logo
St. Anne's survivor awarded $72K after review of denied abuse claim is still fighting

St. Anne's survivor awarded $72K after review of denied abuse claim is still fighting

CBC30-01-2025

For the residential school survivor known only as claimant T-00185, justice has been elusive.
He alleged in 2009 under the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement assessment process that he had been sexually abused by two older boys at the notorious St. Anne's Indian Residential School, which operated between 1906 and 1976 in Fort Albany, Ont. His claim was rejected.
That claim was heard, however, before Canada was forced to release roughly 12,000 police records and court documents containing evidence of rampant physical and sexual abuse at the Catholic-run institution.
T-00185 was the lone survivor awarded compensation after a court-ordered review concluded 11 student-on-student abuse claims may have been impacted by Canada's non-disclosure, CBC Indigenous has learned.
His lawyer says, despite receiving $72,000 in July 2023, this survivor's fight isn't done yet.
"He was not involved whatsoever" in the review itself, said Ottawa-based Fay Brunning, who represents a group of St. Anne's survivors in court.
"He, and we, still say it's not the correct amount. There was no re-hearing."
T-00185 belongs to a small group fighting in Ontario Superior Court to hold Canada accountable for allegedly suppressing evidence during compensation hearings held between 2006 and 2014.
He can't be named because the compensation process is confidential.
The group wants the court to hold Canada in breach of the 2014 court order requiring it to disclose these documents, and they also want to reopen potentially impacted claims.
In response, the Liberal government has asked the court to dismiss the request on procedural and technical grounds. The judge has reserved his decision.
"It's difficult to even think that you're going to get something out of the system," said Edmund Metatawabin, former chief of Fort Albany First Nation and spokesman for the group, in an interview this week.
"It's difficult. But you wouldn't be doing your job, your responsibility, if you didn't at least bring it forward."
He said student-on-student abuse was a learned behaviour. Children learned it from religious authority figures who were supposed to care for them but instead sexually exploited them, then threatened them into silence.
Many survivors carried feelings of fear, guilt and shame with them into adulthood — and some would still turn cold at the sight of their now-frail abusers, Metatawabin said.
"That's how much fear that we have about them, because they give us their guilt, and we take our guilt as if it was our fault that all this stuff happened," he said.
"So it's very, very, very difficult to do this on your own."
About more than money, says lawyer
In 2021, the Liberal government sought a court-ordered review of 427 abuse claims made in connection with St. Anne's, which identified the 11 cases in need of further review.
Brunning, however, described that as a "whitewash process" that excluded the survivors. The group tried to appeal but the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear their case. Now, it's back to the lower court.
"It's not done, and St. Anne's survivors are resilient, strong people and they want their rights enforced," said Brunning.
"And for T-00185, yeah he got paid $72,000 but he's not opting out because this is about more than just money."
That award came to light through a September 2024 question period note prepared for Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Gary Anandasangaree. According to the government, the additional compensation was awarded essentially because of an error by an adjudicator.
"No compensation was awarded for any document-related issues," wrote spokesperson Jacinthe Goulet in a statement.
Brunning contests that position, arguing that T-00185 may have been entitled to more money if his claim was heard with the proper documents available.
She said he always maintained the worst thing that happened to him was years of abuse by Sister Anna Wesley, a nun with the Sisters of Charity of Ottawa. But when compensation hearings began, the government produced a false report on her.
"It looked like she was a lovely nun," said Brunning.
In reality, the Justice Department had nearly 7,000 pages of records indicating Wesley was a cruel abuser.
Witnesses testified in her 1999 criminal trial that Wesley beat the children and forced them to eat their own vomit in front of their peers when they couldn't stomach their required dose of cod liver oil.
She was convicted of three counts of assault and three counts of administering a noxious substance.
Student-on-student cases should have been admitted, says lawyer
In 2009, T-00185 was believed about the abuse but had no evidence to prove the supervisors knew or ought to have known and failed to address it, which was required under the process, Brunning said.
If all the documents were handed over, they would have shown a group of 10 boys went to the bishop in 1967 and told him Oblate priest Father Arthur Lavoie was sexually touching the children, Brunning said.
But the official report on Lavoie, who died in 1992, omitted any allegation of abuse. In fact, there were 2,472 pages on him confirming he was a "serial sexual abuser," a 2015 court decision says.
Had it been disclosed that the bishop was told and did nothing — other than just telling the children "it's the fatherly way" — the outcome may have been different, the lawyer added.
"When you go right to the top and you see that the supervisors are a bunch of pedophiles and they're engaging in this, to me, every student-on-student abuse claim probably should have been admitted right from the beginning."
The survivors say somewhere between between 166 and 250 claimants may have had their rights breached. Canada says 96 per cent of abuse claims tied to St. Anne's were compensated and none were denied because of withheld documents.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manitoba cabinet minister breaks silence about 2019 workplace harassment probe
Manitoba cabinet minister breaks silence about 2019 workplace harassment probe

Winnipeg Free Press

time3 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Manitoba cabinet minister breaks silence about 2019 workplace harassment probe

Manitoba's sole cabinet minister has defended her work at a Winnipeg college and said she's being unjustly targeted more than five years after an investigation concluded she had harassed an employee. At least three employees of Red River College Polytechnic filed separate complaints about the behaviour of their boss, Rebecca Chartrand, in 2019. Chartrand, who won the riding of Churchill-Keewatinook Aski for the Liberals in April, was chosen by Prime Minister Mark Carney to be part of his inner circle. Between her failed 2015 run for office and her successful second try, the new MP and minister of Northern and Arctic affairs spent about 2-½ years in a senior management role at RRC Polytech's Indigenous education unit. On Tuesday, Chartrand provided a lengthy statement in which she touted her commitment to positive change and the progress she made on 'enhancing programs and fostering a student-centered environment' at RRC Polytech. She said her work is a 'source of great pride.' 'Let us concentrate on building up the community and supporting positive developments within the Indigenous community, instead of focusing on negativity that fans lateral violence within the Indigenous community,' the cabinet minister said via email Tuesday. The findings of the 2019 probe into her treatment of one particular employee on campus was leaked against the backdrop of the rookie politician's sudden rise up the ranks on Parliament Hill. Investigators from Rachlis Neville LLP concluded Chartrand had repeatedly harassed and humiliated a subordinate, who is also an Indigenous woman, over an extended period in 2019. RRC Polytech hired the firm that fall, after undertaking an internal investigation sparked by the same complainant. That one concluded Chartrand had breached school policy when she pushed through a controversial student survey — a project that several of her colleagues had raised concerns about — and taken retaliatory action against the employee who flagged the suspected breach. That individual, who left the college in 2020, repeatedly flagged the gist of those conclusions with her federal Liberal contacts before the April 28 election. 'As an Indigenous Liberal member who supports Mark Carney, I have been trying to warn the Winnipeg Liberal head office about (Chartrand). She will be a liability if elected and a scandal waiting to happen,' she wrote in an April 6 email to a fellow Liberal who was heavily involved in Carney's campaign. 'Let us concentrate on building up the community and supporting positive developments within the Indigenous community, instead of focusing on negativity that fans lateral violence within the Indigenous community.'–Rebecca Chartrand The Free Press has interviewed that employee and four others who worked closely with Chartrand when she oversaw Indigenous strategy at RRC Polytech from June 2017 to December 2019. Each of them expressed serious concerns about her treatment of employees — either themselves, former colleagues or both — who had voiced differing views to ones she held. Three said they made written complaints about her, but the report of only one of them was escalated and substantiated. They all agreed to share their experiences on the condition of anonymity. 'She's very authoritarian and she surrounds herself with 'yes' people and if you're not a 'yes' person, you're not going to be there — or she's going to make it really tough for you,' one source said. She said she frequently witnessed what she called 'lateral violence' — undermining and bullying of the whistleblower whose complaint was escalated. Chartrand's hostile behaviour made others 'cower,' the source said. Another ex-staffer recalled being fired on the basis of 'insubordination' after questioning the appropriateness and legalities of collecting deeply personal information from prospective students, via the survey. Chartrand faced criticism during the 2018-19 school year for creating 'an assessment readiness tool,' exclusively prepared for applicants of an Indigenous studies program, that requested details about their alcohol and recreational drug use. Multiple sources described Chartrand as a vindictive ladder-climber, citing one instance when she uninvited a staff member from an international trip to a conference he had pitched they go to because they'd had a disagreement. The employee in question had expressed problems with the survey, sources said. The decision to push forward the initiative and write off workers' concerns showed her 'bad judgment,' said a fourth ex-employee who indicated he contacted the federal NDP after learning Chartrand was nominated as the Liberal candidate for Churchill-Keewatinook Aski. That employee said he left RRC Polytech when his complaints involving Chartrand were unresolved. Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. The Liberal party has declined to comment on the vetting of specific candidate applications, citing confidentiality. RRC Polytech has released limited information about Chartrand's tenure over the same rationale. 'I'm really disappointed at (the Liberals') lack of integrity or their lack of an answer to the people,' said the whistleblower whose complaints were substantiated by Rachlis Neville LLP. 'To be honest, it makes me question if the prime minister has been given the correct information to make the best decisions for who is in key positions.' She noted it was the party that had first brought her and Chartrand together, as they both worked on her 2015 bid under the leadership of then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau. Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie. Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative. Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Sisters angry at their mother attacked her as she slept, murder trial hears
Sisters angry at their mother attacked her as she slept, murder trial hears

CBC

time4 hours ago

  • CBC

Sisters angry at their mother attacked her as she slept, murder trial hears

Two sisters accused of first-degree murder in the 2022 killing of their 88-year-old mother were angry at how they said she treated them, struck and strangled her as she slept, then called 911 and told the dispatcher and police that they had killed her, their trial heard Tuesday. Chau Lam, now 59, and Hue Lam, now 62, have both pleaded not guilty in Superior Court in Ottawa to murdering their mother Kieu Lam. The salt-and-pepper-haired sisters sat in the courtroom Tuesday directly behind defence counsel as the judge gave her opening instructions to the jury and the Crown opened its case. Jury selection was completed Monday. Assistant Crown prosecutor Tasha Bobrovitz told the 13 jurors — seven men and six women — that in the days leading up to the killing on Oct. 31, 2022, the sisters discussed a plan to kill their mother. "They entered her bedroom as she slept in the comfort of her bed, used a hammer to strike her head, and throttled her with a string cinched across her neck," Bobrovitz said. "You will hear each of them in their confessions to police describe how they did it, why they did it and when they did it, in detail. "They were mad — angry at their mother for how they say she treated them." Co-operated with police The sisters were waiting at the front door when police arrived and pointed them up to the second floor of their townhouse where Kieu Lam was lying unresponsive in her bed. Lifesaving efforts had no effect and she was pronounced dead. A forensic pathologist is expected to testify that the cause of death was compression to the neck with a component of ligature strangulation, Bobrovitz said. One officer spoke to the sisters, who speak Vietnamese and participating in the trial with the help of live translation, in the kitchen, using broken English and Cantonese. Bobrovitz told the jury that when the officer asked them what happened, Hue Lam pointed at herself and her sister, clasped both of her hands together in a fist, raised it above her head, then made a downward striking motion. Witnesses for the Crown include police and paramedics who responded to the scene, a forensic pathologist who visited the scene and performed the autopsy on Kieu Lam, and the homicide detectives who interviewed each sister separately and heard "exacting details about the murder of their mother," Bobrovitz said. 'Me and my sister kill my mom' The dispatcher who took Chau Lam's 911 call was the first witness to testify. Marlo Villalobos said it was his birthday the day of the call, and colleagues had just finished singing him happy birthday when he offered to pick up an incoming call. That call was played in court. In the recording, Lam says she needs police and that "Me and my sister kill my mom." "Sorry, I'm having a really hard time understanding," Villalobos replies. "Kill my mom," Lam says before spelling out the word kill. The dispatcher puts Lam on hold to get a translator. When he and the translator hop back onto the line, the translator confirms that Lam is saying she and her sister killed their mother. "Yeah, too angry, so they took a hammer and hit her and strangle her. I don't know if she's dead or not," the translator says. The dispatcher asks if their mother is breathing and if they can go check, and Chau Lam replies through the translator that she doesn't know and will let police check. Moments later police are heard arriving, and the call ends a short while later. Friend of the court appointed for Hue Lam Justice Narissa Somji is presiding the approximately five-week trial. Chau Lam is being represented by defence lawyers Ewan Lyttle and Brett McGarry. Hue Lam is representing herself. To ensure her right to a fair trial, Paolo Giancaterino was appointed by the court to act as an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, to raise any important issues, ask questions and make submissions and objections during the trial. That may sound a lot like a defence lawyer's role, but amicus curiae don't act quite the same. The bar for raising issues is typically higher for an amicus curiae than for defence counsel, and is limited to interventions aimed at preventing a miscarriage of justice. Bobrovitz is prosecuting the case alongside assistant Crown attorney Julian Whitten.

Ex-U.K. soldier sentenced to prison for ‘vicious assault' that killed Winnipeg man in Toronto bar
Ex-U.K. soldier sentenced to prison for ‘vicious assault' that killed Winnipeg man in Toronto bar

Winnipeg Free Press

time4 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Ex-U.K. soldier sentenced to prison for ‘vicious assault' that killed Winnipeg man in Toronto bar

TORONTO — A former British soldier who delivered three lethal elbows to the head of a Winnipeg entrepreneur in a Toronto bar was sentenced to four years and three months in prison Tuesday. 'This was a vicious assault with tragic consequences,' Superior Court Justice Katherine Corrick said during sentencing in a downtown Toronto courtroom. Craig Gibson, 30, was taken into custody late last month. He showed no emotion as he stood up with his arms outstretched, waiting to be handcuffed and taken back to prison. MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES Brett Sheffield On Aug. 28, 2023, Gibson, then a corporal with the British Armed Forces, had just completed a reconnaissance competition in Thunder Bay and was in Toronto on his way home to England. Brett Sheffield, 38, and some of his employees from Pilot Mound-based NextGen Drainage Solutions,were in Toronto on a business trip. Both men and their friends went to Locals Only Bar on King Street West that night. Surveillance footage showed the two groups interacting good-naturedly with each other while consuming copious amounts of alcohol. A disagreement arose, however, and after heated words, Gibson elbowed Sheffield three times in the head. Officers responded to the incident at 11:25 p.m. that night and 'life-saving measures were commenced on scene,' but the victim died two days later in hospital, the Toronto Police Service said at the time. A Toronto jury convicted Gibson of manslaughter in December, rejecting his testimony that he was acting in self-defence because he believed Sheffield was carrying a knife. The judge said Tuesday that what happened that evening was not 'a one-punch manslaughter,' nor a bar fight. Gibson struck Sheffield 'without warning' and had to be pulled away by others. She called Gibson 'a strong and powerful man.' He testified he grew up in a rough part of Scotland 'where you did not make it through school if you did not know how to handle yourself. And he knew how to handle himself.' He had been living in England with his fiancée and infant daughter while on bail. When he was 21, Gibson joined the British army and served in Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine and Kosovo. While Gibson was dishonourably discharged, his British Army superiors submitted letters of support to the court. They described him as a disciplined, dependable soldier who has acted as an instructor and mentor to junior colleagues. As a result of the conviction and sentence, he has lost any chance of realizing his lifelong goal of serving as a member of the SAS, an elite special forces unit in the British army. There is no minimum sentence for manslaughter, and the maximum is life imprisonment. Prosecutors had asked for a six-and-a-half-year sentence. Defence lawyers recommended a sentence of between two and three years. Wednesdays A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom. Corrick also addressed the impact Sheffield's death has had on his loved ones, 'who continue to struggle with profound grief and the immense hole that's been left in their lives.' During the sentencing hearing last month, Sheffield was described in victim impact statements as a successful entrepreneur who was gentle, compassionate and generous, the kind of person who would take a homeless man to a restaurant and buy him coffee and pie. His 96-year-old grandmother wrote the family 'will never get over his tragic, cruel, unnecessary death.' Sheffield's fiancée wrote that not only has she lost her best friend, lover and confidant, but her two children have been robbed of their hero. — Toronto Star

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store