logo
A federal worker was months away from a full pension when DOGE laid her off. Now she'll get $3,000 less per month.

A federal worker was months away from a full pension when DOGE laid her off. Now she'll get $3,000 less per month.

Yahoo13-04-2025
Katherine Ann Reniers' abrupt layoff from USAID will cut her monthly pension earnings.
She joins many Americans who are worried about having enough money to retire.
Reniers last day at USAID is July 1 under a plan by Elon Musk's DOGE to shrink the agency.
When Katherine Ann Reniers bought a house in Rockville, Maryland, two years ago, she thought her financial future was mapped out.
Reniers, 53, was on track to have served two decades in the federal government in November 2025. At that point, she'd be eligible for a pension that paid out nearly $6,000 a month and covered health insurance, according to documents reviewed by Business Insider. Those monthly retirement checks would rise for every year Reniers worked beyond her 20-year anniversary.
Reniers' plans abruptly changed in March, when she received emails notifying her that her position at the US Agency for International Development would be abolished on July 1 as part of sweeping layoffs known as a reduction in force ordered by the White House's DOGE office — five months short of Reniers' 20-year anniversary.
The gap means Reniers won't be able to receive her full federal pension until she's 62, and based on federal rules for foreign service retirement, her monthly payments will be an estimated $3,000 less than she planned.
"I've been panicking," Reniers, a single mom of two children, told BI. "I realized it wasn't enough to cover my monthly mortgage and medical bills."
Reniers is among tens of thousands of government employees whose lives have been upended by DOGE's moves to shrink federal agencies and cut costs. The changes are creating economic uncertainty for many Americans, especially those close to retirement.
An administration official told BI that "the State Department is committed to offering additional resources and benefits to ensure the safety and security of USAID employees transitioning from service."
After DOGE arrived at USAID in January, chaos ensued. Employees received the "fork in the road" email offering full pay and benefits through September to those who voluntarily resigned. They were temporarily locked out of computer systems and told to stay home as the Washington, DC headquarters was shut down.
In February, Reniers said leadership initially told her that she was an "essential" employee. Reniers rose to be division chief for Europe at USAID's Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance. The bureau provides food, water and sanitation, shelter, and emergency healthcare to people facing various crises around the world. Reniers' division covered Ukraine, Turkey, and other countries.
It made Reniers think she was safe from widespread layoffs.
"So I did not take the Fork, and now I'm shooting myself in the foot," Reniers said.
On February 24, Reniers received an email stating that she was being placed on administrative leave and that a subordinate would take over her duties. On March 27, she was informed that her position was being abolished.
Another email asked employees to volunteer to "support critical work" while the agency shifts tasks to the State Department. Reniers said she plans to return for a few weeks because her colleagues are burned out and need help.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on March 28 notified Congress of the reorganization and previously said about 83% of the agency's programs had been cut.
Meanwhile, Reniers said she's had panic attacks while trying to figure out a backup financial plan. She wasn't planning to retire for at least another four years, when her son will graduate from high school.
Now that Reniers won't reach 20 years of federal service, she estimated her pension benefits will be about half of what she would've qualified for in November. For foreign service employees with less than two decades of service, monthly retirement calculations follow this formula: an employee's highest annual salary, multiplied by 20, multiplied by 1%, and divided by 12. Reniers earned $177,200 a year, making her new pension a little under $3,000 a month under that formula.
If she had made it to 20 years, that 1% would instead have been 1.7%. That higher rate, along with a supplemental annuity, would have given her a pension of around $6,000 a month — about double what she expects to get now.
Further, while she could have retired at any time after her 20th anniversary and received that full pension, she won't be eligible for the smaller pension until she turns 62.
Reniers will receive a severance package worth one year's annual salary and is also planning to sell an apartment she owns in Belgium to help establish a financial safety net for monthly expenses.
"I'm lucky I have that, so I can make sure to keep my home in Maryland," she said. "How do I find a job with a similar salary when I'm 53 with a disability?"
When Reniers is 59, she can start receiving payments from a separate federal retirement account known as a Thrift Savings Plan without penalty. At 62, her pension and Social Security kicks in.
In the near term, finding affordable health insurance is Reniers' top concern. She was diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis several years ago and has biweekly injections of medication to manage inflammation and joint pain. Once she is laid off on July 1, she'll have federal health insurance through the end of the month but then need to find another policy for her family, which will likely be more expensive.
"I'm so angry right now," Reniers said, adding that participating in protests and talking to lawmakers on Capitol Hill is helping ease some of the anxiety. "That's what I want to spend my time on."
Do you have a story to share with this reporter? Email cboudreau@businessinsider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most Americans oppose Russia seizing Ukrainian land: Poll
Most Americans oppose Russia seizing Ukrainian land: Poll

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Most Americans oppose Russia seizing Ukrainian land: Poll

Most Americans are opposed to Russia receiving Ukrainian territory at the end of the war, according to a new poll that comes as President Trump has suggested 'land swaps' should be part of a peace deal. When asked in The Economist/YouGov poll about 'how much of Ukraine's territory' they want Russia to have at the end of the war, 68 percent of respondents said 'none of it.' Twenty-one percent in the poll said they were 'not sure' how much territory Russia should get, five percent said they wanted Russia to have 'some of' Ukraine's territory, 2 percent said they wanted Russia to get 'half of' Ukrainian territory and 1 percent said they wanted Russia to have 'most of it.' President Trump met with both Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin on U.S. soil within the past week. Putin reportedly wants most of the eastern Donbas region as part of a deal, while Ukraine has rejected ceding territory. Trump is now pushing for Zelensky and Putin to meet face-to-face, as they remain far apart on the terms for peace. Ukraine has demanded a ceasefire before any formal negotiations; a request that Trump previously backed but dropped after meeting Putin in Alaska last week. Russia has sent signals this week that it's in no hurry to have Putin meet with Zelensky. Moscow also said Wednesday that talks between NATO allies and Ukraine about post-war security gaurantees were a 'road to nowhere' unless Moscow takes part in the discussions. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work,' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a press conference. The Economist/YouGov poll took place from Aug. 15 to 18, with 1,568 respondents and plus or minus 3.5 percentage points as its margin of error.

Gabbard to slash offices, nearly half of staff at ODNI
Gabbard to slash offices, nearly half of staff at ODNI

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Gabbard to slash offices, nearly half of staff at ODNI

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard plans to slash 40 percent of the agency's staff by October in a move she said would help transform the head of the intelligence community into 'ODNI 2.0.' Gabbard's cuts would reassign roles or eliminate various centers within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), including those that monitor foreign efforts to influence Americans, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons, and a team monitoring for cyberattacks. A fact sheet from ODNI boasts the department has already slashed 500 jobs and that the future cuts would save an estimated $700 million from the agency that helps coordinate among the 18 different agencies that make up the sprawling U.S. intelligence community. Targeted in the restructuring is the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which has dedicated itself to tracking the efforts of U.S. adversaries to influence the U.S. public through social media and disinformation campaigns designed to sow division and shift votes. The Trump administration argues the center has been used 'to justify the suppression of free speech' and cited its work in responding to the Hunter Biden laptop. ODNI also accused the Foreign Malign Influence Center of 'falsely alleging Putin 'aspired' to help President Trump win the 2016 election,' though that conclusion is shared by most reports that have evaluated Russia's efforts in the 2016 contest, including in a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee. Gabbard argued that other elements of the intelligence community already monitor foreign influence campaigns, 'making FMIC redundant' — the same argument used for the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center. The fact sheet argues it biosecurity mission is no longer needed after the COVID-related national emergency. 'It has become apparent that taking action to address global health issues falls well outside of ODNI's core mission,' ODNI states. Gabbard said the need for the shift was part of 'ending the weaponization of intelligence and holding bad actors accountable.' 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people.' The shift comes a day after Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, many with ties to prior Democratic administrations. Even as a top Democrat agreed ODNI could use a revamp, he argued Gabbard was not the person to deliver it. 'Twenty years after it was established, there is broad, bipartisan agreement that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is in need of thoughtful reform. The Intelligence Authorization Act directs Director Gabbard to submit a plan to Congress outlining her proposed changes, and we will carefully review her proposals and conduct rigorous oversight to ensure any reforms strengthen, not weaken, our national security,' Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. 'But given Director Gabbard's track record of politicizing intelligence — including her decision just yesterday to revoke security clearances from career national security officials — I have no confidence that she is the right person to carry out this weighty responsibility.' Mark Zaid, a longtime national security lawyer, said the redesign was a clear effort to cut staff that might push back against the Trump administration 'This isn't about reform. It isn't about strengthening our intelligence agencies. It is about the Installation of loyalists & getting rid of anyone who opposes the patrimonialistic/authoritarian policies of Trump, regardless of whether DEM or GOP,' he wrote on X. Gabbard also proposes eliminating a number of other offices she accused, without evidence, of leaking intelligence of political biases. Among those slashed is the External Research Council, which Gabbard said amounted to 'politically appointed partisans who brought their external biases,' as well as the Strategic Futures Group, responsible for long-term forecasting on threats, which Gabbard accused of being used 'to push a partisan political agenda.' It's not entirely clear how many staff work at ODNI, but that figure has been a target of Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) who earlier this year said the office had nearly 2,000 staff. 'The ODNI staff is measured in the thousands, when it should be measured in the dozens, maybe a few hundred,' Cotton said at a hearing at the beginning of the year. 'I promise, that's going to change.' Cotton on Wednesday praised the move, even as he referenced the need for congressional review. 'Congress created the ODNI to be a lean organization that used small staffs to coordinate across the Intelligence Community and execute specific, important tasks. Today's announcement is an important step towards returning ODNI to that original size, scope, and mission. And it will help make it a stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump,' he said in a statement. 'I look forwarded [sic] to working with Director Gabbard to implement these reforms and provide the ODNI with the legislative relief necessary to ensure our Intelligence Community can focus on its core mission: stealing secrets from our adversaries.'

More than half of U.S. thinks racism is widespread, according to Gallup
More than half of U.S. thinks racism is widespread, according to Gallup

UPI

time6 minutes ago

  • UPI

More than half of U.S. thinks racism is widespread, according to Gallup

A protestor stands in the street in front of Akron City Justice Center in Akron, Ohio, in July 2022 after Akron police fatally shot Jayland Walker, 25, after a short chase amid public unrest with law enforcement. Washington-based Gallup polling results suggest 64% of Americans believe racism is widespread in the United States. File Photo by Aaron Josefczyk/UPI | License Photo Aug. 20 (UPI) -- New data released Wednesday by Gallup suggests more than half the country believes that racism against Black people is not only alive and well but widespread in the United States. Gallup's newly-released results of 64% nearly tied with its last reading in its 2021 periodic measurements as its highest recorded by the Washington-based firm since 2008, the year Barack Obama was elected to the White House as the nation's first Black president. It's suggesting that 83% of Black adults and 61% of White adults say that racism is widespread. The question was first posed by Gallup experts in 2008, in which results said at the time that only 56% of U.S. adults thought racism was a widespread issues. It saw a reported dip to 51% by the following year. By 2015, its 60% reading came at a time of several high-profile killings of Black civilians at the hands of law enforcement officers and has since remained in that range. According to Gallup, police interactions stood out as the "top" area of unfair treatment toward Black people, with a perceptions of bias in healthcare, shopping, restaurants and workplaces at or near record high returns. Gallup said that non-Hispanic Black adults continue to be "most likely" to say such racism is prevalent in the country, with 83% expressing that view. Results found that smaller majorities of Hispanic respondents at 64% and 61% of non-Hispanic White adults agreed. The findings come from Gallup's survey from June 2-26 and included an oversample to allow for better estimates. "Conversely, Americans' (29%) belief that racism against White people is widespread is the lowest of five readings since 2008," according to Gallup. It added that 68% in its poll say U.S. adults think civil rights "have improved" in their lifetime. "The overall sample was weighted so all racial/ethnic groups are represented in their proper proportions of the U.S. population," according to Gallup officials. But the survey noted how in six of its interactions that dealing with police was seen largely as racially "inequitable." Gallup's results suggests a trend of at least 57% of Americans who believe Black people are treated less fairly than White people in various situations, particularly during traffic incidents that in recent years have been known to turn deadly in multiple states.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store