Trump says Mexico, EU to face 30% tariff from Aug 1
Both sets of duties would take effect August 1, Trump said in formal letters posted to his Truth Social platform. The president cited Mexico's role in illicit drugs flowing into the United States and a trade imbalance with the EU as meriting the tariff threat.
The EU swiftly slammed the announcement, warning that it would disrupt supply chains, but insisted it would continue talks on a deal ahead of the deadline.
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has unleashed sweeping tariffs on allies and competitors alike, roiling financial markets and raising fears of a global economic downturn.
But his administration is coming under pressure to secure deals with trading partners after promising a flurry of agreements.
So far, US officials have only unveiled two pacts, with Britain and Vietnam, alongside temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China.
The fresh duties for Mexico announced by Trump would be higher than the 25 percent levy he imposed on Mexican goods earlier this year, although products entering the United States under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) are exempted.
"Mexico has been helping me secure the border, BUT, what Mexico has done, is not enough," Trump said in his letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. "Starting August 1, 2025, we will charge Mexico a Tariff of 30% on Mexican products sent into the United States."
The EU tariff is also markedly steeper than the 20 percent levy Trump unveiled in April, as negotiations with the bloc continue.
"Imposing 30 percent tariffs on EU exports would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic," European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement, in reply to Trump's letter to her.
"We remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1. At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required," she added.
The EU, alongside dozens of other economies, had been set to see its US tariff level increase from a baseline of 10 percent on Wednesday, but Trump pushed back the deadline to August 1.
Since the start of the week, Trump has sent out letters to more than 20 countries with updated tariffs for each, including a 35 percent levy for Canada. A US official has told AFP that the USMCA exemption was expected to remain for Canada.
Brussels said Friday that it was ready to strike a deal with Washington to prevent the return of 20 percent levies.
The EU has prepared retaliatory duties on US goods worth around 21 billion euros after Trump also slapped separate tariffs on steel and aluminum imports earlier this year, and they are suspended until July 14.
European officials have not made any move to extend the suspension but could do it quickly if needed.
"Despite all the movement toward a deal, this threat shows the EU is in the same camp of uncertainty as almost every other country in the world," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council.
He told AFP that the path forward now depends on how the EU responds, calling it "one of the most precarious moments of the trade war so far."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Senior US defence official Elbridge Colby says US ‘will not be deterred' from its call for allied countries to boost defence spending
One of Donald Trump's key defence advisers and the man in charge of the AUKUS review has doubled down on Australia's need to increase defence spending, following reports that Australian defence officials have been urged to commit to supporting the United States if China were to invade Taiwan. US Undersecretary of Defence Elbridge Colby said the US' position of 'achieving peace through strength' was 'abundantly and consistently clear,' and would include urging allies to 'step up their defence spending and other efforts related to our collective defence'. This follows Mr Hegseth's call for Australia to boost immediately boost investment from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent of GDP, about $40bn, significantly beyond Labor's current commitment to reach 2.33 per cent by 2033. While Mr Colby, a noted China hawk, didn't name countries who are lagging on their funding commitments, he said the US would 'not be deterred'. 'Of course, some among our allies might not welcome frank conversations. But many, now led by NATO after the historic Hague Summit, are seeing the urgent need to step up and are doing so,' he wrote on X. 'President Trump has shown the approach and the formula – and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda.' His comments follow reports in the Financial Times on Saturday that Mr Colby has been pushing Japanese and Australian defence officials on their response if China invaded Taiwan, an outcome US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said was an 'imminent' threat. Quoting one US official, they told the UK publication that while the US does 'not seek war,' or to 'dominate China,' the US wants to ensure both it and its allies 'have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and guarantee peace'. Speaking to the ABC on Sunday, Acting Defence Minister Pat Conroy would not 'engage in hypotheticals' or 'disclose confidential discussions'. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict is the elected government of the day,' he said. 'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised, and that will continue to be our position.' Australia has repeatedly rebuffed calls from the US to boost defence spending, stating that the amount will be decided according to Australia's sovereign needs, which has in-turn put pressure on the alliance, and Anthony Albanese's attempts to secure a tariff exemption. While politically, the Prime Minister is under increasing pressure to secure a meeting with Mr Trump, the leaders are set to have a face-to-face talk in early September during the Quad meeting in India. This will also be the first in-person meeting between Mr Albanese and Mr Trump since the President's re-election in November, however the leaders have shared three phone calls. Echoing comments made by Anthony Albanese, who is currently on a six-day diplomatic mission in China, Foreign Minister Penny Wong last week said that said Australia's security should not be defined 'simply in the terms of what China or the United States is doing in the regions'. 'Instead Australia will 'take our own approach to our relationships, to the rules and to this region that we share,' she said while attending the ASEAN Summit in Malaysia.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Millions will die by 2029 if US funding for HIV programs isn't replaced, UN warns
In just under six months, the Trump administration has implemented policy changes that critics say have undermined longstanding efforts in the global fight against HIV and AIDS. During his first day in office, US President Donald Trump ordered a 90-day pause on foreign aid. He went on to slash $US4 billion ($6 billion) the US had pledged for the global HIV response for 2025, and in July his administration closed down the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the world's largest humanitarian aid agency. This week, a new report by the United Nations AIDS agency (UNAIDS) said the withdrawal of that aid had caused a "systemic shock", and warned that if the funding wasn't replaced, it could lead to more than 4 million AIDS-related deaths and 6 million new HIV infections by 2029. The UNAIDS report said the funding losses have "already destabilised supply chains, led to the closure of health facilities, left thousands of health clinics without staff, set back prevention programs, disrupted HIV testing efforts and forced many community organisations to reduce or halt their HIV activities". It also said that it feared other major donors would scale back their support, reversing decades of progress against AIDS worldwide — and that strong multilateral cooperation was in jeopardy because of wars, geopolitical shifts and climate change. USAID — a six-decade-old humanitarian and development organisation that officially closed down at the beginning of July — was responsible for implementing the bulk of the assistance under the US president's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the world's leading HIV/AIDS initiative. Mr Trump claimed the agency was run by "radical left lunatics" and rife with "tremendous fraud". Years of US-led investment into PEPFAR has reduced the number of people killed by AIDS to the lowest levels seen in more than three decades, and provided life-saving medicines for some of the world's most vulnerable. "It feels like an intentional tactic," said Kate Rees, public health physician at the Anova Health Institute in South Africa. PEPFAR was launched in 2003 by then US president George W Bush, the biggest-ever commitment by any country focused on a single disease. UNAIDS called the program a "lifeline" for countries with high HIV rates, and said that it supported testing for 84.1 million people, treatment for 20.6 million, among other initiatives. Sub-Saharan Africa remains the epicentre of the AIDS pandemic and South Africa has almost 8 million people living with HIV, the largest number of people in the world. She said that USAID and American money was contributing 80 to 90 per cent towards the Anova Institute. "To suddenly have that huge amounts of funding slashed is a real problem." Mr Trump's cuts have restricted the availability of drugs that millions of Africans have taken to prevent infection — particularly vulnerable communities such as gay men and sex workers who take Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis, or PrEP. "Some of the services [provided by USAID] are for key populations including LGBTQIA+ and people who use and inject drugs," Dr Rees said. The number of initiations, or people who have taken at least one dose of the drug, rose in Africa from fewer than 700 in 2016 to more than 6 million by late 2024, according to PrEPWatch, a global tracker. More than 90 per cent of new initiations last year were financed by PEPFAR, using cheap generic versions of the drug. Dr Rees said that the suddenness in which they money was pulled was "the real difficulty" because there was no chance for transition planning at both a financial and client level. "There was no chance to make sure our patients had their next step or could be transitioned into other programs," she said. Sub-Saharan Africa had 390,000 AIDS-related deaths in 2023, or 62 per cent of the global total, according to UNAIDS. That death toll was down by 56 per cent from 2010, according to the World Health Organization. UN assistant secretary-general Angeli Achrekar, a UNAIDS deputy executive director who was PEPFAR's principal deputy coordinator until January 2023, said the program is under review by the Trump administration, though Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a waiver "to continue life-saving treatment". Last month, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a twice-yearly injectable that many hope could end HIV, called Yeztugo. The drug was tested in clinical trials across South Africa. Dr Rees said there were a lot of important projects across South Africa that people had invested money, time and planning into that would have to now be scrapped. "A lot of the innovation in HIV space comes from South Africa because of course there's so many people here with HIV," Dr Rees said. The FDA approval of Yeztugo should have been a "threshold moment" for stopping the AIDS epidemic, said Peter Maybarduk of the advocacy group Public Citizen. Instead, the drug's pricing will put it out of reach of many countries that need it. "We could be ending AIDS," Mr Maybarduk said. "Instead, the US is abandoning the fight." In 1981, the New York Times reported the first cases of the disease in the US. A year later, the first case was reported in South Africa. It took then-US president Ronald Reagan four years — and 12,000 reported deaths in the US alone — to utter the words AIDS in public. The road from simple acknowledgement to a worldwide effort to end the disease has been long — and no-one wants to go back, Dr Rees said. "We we don't wanna go back." She said that a lot of the response for South Africa now was about looking forward and looking for other sources of funding. "We've kind of accepted that the US is not going to fund us, and even if they did, their values of the current administration, in terms of like the diversity, equity and inclusion and LGBTQIA+ and women's rights, doesn't align with what we have to do in our program. "So, we're looking towards more internal South African funders like philanthropies, and other countries," she said. So, how do they do that? "It's critical, difficult and challenging, but it needs to happen." ABC/AP/Reuters
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Majority of Americans back Donald Trump's ‘enormously popular' mass deportation agenda
Sky News host Rita Panahi claims US President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda is 'enormously popular'. 'He has a mandate for this program, and it's enormously popular – all the polling that has come out shows that the majority of Americans want to see every single illegal immigrant deported, not just those convicted of crimes,' she said. 'This is something that again the Democrats and the media ... can't seem to grasp that this policy is enormously popular and the polling shows even amongst immigrants in America, legal immigrants, the majority of them want to see every illegal immigrant deported.'
