UK at ‘tipping point' as millionaires consider moving abroad over wealth tax fears
More than half of all the 1,000 wealthy respondents also said they are more likely to consider leaving the UK if Rachel Reeves introduces a wealth tax.
The CEO of Arton Capital, the consultancy that commissioned the survey, said the findings show the country is 'at a tipping point', as the chancellor revealed plans for a new homes levy that is already drawing backlash.
Armand Arton said: 'The uncertainty around the government's proposed wealth tax mirrors the ongoing economic uncertainty seen around the world – from Trump's tariffs to conflict in the Middle East, it seems clear that the world is becoming less and less certain.
'There are many repercussions of the introduction of a levy, but one thing is clear: the longer that unpredictability persists, the greater the risk of losing capital, talent, and long-term investment to countries that offer greater security for individuals, families, and their futures.'
Meanwhile, nearly half (47 per cent) of the surveyed millionaire Labour voters stated that they would be more likely to leave the country should a wealth tax be introduced.
The new data comes as the chancellor is under growing pressure to introduce more wealth-based taxes. Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner, has already urged Ms Reeves to consider measures that target property wealth, and Ms Reeves is under pressure to raise revenue without breaking Labour's pledge not to increase taxes on working people.
Cabinet ministers have so far rejected calls for a wealth tax, although Ms Reeves has not yet publicly ruled out a version of the measure.
And on Tuesday, it was revealed that homeowners could be forced to pay a new tax on the sale of houses worth more than £500,000 as part of a shake-up of stamp duty and council tax being considered by the Treasury. It comes after Ms Reeves announced a tax on non-domiciled individuals' inheritance tax based on their global assets.
The Arton Capital Affluence and Elections Survey, which was conducted by Walr, polled 1,009 UK residents aged 18 to 70 with a net worth of at least £1 million between 31 July and 8 August 2025.
When asked which countries they would be most interested in relocating to, the US (35 per cent) topped the rankings among wealthy Brits, with Canada (33 per cent) coming second, and Australia (25 per cent) securing third place, while the United Arab Emirates (UAE) came in fourth (17 per cent).
In June, it was estimated that 142,000 millionaires were set to relocate to a new country this year, with the UK expected to lose a record 16,500 in the 12 months from June, according to the Henley Private Wealth Migration Report.
With a decade of poor economic performance and sweeping tax reforms introduced by the Conservative and Labour governments, affluent individuals are seeking tax-friendly jurisdictions like the UAE, Monaco and Malta.
There are upsides for Ms Reeves though, with two-thirds of British millionaires still viewing the UK as an attractive place to invest when compared to other countries, according to Arton Capital's research.
Possibly buoyed by the country's historic status as a financial powerhouse, the company said its data indicates that many affluent voters remain confident about the prospect of financial returns on their British investments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
EuroMillions winning numbers for record-breaking prize revealed
The winning numbers for tonight's £210 million EuroMillions jackpot have been revealed. The National Lottery EuroMillions winning numbers are 24, 31, 34, 41 and 43. The lucky numbers are 06 and 08 . A single EuroMillions player could become the UK 's record-making National Lottery winner if the prize is claimed. The EuroMillions jackpot is capped once it has reached 250 million Euros – an estimated £210 million. If there are no winners on Tuesday, it will now stay at 250 million Euros for a further four draws until it must be won in the fifth draw. In the 'Must Be Won' draw, if no ticket matches all five main numbers and two Lucky Stars, the jackpot prize will roll down into the prize tier where there is at least one winner – likely to be five main numbers and one Lucky Star. A single UK winner would instantly become the nation's largest-ever National Lottery winner. They would knock into second place the anonymous winner of a £195 million prize in 2022. It follows an Irish family syndicate claiming a EuroMillions jackpot worth 250 million euros (£216 million) on June 17. The jackpot had reached the maximum amount on 6 June after rolling over several times. Andy Carter, senior winners' advisor at Allwyn, said: 'Tuesday's jackpot has the ability to transform not just the winner's life, but the life of the friends and family around them. 'So, make sure you get a ticket to be in with a chance of banking Britain's biggest ever win.' Here are the 10 biggest UK lottery wins to date – all from EuroMillions draws: Anonymous, £213,000,000, 18 June 2025 Anonymous, £195,707,000, 19 July 2022 Joe and Jess Thwaite, £184,262,899.10, 10 May 2022 Anonymous, £177,033,699.20, 26 November 2024 Anonymous, £171,815,297.80, 23 September 2022 Anonymous, £170,221,000, 8 October 2019 Colin and Chris Weir, £161,653,000, 12 July 2011 Adrian and Gillian Bayford, £148,656,000, 10 August 2012 Anonymous, £123,458,008, 11 June 2019 Anonymous, £122,550,350, April 2021
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Opinion: Signals that prove Trump forced a historic reckoning
No one knows if there will be a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia. But this much is emphatically and impressively true: Donald Trump has already done something extraordinary — he has created a moment in which all parties can see two stark alternatives with sudden clarity. They can compromise and make a deal, or they can face the continuation of a grinding war with an uncertain duration and outcome. That sense of crossroads was on display at the White House on Monday in a tableau that was at once theatrical and substantive. Trump has managed, at least for now, to coax the United States, Europe, and Ukraine into a common position. That united front presents Vladimir Putin with what he has long tried to avoid: Western cohesion in the face of his aggression. The day unfolded with all the trappings of political theater. There was the banter about President Volodymyr Zelensky 's choice of wardrobe — a jacket that suggested a nod to formality rather than the olive drab sweatshirt that has become his wartime uniform. There was also a moment of personal warmth, when Zelensky handed Trump a letter from his wife to Melania Trump, written about the plight of children in the war zone. These gestures may appear minor, but in diplomacy such small signals help reinforce the larger message: unity, solidarity, and an insistence on treating each other as friends rather than supplicants or tetchy combatants. For Zelensky, a former actor who once made his living playing roles, Monday was a performance that mattered. He carried his lines with precision and his tone with care. The last time he visited Washington the chemistry soured and tensions spilled into public view. This time, the body language told a different story. Smiles, nods and a sense of easy rapport radiated from the Oval Office outward. Compared with Putin's frosty reception during his stop in Alaska on Friday — a visit the Kremlin had hoped would project strength — Monday's White House welcome stood as a vivid counterpoint. The most consequential takeaway from the day was the absence of daylight between Washington and its European allies. For years, Putin has relied on fissures within the transatlantic alliance, exploiting differences over energy, trade or the use of force. Yet on Monday, the alignment was clear: the US, Europe and Ukraine are working together to shape a peace plan. This is precisely the scenario Putin has sought to prevent, and brings the world to the essential questions now hovering over these fragile negotiations. Will Putin accept a combined European and American framework that offers Ukraine the security guarantees it needs to risk peace? And will Ukraine, whose soldiers have retaken and held swathes of territory at immense cost, truly be willing to cede land now under its control in exchange for ending the bloodshed? Neither question yields an obvious answer. For Putin, compromise has always been a synonym for weakness. For Ukraine, yielding territory risks validating aggression and betraying those who have died defending it. Yet the very posing of these questions, out loud and on equal terms, marks a shift in the conversation. The possibility of peace, however brutal, is now at least conceivable. If the answer to either or both questions is 'no,' then the burden will shift back to Trump. What will he do? Will he enforce punishing new sanctions designed to cripple the Russian economy? Will he authorize Ukraine to use American-supplied weapons to strike deeper into Russian territory? Will he risk escalation to demonstrate resolve? The options ahead are perilous, but they are his to shape. What is striking is how Trump — long painted as skeptical of NATO, dismissive of Europe and oddly solicitous of Putin — now finds himself in the role of transatlantic unifier. By engineering a moment when the allies stand shoulder to shoulder, he has created the conditions for a test: either Putin comes to the table, or he faces the combined weight of American and European pressure. This is not a neat choice between war and peace. It is instead what might be called a 'brutal peace.' Any deal will be painful, incomplete, and fraught with moral compromise. But it will still be peace. If Trump cannot deliver Putin to the table, then he must bring him to heel by other means. Either way, the calculus has changed. Diplomacy often depends on timing. Wars grind on until one side collapses or until leaders perceive that further bloodshed is more dangerous than negotiation. What Trump has done, at least for now, is force that moment of reckoning. He has made all sides look squarely at the costs of continuing the war versus the costs of ending it. It is too soon to know whether history will mark this week as a turning point. But it is fair to say that Trump, a man once derided as an opponent of Europe and a skeptic of alliances, has demonstrated a capacity to bring allies together in common cause against a murderous dictator. That alone is remarkable. It may yet be remembered as the moment when urgency became opportunity.
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
High court asylum hotels ruling leaves Cooper scrambling for alternatives
Yvette Cooper, thanks to Tuesday's high court ruling, is facing potentially explosive decisions over where to house asylum seekers if courts rule that they must leave hotels. The Home Office, usually under Conservative ministers, has been struggling for five years to find an alternative to hotels so they can house a growing number of asylum seekers reaching these shores. Labour has said that it expects to empty the 200-odd hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029. Ministers may be forced to rip up that plan and move at a rapid pace because of the ruling's implications. If councils take to the high court to complain about the use of a hotel for housing asylum seekers – and many will be under immense political pressure from the public to do so – it could force officials to find alternative housing for thousands of people. Legal sources believe that there will be similar grounds to launch applications for interim injunctions from a number of councils. This case has centred on an alleged breach of planning laws by owners of the Bell hotel, who it was claimed did not get permission to switch use from a hotel to hostel-style accommodation. Other hotel owners are thought to be in similar positions to Somani Hotels Limited, which originally housed families in the Bell, but faced a legal challenge after the asylum seekers were switched to single men. Ominously for the government, the Reform UK deputy leader, Richard Tice, said his party would look at pursuing similar cases regarding hotels within the 10 council areas it controls, which include both North and West Northamptonshire councils, Doncaster, and Kent and Staffordshire county councils. And the high court rulings can require a rapid response. Epping's application for an interim was launched on 12 August. By 4pm on 12 September, all asylum seekers will have to be removed from The Bell hotel. There may yet be a lifeline for the government. They could convince the court of appeal to overturn the decision. The fact that the Home Office was not allowed to intervene in a case which was directly related to the home secretary's duties to house asylum seekers could well be seized upon by government lawyers. If they fail to overturn the decision, they will face the same dilemma as successive Tory home secretaries going back to Priti Patel, who promised and failed to find alternatives to hotels to house asylum seekers. The number of asylum hotels soared to 400 under successive Tory home secretaries because of a shortage of housing, a growing backlog in asylum applications, and a failure to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. Since coming to power, Labour has increased the speed at which applications are processed, by using more 'dispersal accommodation' such as flats and housing in the community. Questions will no doubt be asked inside the department as to why it took the Home Office until Monday to try to intervene in the case. If it had done so last week, when the case came to court, it would have stood a better chance of preventing the injunction. The political implications of the ruling will continue to unsettle Cooper and No 10. Yet again, the government has been caught flat-footed on an immigration-related issue, as it struggles with soaring numbers of small boats crossing the Channel. Anti-asylum seeker protesters will see this as a victory in response to their demonstrations across the country this summer. Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, currently leading in most polls, will be buoyed by the prospect of further embarrassment for the government.
