logo
How fruit peels could be used to jump-start your car

How fruit peels could be used to jump-start your car

Independent05-06-2025
Imagine turning fruit waste into technology that stores electricity. This would reduce food waste and promote clean energy storage. Postdoctoral researcher Vianney Ngoyi Kitenge transformed mangosteen peels into specialised carbon materials that he used to make supercapacitor energy storage cells. He came up with a simplified way to do this, hugely reducing the cost. This breakthrough converts agricultural waste into valuable components for energy storage technology. He sets out how it works and what's needed to make it happen.
What is a supercapacitor?
Supercapacitors are a type of energy storage cell, similar to a battery, but with some key differences. They are standalone devices that store and release energy on their own.
The biggest difference between a supercapacitor and a battery is how quickly a supercapacitor can charge and release energy. While batteries are designed to provide energy steadily over a longer period (like minutes or hours), supercapacitors are built to deliver energy very quickly – within seconds or minutes.
This makes them perfect for applications that need a quick burst of power.
You probably use supercapacitors every day without realising it. They help devices like flashes in your smartphone camera, portable jump starters for cars, fitness trackers, and smartwatches that need quick energy boosts to work efficiently.
When making devices, the manufacturers choose whether to use a battery or a supercapacitor. This decision is based on how much power is needed and how fast it's needed. Most of the time, consumers aren't even aware of whether there's a battery or supercapacitor inside their devices.
In energy storage cells where electrical charges are stored, electrodes are key. Supercapacitors' electrodes can be made with activated carbon. This can be made from biomass waste, such as coconut shells, banana peels, mangosteen peels, and coffee grounds. I used mangosteen peels in my research.
What are supercapacitors used for?
Apart from camera flashes and emergency doors, supercapacitors are useful in renewable energy. They act like super-fast energy sponges that can quickly soak up extra electricity when solar panels or wind turbines produce too much. They can also quickly release this energy when too little is produced. This helps keep the power flow steady even when it's not sunny or windy.
Supercapacitors are still a small player in the energy storage world, with sales at around US$3 billion to US$4 billion yearly. To put this in perspective, the sales of lithium-ion batteries are US$50 billion to US$60 billion annually. Most are made in China and Japan, with some production in Europe and America, too.
Supercapacitors haven't caught on widely yet. This is why scientists continue to work to increase supercapacitors' total energy storage while maintaining their speed and longevity.
What role can mangosteen peels play?
There has been little research into using the peels of the mangosteen fruit to create carbon. Yet, mangosteen trees grow abundantly from the east coast of South Africa to Somalia and Guinea, and they can withstand drought and rainstorms.
Their peels naturally contain 35%-45% carbon-rich compounds. When processed through drying, oxygen-free heating and chemical activation, these peels transform into activated carbon.
Through my research, I developed a simplified method to transform mangosteen shells into highly porous activated carbon. By combining the dried shells with potassium carbonate and directly heating to 700°C in a single step, I created valuable activated carbon from agricultural waste.
Usually, creating activated carbon is a longer process of pre-heating fruit peels and reheating. So my method speeds the process up. This faster method makes activated carbon much cheaper by eliminating the initial five-hour heating phase at 400-500°C. This saves on electricity and reduces both production costs and the amount of time the furnace needs to operate. This then makes it more affordable for widespread commercial use.
Using fruit peels to create activated carbon also prevents them from being dumped on landfill sites and instead uses them to make valuable energy storage devices. Just three to five kilograms of fruit peels are enough to produce hundreds of supercapacitors. The global demand for supercapacitors is projected to grow significantly over the coming decade. This demand will be driven primarily by electric vehicles, renewable energy systems, and consumer electronics markets seeking high-power, rapid-cycling energy storage solutions.
Citrus peels can also be used to make activated carbon. Worldwide, the citrus juice industry generates 15 million tonnes of wasted peels, pulp and seeds every year. This waste could be used to make supercapacitors.
What's needed to make this happen?
Some companies are already turning food and agricultural waste into activated carbon. For example, Haycarb, based in Sri Lanka, turns coconut shells into activated carbon. Takachar in the US is also developing small-scale technology to turn agricultural waste into useful products like activated carbon.
In Africa, fruit processing plants could set up facilities to turn their waste into activated carbon. They could then sell it to energy storage companies or other industries that need it.
To make this happen, experts are needed to further develop the science. Governments and the private sector will need to fund equipment and facilities. Then, the factories making supercapacitors need to be connected with industries that could buy them (electric vehicles, renewable energy and electronics manufacturers).
Making supercapacitors from fruit peels could create jobs and support Africa's renewable energy goals.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unitree R1 Humanoid Robot From Just $5,900
Unitree R1 Humanoid Robot From Just $5,900

Geeky Gadgets

time11 hours ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Unitree R1 Humanoid Robot From Just $5,900

What if the future of robotics wasn't confined to industrial labs or sci-fi movies but could be held in your hands, ready to teach, learn, and innovate alongside you? Enter the Unitree R1, a humanoid robot designed not just to perform tasks but to inspire exploration and creativity in robotics. With its modular design and advanced mobility, the R1 is more than a machine, it's a platform for discovery, whether you're a student programming your first bot or a researcher testing the limits of artificial intelligence. At just 25 kilograms and packed with innovative technology, this robot challenges the notion that advanced robotics must be bulky, inaccessible, or prohibitively expensive. In this overview, we'll explore how the Unitree R1 bridges the gap between education and innovation, offering a versatile tool for classrooms, research labs, and beyond. From its 24 degrees of freedom allowing lifelike motion to its AI-ready computing power, the R1 is built to adapt and evolve with its users. But what truly sets it apart is its accessibility, both in price and design, making it a fantastic option for robotics enthusiasts and professionals alike. Could this be the platform that provide widespread access tos robotics and sparks a new wave of innovation? Let's unpack the possibilities. Unitree R1 Overview What Sets the Unitree R1 Apart The Unitree R1 is carefully engineered to address the diverse needs of robotics enthusiasts, educators, and researchers. Its design prioritizes adaptability, precision, and functionality, making it a standout choice for educational institutions, research facilities, and individual developers. By combining innovative technology with user-focused design, the R1 delivers a platform that is both versatile and practical. Below are the defining features that make the R1 a compelling choice. Core Features and Specifications The Unitree R1 integrates advanced engineering and technology to deliver high performance, flexibility, and reliability. Its specifications reflect a careful balance between functionality and innovation: Dimensions and Weight: The R1 stands at 1210 mm in height, with a width of 357 mm and a thickness of 190 mm. Weighing approximately 25 kilograms, including its battery, the R1 is compact yet robust. The R1 stands at 1210 mm in height, with a width of 357 mm and a thickness of 190 mm. Weighing approximately 25 kilograms, including its battery, the R1 is compact yet robust. Degrees of Freedom (DOF): The robot features 24 degrees of freedom, distributed across its limbs: 6 per leg, 5 per arm, and 2 at the waist. The R1 EDU version enhances this with 2 additional DOF in the head, allowing more nuanced movement and interaction. The robot features 24 degrees of freedom, distributed across its limbs: 6 per leg, 5 per arm, and 2 at the waist. The R1 EDU version enhances this with 2 additional DOF in the head, allowing more nuanced movement and interaction. Mechanical Design: Stability and efficiency are ensured through the use of crossed roller and double-hook ball bearings, paired with low-inertia permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) for smooth, precise motion. Stability and efficiency are ensured through the use of crossed roller and double-hook ball bearings, paired with low-inertia permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSM) for smooth, precise motion. Power System: A lithium-ion battery powers the R1 for up to one hour of operation. The smart quick-release system simplifies battery replacement, reducing downtime and enhancing usability. Unitree R1 Humanoid Robot Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in Humanoid robots. Mobility and Modularity: A Platform for Innovation Mobility is a cornerstone of the Unitree R1's design. Its advanced joint movement ranges enable dynamic, natural motion, allowing it to navigate complex environments with ease. This capability is further enhanced by its modular design, which provides users with the flexibility to customize components or integrate optional upgrades. For example, the R1 EDU version supports dexterous hands, making it suitable for tasks requiring fine motor skills, such as object manipulation or intricate assembly. The modularity of the R1 is particularly advantageous in educational and research settings, where adaptability is crucial. Whether the goal is to teach fundamental robotics concepts or to explore innovative applications, the R1 offers a versatile platform that fosters innovation and experimentation. AI Processing and Connectivity The Unitree R1 is equipped with robust computing capabilities to support a wide range of AI-driven applications. The Base R1 features an 8-core CPU, providing sufficient processing power for standard operations. The R1 EDU version takes this a step further by incorporating the NVIDIA Jetson Orin module, which is optimized for advanced AI processing. This enables real-time data analysis, machine learning tasks, and complex decision-making processes. Connectivity options include Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2, making sure seamless integration with external devices and networks. These features make the R1 an ideal tool for exploring AI in robotics, from object recognition and environmental mapping to autonomous navigation and human-robot interaction. Sensors for Enhanced Perception To interact effectively with its surroundings, the Unitree R1 is equipped with a comprehensive suite of sensors. These sensors enhance its ability to perceive and respond to environmental stimuli, making it a valuable tool for both research and education: Stereo Vision Camera: Provides depth perception and spatial awareness, allowing the robot to navigate and interact with its environment effectively. Provides depth perception and spatial awareness, allowing the robot to navigate and interact with its environment effectively. 4-Microphone Array: Assists audio input for voice commands or sound localization, enhancing its interactive capabilities. Assists audio input for voice commands or sound localization, enhancing its interactive capabilities. Speaker: Allows for audio output, allowing the robot to communicate or provide auditory feedback during tasks. These sensory features are particularly beneficial in scenarios where environmental interaction and data collection are critical, such as robotics competitions, AI training, or classroom demonstrations. Software and Development Tools The Unitree R1 supports over-the-air (OTA) updates, making sure that its software remains up-to-date with the latest features and improvements. For developers, the R1 EDU version offers a comprehensive software development kit (SDK), allowing secondary development and customization. This allows users to create tailored applications, expanding the robot's functionality to meet specific project requirements. The availability of development tools underscores the R1's role as a platform for innovation. By empowering users to design and implement custom solutions, the R1 assists exploration and experimentation in robotics, AI, and beyond. Applications and Accessibility The Unitree R1 is designed to serve a wide range of applications, making it a versatile tool for various fields: Education: Ideal for teaching robotics fundamentals, programming skills, and hands-on experimentation. Ideal for teaching robotics fundamentals, programming skills, and hands-on experimentation. Research: Supports advanced AI, machine learning, and human-robot interaction studies, providing a robust platform for scientific inquiry. Supports advanced AI, machine learning, and human-robot interaction studies, providing a robust platform for scientific inquiry. Development: Enables prototyping and testing of new robotics technologies, fostering innovation and technological advancement. The Base R1 is priced at $5,900 (excluding tax and shipping), making it accessible to a wide audience, from educational institutions to individual developers. The R1 EDU version, which includes additional features and capabilities, is available upon request, offering a tailored solution for more advanced applications. A Comprehensive Robotics Platform The Unitree R1 humanoid robot combines advanced mobility, modularity, and AI capabilities to deliver a comprehensive platform for education, research, and development. Whether you are a beginner exploring the fundamentals of robotics or a professional conducting innovative experiments, the R1 provides the tools and flexibility needed to achieve your objectives. With its robust design, powerful computing options, and extensive development support, the Unitree R1 sets a high standard for customizable humanoid robotics, making it a valuable asset in the ever-evolving field of robotics. Media Credit: Unitree Robotics Filed Under: Technology News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

The Independent

time13 hours ago

  • The Independent

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and "a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, "gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest" and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Maxwell Woody, lead author of the University of Michigan study, made the opposite case. Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.' ____

GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Comparison Guide : The Key Differences You Need to Know
GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Comparison Guide : The Key Differences You Need to Know

Geeky Gadgets

time15 hours ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Comparison Guide : The Key Differences You Need to Know

Is newer always better? When GPT-5 was announced, many expected it to be a new leap forward, a model that would leave its predecessor, GPT-4o, in the dust. Yet, early adopters have been met with a surprising reality: while GPT-5 features impressive advancements in reasoning, coding, and visual generation, GPT-4o continues to hold its ground with unmatched speed, simplicity, and reliability. This unexpected dynamic has sparked a heated debate among users, could the latest iteration of OpenAI's technology actually fall short in certain areas? The answer, as it turns out, is far more nuanced than a simple yes or no. The strengths and weaknesses of these models reveal a fascinating trade-off between innovation and practicality. In this comparison, Skill Leap AI unpack the key differences between GPT-5 and GPT-4o, exploring how their distinct capabilities shape their real-world applications. From GPT-5's advanced problem-solving and creative ideation to GPT-4o's efficiency in document creation and everyday tasks, each model offers unique advantages that cater to specific needs. But which one truly delivers the best value? Whether you're a developer seeking innovative tools or a professional craving speed and simplicity, understanding these trade-offs will help you make an informed choice. The answer isn't just about which model is 'better'—it's about which one is better for you. GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Distinct Strengths and Weaknesses Both GPT-5 and GPT-4o bring unique capabilities to the table, making them suitable for different types of tasks. Understanding their core strengths and limitations is essential for making an informed choice. GPT-5: Known for its advanced reasoning and ability to tackle complex problem-solving tasks, GPT-5 is particularly effective in generating detailed visual outputs. It is a strong choice for users seeking innovation in coding, creative ideation, and tasks requiring higher cognitive processing. Known for its advanced reasoning and ability to tackle complex problem-solving tasks, GPT-5 is particularly effective in generating detailed visual outputs. It is a strong choice for users seeking innovation in coding, creative ideation, and tasks requiring higher cognitive processing. GPT-4o: Designed with speed and simplicity in mind, GPT-4o is ideal for straightforward tasks such as document creation and rapid content generation. Its reliability and ease of use make it a preferred option for everyday applications. Performance in Key Functional Areas The differences between GPT-5 and GPT-4o become more evident when evaluating their performance across specific tasks. Each model demonstrates distinct advantages depending on the nature of the task. Coding: GPT-5 outperforms GPT-4o in handling intricate programming challenges. Its ability to generate detailed, executable code makes it a valuable tool for developers working on complex projects. GPT-5 outperforms GPT-4o in handling intricate programming challenges. Its ability to generate detailed, executable code makes it a valuable tool for developers working on complex projects. Data Visualization: GPT-5 offers significant advantages in creating interactive and visually rich dashboards, making it a strong choice for data analysts and visualization tasks. GPT-5 offers significant advantages in creating interactive and visually rich dashboards, making it a strong choice for data analysts and visualization tasks. Document Creation: GPT-4o excels in producing cleaner, more organized documents with fewer formatting errors. This makes it the preferred model for professional writing and administrative tasks. GPT-4o excels in producing cleaner, more organized documents with fewer formatting errors. This makes it the preferred model for professional writing and administrative tasks. Processing Speed: GPT-4o consistently outpaces GPT-5 in terms of speed, particularly for tasks that do not require deep reasoning or complex problem-solving. GPT-4o consistently outpaces GPT-5 in terms of speed, particularly for tasks that do not require deep reasoning or complex problem-solving. Accuracy: GPT-5 shows slight improvements in reducing hallucinated outputs, such as inaccurate citations, but both models continue to face challenges in this area, highlighting the need for further refinement. Is GPT-5 Better Than GPT-4o? Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in ChatGPT 5 comparison. Creative Applications and Ideation For creative tasks such as storytelling, brainstorming, or email drafting, GPT-5 demonstrates clear advantages. Its outputs are more structured, detailed, and contextually relevant, making it a powerful tool for ideation and creative writing. However, the improvements over GPT-4o, while noticeable, may not be substantial enough to warrant a switch for all users. Those who prioritize creativity and innovation may find GPT-5 more appealing, but for simpler creative tasks, GPT-4o remains a reliable option. Automation and Workflow Optimization GPT-5 introduces enhanced capabilities for automating complex workflows. Its advanced reasoning skills enable it to independently break down multi-step tasks and execute them with minimal user input. This makes it particularly valuable for professionals looking to streamline agentic tasks such as project management, workflow optimization, or multi-layered decision-making processes. By contrast, GPT-4o, while efficient, lacks the same level of sophistication in handling intricate automation tasks. User Experience and Practical Usability The user experience offered by GPT-5 and GPT-4o varies significantly, depending on the complexity of the task. GPT-5 includes a streamlined 'auto' mode designed to assess task complexity and adjust its approach accordingly. However, this feature occasionally misinterprets user intent, leading to less satisfactory outputs. On the other hand, GPT-4o provides a more predictable and user-friendly experience, particularly for everyday tasks. For users who prioritize consistency, simplicity, and intuitive interaction, GPT-4o may be the better choice. Challenges and Limitations Despite their advancements, neither GPT-5 nor GPT-4o is without flaws. GPT-5's improvements, while meaningful, do not represent a dramatic leap forward akin to the transition from GPT-3 to GPT-4. Both models continue to struggle with certain tasks, such as generating accurate YouTube thumbnails or avoiding hallucinated citations. These limitations underscore the ongoing challenges in AI development and the need for further refinement to address these persistent issues. Making the Right Choice The decision between GPT-5 and GPT-4o ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities. Each model offers distinct advantages that cater to different use cases: Choose GPT-5: If your work involves advanced reasoning, complex coding, creative ideation, or tasks requiring detailed visual outputs, GPT-5's capabilities make it the better option. If your work involves advanced reasoning, complex coding, creative ideation, or tasks requiring detailed visual outputs, GPT-5's capabilities make it the better option. Choose GPT-4o: For tasks that prioritize speed, simplicity, and reliability, such as document creation or rapid content generation, GPT-4o remains a strong contender. While GPT-5 introduces notable advancements, it does not deliver a new upgrade over GPT-4o. Instead, the choice comes down to weighing the trade-offs and selecting the model that best aligns with your goals and workflow requirements. Media Credit: Skill Leap AI Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store