North Korea's half-sunk warship hauled UPRIGHT with giant balloons as cause of disaster that humiliated Kim is revealed
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A HALF-sunk North Korean warship which bungled its first launch in front of Kim Jong-un has been hauled upright using giant balloons.
The reason behind the humiliating fail has also been revealed - amid fears the regime will execute those it holds responsible.
9
Around 30 large balloons can be seen attached to the boat along with ropes
Credit: Pleiades NEO/ Airbus DS
9
Last month the tyrant unveiled North Korea's largest naval destroyer an extravagant ceremony
9
Kim slammed the mishap and said it brought shame on the country
Credit: AFP
9
The 5,000-tonne naval destroyer ended up on its side after the pompous launch ceremony, watched by Kim, went disastrously wrong.
Kim slammed the "criminal act" caused by "absolute carelessness" in a rare admission of failure - and arrested four officials.
Satellite pictures later revealed the huge warship lying on its side beside the launch dock, with the stern partially sunk and its bow lying on the harbour jetty.
Kim gave orders to right the vessel as quickly as possible - and now details of the farcical rescue mission have emerged.
Pictures from May 29 show workers standing on the quay pulling ropes attached to the boat.
And at least 30 balloons appeared to have been connected along one side - presumably to haul it upright.
On launch day, crews had attempted to slide the ship sideways into the water.
A malfunction meant that the stern entered while the bow remained on the launch gear.
It is likely that the launch mechanism snagged the bow, preventing it from plopping into the sea, reports 38north.
This theory is supported by satellite imagery from May 29, which seems to show damage to the bow.
Watch as chilling features on smuggled North Korean 'iPhone' reveal terrifying scale of paranoid Kim Jong-un's snooping
North Korea's state broadcaster also reported that sections of the hull had been crushed.
The highly-secretive authorities appeared to have tried to hide the disaster by placing blue tarpaulin across the wreck.
But analysis from South Korea's military shows that it was lying on its side.
To be fixed up, the destroyer will first need to be refloated and then transferred to a graving dock, where ships are repaired.
9
A view of the warship before its failed launch
Credit: AFP
9
The boat after being restored to an upright position
Credit: Pleiades NEO/ Airbus DS
9
Kim has been building up Pyongyang's naval forces
Credit: AFP
The dictator demanded that the repairs be completed by the end of June - though that may be optimistic.
Kim was seething in the wake of the embarrassment, and said it brought shame on the country.
The four arrested include chief engineer Kang Jong Chol, hull workshop head Han Kyong Hak, and deputy manager Kim Yong Hak.
It's unclear what punishment they will face, though an expert told The Sun their fates could be fatal.
Michael Madden, founder of North Korea Leadership Watch, said: "Some people will lose their party memberships and be sent to jail for short sentences."
But, more alarmingly, he claimed "some people are going to be shot to death behind this".
The launch failure marks a huge setback for Kim, who has been modernizing his navy to keep up with the West.
9
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un described the failed launch as a 'criminal act'
9
The new ship will be the largest in North Korea's naval fleet when it is finally operational
Credit: AFP
Last month, the tyrant unveiled North Korea's largest naval destroyer yet that could house a vertical launchpad capable of firing nuclear missiles.
Dubbed the Choe Hyon, it is believed to be the same 5,000-tonne class ship as the one which spectacularly failed on Wednesday.
North Korea's state media - which also serves as Kim's leading propaganda machine - reported that the vessel was equipped with the "most powerful weapons".
The ship is named after anti-Japanese revolutionary fighter Choe Hyon, the report said.
When upright and operational, the destroyer is set to become the largest in North Korea's naval arsenal, surpassing the current largest vessel, a 1,360-tonne frigate.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
44 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
The deal, agreed last month after long-running negotiations, returns sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, but will see the UK lease back a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands. But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return. Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders. They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.' The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.' Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'. She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people. 'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same. 'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way. 'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.' The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
Leader Live
44 minutes ago
- Leader Live
UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
The deal, agreed last month after long-running negotiations, returns sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, but will see the UK lease back a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands. But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return. Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders. They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.' The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.' Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'. She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people. 'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same. 'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way. 'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.' The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
North Wales Chronicle
44 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UN urges UK to negotiate new Chagos deal that allows islanders to return
The deal, agreed last month after long-running negotiations, returns sovereignty of the islands to Mauritius, but will see the UK lease back a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the islands. But a panel of experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council said retaining the base and continuing to bar Chagossians from Diego Garcia 'appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return'. The Chagossians were expelled from the islands between 1965 and 1973 to make way for the joint UK-US base and have not been allowed to return. Although the UK-Mauritius deal includes a £40 million trust fund for the benefit of the Chagossians, the UN experts expressed concern that this would not provide an 'effective remedy' for the islanders. They also criticised an apparent lack of consultation of the islanders prior to the deal, saying: 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement.' The experts added: 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia.' Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel urged the Government to 'do the right thing (and) stop this'. She said: 'We have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people. 'Now even the United Nations is saying the very same. 'Labour has completely ignored this community from the get-go, and failed to consult with them at every step of the way. 'It is why I have introduced a Bill in Parliament that would block the (agreement) and force the Government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans.' The deal follows a 2019 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice saying the islands should be handed over to Mauritius. As well as the fund for Chagossians, the UK has agreed to pay at least £120 million a year for 99 years in order to lease back the Diego Garcia base – a total cost of at least £13 billion in cash terms. The deal also includes provisions preventing development on the rest of the archipelago without the UK's consent, which the Government has argued will prevent countries such as China setting up their own facilities. The agreement has also been backed by the United States. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has been contacted for comment.
