Europe auto group welcomes US-EU deal as 'de-escalation'
EU-US trade deal
that will apply 15-percent tariffs on European auto exports as a "de-escalation" and an easing of uncertainty.
In a statement, the European Automobile Manufacturers Association (
ACEA
) said it "supports de-escalation," as director general Sigrid de Vries said "the agreement takes an important step towards easing the intense uncertainty surrounding
transatlantic trade relations
in recent months, and ACEA welcomes this development in principle.
"Nevertheless, the US will retain higher tariffs on automobiles and automotive parts, and this will continue to have a negative impact not just for industry in the EU but also in the US," she said.
US President
Donald Trump
and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched a customs agreement in Scotland on Sunday, whereby European automotive products exported to the United States will be taxed at 15 percent rather than the 30 percent Trump had earlier threatened to impose from August 1 in the absence of an accord.
The automotive industry is one of those most affected by the Trump tariffs, both for the export of cars, particularly German ones, to the United States, and for the manufacturing of cars in North America.
The ACEA said it would have to examine closely the details of the agreement as "at this stage, many elements of the agreement still need to be clarified.
"ACEA will closely examine the details as they become available and assess the implications for Europe's vehicle manufacturing.
"Looking forward, the EU and the US should focus on reducing obstacles to vital transatlantic automotive trade, paving the way for stronger economic ties and shared prosperity," De Vries added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US man laments decline of local shops in America, praises Europe's walkable street culture. Video
A US-based content creator named Adam, known as 'trvlking' on Instagram, has sparked an online discussion after posting a video lamenting the disappearance of locally-owned shops in America. In a viral video, a US man lamented the decline of mom-and-pop shops in America.(Instagram/trvlking) (Also read: 'Magnets abroad feel stronger': Indian man in Sweden on why NRIs don't return) In the video, Adam remarks, 'America has lost the art of the mom-and-pop shop. In America, when you want coffee, you go to Starbucks. If you want art supplies, you go to Walmart. If you want fruit and vegetables, you probably also go to Walmart. But here in Europe and other places too, you have these small locally-owned shops for almost anything you can think of.' Europe's walkable variety, America's corporate sprawl He walks through a street, pointing to different niche shops — 'Fruit and vegetables here. A store for everything plastic. And your local coffee shop.' He adds, 'The craziest part is that almost all of these things are usually within a 10 or 15-minute walk. The American mind cannot comprehend this.' Take a look here at the clip: Caption fuels nostalgia for lost neighbourhood culture In the caption of his post, Adam expands on his sentiment: 'America has lost the art of the mom and pop shop. I love being able to walk five minutes to a little store that sells exactly what I'm looking for, and being greeted by a nice person who's been running the store for probably 40 years. It just adds depth to your life that you can't get when your main place of shopping is Walmart.' Internet reacts Though the video has attracted nearly 4,000 views and several reactions. One user recalled, 'I remember thinking the exact same thing when I visited England for the first time. I saw a speaker music store, a vacuum shop, and a tailor all on the same street.' Another pointed the finger at big companies, saying, 'Corporations are 100 percent to blame.' One user simply wrote, 'It's called community. America, unfortunately, has lost its value and respect for community.' Another added, 'True. America talks a big game on small business, but small businesses get short confession.' A commenter shared, 'I already left and I don't plan on ever going back!' to which Adam replied with a brief, 'Nice.'
Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Short-term hiccups, long-term rewards
That this is not a good week for India-US relations is an understatement. With 25% tariffs, threat of a 'penalty' for purchasing oil and military equipment from Russia, criticism for being a part of the Brics grouping, and sermons over an apparently 'dead economy' and 'obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers,' US President Donald Trump has made clear that India, who he still calls a 'friend', is high on his imagination. His irritation might even be personal. It's difficult to say. The conclusion of what appears to be a last-minute trade agreement with Pakistan, still with 19% tariffs, and a plan — the details of which are best known to the President — to develop untapped and 'massive oil reserves' within Pakistan is striking, if not mystifying to global oil experts. Understandably, within India, anger has dimmed the vision for promise in a relationship that has transformed in the past two decades. Well known television anchors have selflessly advised the government to 'draw a line' because, apparently, 'Trump always chickens-out'. Given that the Indian Parliament is in session, news channels have one sound bite after another on this crucial relationship, the state of the Indian economy, and much else. Friends in Washington D.C. who have spent a lifetime building trust between the two countries are appalled. 'What is lost,' argues Evan Feigenbaum, a former US official who played a key role in getting the US-India civil nuclear agreement across the line, 'is trust that took 25 years of painstaking, hard, bipartisan work and a huge lift by advocates in both countries'. Trust, the former official argues, is 'hard to build, easy to lose'. To be sure, within India, those who have remained sceptical, to put it mildly, of deepening US-India ties find themselves back in the limelight. Russian social media handles are electrified. 'We stand with India' are lines being circulated on WhatsApp groups and through unattributable handles. There is little doubt that in some office corner in China, a disinformation campaign is on the loose. Yet, whilst fully acknowledging the complexities woven into these difficult days for Indian and American interlocutors who have battled hard for a better future, this is neither the time for India to engage in grammar wars — this can be left to anchors and pundits alike — or, in fact, give-up on the functional aspects of the relationship. Understandably, there will be an impulse to pause ties across the board. Politically, it might be prudent too. But this is the time to demonstrate a version of altruism keeping the future in mind. For US experts, the term altruism refers to some strange conceptualisation of benevolence. Supporting India without asking for something in return, they would argue, was the spirit that drove American officials to go out of their way to accommodate India's civil nuclear ambitions. Currently, the verve is to turn altruism on its head, and for India to give more than it gets — to get past Trump 2.0. Many in India will disagree with this conceptualisation. I do. But that's another matter altogether. What is needed is an altruism not to react to a President who may well be negotiating for a better day or determinately pushing India where it hurts. He may hit India with 30% tariffs next week. His negotiators and their counterparts within India, who in all likelihood had agreed on terms for the first tranche of the trade deal, may still prevail. It is impossible to tell. What is clear is that no one in the US, including those within the White House can second guess Trump's next move or tweet. What is required is for India to be lingually altruistic to a President, who only in part controls the temperature and shapes the trajectory of a relationship that has proliferated well beyond government ties. This is the real success of the US-India relationship: The creation of a wide and spirited ecosystem that is fusing ties that go well beyond the government and foreign military sales. This is not to say that the drum that beats within the White House is not important. It is not necessarily all-important. The trust that has been built may not, in fact, be that easy to lose. Neither can it be taken for granted any longer. But this will require persistent engagement at the functional level and within this broader ecosystem. There are some 1,500 American Global Capabilities Centres peppered across India. Cutting-edge American defence platforms are being assembled in Hyderabad. Every major American technology firm has deep investments in India. This number is only growing. India's space companies service contracts for the US Space Force. The lists of these intersections are almost countless. For India's own economic and technological growth, a good part of the future lies with the US beyond Trump. This, of course, does not mean taking the bait for geopolitical realignments, which the government seems firm on. And rightly so. In fact, in a couple of months, the US may even strike an agreement with Russia, turning the tide on the current pressure on oil sales. If the Quad summit takes place in October or November, there is still an opportunity to functionally streamline and add substance to the myriad of working groups from cyber and infrastructure to space and critical and emerging technologies. AI infrastructure deals are unlikely, as of this moment, to stop in their tracks. India will host the Global AI Impact Summit in February 2026. Every technology company in the world wants to be involved, and all American firms want to send their top brass to Delhi. This is an opportunity to further deepen an already invested ecosystem. In sum, there is no doubt that India is in a tight spot. But not an impossible one. As of this moment, there is nothing to suggest that all is lost. It is not. Yet, at the functional level from government to industry and from technology to investment portfolios, there is a need to engage — for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for a little time, to bridge ties beyond normalcy. Notwithstanding all the noise on the television channels and in Parliament, it is in India's interest to be linguistically altruistic for the sake of a relationship that has the space and dexterity, at least for some time, to bridge ties beyond immediacy. Rudra Chaudhuri is director, Carnegie India. The views expressed are personal.
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Elon Musk's Starlink Axed In Canada's Ontario Amid Trump's Tariff War Firstpost America
Elon Musk's Starlink Axed In Canada's Ontario Amid Trump's Tariff War | Firstpost America | N18G US-Canada trade tensions: The Canadian province of Ontario canceled a $68.12 million satellite high-speed internet contract with Elon Musk's company Starlink, following through with a vow by the province's premier, Doug Ford, to cut ties in retaliation for US tariffs imposed on Canada. Ontario's threat to block American goods first emerged after President Trump imposed tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminum and proposed a 35 per cent duty on exports. Despite urgent rural internet needs, Musk's project became collateral damage in the trade dispute. Musk, once an ally of Trump and a key figure in his administration, saw their alliance crumble over policy disagreements. As Canada and the US scramble to finalise a trade deal before the August 1 deadline, Prime Minister Mark Carney warns talks are complex and may not conclude in time. See More
