' — Jobseeker asks and gets advice from career coach, who also advises HR to stop ghosting interviewees
Welcome to modern job-seeking purgatory—otherwise known as being ghosted by HR. On Channel NewsAsia (CNA)'s Work It podcast, host Tiffany Ang and career counsellor Gerald Tan dissected the all-too-familiar agony of job interview limbo.
In particular, they addressed an email letter from a listener, 'Gary' (not his real name), who poured out his frustrations about being ghosted after going through multiple rounds of interviews. So why are job seekers getting ghosted?
Gerald Tan didn't mince his words: 'You're certainly not the only one that's haunted by this ghost.' Many job seekers, he says, 'send in tons of applications, and they really don't know where the applications go.'
Platforms may show your application as 'under review' for weeks or months, with no follow-up, and even after multiple interview rounds, many companies go quiet. 'The most common reason this happens,' Gerald explains, 'is very simply—sometimes HR forgets to close the loop with the candidates.'
That's right. Forget.
While they're busy pushing successful candidates through to the next round, others are quietly shelved and left to refresh their inbox in vain. Some companies even state outright: 'We'll only contact you if you're shortlisted,' which, let's face it, is corporate speak for 'Don't call us. We'll call you, or rather… We'll ghost you.'
However, ghosting has consequences. 'I think he [Gary] probably has a very bad impression of the company right now,' Gerald says, and he's not wrong—job seekers do talk. And tweet. And leave company reviews on Glassdoor .
So here's Gerald's plea to HR professionals everywhere: 'Please, please, please close off the loop with all your candidates… also tell them what areas they may have been unsuccessful. Where did they lose out, so that they have some closure?' How long should you wait before following up?
Gerald's rule of thumb is two weeks. However, 'there's no hard and fast rule about this,' he clarifies, 'but I would recommend not waiting anything longer than two weeks.'
That said, don't assume rejection just yet. Hiring can be a sluggish beast, especially during peak travel or holiday seasons.
'The hiring manager might go overseas… and that's where some of the recruitment gets hung in the midst of the air,' Gerald explains. 'Good recruiters will keep the candidates warm… they will tell them, 'Hey, we need a bit more time.''
In fact, some candidates have received callbacks two months later. Yes—two months. 'I heard of cases where people thought that the job is done and dusted… two months later, ding ding, they get a call.'
One such delayed offer came from a major multinational tech company. So, patience may pay off—just don't bet the house on it. Don't put all your interview eggs in one job basket
Gerald's advice to Gary and every jobseeker out there stuck in limbo: Keep the momentum going.
'Don't put all your eggs in one basket or one job row just because you've gone through several rounds,' he advises. 'Keep interviewing so that you get multiple offers and can properly evaluate which is best for you.'
In other words: Don't let one ghost stop your hustle. Move on, apply elsewhere, and keep your options open. That next interview might just be the one that sticks. Should I drop a follow-up note?
Tiffany then posed the million-dollar question on behalf of all ghosted job seekers: 'What happens if I don't hear back after two weeks? Should I drop a note?'
'Yeah, you should most definitely drop a note,' Gerald affirms. 'Politely inquire about the status… whether you made it through the next round.'
The keyword here is 'politely' because 'Many jobseekers, out of anxiety… send multiple emails,' Gerald cautions. 'Then it gets irritating for the HR person.'
One email is enough. Maybe two, max. Don't cross over into 'Hey, just following up for the 5th time this week' territory. Nobody likes a clingy candidate. Can I mention I have other job offers?
What if you're on a ticking clock and need to make a decision? Tiffany asked, 'Should I be honest and say, 'Hey, I'm considering something else, so it would be good to know if I'm still on the KIV list'?'
Gerald's take: It depends—just don't sound like you're issuing ultimatums. 'It's okay for you to say that if that's really the case,' he replied, 'but don't say that as a threat… they might think you're trying to push them and call you out on your bluff.'
Honesty is still the best policy. Just keep it humble and sincere. You want to be remembered as the one who followed up gracefully, not as the one who strong-armed a decision. Don't take it personally: Ghosting isn't about you
As personal as it feels, ghosting often isn't a personal attack. Sometimes it's bureaucracy, sometimes it's disorganisation, sometimes it's just plain neglect.
Either way, don't take it to heart. Stay professional. Stay persistent. Most importantly, stay sane.
Because in the unpredictable jungle of modern job-hunting, ghosting is unfortunately part of the terrain, but with good strategy and resilience, you'll come out on the other side—with a job that actually values you enough to write back.
Meanwhile, in a time when layoffs are becoming the new normal and artificial intelligence (AI) is the new office colleague who never takes a coffee break, Singaporean millennial Jeraldine Phneah has a story to share — one that's equal parts sobering, sincere, and surprisingly uplifting for those who are facing the terrible fate of retrenchment like she did.
You can read Jeraldine's full story here: 'How I coped facing layoffs as a millennial' — Singaporean shares her 'retrenchment story' as a reminder that even in 'difficult seasons — growth and renewal are possible'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
'If unemployment's so low, why am I competing with a small village for one job?'
SINGAPORE: A recent Reddit post made waves with job seekers all over the Lion City. One user, newly out of work and plunging headfirst into the job market, shared a startling disclosure: 'I recently left my job and was trying to job search. Boy, I was shocked at the number of applicants per job vacancy. Never have I ever encountered this in my entire job search history, but what seems contradictory is our government keeps saying unemployment data is low, like, how's that even possible? Are they drunk on Kool-Aid?' It's an attitude that has become increasingly familiar, scanning through LinkedIn and other job boards, and seeing a pile of applicants for just one job opening can be extremely depressing. The user's confusion triggered a burst of responses from fellow Reddit users, providing discerning and more insightful views of what those daunting numbers actually signify. More clicks, less clarity One of the most common responses was about the way job platforms count applications. It appears that not all 'applicants' are truly in the race or are actually applying. One commenter said, 'LinkedIn's representation is not accurate! I learned a bit late, but better late than never—they count as long as you click, so maybe a role in SG got 150 applications, but half could be overseas, and a chunk of the rest might not even complete the application. That 150 could actually be more like 50 real submissions.' This disclosure was informative. Many users don't know that ticking the 'Apply' button on LinkedIn frequently records them as applicants, even if they leave in the middle of the process. Some are even counted as new applicants if they click on the same job the next day or next week, so that jaw-dropping figure you see is the overblown result caused by inquisitive browsers, hopefuls from overseas, and unfinished applications. Unemployment ≠ job applications Another shared misunderstanding addressed was the supposition that every job application mirrors a jobless person. 'The number of applicants doesn't equal the number of unemployed in Singapore. People are looking to change jobs, people are applying out of the country, and people are applying just because.' Career movement means that even people with jobs or professionals with thriving careers may actively apply for new roles. That is because people continue to seek better pay, more career growth opportunities, or are simply trying to escape a toxic environment. Others are also freelancers looking for stability, or students pursuing entry-level roles even before their graduation. As one commenter concisely puts it: 'You left your job without finding another job first. Many people job hop after securing their next move. A chunk of applicants is already employed.' Advice to job seekers – stay flexible As a reaction to the apparent disparity between high rivalry and low joblessness figures, some users cited that economic task forces have been motivating job seekers to have an open mind and expand their prospects. 'Keep an open mind: Economy taskforce calls on new grads and job seekers to consider all opportunities.' That could mean taking a look at industries outside of one's comfort zone and usual scope, upskilling, or even considering contract jobs and gig roles as stepping stones. Is the Kool-Aid spiked? There's no trouble feeling sceptical, especially when personal experiences don't align with authorised data, but the statistics, as many Reddit users explained, aren't automatically inconsistent; they're just more complicated than they appear to be on the surface. What appears to be an outpouring of competition may, in truth, be just a combination of ghost applicants, duplicate clicks, not-so-serious overseas aspirants, and working professionals who are keeping their options open. For those navigating today's job market, the message is simple — don't be disheartened by huge numbers. Focus on honing your skills and improving your CVs, continue building connections, and always stay adaptable. The real competition might be less than you think, but the effort needed is still big.


Independent Singapore
an hour ago
- Independent Singapore
Singaporeans dream of retiring abroad — but reality may be more complicated
SINGAPORE: A Reddit post on Jul 13 has sparked a wave of honest conversation among Singaporeans about what it really takes to retire overseas. In a country where the cost of living remains high and retirement age continues to climb, the idea of spending one's golden years abroad — where daily expenses are lower and space more abundant — is an increasingly attractive prospect. But how realistic is it? The original poster suggested that China and Malaysia seemed like reasonable retirement options — close to home, relatively affordable, and well-connected to Singapore. Others chimed in quickly, discussing destinations ranging from Australia to New Zealand, yet amid the hopeful anecdotes, one highly upvoted comment struck a chord: 'You can't just waltz into another country and retire like it's your backyard.' The commenter highlighted key concerns: legal residency, visa restrictions, and cultural and bureaucratic barriers. 'Golden Visas can cost a lot, and they are subject to change,' they warned. 'Imagine buying property in a foreign country, thinking you can retire there, only to have the laws change overnight.' Here's a closer look at what retirement abroad actually requires — from visa hoops to financial hurdles — in the most commonly discussed countries. Malaysia: The familiar yet formalised option Malaysia remains one of the most talked-about retirement destinations for Singaporeans — and for good reason. It's nearby, shares cultural and linguistic overlap, and has excellent and affordable healthcare infrastructure in Tier-1 cities like Kuala Lumpur, Penang, and Johor Bahru, but it's not as simple as hopping across the Causeway. The Malaysia My Second Home (MM2H) programme is the main long-term visa scheme. It offers three tiers — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — along with a special track for designated Special Economic and Financial Zones (SEZ/SFZs). Each tier comes with its own fixed deposit and property investment requirements, ranging from a modest RM 600,000 (about S$170,000) for Silver to over RM 4.5 million for Platinum applicants. For many Singaporeans, these financial thresholds — while not unattainable — require serious planning. China: More hurdles than hope for retirees Despite China's affordability and rich cultural offerings, it doesn't have a formal retirement visa. Foreigners looking to stay long-term often rely on the F-class business visa, which requires applicants to start or invest significantly in a Chinese company, with investment thresholds in cities reaching up to US$2 million (S$2.7 million). See also Stories you might've missed, Nov 12 Alternative options include spousal visas or stacking back-to-back tourist visas, but both come with uncertainty. Bureaucracy, language barriers, and limited access to public services for foreigners can make retiring in China a challenging path. Australia: Expensive, but comfortable Australia's climate, quality of life, and access to healthcare have long appealed to Singaporeans, but retiring there is both costly and impermanent. The Investor Retirement Visa requires proof of substantial financial assets — between AUD$500,000 (S$ 420,000) and AUD$750,000 — and an annual income of AUD$50,000 to AUD$75,000. The visa can potentially serve as a pathway to permanent residency, but it must be renewed in the meantime. Moreover, the upfront application fees can exceed AUD$11,000. New Zealand: A long game In New Zealand, retirees must either qualify under the parent category — which prioritises applicants with sponsors or income — or through investor routes. The latter requires at least NZ$750,000 (S$575,250) in investments and NZ$500,000 in living funds, with NZ$60,000 annual income. It also demands patience. The path to permanent residency takes at least five years, and as with other countries, applicants must show they can afford healthcare and insurance during their stay. Retiring abroad: Not just a financial question While online forums are filled with hopeful speculation about life abroad, the reality is complex and bureaucratic. Beyond finances, Singaporeans must grapple with the risk of changing laws, unfamiliar systems, and potential isolation, especially if family and friends remain in Singapore. Yet, the appeal is incredibly strong: cheaper housing, a slower pace of life, more space to breathe — add to the mix diverse weather patterns and new landscapes to explore. As the retirement age continues to push past 65, many are questioning whether it's worth waiting to grow old at home if home itself becomes unaffordable, whilst you witness the remaining tenure of your HDB decrease. The dream of retiring abroad is not out of reach. It's a dream that requires more than wishful thinking, a passport, and a property brochure — it needs a plan, patience, and a healthy dose of optimism.


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
India's HCLTech slides on lower operating margin forecast
Shares of HCLTech dropped about 3 per cent on Tuesday after India's No.3 software services provider lowered its annual operating margin forecast, dampening hopes of a rebound in client spending across the sector. On Monday, HCLTech reduced its annual operating margin forecast to a range of 17 per cent to 18 per cent from a previous projection of 18 per cent to 19 per cent for fiscal year 2026.