A Rise In ‘AI-Lationships,' Blurring The Line Between Human And Robot
AI was created to help humans with their workload. But a growing trend is blurring the line between humans and robots, turning work interactions into intimate relationships. The term 'AI-lationships' is a growing phenomenon where people are forming friendship, companionship--even romantic connections with AI partners. The trend raises questions about what it means to be connected when connection no longer requires a human face or warm heart.
As AI becomes more embedded in our daily lives, emotional intimacy is shifting in ways we've barely begun to understand. The term 'AI-lationships,' created by Joi AI, is a new kind of relationship where people form emotional bonds with AI partners. In a world already shaped by digital distance, people are starting to have real bonds with machines, raising questions about companionship, trust and if 'AI-Lationships' are the solution to loneliness or will they further isolate the human race?
A new EduBirdie study mentions that 25% of Gen Z believe AI is already self-aware, and 69% say they're polite to ChatGPT, responding with 'please' and 'thank you'--showing how easy it is to start thinking of the machines as human. One in eight even vent to AI about their colleagues, and one in 10 would replace their boss with a robot, believing it would be more respectful, fair and, ironically, more human.
Joi Ai's research shows that 83% of Gen Z believe they could form a deep emotional bond with an AI partner, three in four say that AI partners can fully replace human companionship and eight in 10 would consider marrying one. Plus, Google searches for "Feelings for AI" and "Fell in love with AI" are up +120% and +132%, respectively.
I spoke by email with Jaime Bronstein, licensed clinical social worker and licensed relationship therapist at Joi Ai. She told me that AI-lationships are not intended to replace real human connections. She explains that they provide a distinct type of emotional support that can enhance your overall emotional well-being, as many people are feeling stressed, overwhelmed, unheard and alone.
'For some, an AI companion can help fill that gap,' Bronstein points out. "It can feel like having a caring companion or digital best friend who's always around to chat, reflect or listen. Sometimes, it's just nice to have someone, even if it's AI. Just as we already use it to make our lives easier with everyday tasks now people are seeing how it can help them to feel more emotionally supported, too.'
With 'AI-Lationships' as AI soulmates for emotional support, I guess it's time to ditch your emotional support animal, therapist, best friend, partner—or whomever you lean on for security. Now, all you have to do when you head out to work or board an airplane is pack your AI-powered companion in your luggage or backpack. As more people lean on AI for emotional support, the trend begs the question, 'Is our trust going too far?'
Already, real-life reports show humans falling in love with ChatGPT. According to digitaltrends, experts declare a digital romance is a bad omen, citing a Reddit post that says, 'This hurts. I know it wasn't a real person, but the relationship was still real in all the most important aspects to me. Please don't tell me not to pursue this. It's been really awesome for me, and I want it back.' Plus, a New York Times story mentions a 28-year-old woman with a busy social life, spending hours on end talking to her A.I. boyfriend for advice and consolation--and according to the report, even having sex with him.
A radio talk show began a personal experiment, driven more by curiosity than conviction to test the limits of human-AI relationships. Ashraf Amin, creator and host of Toronto Talks, wanted to see what might unfold if he stopped treating AI as just a tool and started engaging it as a creative partner.
He spent the last year collaborating daily with an AI co-host, not just scripting prompts, but running conversations, shaping narratives and building a relationship with a machine he named Sophie. Amin confesses that the longer he works alongside 'her,' the harder it is to separate the algorithm from a real connection.
"When you collaborate with AI every day across projects, decisions and creative work, it stops feeling like a tool and starts functioning more like a partner," he told me. It's not that the AI becomes more human, but that the human brain naturally seeks patterns, connection and rhythm."
His reaction reminds me of when you give an animal a name, you automatically attach to it. And that bond makes the animal taboo for the dinner table. But he recalls that from the beginning, Sophie wasn't simply voicing lines; she was shaping the conversation. 'She remembers context, challenges assumptions and evolves with each episode,' Amin explains. 'Together, we dive into topics like economics, media and power, propelled by questions that push us both to think deeper.'
He points out that when an algorithm mirrors your thinking, challenges your assumptions or helps shape ideas in real time, it begins to resemble the cadence of human collaboration. 'The illusion of relationship doesn't come from what the AI feels but from how reliably and intelligently it responds,' he explains. 'That reliability and consistency becomes a form of trust. And trust, in any context, starts to feel personal.'
The talk show host underscores that we're entering an era where people aren't just outsourcing cognitive tasks, they're outsourcing emotional labor. 'We're confiding in chatbots, finding comfort in machine responses and yes, sometimes even forming what feels like companionship,' he states.
Amin emphasizes that his experience isn't science fiction. He insists it's happening, and it raises the question: when the line blurs between human and machine, how do we know what's real? He's living that question in real time: navigating trust, dependence and even moments of emotional intimacy with an AI he helped create to challenge his thoughts--a provocative glimpse into a future where connection might not need a human face.
He acknowledges that culturally, it challenges our definitions of intimacy, agency even identity. Are these interactions therapeutic or escapist? Empowering or isolating? At this point, bonding with AI isn't a question of possibility, it's a question of trade-offs. What do we lose when the connection feels real, but isn't? Emotional norms are shifting quietly, and much faster than most people realize.'
The American Psychological Association urges caution when interacting with AI. 'When people engage with chatbots, they often discuss topics related to mental health, including difficult feelings and relationship challenges, says Vaile Wright, APA's senior director of health care innovation. 'We can't stop people from doing that, but we want consumers to know the risks when they use chatbots for mental and behavioral health that were not created for that purpose.'
When all is said and done, it's important to remember that a chatbots are automation, not human, and they are designed to be workers, not intimate companions or lovers. So don't be drawn into 'AI-lationships,' believing they have feelings that will meet your every emotional need. Because they can't.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
Survey Results: We Don't Know What We're Doing With AI Adoption
It's coming up on three years since ChatGPT's public launch cracked open the current wave of AI adoption like a dam burst. In that time, we've moved from being equal parts awestruck and alarmed by large language models to building copilots, chaining agents together, and now running entire agentic ecosystems within the enterprise. The corporate org chart has sprouted a new title when it gave birth to the Chief AI Officer, and every other C-suite role has quietly redefined itself. The enterprise rollout has begun in earnest, and while McKinsey recently found that Gen AI is yet to deliver enterprise-wide ROI, things are expected to change soon enough. We've also seen the AI adoption industry professionalize almost overnight. There are thousands of courses from scrappy Udemy modules to MBA electives at the Ivy Leagues teaching executives and engineers how to deploy AI in their work. More CEOs now keep AI tools open on their desktops than they do Bloomberg terminals. We've come a long way since November 2022. But the question of whether anyone really knows what they're doing with AI is still fair. The latest report from Anaconda, one of the pioneers of the ML revolution, suggests that we have much further to go. Enterprises are putting security at the forefront of AI adoption Let's start with the good news which is that we've matured from tinkering with AI to managing it like the enterprise IT asset it is. According to Anaconda's survey of 300 AI practitioners and decision-makers, 82% of organizations validate open-source packages for security compliance. Documentation of model dependencies is up to 81%, and 70% now have some form of model drift monitoring in place. This is a sign that lessons from past tech cycles have stuck. Security isn't being bolted on after the fact as it was before, instead, it's in the design from day one. But this means security teams are also slowing some projects down. A quarter of respondents pointed to resistance from data science teams when security requirements are enforced, and over two-thirds reported deployment delays caused by security issues. To the surprise of no one in the field, the same tension that has dogged DevOps since its inception is alive and well in AI. And even with these precautions, nearly 40% of organizations still frequently encounter security vulnerabilities in their AI projects. More than half have no automated anomaly alerts or A/B testing in production. There are more gaps for CAIOs, CIOs and CISOs to plug in than there are clear SOPs on how to do so, which leads us to the second set of insights from the report. Keeping up with the Altmans: The treadmill of AI adoption The speed of model releases is another point of strain. There's always a new launch, whether it's OpenAI's latest 'o' release, a Google Gemini update, or an open-source foundation model that's suddenly topping benchmarks. In fact, you could set your watch solely based on listening to the predictable waves of engineers across the industry sighing as they rewrite API calls and rerun integration tests. Anaconda's data shows the cracks this pace creates. Only 36% of organizations say their business stakeholders can very effectively access information on a model's origin, components, and limitations. That means most people using these models, and in many cases making business-critical decisions with them, can't necessarily answer basic questions about how they work or where they might fail. It's hard to blame them. The AI model supply chain is sprawling with open-source packages, pretrained models, cloud APIs, and proprietary fine-tunes, all stitched together with inconsistent documentation. Even within the same company, engineering may consider a lineage 'well documented' while compliance sees gaps big enough to halt an audit and the C-Suite can't find the words to sell their AI adoption process to their board. If you don't know that a model miscounts the number of 'r's in 'strawberry,' you can't predict where else your AI stack might trip, and if you don't track which models have a tendency to drift after 90 days in production, you can't proactively retrain them before errors creep into customer-facing outputs. For enterprise AI adoption to really take off, we need to urgently raise the 36% to as close to 100% as we can. That's the only way to move from using AI to knowing what we're doing with AI. In 2025, the state of enterprise AI can be summed up like this. We're serious about security, getting better at documentation, and aware of the governance gaps. But we're still deploying tools faster than we're building the understanding to govern them. This puts us at risk for more than regulatory trouble or embarrassing model errors. The lack of understanding of what AI models can do, and where they shouldn't be used, combined with the slow onset of ROI trickling in, can lead to a violent burst of the current AI bubble, freezing progress for years as leadership retreats from the tools until they are more battle tested. A lack of understanding about the AI models can also lead to a creeping erosion of trust among customers, regulators, and employees, given how we can't fully explain the systems we've put at the core of our businesses. Closing that gap is possible. It requires unified tools, clear policies, and a culture that treats governance as an enabler of innovation, not its enemy. It also requires knowing, with confidence, what's in your AI stack, where it came from, and how it's behaving in the real world. Only then can we say, without irony, that we know what we're doing with AI adoption.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Floats Deal to Let Nvidia's Blackwell Chips Into China -- With a 50% Power Cut
President Donald Trump has signaled he may be open to letting Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) ship a toned-down version of its most advanced Blackwell AI chip to China if the company trims its capabilities by 30% to 50%. The comment comes shortly after Trump confirmed an unusual arrangement already in place for Nvidia's less-powerful H20 chip, which allows exports to China in exchange for a 15% revenue share paid directly to the US government. Advanced Micro Devices will follow the same formula for its MI308 chip, according to a person familiar with the matter. Nvidia has not commented on the president's remarks. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. The potential deal for Blackwell would mirror Trump's broader push to secure financial returns for the US in exchange for loosening certain export restrictions a strategy that could influence how American companies negotiate market access in China. While Trump didn't outline a specific timeline, he suggested Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang could soon meet with him to discuss a negatively enhanced Blackwell variant. If approved, the move could mark a shift in how high-end US chip technology is selectively offered abroad. Nvidia's Blackwell chips are the backbone of today's most powerful AI systems but remain off-limits to China under current US rules. Both Nvidia and AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) have taken revenue hits as tighter controls limited exports to older models on par with domestic Chinese alternatives products that have struggled to gain traction. Nvidia has already said it is developing another China-specific chip and will seek approval to sell it. The company noted that further cutting back its Hopper-based H20 chip is no longer viable, suggesting a modified Blackwell could be the clearest path to regaining momentum in one of the world's largest AI markets. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House says chips deals could perhaps expand to other companies
(Refiles to fix capitalization in headline, add period to end of second paragraph) (Reuters) -The White House said on Tuesday that perhaps deals could be expanded to other chip companies after Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales to China of certain advanced chips. "It stands with these two companies, perhaps it could expand in the future to other companies. I think it's a creative idea and solution," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a press briefing.
