Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief
Donald Trump
largely exempted industry heavyweights from his threat to impose 100 per cent levy on chips and semiconductors.
Mr Trump said the new
tariff
rate would apply to 'all chips and semiconductors coming into the United States,' but would not apply to companies that had made a commitment to manufacture in the US or were in the process of doing so.
Apple
's stock rose 2.9 per cent in premarket trading after Mr Trump's announcement on Wednesday that the company will invest an additional $100 billion in the US, a move that could help it sidestep potential tariffs on iphones.
Semiconductor manufacturing equipment supplier Applied Materials and chipmakers Texas Instruments, GlobalFoundries and Broadcom – Apple's partners in the investment effort – climbed between 1.1 per cent and 8.5 per cent.
Other US-listed chipmakers also rose, with Advanced Micro Devices up 2.2 per cent, Intel gaining 0.8 per cent and Nvidia up 1.5 per cent.
'From a high level, the 100 per cent headline number seems intimidating, but in practice we expect a much lower impact,' Bank of America Global Research analysts led by Vivek Arya said in a note.
European chipmakers also joined the rally, with ASML, ASMI and BE Semiconductor Industries climbing more than 3 per cent each.
JP Morgan analysts expect the proposed 100 per cent semiconductor tariff would not be stacked on top of the 15 per cent baseline tariff agreed between the European Union and the US last week.
According to EU officials, the framework trade deal will have zero-for-zero tariffs on semiconductor-making equipment.
Germany's Infineon said it could not speculate on possible semiconductor tariffs, as no details have been disclosed yet. Its shares were up 1.3 per cent.
Mr Trump's latest on semiconductor tariffs seemingly rules out Taiwanese chip contract manufacturer TSMC, which makes chips for most US companies, including Nvidia, as it has factories in the US.
'The market remains keen to buy TSMC on dips. Investors also believe they need to remain positioned in AI – with or without tariffs,' UBS analysts said.
TSMC shares closed almost 5 per cent higher to hit all-time highs, while Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix climbed 2.5 per cent and 1.4 per cent, respectively.
South Korea's Samsung and SK Hynix will also not be subjected to 100 per cent tariffs on chips, the country's top trade envoy said.
Samsung has invested in two chip fabrication plants in Austin and Taylor, Texas, while SK Hynix has announced plans to build an advanced chip packaging plant and research and development facility for artificial intelligence products in Indiana.
Since stepping into the White House in January, Donald Trump has made several tariff threats, specifically on semiconductors, aimed at reshaping the supply chain of the industry and spurring domestic production.
'The [100 per cent tariff] figure fits Trump's approach of 'open high, negotiate down' and the final figure could be similar to reciprocal tariffs to limit inflation in consumer goods, given that many have chips,' said Phelix Lee, senior equity analyst at Morningstar.
Not everyone has come out of the latest blitz on the right side, with the Philippines and Malaysia looking to find out more details about the tariff rate.
Dan Lachica, the president of the trade body for the Philippine semiconductor industry, said 70 per cent of its electronics exports are semiconductors and the new tariff rate would be 'devastating'. Philippine stocks were down 0.1 per cent after falling as much as 0.9 per cent during the day.
Malaysia's trade minister said the country has reached out to US counterparts for clarity on the tariffs. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Trump says that homeless people need to be moved 'far' from Washington 'immediately'
US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump said today that homeless people must be moved 'far' from Washington, after days of musing about taking federal control of the US capital where he has falsely suggested crime is rising. The Republican billionaire has announced a press conference for tomorrow in which he is expected to reveal his plans for Washington – which is run by the locally elected government of the District of Columbia under congressional oversight. It is an arrangement Trump has long publicly chafed at. He has threatened to federalise the city and give the White House the final say in how it is run. 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' the president posted on his Truth Social platform today. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital,' he continued, adding that criminals in the city would be swiftly imprisoned. 'It's all going to happen very fast,' he said. He followed the post on Truth Social with a post of a YouTube short showing an Australian man grappling with a shark. Advertisement Washington is ranked 15th on a list of major US cities by homeless population, according to government statistics from last year. While thousands of people spend each night in shelters or on the streets, the figure are down from pre-pandemic levels. Earlier this week Trump also threatened to deploy the National Guard as part of a crackdown on what he falsely says is rising crime in Washington. Violent crime in the capital fell in the first half of 2025 by 26% compared with a year earlier, police statistics show. The city's crime rates in 2024 were already their lowest in three decades, according to figures produced by the Justice Department before Trump took office. 'We are not experiencing a crime spike,' Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said today on MSNBC. While the mayor, a Democrat, was not critical of Trump in her remarks, she said 'any comparison to a war torn country is hyperbolic and false.' Trump's threat to send in the National Guard comes weeks after he deployed California's military reserve force into Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration raids, despite objections from local leaders and law enforcement. The president has frequently mused about using the military to control America's cities, many of which are under Democratic control and hostile to his nationalist impulses.
Extra.ie
3 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Bono admits he 'circled the subject' as U2 condemn Israel
U2 have released a joint statement condemning the Israeli government for their actions in Gaza. Bono also admitted to 'circling the subject' of the inhumane conditions Israel has inflicted upon the Palestinian people over the past two years. In a series of lengthy statements posted to social media, each of the four members of the band laid out their stances on the ongoing humanitarian crisis. Bono has admitted to 'circling the subject'. Pic: Rocco Spaziani/Archivio Spaziani/Mondadori Portfolio via Getty Images The post was captioned: 'Everyone has long been horrified by what is unfolding in Gaza – but the blocking of humanitarian aid and now plans for a military takeover of Gaza City has taken the conflict into uncharted territory. 'We are not experts in the politics of the region, but we want our audience to know where we each stand.' Bono's statement, which covered ten slides, admitted that he had circled around the issue of speaking out on Israel's horrific actions in Gaza. Bono has been heavily criticised over his silence. Pic:He still used a great deal of the statement to condemn Hamas over the attack on October 7, 2023 and explain his reactions to it. Bono has been heavily criticised for not speaking publicly about Gaza, along with his decision to accept the Medal of Freedom from then-US President Joe Biden earlier this year. He stated: 'Israel's revenge for the Hamas attack appeared more and more disproportionate and disinterested in the equally innocent civilian lives in Gaza. Gaza is being starved by Israel. Pic: AFP via Getty Images 'The Government of Israel is not the nation of Israel, but the Government of Israel led by Benjamin Netanyahu today deserves our categorical and unequivocal condemnation.' The singer added that he has long believed in Israel's 'right to exist' and supported a two-state solution. He continued: 'I want to make clear to anyone who cares to listen our band's condemnation of Netanyahu's immoral actions and join all who have called for a cessation of hostilities on both sides. View this post on Instagram A post shared by U2 (@u2) 'Our band stands in solidarity with the people of Palestine who truly seek a path to peace and coexistence with Israel and with their rightful and legitimate demand for statehood. 'We stand in solidarity with the remaining hostages and plead that someone rational negotiate their release.' Bono said the images of 'starving children on the Gaza Strip' reminded him of a trip he made to Ethiopia with his wife Ali Hewson nearly 40 years ago. He still used a great deal of the statement to condemn Hamas over the attack on October 7, 2023 and explain his reactions to it. Pic: Getty. He added: 'To witness chronic malnutrition up close would make it personal for any family, especially as it affects children. 'Because when the loss of non-combatant life en masse appears so calculated… especially the deaths of children, then 'evil' is not a hyperbolic adjective.' He wrote that he had felt he should focus on poverty and the humanitarian crisis occurring within Africa, while saying that he felt countries like Sudan were overlooked in their suffering. Bono said that he understands that 'Hamas are not the Palestinian people', who have undergone oppression, occupation, and 'the systemic stealing of the land that is rightfully theirs'. The U2 frontman added that he can see the parallels between the historic occupation of Ireland and the occupation of Gaza, stating: 'It's little wonder so many here in Ireland have campaigned for decades for justice for the Palestinian people.' Shorter statements from the three other band members took the same stance.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the Trump/Putin meeting: Ukraine must be at the table
The symbolism of the planned Trump-Putin meeting this week in Alaska is striking. Alaska, after all, was bought from Russia for $7.2 million in 1867, much as Donald Trump hopes to buy Greenland. Nothing wrong with trading land ,Trump appears to be telling Russia's president, whether you own it or not. If the price is right. The US president has set the scene for his encounter with Vladimir Putin with the promise that land concessions of forcibly conquered land are on the cards . 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' Trump said on Friday. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' The owner of that land, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has not been invited . But a deal without Ukraine being present would not be a deal at all. Calls from EU countries over the weekend for the Ukrainian president to be present should be heeded. While Trump appeared to have patched up his relationship with Zelenskiy after the Oval Office blow-up, his resulting public coolness towards Putin over the latter's stonewalling over a ceasefire has all but dissolved in his enthusiasm to set up a meeting entirely on the Russian's terms, and without any previously demanded ceasefire commitment. Talk of deadlines and secondary sanctions against those buying Russian oil are now, apparently, on hold. And for what? READ MORE Bringing Putin in from diplomatic isolation is in itself a win for the Russian president. An agreement to the permanent consolidation of territorial gains, whether formally or informally acknowledged, would represent an explicit concession of Russia's war aims, a massive reward for an illegal war. Also on Putin's agenda, a Nato commitment not to take in Ukraine is already US policy, and both the ending of US engagement in Ukraine and the splitting of the Europeans off from the US appear feasible objectives for Moscow. At the same time, tensions between Washington and Kyiv have reappeared. Zelenskiy's rapid repudiation of 'constitutionally prohibited' territorial concessions is certain to anger Trump, whose promise that the meeting will be followed by one including Zelenskiy has also been repudiated by Moscow. Putin has made clear all along that he is not interested in a preliminary ceasefire to allow comprehensive peace talks to be arranged. He wants a deal now that will effectively disarm Kyiv and put as much distance between it and allies safely confined to their own territories. No question of international peacekeeping or monitoring. In effect, permanent vulnerability. The prize this week for Putin would be a deal with Trump that Ukraine cannot accept, with the US then walking away and washing its hands of the conflict. Trump's promise of land for peace appears to make that a possible outcome .But a deal without Ukraine being present is not a deal at all.
