Woman claims Ola delayed surgery compensation after accident due to rash rider
A Noida-based woman claimed that Ola delayed compensation for the surgeries she had to undergo after an accident caused by an Ola Bike rider's mistake, which left her left arm fractured.In a now-viral post on LinkedIn, her colleague Pratyush Singh shared a detailed account of the series of events. He attached a hospital photo of his colleague, Siddhi Vijayvargia, along with a screenshot of the ride she had booked on the day of the accident, April 22. advertisementSingh said, 'My colleague Siddhi Vijayvargia recently went through something no one should. She met with a serious accident while riding an Ola Bike, due to negligent driving by the rider. The result - a major fracture in her left arm, multiple surgeries, and over Rs 3 lakh in medical expenses.'
He claimed that Ola, despite promising assistance, failed to act. 'The reality has been delays, ignorance, and vague responses. It's been months. No concrete help, no empathy, and certainly no accountability,' he said.Singh further called out the company, tagging Ola and its CEO, Bhavish Aggarwal, questioning the lack of support and responsibility. This isn't just about money. When someone places trust in your platform, the least you can do is stand by them when things go wrong,' he said.advertisementHe added that Siddhi, who never expected her life to be derailed this way, has now been left to fight for the basics: support, clarity, and reimbursement.'Siddhi didn't ask for this trauma. She didn't expect her life to come to a halt. And now she's forced to fight for what should've been automatically extended to her,' he said. Take a look at the post here: Reacting to the viral post, Ola claimed the issue had been resolved. The company wrote, 'We want to ensure that this matter is properly addressed, and we empathise with how distressing it may have been for you. We are actively working on the details you have provided and will connect with you at the earliest.'However, Singh wasn't entirely convinced. He said, 'Appreciate the response, but this issue has already been delayed far too long. We hope this isn't just another template reply, but a sign that Ola will finally take real, prompt action.'Siddhi Vijayvargia's story has now become a point of conversation online, not just about platform accountability but also about how companies handle consumer grievances when things go terribly wrong.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC dismisses Leela Group appeals against AAI eviction proceedings in Mumbai
MUMBAI : The Bombay high court has dismissed appeals filed by the Leela Group against eviction proceedings initiated by the Airports Authority of India (AAI) over its Mumbai plots leased out for building a hotel. The court observed that the lease period expired long ago, and eviction was not an issue amenable to arbitration under the lease agreement between AAI and Leela. Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan dismissed the Leela Group's appeals and imposed costs of Rs 10 lakh to be paid in four weeks to AAI. The judge cited Leela's "prolonged enjoyment" of the expired leasehold land and his "assessment of the lack of reasonableness in some of the contentions raised on behalf of Leela" as reasons to impose the costs. In 1983, AAI leased two plots, together measuring 18,000 square feet, to Hotel Leela Venture Ltd (Leela Group) to construct a hotel and flight kitchen, with the lease expiring in July 2012. Another lease for an AAI-owned plot of 11,000 square metres to construct a hotel wing expired on March 31, 2024. The plots were deemed public premises under the Public Premises Eviction Act. AAI initiated eviction proceedings in 2017 for the two plots. However, on a request by senior counsel Rafiq Dada for the Leela Group, the high court, which had directed the eviction officer to begin eviction on merits swiftly, day-to-day, stayed the start of the process by four weeks. The Leela Group, represented by Dada with advocate Vivek Menon, argued that the matter must be decided only by an arbitrator as private lands were amalgamated into the 18,000 square feet and could never thus be 'public premises'. The AAI, represented by former AG Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, argued that under the agreement, eviction and rental dues were excluded from arbitration, and also since the plots were 'public premises'. The Leela Group "continued to enjoy the usage of the premises on expired lease rental terms and despite the expiry of the very lease periods" on the basis of a statement that no precipitate steps would be taken pending proceedings, said Justice Sundaresan. The high court noted that Leela is itself not keen to retain the 11,000 square metres land and offered to return it. HLV Ltd, formerly known as Hotel Leela Venture Ltd, petitioned the high court this year against the AAI. The core issue raised was whether disputes over eviction under the lease deeds governing two plots leased by AAI would fall within the scope of arbitration agreements. The disputes, the high court noted, led to an "intricate and strategic web of filings of various proceedings" by Leela across tribunals and courts. The high court noted that the parties explicitly agreed to the land leased to Leela as being public premises. Hence, one need not look beyond the contract to determine if eviction is excluded from the scope of arbitration. The Leela Group is at liberty to proceed with arbitration on any facet of the lease except eviction from the leased land. The high court appointed former Madras high court Chief Justice S V Gangapurwala as the sole arbitrator for all issues barring eviction.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengaluru: Banashankari allottees await legal resolution
BENGALURU : Banashankari Affected Site Owners Federation (BASOF) on Wednesday urged the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) Commissioner and Bangalore Deputy Commissioner to protect the rights of those who bought sites at Banashankari 6th Stage. The Karnataka High Court has passed the judgment in favour of original land owners, who claimed the BDA has failed to fully develop the land. With this hundreds of people who bought sites at Banashankari 6th Stage Layout are in trouble as the High Court quashed proceedings over acquisition of 16 acres of land. Speaking with media persons at Press Club, Yogesh, convenor of BASOF, said that the affected site owners have decided to submit a memorandum to the Bangalore Deputy Commissioner and the BDA Commissioner to take legal measures to protect the interests of the site owners. 'With the failure of the BDA to submit the documents in the honourable court, the future of around 350 site owners is at risk. Many people have already constructed buildings and have been paying property tax to the BDA,'' said Yogesh. He said that he bought the site (30X40) from one of the allottees by paying around Rs 80 lakh more than a year ago. 'Now, the land owner is not allowing me to construct the building on the site claiming that the land belongs to him,'' he said. The hapless site allottees, who paid their hard-earned money to buy sites from the BDA, have to wait to construct their dream homes till the petition in the court is disposed– M Ravishankar, social activist Expressing concern over the plight of the site allottees, M Ravishankar, a social activist, said the hapless site allottees, who paid their hard-earned money to buy sites from the BDA, have to wait to construct their dream homes till the petition in the court is disposed. 'The BDA cannot allot alternative sites to the victims till the court gives final judgment,'' he said. Rudrappa S, a retired employee, said that the BDA has allotted him a 30x40 site in 2002. 'Now, I am 84 years old. I want to construct my dream home but the land owner is not allowing me to go ahead with my plan. The BDA has sanctioned the building plan. I have been paying the property tax to the BDA all these years. I do not know whether I will be able to realise my dream of having my own house,'' rues Rudrappa.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Top 15 Tier-2 cities see 6% growth in home sales value in Q1 2025
The value of residential properties sold across India's leading 15 tier 2 cities showed a 6% rise to Rs 40,443 crore during Q1 2025, compared to Rs 38,102 crore in Q1 2024. PropEquity, an NSE-listed property analytics firm, reported that Lucknow led the growth amongst tier 2 cities with a 25% increase, selling 1301 units in Q1 2025. Coimbatore followed with 21% growth, Gandhi Nagar with 18%, and Mohali with 2%. The total units sold decreased by 8% to 43,781 units in Q1 2025, down from 47,378 units in the corresponding period of the previous year. "The decline in sales in tier 2 cities in January-March period is in line with trends witnessed in tier 1 cities. However, lesser supply in this quarter resulted in lower sales in tier 2 cities. State Capitals performed relatively better," said Samir Jasuja, Founder and CEO, PropEquity according to an ET repport by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo Among the remaining 11 cities, sales declined in Q1 2025, with Visakhapatnam showing the steepest fall at 37%, whilst Ahmedabad and Goa experienced minimal declines of 1% each. Coimbatore achieved the highest increase in sales value at Rs 1120 crore in Q1 2025, representing 52% growth. Lucknow followed at 48%, Gandhi Nagar at 36%, whilst Mohali and Goa each grew by 17%. Ahmedabad and Bhubaneshwar both increased by 7%, and Kochi by 5%. Seven cities experienced declining sales values in Q1 2025, with Visakhapatnam showing the largest decrease at 35%, whilst Vadodara and Nagpur recorded the smallest declines at 1% each. "Demand in tier 2 cities, however, remains robust as people have shown greater preference for organised living. Urban rejuvenation efforts, improved connectivity & social infrastructure, and more importantly greater employment opportunities mainly in IT and new manufacturing hubs in tier 2 cities have further accelerated demand not only from within but also from people who have migrated to metro cities and are preferring to purchase property in their hometowns," Jasuja said. The six State Capitals - Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, Bhubaneshwar, Lucknow, Goa and Bhopal - experienced a 5% reduction in sales but a 17% increase in sales value, comprising 25% of sales and 30% of sales value in Q1 2025.
