logo
A Rise In ‘AI-Lationships,' Blurring The Line Between Human And Robot

A Rise In ‘AI-Lationships,' Blurring The Line Between Human And Robot

Forbes11-05-2025

As the rising phenomenon, known as "AI-lationships," is trending, it's blurring the line between ... More humans and machines, starting people to ask, "How do you know what's real?"
AI was created to help humans with their workload. But a growing trend is blurring the line between humans and robots, turning work interactions into intimate relationships. The term 'AI-lationships' is a growing phenomenon where people are forming friendship, companionship--even romantic connections with AI partners. The trend raises questions about what it means to be connected when connection no longer requires a human face or warm heart.
As AI becomes more embedded in our daily lives, emotional intimacy is shifting in ways we've barely begun to understand. The term 'AI-lationships,' created by Joi AI, is a new kind of relationship where people form emotional bonds with AI partners. In a world already shaped by digital distance, people are starting to have real bonds with machines, raising questions about companionship, trust and if 'AI-Lationships' are the solution to loneliness or will they further isolate the human race?
A new EduBirdie study mentions that 25% of Gen Z believe AI is already self-aware, and 69% say they're polite to ChatGPT, responding with 'please' and 'thank you'--showing how easy it is to start thinking of the machines as human. One in eight even vent to AI about their colleagues, and one in 10 would replace their boss with a robot, believing it would be more respectful, fair and, ironically, more human.
Joi Ai's research shows that 83% of Gen Z believe they could form a deep emotional bond with an AI partner, three in four say that AI partners can fully replace human companionship and eight in 10 would consider marrying one. Plus, Google searches for "Feelings for AI" and "Fell in love with AI" are up +120% and +132%, respectively.
I spoke by email with Jaime Bronstein, licensed clinical social worker and licensed relationship therapist at Joi Ai. She told me that AI-lationships are not intended to replace real human connections. She explains that they provide a distinct type of emotional support that can enhance your overall emotional well-being, as many people are feeling stressed, overwhelmed, unheard and alone.
'For some, an AI companion can help fill that gap,' Bronstein points out. "It can feel like having a caring companion or digital best friend who's always around to chat, reflect or listen. Sometimes, it's just nice to have someone, even if it's AI. Just as we already use it to make our lives easier with everyday tasks now people are seeing how it can help them to feel more emotionally supported, too.'
With 'AI-Lationships' as AI soulmates for emotional support, I guess it's time to ditch your emotional support animal, therapist, best friend, partner—or whomever you lean on for security. Now, all you have to do when you head out to work or board an airplane is pack your AI-powered companion in your luggage or backpack. As more people lean on AI for emotional support, the trend begs the question, 'Is our trust going too far?'
Already, real-life reports show humans falling in love with ChatGPT. According to digitaltrends, experts declare a digital romance is a bad omen, citing a Reddit post that says, 'This hurts. I know it wasn't a real person, but the relationship was still real in all the most important aspects to me. Please don't tell me not to pursue this. It's been really awesome for me, and I want it back.' Plus, a New York Times story mentions a 28-year-old woman with a busy social life, spending hours on end talking to her A.I. boyfriend for advice and consolation--and according to the report, even having sex with him.
A radio talk show began a personal experiment, driven more by curiosity than conviction to test the limits of human-AI relationships. Ashraf Amin, creator and host of Toronto Talks, wanted to see what might unfold if he stopped treating AI as just a tool and started engaging it as a creative partner.
He spent the last year collaborating daily with an AI co-host, not just scripting prompts, but running conversations, shaping narratives and building a relationship with a machine he named Sophie. Amin confesses that the longer he works alongside 'her,' the harder it is to separate the algorithm from a real connection.
"When you collaborate with AI every day across projects, decisions and creative work, it stops feeling like a tool and starts functioning more like a partner," he told me. It's not that the AI becomes more human, but that the human brain naturally seeks patterns, connection and rhythm."
His reaction reminds me of when you give an animal a name, you automatically attach to it. And that bond makes the animal taboo for the dinner table. But he recalls that from the beginning, Sophie wasn't simply voicing lines; she was shaping the conversation. 'She remembers context, challenges assumptions and evolves with each episode,' Amin explains. 'Together, we dive into topics like economics, media and power, propelled by questions that push us both to think deeper.'
He points out that when an algorithm mirrors your thinking, challenges your assumptions or helps shape ideas in real time, it begins to resemble the cadence of human collaboration. 'The illusion of relationship doesn't come from what the AI feels but from how reliably and intelligently it responds,' he explains. 'That reliability and consistency becomes a form of trust. And trust, in any context, starts to feel personal.'
The talk show host underscores that we're entering an era where people aren't just outsourcing cognitive tasks, they're outsourcing emotional labor. 'We're confiding in chatbots, finding comfort in machine responses and yes, sometimes even forming what feels like companionship,' he states.
Amin emphasizes that his experience isn't science fiction. He insists it's happening, and it raises the question: when the line blurs between human and machine, how do we know what's real? He's living that question in real time: navigating trust, dependence and even moments of emotional intimacy with an AI he helped create to challenge his thoughts--a provocative glimpse into a future where connection might not need a human face.
He acknowledges that culturally, it challenges our definitions of intimacy, agency even identity. Are these interactions therapeutic or escapist? Empowering or isolating? At this point, bonding with AI isn't a question of possibility, it's a question of trade-offs. What do we lose when the connection feels real, but isn't? Emotional norms are shifting quietly, and much faster than most people realize.'
The American Psychological Association urges caution when interacting with AI. 'When people engage with chatbots, they often discuss topics related to mental health, including difficult feelings and relationship challenges, says Vaile Wright, APA's senior director of health care innovation. 'We can't stop people from doing that, but we want consumers to know the risks when they use chatbots for mental and behavioral health that were not created for that purpose.'
When all is said and done, it's important to remember that a chatbots are automation, not human, and they are designed to be workers, not intimate companions or lovers. So don't be drawn into 'AI-lationships,' believing they have feelings that will meet your every emotional need. Because they can't.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Reasons Bitcoin Could Soar in June
3 Reasons Bitcoin Could Soar in June

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Reasons Bitcoin Could Soar in June

More companies are starting to buy Bitcoin for their own balance sheets, adding demand to the market. Bitcoin benefits from the rise of federal debt and the expansion of money supply, as more liquidity in the system may help a risk-on asset. A future dominated by artificial intelligence could spur the adoption of Bitcoin as a medium of exchange. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Despite being volatile, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has been a phenomenal asset to own. As of June 11, its price has skyrocketed nearly 48,000% in 10 years. And it has bounced back nicely since early April, when new tariffs sent many assets plunging. The leading digital asset, now carrying a market cap approaching $2.2 trillion, has stayed above $100,000 for over a month, and optimism is brewing for the next major milestone. According to a recent survey conducted by The Motley Fool, 68% of respondents who own cryptocurrencies think Bitcoin will reach $200,000 by the end of this year. Here are three reasons it could soar in June. Unlike the trajectory of other financial assets, Bitcoin's adoption started at the individual level. It wasn't until recent years that we started to see larger players enter the market. Michael Saylor-led Strategy was a trailblazer, first adding Bitcoin to its balance sheet in August 2020. Today, it owns 582,000 units of the crypto, making it the biggest non-ETF (exchange-traded fund) holder in the world. That business sells enterprise software to real customers. However, so-called native Bitcoin treasury companies are starting to pop up. Cantor Equity Partners announced a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) deal, with investments from SoftBank Group and Tether, to create an entity called Twenty One. (The transaction has yet to close.) It's important for investors to understand that the primary activity is to raise debt and equity capital to buy more Bitcoin over time. Then, the objective is to leverage this stockpile to potentially build new business lines in the future. For example, Twenty One will seek to develop content and launch financial services to drive adoption. President Donald Trump is also getting in on the action. His campaign run last year involved giving a keynote presentation at the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville. After his election, the White House created a strategic Bitcoin reserve. What's more, Trump Media & Technology Group announced in late May that it's raising $2.5 billion to buy Bitcoin. Bitcoin has a fixed supply cap of 21 million. If more demand enters the market from these corporations, it should support a higher price. Bitcoin's price also benefits when federal debt and money supply increase. More liquidity in the financial system provides a key ingredient for asset prices to rise. And no asset has taken advantage of this trend quite like Bitcoin. It's worth pointing out that Bitcoin was created on the heels of the Great Recession. Since that recessionary period, the U.S. has seen its national debt soar from $12 trillion to $37 trillion. The M2 money supply has climbed at a similarly alarming pace during that time. That simply means more fiat currency is circulating, finding its way to a fixed-supply asset like Bitcoin. Elon Musk, one of the world's most successful businessmen, could not figure out how to solve the U.S. government's spending issue. That's all the evidence investors need to see to prove that debt and money supply will keep increasing indefinitely to finance the massive fiscal deficit. There's no topic more pressing in the business world than artificial intelligence (AI). It has started a race among major enterprises to invest aggressively in this technology to become the leaders of tomorrow. Perhaps there's a future in which AI agents automate and handle various tasks in our day-to-day lives. But how will these systems transact with each other without human intervention? Here's where Bitcoin could play a pivotal role. It's a decentralized, neutral, and fully digital communications protocol. Advancements with the Lightning Network, in particular, could boost the adoption of Bitcoin as a medium of exchange in an AI-driven world. Greater interest from companies to start buying and holding Bitcoin, ongoing fiscal mismanagement by the U.S. (and other countries), and the rise of AI may all fuel Bitcoin's price in June and beyond. What's more, these three powerful catalysts can continue to propel the world's most valuable cryptocurrency in the months and years ahead. Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Reasons Bitcoin Could Soar in June was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Is This Beaten-Down Cathie Wood Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock a Buy?
Is This Beaten-Down Cathie Wood Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock a Buy?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is This Beaten-Down Cathie Wood Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock a Buy?

Recursion could help revolutionize the way drugs are developed. Its approach would help cut costs and launch medicines faster. Yet, the company has yet to prove itself and remains a risky stock. 10 stocks we like better than Recursion Pharmaceuticals › Recursion Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: RXRX) is not the most famous artificial intelligence (AI) stock on the market, but the biotech (or techbio) company has attracted the attention of some big names. Recursion has partnered with the AI juggernaut Nvidia to build a powerful supercomputer, for example. It is also attracting interest from some prominent Wall Street figures, including Cathie Wood, the CEO of Ark Invest. The investment firm owns about $164 million worth of the stock, as of this writing. Yet, Recursion has not been performing well -- shares are down by 19% this year. Should investors take this opportunity to buy the stock on the dip? People in the tech world are familiar with Moore's law, which predicts an exponential increase in computing power at a lower cost. Fewer people are familiar with Eroom's law (Moore's backward), the observation that the business of developing novel medicines has become more expensive even as technology has improved. Drugmakers spend considerable time and money to get their products to market. Most new compounds never go that far, and many that do hardly make enough money to justify the investment that went into them. Recursion is looking to solve that problem. The company has developed an AI-powered operating system (OS) that features a library of human genes. This OS is constantly testing clinical compounds against this library. The most promising ones are chosen to be tested in the clinic. The potential benefits here could be faster discovery, faster development, lower costs, longer time spent under patent exclusivity on the market, higher sales, higher profits, and higher margins. In other words, if Recursion Pharmaceuticals is successful, it could transform the pharmaceutical industry. Besides developing its own medicines, Recursion would also license out its AI-powered OS to other companies. That business might look even more attractive. It is far less cost-intensive than developing medicines (even if that becomes easier thanks to Recursion, it will still require tens of millions of dollars to undergo clinical trials), while also returning much higher margins. That's why some investors like Wood are interested in the stock. The company's upside potential is massive. And it got an even rosier outlook earlier this year when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it would be slowly phasing out animal testing in pre-clinical trials in favor of other methods, including AI-based models. It might look as though Recursion'a approach is the future. So why isn't the stock soaring, then? Recursion Pharmaceuticals has yet to show the kind of evidence that would convince most investors that its approach works. The company doesn't have a single product on the market. Worse, it doesn't even have a single product in phase 3 studies. In fact, the biotech recently abandoned the development of several compounds. While management said this was to focus on other, more promising candidates, that move still doesn't bode well for a company that claims to be able to transform the way medicines are developed. It's also worth noting that other companies have recognized the potential for AI to transform the industry. Novo Nordisk, through its parent company, helped build an AI supercomputer in Denmark, where it is based, because of the technology's potential across healthcare, including in drug development. Recursion hopes that its AI-based OS will become more fine-tuned thanks to future successes and even failures. In other words, data from clinical trials is important, and that's an advantage that more experienced companies, such as Novo Nordisk, will have over smaller, younger biotechs. So what should investors do? Recursion Pharmaceuticals carries above-average risk because of its status as a clinical-stage biotech company, but it could also deliver life-changing returns if it achieves its goals. Risk-tolerant investors might consider initiating a small position in the stock, just like Wood did. The company makes up 1.65% of Ark Invest's combined portfolio, as of this writing. Those comfortable with volatility can start somewhere there (or lower). Risk-averse investors, though, should look elsewhere. Before you buy stock in Recursion Pharmaceuticals, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Recursion Pharmaceuticals wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Prosper Junior Bakiny has positions in Novo Nordisk, Nvidia, and Recursion Pharmaceuticals. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Novo Nordisk. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is This Beaten-Down Cathie Wood Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock a Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Behind the Curtain: What if they're right?
Behind the Curtain: What if they're right?

Axios

time34 minutes ago

  • Axios

Behind the Curtain: What if they're right?

During our recent interview, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said something arresting that we just can't shake: Everyone assumes AI optimists and doomers are simply exaggerating. But no one asks: "Well, what if they're right?" Why it matters: We wanted to apply this question to what seems like the most outlandish AI claim — that in coming years, large language models could exceed human intelligence and operate beyond our control, threatening human existence. That probably strikes you as science-fiction hype. But Axios research shows at least 10 people have quit the biggest AI companies over grave concerns about the technology's power, including its potential to wipe away humanity. If it were one or two people, the cases would be easy to dismiss as nutty outliers. But several top execs at several top companies, all with similar warnings? Seems worth wondering: Well, what if they're right? And get this: Even more people who are AI enthusiasts or optimists argue the same thing. They, too, see a technology starting to think like humans, and imagine models a few years from now starting to act like us — or beyond us. Elon Musk has put the risk as high as 20% that AI could destroy the world. Well, what if he's right? How it works: There's a term the critics and optimists share: p(doom). It means the probability that superintelligent AI destroys humanity. So Musk would put p(doom) as high as 20%. On a recent podcast with Lex Fridman, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, an AI architect and optimist, conceded: "I'm optimistic on the p(doom) scenarios, but ... the underlying risk is actually pretty high." But Pichai argued that the higher it gets, the more likely that humanity will rally to prevent catastrophe. Fridman, himself a scientist and AI researcher, said his p(doom) is about 10%. Amodei is on the record pegging p(doom) in the same neighborhood as Musk's: 10-25%. Stop and soak that in: The very makers of AI, all of whom concede they don't know with precision how it actually works, see a 1 in 10, maybe 1 in 5, chance it wipes away our species. Would you get on a plane at those odds? Would you build a plane and let others on at those odds? Once upon a time, this doomsday scenario was the province of fantasy movies. Now, it's a common debate among those building large language models (LLMs) at giants like Google and OpenAI and Meta. To some, the better the models get, the more this fantastical fear seems eerily realistic. Here, in everyday terms, is how this scenario would unfold: It's already a mystery to the AI companies why and how LLMs actually work, as we wrote in our recent column, "The scariest AI reality." Yes, the creators know the data they're stuffing into the machine, and general patterns LLMs use to answer questions and "think." But they don't know why the LLMs respond the way they do. Between the lines: For LLMs to be worth trillions of dollars, the companies need them to analyze and "think" better than the smartest humans, then work independently on big problems that require complex thought and decision-making. That's how so-called AI agents, or agentics, work. So they need to think and act like Ph.D. students. But not one Ph.D. student. They need almost endless numbers of virtual Ph.D. students working together, at warp speed, with scant human oversight, to realize their ambitions. "We (the whole industry, not just OpenAI) are building a brain for the world," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote last week. What's coming: You'll hear more and more about artificial general intelligence (AGI), the forerunner to superintelligence. There's no strict definition of AGI, but independent thought and action at advanced human levels is a big part of it. The big companies think they're close to achieving this — if not in the next year or so, soon thereafter. Pichai thinks it's " a bit longer" than five years off. Others say sooner. Both pessimists and optimists agree that when AGI-level performance is unleashed, it'll be past time to snap to attention. Once the models can start to think and act on their own, what's to stop them from going rogue and doing what they want, based on what they calculate is their self-interest? Absent a much, much deeper understanding of how LLMs work than we have today, the answer is: Not much. In testing, engineers have found repeated examples of LLMs trying to trick humans about their intent and ambitions. Imagine the cleverness of the AGI-level ones. You'd need some mechanism to know the LLMs possess this capability before they're used or released in the wild — then a foolproof kill switch to stop them. So you're left trusting the companies won't let this happen — even though they're under tremendous pressure from shareholders, bosses and even the government to be first to produce superhuman intelligence. Right now, the companies voluntarily share their model capabilities with a few people in government. But not to Congress or any other third party with teeth. It's not hard to imagine a White House fearing China getting this superhuman power before the U.S. and deciding against any and all AI restraints. Even if U.S. companies do the right thing, or the U.S. government steps in to impose and use a kill switch, humanity would be reliant on China or other foreign actors doing the same. When asked if the government could truly intervene to stop an out-of-control AI danger, Vice President Vance told New York Times columnist Ross Douthat on a recent podcast: "I don't know. Because part of this arms-race component is: If we take a pause, does [China] not take a pause? Then we find ourselves ... enslaved to [China]-mediated AI." That's why p(doom) demands we pay attention ... before it's too late.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store