Survival manual to be sent to every French household by this summer
The French government is preparing to send some literature to every household this summer.
A new tome for the annual 'A book for the holidays' campaign? How delightful.
Well, not so wholesome or cheery as it turns out, as the literature in question is a twenty-page survival manual which details the steps to take in the event of an armed conflict or any crisis.
Modelled on a similar Norwegian booklet and the Swedish model, 'Om krisen eller kriget kommer' ('In case of crisis or war'), which was distributed to households in 2018, the booklet will detail "all the good gestures to adopt in the event of an imminent threat in France', a government source told Europe 1.
These threats include armed conflict, as well as natural disasters such as flooding or a new health epidemic.
The publication is reportedly divided into three distinct parts:
'Protecting yourself' - a section intended to raise solidarity when it comes to protecting oneself and neighbours. This first part also lists the survival kit to have at home in the event of a serious crisis. The kit includes at least six litres of bottled water, ten canned goods, batteries and a flashlight in case of a power cut.
'What to do in the event of an alert' - a part detailing the actions one must take in the event of an imminent threat. This chapter lists emergency numbers, radio frequencies, as well as tips like closing all doors in the event of a nuclear accident.
'Get involved' - this final section explains how to sign up to a reserve force, whether military or communal.
"This document aims to ensure the resilience of populations in the face of all types of crises, whether natural, technological, cyber, or security-related,' according to a statement from the government. 'This draft document, whose conditions for distribution to the French public have not yet been defined, is currently being approved by the Prime Minister.'
The title also has not been defined, and sources say that the two main options are: 'French Resilience" or "All Resilient'.
As you can imagine, the announcement of the distribution of a survival manual has sparked criticism online, with many calling it a waste of money, some likening it to Cold War brochures, and others writing: "Stop creating a climate of fear and anxiety."
Indeed, while hardly surprising in the wake of President Emmanuel Macron's March 5 speech, in which he declared that the threat of armed conflict with Russia concerned all European countries and called for strengthening the continent's defenses, a survival booklet doesn't exactly smack of reassurance.
However, as indicated by the General Secretariat for Defense and National Security (SGDSN), this guide is an integral part of the national resilience strategy, initiated after the Covid-19 pandemic - and therefore predates the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Still, until the pamphlet arrives in letterboxes, let's just hope the advice goes beyond 'close your doors in case of a nuclear blast'. Anxiety-inducing is one thing, but thinking that closed doors are going to prevent... well, anything... or that people would rush to crack open a window in order to take in as much of the nuclear mushroom as possible is insulting.
Hell of a sunrise, though.
Also, no mention of what to do in case of a zombie apocalypse...
Part 4, maybe?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
40 minutes ago
- Associated Press
A jab from 33,000 feet cools Trump–Macron ties, but is it just a passing frost?
PARIS (AP) — What began with a handshake evolved into turbulence at 33,000 feet as one of diplomacy's oddest relationships took another strange turn. The political chemistry that once defined the Trump–Macron dynamic — immortalized by a famously tense 29-second handshake in 2017 — was nowhere to be seen in midair Tuesday when U.S. President Donald Trump blasted his French counterpart on social media. As Trump departed the G7 summit early, French President Emmanuel Macron tried to reframe the exit as strategic. 'There is indeed an offer to meet and exchange,' Macron told reporters, suggesting the U.S. might help broker a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. But aboard Air Force One, Trump responded with a swipe that accused Macron of showboating. 'Wrong! He is 'publicity seeking' and always gets it wrong,' Trump said. 'He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington… Much bigger than that. Stay tuned!' The takedown punctured Macron's narrative and revealed a rupture in a relationship that has featured theater, flattery and touch. Macron, who once styled himself as a 'Trump whisperer,' has long used charm and proximity to try to manage the unpredictable U.S. leader, often contrasting himself with more openly critical peers like Germany's Angela Merkel. But those efforts are far from foolproof. The Élysée Palace made no formal comment on Trump's outburst. Their diplomatic style has never been purely transactional — and has often been tactile. From their earliest encounters, physical gestures have been part of the pageantry: Trump's firm pats and arm-yanks, Macron's theatrical poise and instinctive touches. The roots of their rapport run deep. In 2017, Macron dazzled Trump with a Bastille Day parade, formal dinners and white-knuckle handshakes. A viral 29-second grip — knuckles white, jaws clenched — set the tone for a relationship of theatrical dominance. The physical choreography evolved over the years: Trump yanking Macron's arm at the Élysée, Macron placing a steadying hand on Trump's thigh in Washington. Their February 2025 White House meeting brought a refined version of the dance as Macron delivered corrections with charm, countering Trump's Ukraine comments while laughing at Fort Knox jokes. Signals of strain before the summit Trump joked about Macron's marriage last month after a video of Brigitte Macron playfully pushing her husband surfaced. 'Make sure the door remains closed,' he quipped, before adding: 'They're fine.' But the chill had already begun to set in. This month, Macron traveled to Greenland — a territory Trump has floated buying — to express solidarity with Danish sovereignty. 'This is not what is done between allies,' he said, in what many interpreted as a veiled swipe at the U.S. The G7 summit, intended to project Western unity on Russia and Iran, instead showcased fracture. Trump skipped the final sessions, refused to back new Russia sanctions, and warned Tehran to 'immediately evacuate.' Macron tried to frame the early exit as useful. Trump's one-line rebuttal shut that down. But later in the flight, Trump softened his tone. When reporters asked about the outburst, he replied: 'That was Emmanuel — nice guy but he doesn't get it right too often.' The pivot was familiar. 'It's difficult to be confident about any clear arc in President Trump's reactions to people or events,' said Dana Allin, U.S. policy expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. 'He tends to be disinhibited — he says what's on his mind, and that can change quickly.' There was no handshake this time. No shoulder clap. Just a flick of the thumb — and a public slap across the alliance. The dynamic, Allin suggests, reflects a shift in how Europe engages with Washington. In Trump's first term, many European leaders treated his behavior as a storm they could wait out. 'Now it seems like a more permanent thing,' Allin said.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Vance: Trump may ‘take further action' to stop Iran
Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday warned that President Donald Trump may 'take further action' to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, and urged people who don't support such action to trust the president. Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' Vance wrote in a post on X. 'That decision ultimately belongs to the president.' Iran has increased its uranium enrichment to near weapons-grade levels, according to a report from a United Nations nuclear watchdog. The country has been the subject of Israeli bombardment in recent days over its refusal to give up its nuclear capabilities. The Trump administration has attempted to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran in recent months but talks halted after Israel struck Tehran last week. 'Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday. 'What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' Vance, in an attempt to appease both the MAGA war hawks and isolationists within Trump's base, the latter of which he's been a committed member, validated the concern about getting involved in a foreign war. 'People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy.' But he stressed that Trump 'has earned some trust on this issue,' and 'having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using American military to accomplish the American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus.' The comments come hours after Trump made an abrupt departure a day earlier than scheduled from the G7 summit in Canada. French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump left the conference to negotiate a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. But the president took to Truth Social to correct his French counterpart. 'Wrong!' he said. 'He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire.' The reasoning is 'much bigger than that,' Trump said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: China has made only one public statement on Chagos Islands deal
Claims have circulated around international support for the Government's deal with Mauritius over the Chagos Islands and its implications for the US-UK military base on Diego Garcia. The Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the deal had 'secured the base for the long term' and that 'has been opposed by our adversaries' including China. The Conservative Party has claimed it is 'pure disinformation' that critics of the deal are siding with China. There is limited information on what Beijing thinks about the deal. Certainly the only known public statement from a Chinese official on the deal applauded the agreement in the context of safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity. It did not mention China's view on the continued presence of the military base on Diego Garcia. China abstained on the UN vote which was a key stage in the road to the deal, and one expert the PA news agency spoke to said he believes that Beijing 'privately views the agreement … somewhat as a setback', citing a variety of reasons. How long have the Chagos Islands been in UK hands? Britain took control of Mauritius from 1810 when it was seized from the French. Between 1814 and 1965 the Chagos Archipelago was administered by the UK as a dependency of the Mauritius colony. In 1965 the UK detached the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and several Islands from the Seychelles and created the new British Indian Ocean Territory. Three years later Mauritius became an independent country. Between 1967 and 1973 the UK removed the population of the Chagos Archipelago. What has China said about the UK-Mauritius deal? On May 26 the new Chinese ambassador to Mauritius, Huang Shifang, gave a speech at a reception attended by the Mauritian Prime Minister, the Vice President and others. The official text of the speech – which was sent to the PA news agency by the Chinese embassy in Mauritius – does not directly mention the Chagos deal. A release from the Mauritian Prime Minister's office the next day said of the ambassador's speech: 'Acknowledging Mauritius's firm adherence to the One-China Policy, she commended the recent achievement regarding the Chagos Archipelago.' The closest that the official text of the speech comes to this is a section where the ambassador says: 'China highly appreciates Mauritius's adherence to the One-China Policy, and fully supports Mauritius in safeguarding its national sovereignty and territorial integrity.' However, a short video excerpt from the speech, posted to YouTube, shows that immediately afterwards the ambassador added: 'In particular we applaud loudly for the historical achievement on the Chagos agreement. Massive congratulations.' What might Beijing think behind closed doors? It is difficult to say what policymakers in the Chinese capital might be thinking about the deal behind closed doors. The prime minister's statement appears to claim that China opposed the part of the deal which allows Diego Garcia to remain open. When the ambassador's speech supported Mauritius's work on its territorial integrity she linked that to the country's One China Policy. The One China Policy is Beijing's claim that 'Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory'. So the ambassador's statement – if an accurate representation of Beijing's thinking – could show that China supports the handing over of Chagos to Mauritius because it reinforces the principle of territorial integrity which the Chinese leadership thinks supports its claim to Taiwan. But this does not rule out Beijing being disappointed about the part of the deal which allows the Diego Garcia base to remain open. When quizzed on Sir Keir's claims, his official spokesperson pointed towards the deal's support from the US and other allies. This included a post from US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth who said the deal secures 'key US national security interests in the region' and added: 'We are confident the base is protected for many years ahead.' Benjamin Sacks, a professor of political geography at the RAND School of Public Policy in the US, told PA: 'I contend that Beijing privately views the agreement, even if modified to ameliorate some Chagossians' outstanding demands, somewhat as a setback. In practical terms, it gains little if any advantage from it.' He said the deal resolves the question as to whether the UK, 'a major state actor supporting existing rules-based orders (RBOs), was violating them in respect to the Chagos'. He added: 'The Chagos issue constituted a perennial problem for British foreign policy; one that China could simultaneously exploit to demonstrate its supposed adherence to existing RBOs and undermine the UK's traditionally important role in maintaining it.' The deal 'deters Port Louis (Mauritius) from becoming an effective client state of Beijing' while allowing it to balance a strong economic relationship with China while continuing its close relationships with Beijing's competitors, India, the UK and the US, he said. Dr Sacks added: 'Analysis … suggests that China prioritises decolonisation so as to replace European and American influence with its own. For this reason, Beijing will applaud the agreement as a 'win' against the major Western powers.' As for the base at Diego Garcia: 'Beijing will have to contend with its continued presence for at least the next 99 years, and likely longer.' He said it can also be argued that the base's deterrence effect 'is stronger now that the agreement has secured and clarified its future within international laws and norms'. What has China said about the Chagos Islands in the past? In 2017 China abstained on a UN General Assembly vote which asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to deliver an advisory opinion on the dispute between the UK and Mauritius. This ICJ opinion was ultimately cited in the UK-Mauritius agreement. At the time the Chinese representative to the General Assembly said: 'China calls upon the countries concerned to continue to make efforts in good faith and to continue to carry out bilateral negotiations and consultations, so as to seek an appropriate solution to the question of Chagos archipelago as soon as possible.' The court opinion that followed in 2019 was that the UK is 'under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as quickly as possible'. In the wake of this opinion, in 2019 the General Assembly adopted a resolution which welcomed the court's decision. At this point China was one of the 116 votes for the resolution. Six countries voted against and 56 abstained. The Chinese representative said at the time: 'The Chinese Government is a consistent and firm supporter of the decolonisation process.' More recently in a China-Mauritius meeting on August 1 last year – according to a Mauritian press release – the Chinese representative 'reiterated China's aid to Mauritius in its quest for sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago'. UK Parliament – Hansard for June 11 2025, Engagements (archived) Video on YouTube (archived page and audio) ICJ advisory opinion (archived) Government Information Service – Reception marking assumption of office (archived) Ambassador's speech – text (archived) YouTube video of speech (archived page and audio) MFA – Statement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China (archived) Pete Hegseth statement (archived) UNGA – Thursday, 22 June 2017, 10 am (archived) UK-Mauritius agreement (archived) UNGA – Adopts Resolution Seeking International Court's Advisory Opinion (archived) UNGA – Welcomes International Court of Justice Opinion (archived) UNGA – Vote in 2019 (archived) UNGA – Wednesday, 22 May 2019, 3 pm (archived) Government of Mauritius – The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (archived)
