British-Israeli ex hostage 'deeply saddened' by UK plan to recognise Palestinian state
The British-Israeli former hostage Emily Damari has said she feels "deeply saddened" by the UK's announcement on Tuesday that it will recognise the state of Palestine by September, if Israel does not take steps to end the conflict.
Posting on X, Damari wrote: "As a Dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by your decision Keir Starmer to recognise Palestinian statehood.
"This move does not advance peace—it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy."
She continued: "Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace.
"Shame on you."
Adam Rose, a Partner at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, represented seven families of the ten people taken hostage by Hamas with ties to the UK.
Writing today, he said: "British hostage families are deeply concerned that hostages have been made a bargaining chip by the UK.
"We are concerned that the UK's proposal risks delaying the release of the hostages. This is because the UK has said that it will recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel agrees a ceasefire.
"But the risk is that Hamas will continue to refuse to a ceasefire because if it agrees to one this would make UK recognition less likely."
Speaking to ITV News, Rose clarified: "If Hamas don't release the hostages, Israel is less likely to agree a ceasefire. If Israel doesn't agree a ceasefire, the UK position appears to be they will recognise the state of Palestine."
Announcing the UK's intention on Tuesday, Starmer set certain conditions Israel would need to meet to prevent the UK recognising the state of Palestine.
Speaking to press, he said: "The UK will recognise the state of Palestine by the United Nations general assembly in September, unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and commit to a long term sustainable peace - reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.
"This includes allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid and making clear that there will be no annexations in the West Bank."
He then went on to reiterate the demands on Hamas, saying: "They must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza."
He concluded: "We'll make an assessment in September on how far the parties have met these steps."
The lawyers representing British hostages' families have asked for clarity from number ten on whether recognition of Palestinian statehood is contingent on the release of all remaining hostages by Hamas.
Whilst Downing Street have not given that assurance, they have restated their demands on Hamas remain unchanged.
In recent days, the PM had faced intense pressure from political opponents, as well as those in his own party, after 255 MPs from nine seperate parties wrote a letter calling on the UK to act faster in recognising Palestine's statehood.
Chair of the Foreign Affair Committee Dame Emily Thornberry described the announcement as "fantastic" and said it showed Starmer was listening to people's concerns.
Calls for the UK to join France in taking this step have been growing as the humaniatrian crisis in Gaza deteriorates, with scenes Starmer himself described as "revolting."
The Labour party's position has long been to recognise the state of Palestine aspart of a two-state solution, with ministers recently saying it was a question of "when not if."
Although the situation in the Middle-East was high on the agenda in a meeting between Starmer and Donald Trump, the US president distanced himself from the PM's position whilst flying home from his trip to Scotland.
"You could make the case that you're rewarding people, that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that and I don't think they should be rewarded," Trump said, repeating the Israeli position.
He added: "I'm not in that camp to be honest."
The announcement of the UK's intention to recognise Palestine came the same day as Gaza's Health Authority brought the death toll up to over 60,000 over the 21-month conflict.
Last week, experts warned the remaining population of Gaza is dangerously close to starvation, something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denied before being rebuffed by both Starmer and Trump.
Israel's actions in Gaza come after an attack by Hamas terrorists on October 7, 2023, in which around 1,200 people were killed, nearly 800 of them civilians, and around 250 taken hostage.
50 hostages are thought to still be in captivity, of whom Israel believes 27 are dead. Netanyahu has previously said there are 'doubts' about the fate of several more.
Responding to the UK's commitment to recognise the state of Palestine, Netanyahu posted on X: "Starmer rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims."A jihadist state on Israel's border TODAY will threaten Britain TOMORROW."Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
The Deputy Prime Minister, who as Housing Secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why areas of its plans for the sprawling new embassy site in central London are blacked out. China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil. Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead. This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also Housing Secretary (Peter Byrne/PA) In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out. The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided. It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9. Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email. It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application. Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal. However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application. Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule. The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary. Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant. 'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country. 'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
The Deputy Prime Minister, who as Housing Secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why areas of its plans for the sprawling new embassy site in central London are blacked out. China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil. Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead. This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK. In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out. The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided. It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9. Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email. It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application. Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal. However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application. Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule. The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary. Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant. 'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country. 'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
The Deputy Prime Minister, who as Housing Secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why areas of its plans for the sprawling new embassy site in central London are blacked out. China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil. Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead. This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also Housing Secretary (Peter Byrne/PA) In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out. The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided. It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9. Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email. It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application. Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal. However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application. Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule. The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary. Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant. 'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country. 'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
