Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil.
Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead.
This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK.
In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out.
The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided.
It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9.
Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email.
It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application.
Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal.
However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application.
Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule.
The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary.
Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant.
'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country.
'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Anas Sarwar blasted after calling Benjamin Netanyahu 'war criminal'
The Scottish Greens said the Scottish Labour leader failed to "understand the devastating scale of death and destruction happening in Palestine", pointing towards Labour's "complicity" in the genocide. It comes after Sarwar said there is a "plausible case for genocide" committed by Israel, as he conceded that "there's still more" for the Labour Government to look at. READ MORE: Former Knesset speaker urges '1 million Jews' to file Israel war crimes complaint In an interview with the PA news agency, Sarwar said: 'The problem here is Benjamin Netanyahu, his Israel government, his illegal occupation, his lack of interest in peace and the fact that he clearly has no respect for international law, and gives no value to the sanctity of human life. 'He is a danger to his own population in Israel, but he's also a danger to the Palestinian population and a danger to the wider region in the Middle East.' He added: 'We all have to be resolute in saying that Netanyahu is a war criminal, he's not acting in the interests of peace. 'He's not a partner for peace, Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed horrific acts on October 7 2023 – they aren't partners for peace.' Sarwar said that "there is a plausible case for genocide that the Israeli government has to answer and one day I believe will have to answer to the ICC and the ICJ". He added: 'But we have to urgently end the war – if we think just stopping talking to the Israeli government means that we end the war, I think that's a pretty naïve view of the situation right now." And when asked if he felt the UK Labour Government had done enough to end the genocide, Sarwar said it had done "a lot" but added: "I think there's still more we have to look at." Speaking to The National, Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater said Labour have spent the last year "actively collaborating in this devastating genocide" and have done "nothing" to end their complicity. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater (Image: unknown) The Scottish Greens previously urged Prime Minister Keir Starmer to expel Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely from the UK, after the Israeli security cabinet approved plans to escalate the genocide in Gaza. Slater told The National: 'If Anas Sarwar seriously thinks Labour is doing enough to end the genocide in Gaza then he clearly doesn't understand the devastating scale of death and destruction happening in Palestine. 'Weapons made in the UK are being used to destroy communities and end lives. What have Labour actually done to end their complicity? Nothing." READ MORE: Police Scotland 'on notice' for visit by JD Vance during UK holiday Slater said that instead of "taking action to end the genocide" in Gaza, Labour have 'hyped Israel's war criminal government on the international stage, sold arms to the IDF, and dangled the future of Palestine as a bargaining chip". "This isn't bold action to end the war, Labour and Starmer have spent the past year actively collaborating in this devastating genocide," she told The National. Slater added: 'Urging restraint is not enough, Labour's hypocrisy must end now! It's time to end arms sales, back international sanctions and boycott war criminals.' Meanwhile, the SNP said the Scottish Labour leader's words "mean nothing" unless Labour recognise Palestine and stop arms exports to Israel. SNP MSP Kevin Stewart – who previously lodged a motion calling on the UK Government to recognise Palestine – told The National: 'Anas Sarwar's words are all fine and well but mean nothing unless the UK Labour Government takes immediate action by recognising Palestine as a state and stopping all UK arms sales to Israel.' Last month, Sarwar said he backed the "immediate recognition" of the state of Palestine, ahead of the UK Government saying just days later that it planned to do so in September. Scottish Labour declined to comment further.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US, EU, and Ukrainian officials to meet in UK on Saturday ahead of Trump-Putin meeting
LONDON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - British foreign minister David Lammy and U.S. Vice President JD Vance will meet Ukrainian and European allies in Britain on Saturday to discuss President Donald Trump's push for peace in Ukraine, a spokesperson for Downing Street said. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ahead of the security meeting, the spokesperson said. Starmer and Zelenskyy discussed Trump's proposals for ending the war in Ukraine ahead of talks with his Russian counterpart on August 15 in Alaska. "The Prime Minister spoke to President Zelenskyy of Ukraine this morning. They looked ahead to the meeting of National Security Advisers from Europe, Ukraine and the United States taking place today, hosted by the UK Foreign Secretary and US Vice President," the spokesperson said. "They agreed this would be a vital forum to discuss progress towards securing a just and lasting peace."
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Groups clash as hotel near Cardiff takes in Afghans
The demonstration was called by a group identifying itself as Concerned Local Families, who voiced opposition to the UK Government's relocation of Afghan nationals to the site. Among its members were leaders of 'Voice of Wales', an online platform that challenges official immigration policy. In response, people describing themselves as anti-racism campaigners, mostly from Stand Up to Racism (SUTR) and allied groups, staged a counter-demonstration. The hotel is currently housing Afghan nationals who supported British forces during the war in Afghanistan and have been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK, known as Entitled Persons (EPs). The Ministry of Defence selected the site as part of a relocation programme, with the first intake including 19 families, three couples, and one single person. The arrangement is expected to last up to nine months while permanent housing is secured. The protest began at 6pm on the access road leading to the hotel. Protesters on one side (Image: NQ) People gathering outside the hotel (Image: NQ) From the perspective facing the hotel, the 'Concerned Families group' stood to the left, while SUTR and their supporters gathered to the right. Initially, the two groups remained largely self-contained, but tensions escalated, prompting police to establish a cordon and instruct attendees not to cross sides. In the middle of the road stood aid worker Nizar Dahan, known as 'Neezo,' who was told by police to choose a side. At first he declined, and then reluctantly complied, saying: 'I don't believe in sides, I am a human being, and I don't believe in all these divisions. There is no left and right, just humans and we all need to think that way.' Neezo also said he was perfectly happy to chat to all at the protest and would respect all views. The SUTR side, led by human rights lawyer Hussein Said, appeared more organized and unified in its protest behaviour. Protesters carried printed signs and banners, including those from the National Education Union. Chanting was coordinated and persistent, with slogans denouncing fascism and racism. Hussein said: 'These people fought for this country and are in danger. We have a duty to take them in.' When asked about the nature of fascism, he did not define it but said: 'The threat of fascism anywhere is a threat that must be taken very seriously. "Of course, we weren't sure if fascist people would turn up today, but there was enough to concern the police and the council so we felt we must be loud and clearly visible here today to say we won't stand for this.' On the opposite side, Stan Robinson of 'Voice of Wales' challenged the official narrative surrounding the Afghan families. He said: 'You shouldn't believe these figures. Only one in sixteen (of the people moving into the hotel) is genuine, and all their families are entitled to come.' Mr Robinson expressed concern about the long-term impact on local services and questioned the transparency of the relocation process. He added that the only exception to his hard-nosed approach would be care and resettlement of Gurkhas and their families. While the protest remained relatively peaceful, both sides exchanged heated accusations. Despite this, attendees from both sides described the police operation as effective and well-managed. However, Mr Robinson voiced dissatisfaction with the policing approach, accusing officers of bias. He claimed that police cameras were focused only on his side and that officers failed to act on provocative chants from the counter-protesters. Stan Robinson (Image: NQ) By 7.40pm, the SUTR group was led off the site under police supervision, with the visible police presence swelling from around 20 officers at 6pm to about 40. Officers blocked traffic to allow for an orderly evacuation of the site, and by 8pm the site was almost entirely cleared. The protest highlighted deep divisions over migration, national identity, and public accountability, with each side insisting it spoke for the true interests of local residents and the wider community. At the end of July, Vale Council provided clarity on the situation, saying: "As Entitled Persons (EPs), this group have the right to live in the UK following their efforts supporting the British military in Afghanistan. "These households are not illegal immigrants, asylum seekers or refugees. The UK Government has granted them indefinite leave to remain in this country, which is now regarded as their home. "The first of two intakes, which is expected shortly, will consist of 19 families with children, three couples and a single person. "This temporary arrangement, lasting up to nine months, is in place while they are helped to find more permanent accommodation across the UK." As of writing there were no reports of arrests.
