logo
'Since when is renting a room in HDB more expensive than landed?' Redditor asks

'Since when is renting a room in HDB more expensive than landed?' Redditor asks

SINGAPORE: A curious Redditor recently posted a question on the Singapore subreddit that sparked an interesting discussion: 'I am looking for a room for my Malaysian cousin. I found out that a room for one person in an HDB flat is more expensive than in a landed property. Why is that? I thought landed houses were pricier. Can any sifu enlighten me?'
At first glance, the confusion is understandable. Landed homes, which feature private gardens, driveways, and no tall neighbours, are generally seen as more luxurious and costly. So, why would a simple room in an HDB flat, the typical heartland housing in Singapore, cost more to rent than one in a landed house?
Redditors quickly jumped in and clarified that the answer is not in the kind of housing but in the site, ease, and accessibility. It's all about accessibility
One popular reaction encapsulated it well: 'I think it's about accessibility. It's easier to reach HDB by MRT or bus. The common assumption is that if you live in a landed home, you usually have a car to get around.'
Many landed properties are located in low-density residential areas where public transport options may be limited. In contrast, most HDB estates are built close to MRT stations, bus interchanges, hawker centres, supermarkets, and other amenities. For many renters, especially those without a car, this proximity is worth the extra cost.
Another commenter posed a practical question: 'Assuming the room, price, and condition of both are the same, would you rather stay in HDB, with bus, MRT, supermarket, and coffee shop all within a 5-10 minute walk, or in a landed home with nothing nearby except a bus stop that's 10-20 minutes away?' Landed experience isn't always inconvenient — but it can be
Not every landed home is hard to reach. One user shared their own story: 'I've lived in a room on a landed property that's just 10-15 minutes from the nearest station. If you factor in the time spent going down the lift in an HDB, it's probably about the same. The only downside is there's a 6-minute walk that isn't sheltered. But the peace of the neighbourhood makes up for it.'
However, that level of accessibility is more the exception than the norm. Most landed homes in Singapore are further from transport hubs. When it rains or the sun is harsh, even a short walk without shelter can become a deal-breaker. The hidden costs of renting out landed homes
But it's not only about renters. Owners of landed homes might not be focused on rental income. One Redditor offered a detailed perspective:
'If this is rented through co-living, some owners may not care much about return on investment. They might just want their house looked after without losing money. They could still benefit from property value increases.'
They outlined the finances: if all rooms are rented out, a landed home might bring in around $7,000-$10,000 per month. But after adding up the costs of upkeep, charges from co-living operators, and higher property levies for second homes, the rental profit could plummet to as low as 2% or even become negative. Why are HDB rooms more expensive?
Eventually, it comes down to convenience, connectivity, and one's way of life. Tenants, especially those who don't own cars, are willing to pay a good amount for a location that makes going back and forth, doing household errands, and taking late-night snacks effortless.
While landed homes may be spacious and peaceful, if they are far from public transport or basic amenities, their rental rooms attract less demand.
As one Redditor summed it up: 'Financially, it doesn't make sense to rent out a landed property unless you're in for the long haul. But for renters, it's all about whether the location meets their daily needs.'
In land-scarce, efficiency-driven Singapore, even the simplest HDB room can surpass the rental price of a room in a large landed house if it has the right location.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘What is this round up concept?' — Singapore woman curious why men lie about their height on dating apps
‘What is this round up concept?' — Singapore woman curious why men lie about their height on dating apps

Independent Singapore

time9 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

‘What is this round up concept?' — Singapore woman curious why men lie about their height on dating apps

SINGAPORE: Surprised by how often men seem to misrepresent their height online, one woman decided to bring the topic to social media, hoping to understand why this keeps happening. In a post on the r/SingaporeRaw subreddit, she shared her own experiences navigating the world of dating apps. The woman explained that she stands at 180 cm tall, and whenever she chats with men on these platforms, many of them claim to be her height as well. But reality, she said, often doesn't match up. 'When we meet up, they are clearly shorter. Like at least 5 cm short,' she wrote. Clearly baffled by the phenomenon, she posed a cheeky question to the online community: 'What happened? What is this round-up concept? Or did you lose your forehead on the way to meet me? Before y'all come at me, I've dated short guys and had no issues with it. I just don't understand the logic behind lying about your height when it's so blatant???' 'Give the guys a break.' Her post sparked a lively discussion on the platform, with many Redditors chiming in on why men might feel the need to 'round up' their height on dating apps. One said, 'Because being 180 cm gets matched? So men lie to join the competition. Those that don't lie often don't get matched and are undesired.' Another shared their personal experience, saying, 'Used dating apps as a short guy, usually get less matches, decent-looking guy, but 164 cm. Played around with the height, and at around 185 cm, I got six times the amount of matches than I did at 164 cm.' 'Maybe they just want to have a feel of getting more chances to talk to different people, and hopefully a rapport good enough that the other party would not mind their height in the long term, I guess?' Not everyone, however, reacted kindly to the question. Some Redditors called out the woman for her hypocrisy, pointing out that it's not only men who misrepresent themselves online. One user fired back, 'Why do girls use filters for their pictures, and what's their strategy once they meet up? Same as the guys who lie about their height. Hope you like them enough, and hope for the best to overlook that.' Another wrote, 'Why do girls lie about their size? Why do girls lie about their personality? It's all the same; there is no saint or saintess in this world, and people will inflate or exaggerate certain metrics to increase their odds of finding someone. In the dating scene, girls are living on easy mode. So, give the guys a break.' In other news, an employee recently shared on social media that he feels 'stuck in a company that runs like it's still the 1980s.' Detailing his experience on Reddit's r/askSingapore forum, he explained that he had recently joined a family-owned listed company, only to find the work culture outdated and, in his words, 'toxic.' 'The CEO is overly demanding, which sets the tone for everyone else, the General Manager (GM) included.' As a result, he said the environment has become so stifling that only employees in their 50s seem able to endure it, while younger staff typically leave within one to two years. Read more: Employee 'stuck in a company that runs like it's still the 1980s' admits he's now just coasting through work

32-year-old man notices women on dating apps are blunt about wanting men with a 'provider mindset'
32-year-old man notices women on dating apps are blunt about wanting men with a 'provider mindset'

Independent Singapore

time10 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

32-year-old man notices women on dating apps are blunt about wanting men with a 'provider mindset'

SINGAPORE: A 32-year-old man recently returned to the dating scene and quickly realised that things had changed since he was last single. Scrolling through dating app profiles, he noticed that some women were very upfront about what they were looking for in a partner. In a post on r/sgdatingscene, he shared that he saw profiles with statements like 'looking for a man with a provider mindset' or 'provider men are charming.' Some matches even asked him directly if he drives and seemed to decide whether to continue talking based on his answer alone. The man also wrote that although he completely 'respects their preferences,' it still feels a bit transactional when the very first question he gets asked is 'whether he drives.' 'Just to be clear- I am doing okay financially, have a good job, and can take care of myself. I also always pay for the first date,' he wrote. 'And I do agree that provider man is attractive, and no doubt I would give my best to my other half next time (when I find her).' Ending his post on a curious note, he asked other forum users whether this is the new normal in Singapore's dating scene. 'That is because they are incapable of providing for themselves.' In the comments, one Singaporean Redditor explained that the dating scene has indeed shifted drastically over the years, though not necessarily for the worse. From his perspective, women today tend to be 'better educated,' more independent, and more forward-thinking than in previous generations. They plan and make projections for the future in a way their mothers may not have, and they place a strong emphasis on values such as 'integrity, security, kindness, and honesty.' For some, 'age and looks' are not even major factors in their dating choices. He continued, 'They want an equal work-share partner, not someone who lazes around the house playing games and expects the wife (or maid) to handle everything.' Another Redditor chimed in to clarify that this approach shouldn't be seen as 'transactional.' Everyone has the right to choose who they date, and women are no different. Just as some men may specifically pursue partners who are 'slim and attractive,' it's reasonable for women to have preferences too. A third Redditor added, 'Yes, these women want a man with a provider mindset, but that is because they are incapable of providing for themselves.' In other news, an unemployed local recently turned to Reddit to ask how the job market is really faring for Singaporeans. Writing on the r/askSingapore forum, the local, who has four years of experience (most of it in the banking industry) and a PTE degree in economics, shared that it had been eight long months since he last held a full-time job. Read more: Man with economics degree jobless for 8 months, says he only asked for S$4.5k

80% of Singaporeans say nationality is the strongest marker of Singapore identity: IPS survey
80% of Singaporeans say nationality is the strongest marker of Singapore identity: IPS survey

Independent Singapore

time18 hours ago

  • Independent Singapore

80% of Singaporeans say nationality is the strongest marker of Singapore identity: IPS survey

Photo: Depositphotos/ Shadow_of_light (for illustration purposes only) SINGAPORE: Nationality continues to be the strongest marker of Singaporean identity, but religion has now risen to second place in importance, ahead of language and race, according to the latest survey by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS). The survey, conducted from April to August last year among 4,000 Singapore residents, found that nearly 80 per cent of respondents viewed nationality as the most important component of their identity. Close to 74 per cent considered religious belief to be important or very important, marking a significant jump from 69 per cent in 2013, when religion ranked fourth in priority. The study highlighted that religion carries particular weight among Muslims in Singapore. Nearly 60 per cent of Muslim respondents described religion as a very important part of their identity. This is a higher proportion compared to respondents from other faiths. The findings also indicate that there is a growing desire among Singaporeans to understand their own religious beliefs. See also Lawrence Wong urges people to heed quarantine, travel advisories In 2018, 70.6 per cent of respondents indicated this interest, rising to 73.1 per cent in the most recent survey. More respondents also said they derived a sense of belonging from their faith. () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store