Investment banks anticipate Bank Negara's 25bps OPR cut in 2H25
KUALA LUMPUR: Investment banks expect Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to lower the Overnight Policy Rate (OPR) by 25 basis points (bps) in the second half of 2025 (2H 2025) amid softer first quarter (1Q) growth and tariff disruptions.
Public Investment Bank Bhd said the earlier 100 bps reduction in the Statutory Reserve Requirement (SRR) is expected to serve as a timely liquidity buffer, allowing BNM to maintain a data-dependent stance amid elevated external volatility.
Should the 90-day tariff suspension lapse without renewal, raising Malaysia's effective tariff exposure to 24 per cent, the investment bank anticipated a more front-loaded policy response, comprising two 25 bps OPR cuts in 2H 2025.
"This would be intended to mitigate negative spillovers on trade performance, investment activity and broader economic sentiment.
"With three scheduled policy meetings remaining this year -- July 9, Sept 4 and Nov 6 -- the window for calibration remains open, though timing will depend on incoming data and developments surrounding global trade negotiations,' it said in a note today.
Meanwhile, Hong Leong Investment Bank said the projection was made in view of external uncertainties and modest inflationary environment.
As for Standard Chartered (StanChart), it continued to expect BNM to cut the policy rate by 25 bps in July, with more cuts (beyond 25 bps) in 2025 likely if data deteriorates by more than expected.
The bank has lowered its 2025 gross domestic growth (GDP) growth forecast to 4.2 per cent from 5.0 per cent previously on weaker-than-expected 1Q GDP growth and tariff disruptions.
"We estimate that a 24 per cent and 10 per cent reciprocal tariff rate will subtract 0.7 percentage point (ppt) and 0.4 ppt respectively, from GDP, assuming that 30 per cent of Malaysia's exports are exempt from tariffs and a United States (US) import elasticity rate of 0.5 times.
"The hit to GDP from a fall in demand of trading partners will also likely weigh on growth in 2025,' it said.
Nevertheless, StanChart expects consumer spending and investment are likely to remain the key pillars of growth in 2025. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Engineer duped of over RM1.5m in online investment scam
GEORGE TOWN: A 40-year-old engineer working in the Middle East has lodged a police report after allegedly losing more than RM1.5 million to an online investment scam. Seberang Prai Tengah district police chief Datuk Hamzah Ahmad said the man claimed he was cheated in a non-existent investment scheme, resulting in total losses of RM1,532,563. According to Hamzah, the victim's ordeal began in November last year, when he became acquainted with a woman over the phone and later developed a romantic relationship with her. "The suspect then persuaded the victim to join an investment platform called GoldenCrimson, which offered various packages — Junior Room, Intermediate Room, Superior Room, and Supreme Room — with returns depending on the package selected. "The victim was given a customer service number and a website link, to register," he said in a statement today. Hamzah said the victim initially invested RM90,510 and received returns amounting to RM108,611. "Believing the investment was profitable, the victim proceeded to make 103 transactions into 31 different accounts between Dec 2 last year and Mar 8 this year, totalling RM1,532,563. "He realised he had been scammed when he was unable to withdraw the supposed profits of RM4,131,671 via the application. The suspect even asked for additional capital contributions to facilitate the withdrawal," he added. The case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for fraud. Hamzah urged the public to be cautious and not fall for investment offers not recognised by authorities such as Bank Negara Malaysia, the Securities Commission Malaysia, and the Companies Commission of Malaysia. He advised the public to verify the legitimacy of such schemes with relevant agencies or consult the nearest police station before committing to any investment, especially those offered online.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Foreign transaction firms must boost AMLA compliance diligence
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian business owners engaged in international transactions are advised to maintain comprehensive records and promptly report any suspicious activity to Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to ensure compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001(AMLA). Lawyer Guok Ngek Seong, who has nearly 25 years of experience in civil and criminal litigation, told Bernama that companies operating in high-risk sectors such as maritime, petroleum and logistics, which frequently conduct foreign exchange transactions, must exercise heightened diligence in documenting their operations. He was speaking on the matter in light of recent actions taken by BNM, which imposed administrative monetary penalties amounting to RM4.95 million on several financial institutions for breaches of statutory and regulatory obligations. The penalties involved non-compliance with provisions under the Development Financial Institutions Act 2002 as well as failures to adhere to requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering, Countering Financing of Terrorism and Targeted Financial Sanctions for Financial Institutions Policy Document. These regulatory actions reflect the heightened scrutiny placed on financial and corporate entities, reinforcing the need for robust compliance measures, especially in sectors exposed to cross-border transactions. Guok stressed that proper record-keeping may constitute a key line of defence should a company come under investigation for alleged money laundering or involvement in unlawful activities. 'BNM has the authority to conduct annual checks on such entities to ensure compliance with AMLA regulations,' he said. When asked whether litigants may obtain court orders through pre-action discovery or the Norwich Pharmacal process, Guok explained that such orders are available to parties seeking disclosure from individuals or entities not directly involved in the anticipated proceedings. He noted that Norwich Pharmacal orders permit a litigant to compel a third party, who is not itself implicated in the alleged wrongdoing but is mixed up in it innocently, to disclose information necessary to identify or pursue the actual wrongdoer. 'However, the court must balance such applications to prevent any form of abuse or 'fishing expeditions', particularly in light of, among other considerations, the principle of banker-client privilege. 'It is sometimes crucial for clients to obtain documents from banks, especially in cases where suspicious transactions have been traced to accounts held by corporations later found to be involved in fraudulent activities,' he said. He said the only viable means for victims to substantiate such transactions is by obtaining the relevant documentation, which may be instrumental in identifying the mechanisms or systems employed to facilitate the fraudulent activity. Commenting on the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 (BBEA), Guok noted that while Section 6 restricts the compellability of bank officers to produce bankers' books where the bank is not a party to the proceedings, the court nonetheless retains the discretion to issue such an order where appropriate. 'The court must balance the interests of banker-client confidentiality against the issues in the particular suit before making appropriate orders. 'While some discovery applications may be deemed an abuse of process, others are genuine, especially when litigants require documents from banks to trace the money trail in their cases,' he added.
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Businesses engaged in foreign transactions must exercise heightened diligence under AMLA
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian business owners engaged in international transactions are advised to maintain comprehensive records and promptly report any suspicious activity to Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) to ensure compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001(AMLA). Lawyer Guok Ngek Seong, who has nearly 25 years of experience in civil and criminal litigation, told Bernama that companies operating in high-risk sectors such as maritime, petroleum and logistics, which frequently conduct foreign exchange transactions, must exercise heightened diligence in documenting their operations. He was speaking on the matter in light of recent actions taken by BNM, which imposed administrative monetary penalties amounting to RM4.95 million on several financial institutions for breaches of statutory and regulatory obligations. The penalties involved non-compliance with provisions under the Development Financial Institutions Act 2002 as well as failures to adhere to requirements under the Anti-Money Laundering, Countering Financing of Terrorism and Targeted Financial Sanctions for Financial Institutions Policy Document. These regulatory actions reflect the heightened scrutiny placed on financial and corporate entities, reinforcing the need for robust compliance measures, especially in sectors exposed to cross-border transactions. Guok stressed that proper record-keeping may constitute a key line of defence should a company come under investigation for alleged money laundering or involvement in unlawful activities. 'BNM has the authority to conduct annual checks on such entities to ensure compliance with AMLA regulations,' he said. When asked whether litigants may obtain court orders through pre-action discovery or the Norwich Pharmacal process, Guok explained that such orders are available to parties seeking disclosure from individuals or entities not directly involved in the anticipated proceedings. He noted that Norwich Pharmacal orders permit a litigant to compel a third party, who is not itself implicated in the alleged wrongdoing but is mixed up in it innocently, to disclose information necessary to identify or pursue the actual wrongdoer. 'However, the court must balance such applications to prevent any form of abuse or 'fishing expeditions', particularly in light of, among other considerations, the principle of banker-client privilege. 'It is sometimes crucial for clients to obtain documents from banks, especially in cases where suspicious transactions have been traced to accounts held by corporations later found to be involved in fraudulent activities,' he said. He said the only viable means for victims to substantiate such transactions is by obtaining the relevant documentation, which may be instrumental in identifying the mechanisms or systems employed to facilitate the fraudulent activity. Commenting on the Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 (BBEA), Guok noted that while Section 6 restricts the compellability of bank officers to produce bankers' books where the bank is not a party to the proceedings, the court nonetheless retains the discretion to issue such an order where appropriate. 'The court must balance the interests of banker-client confidentiality against the issues in the particular suit before making appropriate orders. 'While some discovery applications may be deemed an abuse of process, others are genuine, especially when litigants require documents from banks to trace the money trail in their cases,' he added.
