
Trump's ‘slap in the Face' puts neutral Switzerland in trade-war crossfire
Tettamanti is the chief executive of a 55-year-old precision toolmaking business nestled in this mountain-hugged town. He had planned in the near future to expand further into the U.S. by opening an office in Indiana.
His company, Tecnopinz, counts on the American market for as much as a fifth of the demand for its components for industrial machines that make cars, planes and watches.
'I had to check my phone twice, I thought it was fake news," said Tettamanti on the company's factory floor, about two scenic hours by train south of Zurich. 'This is a catastrophic scenario."
In a land famed for its neutrality and order, the Swiss reacted with shock and confusion to Trump's decision to impose a 39% tariff—higher than all but three nations on last week's executive order, Laos, Myanmar and Syria. Switzerland is one of the few nations whose Aug. 1 tariff rate was higher than Trump's April 'Liberation Day" threats.
The move upended months of negotiations in which Swiss officials believed they were on the verge of securing a favorable deal.
For Tecnopinz, a precision maker of industrial machine components two hours south of Zurich, U.S. tariffs on Swiss imports are a 'catastrophic scenario,' the CEO said.
Business leaders and politicians are scrambling to understand why their historically stable relationship with Washington has suddenly fractured. The Swiss newspaper Blick called it the country's biggest defeat since French victory in the Battle of Marignano in 1515.
'Switzerland is not a threat to U.S. national security," said Jan Atteslander, member of the executive board at Swiss business organization Economiesuisse. 'Our chocolate and watches don't endanger U.S. manufacturing."
Many here now wonder whether Switzerland's go-it-alone stance in the world should be jettisoned for a closer relationship with the European Union, which struck a more advantageous 15% rate with Trump.
'We're a small country, we're extremely vulnerable and we've just been humiliated," said Sherban Tautu, founder of Geneva-based asset manager Ten Edges Capital. 'The cost of being independent suddenly becomes cruelly obvious to people."
The levy on Switzerland, which could still change until an Aug. 7 deadline, threatens to cripple key sectors of the Alpine nation's export-reliant economy. The U.S. is Switzerland's top export market for goods including watches, chocolates, drugs and machine tools. It puts the nation at a steep disadvantage to EU neighbors Germany, Italy and France.
Switzerland earns its every second franc from foreign trade and around 19% of its exports go to the U.S., its largest market, according to UBS. The relationship is a two-way street, however: Switzerland is the sixth-largest foreign investor in the U.S., according to Economiesuisse, with major companies such as Nestlé, Roche and Novartis and others supporting some 400,000 American jobs.
But the key issue for Trump is that the nine million-strong nation has one of the largest trade imbalances with the U.S.
The deficit in goods has skyrocketed this year due to a surge in pharmaceutical and gold imports looking to get to the U.S. ahead of anticipated tariffs. The deficit was nearly $50 billion this year through May, ranking as the fifth-largest goods-trade imbalance among U.S. trading partners.
In June, the U.S. Treasury Department added Switzerland to its watchlist for unfair economic and currency practices. During Trump's first term, it labeled Switzerland a currency manipulator, accusing it of weakening the franc to aid exports. The central bank has said it intervenes in currency markets to stabilize inflation, not for trade advantage.
Addressing crowds on Friday gathered to celebrate the country's founding charter, signed in 1291, President Karin Keller-Sutter said that 'Switzerland has repeatedly experienced storms" and will find a solution.
For months, Keller-Sutter and her officials had been negotiating a deal that would see Switzerland invest around $150 billion into the U.S. and keep its exports at a lower tariff rate than for the EU.
The two sides met in Washington in April, after which Keller-Sutter said that Switzerland was one of 15 countries the U.S. was working with on negotiations to reach fast deals.
Switzerland gained further credibility when it hosted trade talks between the U.S. and China in May that led to a dialing-down of hostilities. In recent weeks, Swiss government officials suggested a deal was in its final stages.
That optimism evaporated late Thursday after a phone call with Trump, following which Keller-Sutter posted on X that 'no agreement could be reached."
'We have a $40 billion deficit with Switzerland. That's a big deficit," Trump said on Friday.
Rahul Sahgal, chief executive of the Swiss-American Chamber of Commerce, said his group worked on 20 or so rounds of negotiations between Swiss and U.S. officials in recent months. He said the $150 billion on the table for Swiss investment into the U.S. is far more per Swiss person than other countries have committed.
'We will never be able to import the same amount of goods from them as they will be able to from us. Even if the Swiss drink bourbon every day and buy a Harley-Davidson the trade deficit is not going to change," Sahgal said.
Some companies took immediate action. The Lucerne-based confectionery maker Confiserie Bachmann—known for its Schutzengeli, or handcrafted guardian-angel chocolate truffles—closed its online shop to U.S. customers to avoid the new levy.
'We will survive without the American market but it was a growing market for us," said Raphael Bachmann, the managing director of the more than 125-year old family business, whose father started selling to U.S. customers decades ago. 'Enjoyment normally knows no boundaries, but our guardian angels don't fly through walls of customs papers."
The overall economic hit will depend on whether the rate is negotiated down, and whether pharmaceuticals, which are currently exempted, remain so.
If the tariff were to remain in place, it would knock around 0.6% off the Swiss gross domestic product—and significantly more if the exemption on pharmaceutical goods is removed, Capital Economics wrote in a note to clients.
It is precisely this uncertainty that has dogged Tettamanti's company for months. Tecnopinz has been exporting to the U.S. since the 1980s. But since Trump's second term, most of its American business is on ice.
Robots in the Tecnopinz factory, which has been exporting to the U.S. since the 1980s but has paused much of its American business during Trump's second term.
Walking around his facility, where wardrobe-sized machines and robotic arms shape, mill and grind pieces of steel, aluminum and titanium into polished industrial clamps and other components, Tettamanti lamented the 'loss of trust" that Trump's trade policies are causing.
'I have American customers that have bought from us for years and are now saying, 'Nicola, we need to put it on hold, we need clarity on tariffs,'" Tettamanti said. 'Well, the clarity we just got is a slap in the face."
For some in Switzerland, the country's usually close relationship with the U.S. is now under question.
'We're a small country, we can't pressure the U.S.," said Karl Gschwend, a pensioner living in Zurich who used to work as an electrical engineer and had U.S. customers. 'Now I wouldn't want to work with Americans if I had to. Well, maybe in three and a half years when Trump is gone."
Write to Georgi Kantchev at georgi.kantchev@wsj.com, Chelsey Dulaney at chelsey.dulaney@wsj.com and Margot Patrick at margot.patrick@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump orders NASA to kill 2 satellites that can function for many more years - the reason will shock all
Trump NASA satellite shutdown: The White House has directed NASA to shut down two carbon-tracking satellites. These satellites monitor carbon dioxide levels. The satellites provide crucial data for understanding climate change. Scientists, farmers, and energy companies use this data. One satellite is on the International Space Station. The other will burn up in the atmosphere if shut down. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Satellites Tracking Carbon Emissions To Face Early Shutdown What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former NASA Scientist Raises Concerns What Are the Orbiting Carbon Observatories? Lawmakers Push Back, Call Cuts 'Catastrophic' Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs A decision that has left many scientists and space lovers scratching their heads is that the White House has ordered NASA to shut down two important satellites that are still working perfectly and could keep doing so for years, as per a report. These satellites track carbon dioxide levels in Earth's atmosphere, which helps to understand climate change and how it affects everything from farming to energy industries, as per a Futurism Trump administration's officials have reached out to NASA to draw up plans for terminating the two missions, called the Orbiting Carbon Observatories , as reported by Futurism. Both of them have been used to collect widely used data, which provide information to oil and gas companies and farmers about the distribution of carbon dioxide and how it can affect crop health, according to the READ: When is Labor Day 2025 in US and what should you know before celebrating? One of the satellites is attached to the International Space Station, and the other is collecting data as a stand-alone satellite, as reported by Futurism. The latter would see its permanent demise after burning up in the atmosphere if the mission gets terminated, according to the Trump administration's move to end the missions comes at a time when the two observatories had been expected to function for many more years, and a 2023 review by NASA found that the data they'd been providing had been "of exceptionally high quality," as reported by review also found that the observatories give detailed carbon dioxide measurements across various locations, which let scientists get a detailed glimpse of how human activity is affecting greenhouse gas emissions, according to the READ: Another Indian-American shakes up Silicon Valley - Meet Shyam Sankar, Palantir's CTO powering company's meteoric rise An ex-NASA employee, David Crisp, who worked on the Orbiting Carbon Observatories' instruments, revealed that current staffers reached out to him, saying, "They were asking me very sharp questions," adding, "The only thing that would have motivated those questions was [that] somebody told them to come up with a termination plan," as quoted by explained that it "makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data," pointing out that it costs just $15 million per year to maintain both observatories, which is a small fraction of the agency's $25.4 billion budget, as reported by other scientists who have used data from the missions have also been asked questions about terminating the missions, as per the the two observatories are just two of dozens of space missions that are currently facing existential threats due to the Trump administration's proposed 2026 fiscal year budget, according to the reasons for terminating these missions are not known yet, but there is only speculation given US president Donald Trump's staunch climate change denial and his administration's efforts to deal the agency's science directorate a potentially existential blow, as per the has led many scientists to argue that the move could precipitate an end to the United States' leadership in space, according to the Futurism report. Many lawmakers have also drawn up a counteroffer that would keep NASA's budget almost in line with this year's budget, as per the and top appropriator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) had siad in a July, "We rejected cuts that would have devastated NASA science by 47 percent and would have terminated 55 operating and planned missions," as quoted in the representative and Committee on Science, Space and Technology ranking member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) said thar, "Eliminating funds or scaling down the operations of Earth-observing satellites would be catastrophic and would severely impair our ability to forecast, manage, and respond to severe weather and climate disasters," adding, "The Trump administration is forcing the proposed cuts in its FY26 budget request on already appropriated FY25 funds. This is illegal," as quoted in the Futurism farmers, environmentalists, energy companies, anyone needing detailed carbon emission will burn up in the atmosphere, and the other will stop collecting data, ending their missions prematurely.


Scroll.in
27 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Trump's revised tariffs will reduce GDP of several countries, including the US
The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump Administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. Economic impacts The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. An economic own goal The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. Global impacts For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead.

The Wire
27 minutes ago
- The Wire
Trump Considering Hiking 25% Tariff on India ‘Very Substantially' in Next 24 Hours
He also said that New Delhi's ostensible offer to lower its tariffs to zero is 'not good enough' if it keeps buying Russian oil. New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has reiterated his intention to levy a tariff on Indian goods 'very substantially' higher than the 25% he announced last week, repeating his stance that he is unhappy with India's purchases of Russian oil even as Moscow continues its war with Ukraine. In an interview to CNBC Television on Tuesday (August 5), Trump also claimed that while New Delhi has agreed to charge 'zero tariffs' on American goods, its offer is 'not good enough' as long as it continues to buy oil from Russia. A day prior, Trump had said he would 'substantially raise' his 25% tariff on India – scheduled to go into effect on Thursday – because it was 'not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' but selling much of this 'on the Open Market for big profits', drawing a rejoinder from the Ministry of External Affairs , which pointed to Washington as well as the EU's continuing economic links with Moscow. Speaking to CNBC, Trump said on Tuesday that he was considering raising his 25% tariff on India 'very substantially over the next 24 hours' because of its purchases of Russian oil. 'So we settled on 25%, but I think I'm gonna raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil, they're fuelling the war machine. And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be very happy,' he told the channel. Adding that India's tariffs on the US were too high, the president continued: 'Now I will say this. India went from the highest tariffs ever–they will give us zero tariffs … But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil.' Trump on July 30 announced that India would pay a 25% tariff as well as a yet-undisclosed 'penalty' for buying energy and military equipment from Russia. This levy was to kick off two days later, but the executive order Trump signed deferred the date of its implementation to August 7. In a post on his Truth Social platform on Monday, Trump blamed India for not caring 'how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine', adding that because of its dealings with Moscow he would be 'substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA'. New Delhi, which had stuck to its cautious approach to the issue when Trump announced the tariff and also went on to call India's economy 'dead', responded by accusing Washington and Brussels of 'targeting' India in an 'unjustified and unreasonable' manner. Charging the US with 'actively encouraging' its imports of Russian oil shortly after Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, the Ministry of External Affairs pointed to the US as well as the EU's continuing trade with Russia in various sectors after the latter's invasion began. 'In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' it said in a statement. Citing the US's trade deficit with India as well as the latter's high tariffs, Trump had unveiled a 26% 'reciprocal' tariff on India earlier this year but deferred it pending the completion of negotiations over a trade deal. Talks pursuant to that deal are ongoing but New Delhi's resistance to opening up its dairy and agricultural sector to America is reportedly a sticking point. There is no sign of a deal yet even as Trump has claimed on more than one occasion that India has agreed to lower its tariffs. Bilateral ties have also taken a hit amid Trump's repeated claims – consistently denied by India – that he mediated a ceasefire to the Indo-Pakistani military conflict in May by using trade with the two countries as leverage. The perception of a tilt towards Pakistan was reinforced when Trump hosted a luncheon for Pakistan's army chief , Field Marshal Asim Munir, and more recently taunted India after finalising a trade deal with Islamabad that includes the development of its 'massive' oil reserves. Meanwhile, India since 2022 has emerged as a top buyer of Russian crude oil – which has come under heavy sanctions from the US and its allies. Russia now accounts for nearly 40% of India's oil imports, while Delhi is currently Moscow's second-largest buyer after China. The tariffs have also cast a cloud over the two sides' burgeoning defence partnership. This article went live on August fifth, two thousand twenty five, at fifty-nine minutes past nine at night. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.