Where did Oregon rank on US News & World Report's list of best states in US?
Oregon was ranked 35th on U.S. News & World Report's list for the 2025 best states in the U.S.
The digital media company conducted a study determining which U.S. states were the best based on each state's health care, education, economics, infrastructure, public safety, government, environment, and opportunities.
The state's ranking was a drop from its 2024 ranking as the 31st best state in the U.S.
According to the study, Oregon stretches more than 98,379 square miles and has a population of around 4,272,371.
The study found that 47% of Oregonians are college educated. It noted the state's overall median income is $45,295.
Oregon's gross domestic product is $331 billion and is among the most trade-dependent states, U.S. News & World Report said.
"The state's greenhouse and nursery products, cattle and calves, milk, hay, grass seed and wheat also generate significant revenue," the report said.
Oregon ranked fifth for infrastructure, 17th for health care, 22nd for fiscal stability, 37th for economy, 39th for opportunity, 41st for education, 44th for natural environment and 44th for crime and corrections.
Oregon's highest ranking was for infrastructure, which looked at a state's use of renewable energy, the quality of its roads and bridges, and its residents' access to high-speed internet.
Oregon's lowest ranking was for crime and corrections, which looks at corrections and outcomes and public safety.
U.S. News & World Report calculated its rankings for the 2025 best states in the U.S. by evaluating the performance of each state using 71 metrics across eight categories. Each category was weighted based on three years of national survey data.
To see U.S. News & World Report's full methodology, go to usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/methodology.
Here is U.S. News & World Report's full list of the 2025 best states in the U.S.
No. 1: Utah
No. 2: New Hampshire
No. 3: Idaho
No. 4: Minnesota
No. 5: Nebraska
No. 6: Florida
No. 7: Vermont
No. 8: South Dakota
No. 9: Massachusetts
No. 10: Washington
No. 11: Colorado
No. 12: North Dakota
No. 13: North Carolina
No. 14: Iowa
No. 15: Connecticut
No. 16: Virginia
No. 17: Wisconsin
No. 18: Delaware
No. 19: New Jersey
No. 20: Maryland
No. 21: Georgia
No. 22: New York
No. 23: Wyoming
No. 24: Rhode Island
No. 25: Kansas
No. 26: Montana
No. 27: Maine
No. 28: Hawaii
No 29: Texas
No. 30: Arizona
No. 31: Missouri
No. 32: Tennessee
No. 33: Indiana
No. 34: Nevada
No. 35: Oregon
No. 36: Illinois
No. 37: California
No. 38: Ohio
No. 39: Kentucky
No. 40: South Carolina
No. 41: Pennsylvania
No. 42: Oklahoma
No. 43: Michigan
No. 44: Arkansas
No. 45: Alabama
No. 46: West Virginia
No. 47: New Mexico
No. 48: Mississippi
No. 49: Alaska
No. 50: Louisiana
Ginnie Sandoval is the Oregon Connect reporter for the Statesman Journal. Sandoval can be reached at GSandoval@gannett.com or on X at @GinnieSandoval.
This article originally appeared on Salem Statesman Journal: Oregon ranked 35th on US News & World Report list for best US states
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
8 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana's property tax reform delivers relief while preserving local growth
Indiana's 2024 elections sent a message to leaders that Hoosiers across the state were concerned about getting squeezed out of their homes by skyrocketing property taxes. The angst I heard talking to members of our community came, of course, with an acknowledgement that rising taxes were a result of increased home values, but a lack of transparency around home assessments and some frustration with a seemingly endless chain of school referenda made it clear that many Hoosiers were demanding relief. Heading into the 2025 legislative session, it surprised no one that this issue was front and center for lawmakers. After months of negotiations and input from residents, the Indiana General Assembly delivered one of the most significant changes to local taxation we have seen in nearly two decades. No one got exactly what they wanted — it would take you three minutes on social media to know that — but the result is a bill that provides immediate relief to nearly every Hoosier and, when fully implemented, allows homeowners to deduct two-thirds of their assessed value to lower their property tax bill while reining in $54 billion in local government debt. We transformed some tax deductions into tax credits, a change that will result in lower actual tax bills for thousands of taxpayers; moved school referendums to even-year general election ballots to ensure better participation; and lowered the amount of local income taxes governments can collect by $1.9 billion. In short, while changes to tax policy can be complicated, Senate Enrolled Act 1 not only gives Hoosier homeowners tax relief today, but also moves Indiana to a fairer, simpler and more balanced local tax system in the near future. One of my goals as a state legislator is to ensure the voices of growing communities are represented in these debates. It was important that we find a balance between needed relief and the resources upon which communities like mine have come to rely, resources that represent critical investments in quality of life, amenities, infrastructure and key services. Carmel and Westfield, the cities I represent at the Statehouse, have enjoyed forward-thinking, fiscally responsible leadership for years. The results are demonstrative. Carmel, for example, was ranked No. 2 on the list of the Best Places to Live in 2025 by Livability & U.S. News, and both communities are consistently ranked among the best in the country. Indiana, moreover, is now ranked 7th nationally for net in-migration, with the high-earning, talented individuals Indiana needs flocking to cities in Hamilton County. That's not an accident. The strategies that Carmel and Westfield have implemented should be celebrated and enhanced by the policies coming from the Statehouse. That balance was not easy to strike and local governments and schools will, no doubt, be faced with difficult decisions in the future. But SEA 1 represents much-needed reform to a convoluted property tax system that disincentivizes these hard decisions today at taxpayers' expense. Even with these changes, schools in my district will receive more money from property taxes over the next three years, and the new state budget increases tuition support for students. I am proud of the work we did this session on this issue, and I am equally grateful for the perspectives, insights, and counsel shared by our incredible local leaders who helped legislators avoid harmful unintended consequences. As with any bill this complex, property tax reform will remain a topic of discussion in the General Assembly, and we will be making tweaks to the law moving forward. But SEA 1 is a strong step forward to helping homeowners while improving accountability in local government spending.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Class action lawsuit accuses Grocery Outlet of deceptive pricing in Oregon stores
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Oregon patrons of a California-founded grocer are accusing the company of deceptive pricing. On Tuesday, Oregon Consumer Justice Law and other legal partners filed a class action lawsuit against Grocery Outlet on customers who believe they have paid the same price — or more — for items that were advertised as discounted when compared to competitors. Filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court, the complaint alleges the grocery chain has violated the Unlawful Trade Practices Act with its 'elsewhere' pricing model. The three Oregonians listed as plaintiffs have shopped at Grocery Outlet within the past year and saw this deceptive pricing at locations in Salem, King City and North Portland's St. John's neighborhood in mid-May, according to the lawsuit. 'Defendants claim this model particularly helps its customers who are at risk for food insecurity, which would include those who receive food subsidies and whom most need to stretch their dollars to feed families in need,' the complaint reads, referring to Grocery Outlet's bulk purchases of 'overrun, closeout, or expiring' products. 'In reality, defendants collectively conspire to sell these 'opportunistic' and substandard groceries to Oregon consumers through the illegal use of fictitious reference prices, which Defendants vaguely refer to as 'elsewhere,'' attorneys said. Court documents show receipts of purchases that were advertised as having 'elsewhere' pricing, despite the fact that the product isn't sold anywhere else in the state. Oregon law establishes that this competitive pricing practice should be used for other companies in the geographic market area. Other purchases were sold by competitors in the area, but attorneys said Grocery Outlet failed to identify which one. The suit also alleges one plaintiff purchased oat milk for $3.19, with its 'elsewhere' price listed at $4.99, although Fred Meyer offered the same product for $1.99. According to Oregon Consumer Justice Law, more than 100,000 customers statewide could be eligible for the class action lawsuit. KOIN 6 has reached out to the grocery chain for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Senior care, already challenged by pandemic and Boomers aging, needs Medicaid
PACE, the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly, centers provide government-funded medical care and social services to people older than 55, and they are a growing alternative to nursing home care. In the photo, physical therapist Brad Ellis, standing, works with George Raines on mobility issues at a PACE center in Tennessee. (Anna Claire Vollers/Stateline) Caring for Oregon's seniors has been my life's work. It began when I was a high school student in Hillsboro, and it continues today in my role leading Arete Living, an Oregon-based company that provides assisted living and memory care facilities. Our caregivers and staff provide essential care to hundreds of seniors and people with disabilities every day in all corners of the state. We meet people where they are, and we provide the care they need to sustain their independence and quality of life. The work is hard, but it is also incredibly rewarding and fulfilling. The last five years in senior care have been challenging to say the least. We faced a global pandemic and worked tirelessly to keep our residents safe and supported. And yet, with the pandemic behind us, I can say that I have never been more worried about the future of long term care in Oregon. At the federal level, discussions around cutting Medicaid are rampant and incredibly worrisome. At the state level, difficult decisions are being made about what programs to fund and what programs to cut. I am deeply concerned about what cuts to healthcare, or flat investments, will mean for our seniors as more Baby Boomers age into the years of their life when they need care, whether it is in an assisted living facility or in their own home. The increasing number of aging Oregonians who have more complex care needs than past generations, along with record-high inflation in medical supplies, food services, labor, and other critical health care components, means that the cost to provide care in Oregon is higher than it has ever been. These issues are felt more deeply in our rural and frontier communities where fewer caregivers are available and health care deserts already exist. Older Oregonians who have spent their lives in these communities should not have to move away from family and friends simply to find care. But Oregon is seeing assisted living and memory care facilities close their doors amid the combined pressures of more regulation, higher costs, and an underfunded Medicaid system. I know that lawmakers have hard choices to make, and I do not envy their positions. But I urge them to think about the seniors in their districts who have worked hard and contributed to Oregon's beauty and success. They deserve a long term care system that is well-funded and thriving. That will only happen when lawmakers step up and invest in Medicaid for our most vulnerable seniors, the same individuals we serve every day at Arete facilities and in others around the state. They are counting on us. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
