
Michigan-Ohio State, diminished? No, college football's No. 1 rivalry is as bitter as ever
In 1835, armed militias gathered for a tense standoff along a contested piece of land known as the Toledo Strip. At stake was the city of Toledo and a stretch of the Maumee River, a crucial shipping channel claimed by Ohio and the soon-to-be state of Michigan.
Advertisement
The buildup was worse than the war, which was resolved after a few gunshots and no fatalities. Ohio got the Toledo Strip, and the new state of Michigan got land in the Upper Peninsula. They did not live happily ever after.
Almost 200 years later, the Michigan-Ohio War is still an apt origin story for the college football rivalry it inspired. The Michigan-Ohio State rivalry involves lots of shouting, shoving and posturing but little actual violence — except on the football field, where it remains the most intense 60 minutes of the regular season. The victors gloat, the losers seethe and neither side gives an inch.
'It's almost like two different political parties,' said Quinten Johnson, a safety who played at Michigan from 2019 to 2024. 'They're finding ways on both sides to make sure the other side can't operate. The fan bases on both sides are finding little ways to nitpick each other or diminish each other. It is a true, natural hatred.'
Though Michigan-Ohio State doesn't seem to be losing any of its intensity, the rivalry isn't immune from the broader forces of change in college football. Last season, for the first time in the history of the rivalry, the loser of The Game went on to win a national championship thanks to Ohio State's run through the expanded 12-team College Football Playoff. Jack Sawyer, the Ohio State defensive end who was in the middle of the postgame fracas after Michigan's stunning win in Columbus, said it would be 'crazy' to place the outcome of the rivalry game ahead of winning a national championship.
'In a perfect world, you'd do both of those things,' Sawyer, a fourth-round pick of the Pittsburgh Steelers, said on a podcast hosted by former Steelers QB Ben Roethlisberger. 'Obviously, we didn't. Winning a national championship kind of erases all that. For me, it does, at least.'
Michigan's upset victory, the brawl that ensued and Ohio State's run to the national championship started a debate that's likely to keep fans of both programs occupied for years to come. In the new era of college football, which matters more: a national championship or a win against your rival?
For Michigan and Ohio State, this is the first time it's ever been a choice. While it's easy to say that a national championship trumps everything, winning the rivalry game was always the crucial step that kept both sides scheming 365 days a year. Now that the pathways to a national championship have expanded, fans and players have to assess what the rivalry means and doesn't mean.
Advertisement
'Obviously, the ultimate goal is to win the national championship,' said Big Ten Network analyst Jake Butt, an All-America tight end at Michigan in 2015 and 2016. 'You want to prove that you're the best program in all of college football, but this is still the greatest rivalry in college football and one of the great rivalries in all of sports. To say that game doesn't matter because you won a national championship is a lie. That's just not true.'
Anything that minimizes the outcome of The Game is bound to be controversial for two fan bases that devote so much of their energy to despising one another.
On a summer day in Ann Arbor, you can walk past Michigan Stadium and see the words 'What are you doing to beat Ohio State today?' displayed on the video board. Michigan has a sign prohibiting visitors from wearing red at Schembechler Hall, and Ohio State fans spend the week leading up to The Game crossing out the letter 'M' on campus signage and even the parts of town surrounding campus. The two cities even go back and forth with jabs on billboards across town.
Last November, hours before the game in Columbus, an electronic sign over the Columbus highways alluded to the Connor Stalions saga by saying, 'A signal you can't steal: Your turn signal.'
'People still look at that game as life or death,' said Tyvis Powell, a safety who played at Ohio State from 2013-15. 'It has softened a little bit, but the bragging rights mean a lot. Even last year's team, you see the rings, and if you go look under all those social media posts, you see Michigan fans saying, 'But where are their gold pants at?' You don't want to deal with that.'
The year-round obsession is what separates Michigan-Ohio State from rivalries in American professional sports. In pro sports, even the best rivalries play second fiddle to the Super Bowl, the World Series, the NBA playoffs and the Stanley Cup Final. While college football's postseason format is always changing, the Ohio State-Michigan rivalry is the thread that connects the biggest moments in both programs' histories.
Advertisement
And it's that history that makes the rivalry special.
'To have a great rivalry you have to have back and forth and there always has to have something on the line, but then when you get to a point where you know an underdog has taken something from the favorite in a year, that's when it heats up,' said Bobby Carpenter, who played at Ohio State from 2002-05. 'You do that over years and decades and then one day you wake up and it's been 50 or 60 years, and in this case, it's over 100 years. … That's when you throw the records out the window. It starts like that, and then eventually there's a hatred that exists between the two teams that only time can replicate.'
The 1970s produced the 10-Year War between Bo Schembechler and Woody Hayes, with two programs combining to appear in 13 consecutive Rose Bowls. After the 1973 game ended in a 10-10 tie, the Big Ten athletic directors made a controversial choice to award the league's only postseason bid to Ohio State. (The Big Ten didn't allow multiple teams to play in bowl games until 1975.)
At Ohio State, the words 'John Cooper' are synonymous with struggles against Michigan during the 1990s. The 2000s produced the Game of the Century — No. 1 Ohio State against No. 2 Michigan in 2006 — and a decisive swing toward the Buckeyes under Jim Tressel and Urban Meyer. Jim Harbaugh's tenure at Michigan can be divided into two eras: the soul-crushing losses to Ohio State and the three consecutive victories that heralded Michigan's return as a national power.
The 2022 season was the first hint of the rivalry's shifting dynamics. Ohio State lost to Michigan to end the regular season but earned a spot in the CFP and came within a last-second field goal of upsetting Georgia in the Peach Bowl. With Michigan losing to TCU in the other CFP semifinal, the possibility of a team losing The Game and going on to win a national championship nearly came to fruition.
The 2023 matchup between 11-0 Michigan and 11-0 Ohio State, played with Harbaugh serving the final game of a Big Ten-imposed suspension, may have been the last true winner-take-all showdown in the history of the rivalry. Michigan prevailed 30-24 and went on to claim the CFP championship.
Last year's game featured an underachieving Michigan team against an Ohio State team that was built to win it all. The Wolverines pulled off a 13-10 upset and, as they did two years prior, celebrated by planting their flag at midfield in the Horseshoe. The Buckeyes took exception, resulting in a brawl that was broken up by police officers wielding pepper spray.
Advertisement
Johnson described the brawl as regrettable but also inevitable given how much hatred, pressure and pride get packed into a single game.
'Whenever they come into the Big House or whenever we come over there, you gotta be ready to fight,' Johnson said. 'That's what the whole game is, one big fight. The fight felt like a natural part of the game. Everybody knew where it was going. It's going to be that way every year unless they get, like, 100 policemen to prevent both sides from doing it.'
Ohio State's fourth consecutive loss to Michigan was a rock-bottom moment for the Buckeyes and coach Ryan Day. By almost any measure, Day is among the most successful college football coaches of his era. Yet the vitriol directed at Day by a segment of the fan base — what ESPN analyst and former Buckeye quarterback Kirk Herbstreit called the 'lunatic fringe' — forced the Day family to enlist security protection at its home following the Michigan loss.
While nobody in college football is condoning that type of reaction from fans, the emotions of losing The Game are what will keep it relevant even in an era when the stakes aren't as high, Carpenter said.
'I was worried college football would lose its fastball, but I will tell you that if you were in Columbus the week after Ohio State lost to Michigan, there was no fastball being lost,' Carpenter said. 'Everybody was furious. It doesn't need to matter as much in the context of your schedule and like if you lose a game, now you're done for the year, but as long as it still emotionally matters, you're fine.'
For most of the rivalry's history, that loss to Michigan would have been a season-killer for Ohio State. Instead, the loss galvanized the Buckeyes and fueled their victories against Tennessee, Oregon, Texas and Notre Dame in the first year of the 12-team CFP.
Ohio State's run to the national championship produced conflicted feelings on both sides. As much as Michigan fans hated it, some took solace in putting a blemish on Ohio State's otherwise triumphant season. While Ohio State fans and players acknowledged the pain of losing to Michigan, winning a national championship eased the sting, at least for some.
Advertisement
'I'm not a sore loser, but I hate losing, and losing to that team up north was pretty crazy,' Ohio State sophomore receiver Jeremiah Smith told The Athletic's Manny Navarro last week. 'In the end, I think it really helped us play the way we did in the playoffs. But I didn't want to go to Ohio State and lose to that team up north. I just hate them. Just something about them.
'For the next two years, I promise you, I will not lose to them. I can't lose to them in the next two years.'
In college football's new era, both sides will have to learn to live with some nuance, Butt said. Michigan's win doesn't invalidate Ohio State's national championship, nor does Ohio State's national championship erase the disappointment for Buckeyes seniors who went winless against Michigan in their careers. Both things will always be true.
'The loss to Michigan didn't define their season,' said Butt, a native of Pickerington, Ohio. 'And yet, I know for a fact that those guys are always going to remember the fact that (they) let one slip away and got upset as three-score favorites in their stadium in a game they never should have lost. Those guys are never going to forget this. I know this, because I'm a guy that never beat Ohio State.'
In the story of Ohio State's season, the loss to Michigan became the disappointment that fueled the Buckeyes' dominant run through the CFP. For the first time in the history of the rivalry, both sides had to deal with the kind of ambivalent compromise that reflects that spirit of the original Michigan-Ohio War.
Ohio State got the national championship. Michigan got bragging rights. As for which side got the better deal, the debate might never end, but the importance of The Game has not lessened at all.
'The only way it could get diminished is if they don't play anymore,' Powell said. 'If one team left the Big Ten, that's the only way this wouldn't be the best rivalry in sports. As long as they continue to play this game, there's nothing that will be better.'
(Illustration: Will Tullos / The Athletic; photos: Todd Kirkland, Joe Robbins, Scott W. Grau / Getty Images)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ESPN, NFL Fight Mark Gastineau's $100M Lawsuit Over '30 for 30′
ESPN, the NFL and other defendants named in retired New York Jets defensive end Mark Gastineau's $100 million breach of contract and false endorsement lawsuit argue in a new motion to dismiss the case that the five-time Pro Bowler's legal theories are contradicted by contracts he signed and defy basic principles of both the right of publicity and the First Amendment. In March, Gastineau filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York accusing ESPN and the NFL of using unauthorized video of him confronting retired Hall of Fame quarterback Brett Favre at a sports memorabilia show in 2023. The video appears in '30 for 30: The New York Sack Exchange,' which centers on Gastineau and teammates who were part of the highly-vaunted Jets' defensive line in the early 1980s. The 30 for 30 includes a clip of Gastineau accusing Favre of 'falling down' in the final minutes of the 2001 regular season, when New York Giant defensive end Michael Strahan sacked Favre and broke Gastineau's NFL record for most sacks in a single season. Gastineau, 68, says he has been ridiculed on social media over how he is portrayed. He says he never consented to the filming of the Favre confrontation. Gastineau also accuses ESPN and the NFL of placing him in a false light by omitting video of Gastineau and Favre shaking hands at the end of their conversation. Through a brief filed by Alexander Kaplan and other attorneys from Oppenheim + Zebrak on July 3, ESPN and the NFL assert Gastineau's case has numerous flaws. First, Gastineau signed contracts with NFL Films that—ESPN and the NFL maintain—negate his claims. Of central importance Gastineau signed a talent agreement which, in exchange for Gastineau receiving compensation, granted NFL films the right to his NIL and other aspects of his right of publicity, including his voice, actions and biographical information. The agreement also contemplated Gastineau waiving any right to approve how he is portrayed or to approve the film itself. Likewise, the agreement indicates that NFL films can modify and edit content. It also neither requires nor excludes 'any material to be specifically included in the Film.' ESPN and the NFL maintain that a plain reading of the contractual language should end Gastineau's case. As the defendants tell it, he granted 'unfettered rights of publicity, including with respect to the footage about which he is complaining.' Beyond contractual language, ESPN and the NFL stress the 'Favre Encounter' was a newsworthy event and thus exempt from right of publicity and privacy claims. The defendants stress that the encounter was of public interest because it concerned Gastineau's relationship with Favre regarding and tackled an especially divisive topic: Whether Favre took a dive to give Strahan the all-time NFL single season sack record. 'The Favre Encounter,' the defendants wrote, 'is a key development in the narrative of Gastineau's legacy, how he was impacted by Favre's sack, and how his New York Sack Exchange teammates viewed him.' ESPN and the NFL also argue that while Gastineau contends his impromptu meeting with Favre at the memorabilia show was a 'private encounter,' it was anything but. The defendants point out that Gastineau and Favre were surrounded by onlookers. Gastineau also wore a microphone provided by the film crew, which indicates he 'consented to the recording.' This was also not a hidden camera situation: the film crew was around Gastineau, and he was 'fully aware' of them. In addition, ESPN and the NFL stress how in interpreting the First Amendment, courts have consistently protected artistic works, including documentaries and other biographical works. The New York Sack Exchange and its members, including Gastineau, are fair game for historical reports and other media, the defendants insist. Through what is sometimes coined artistic license, filmmakers also enjoy substantial discretion in how they tell of events and narrate history. Lastly, ESPN and the NFL maintain that Gastineau didn't suffer any damages. He contractually assented to appear in a film and to the filmmaker controlling how he appeared. Further, 'waived any right to inspect or approve' how he appeared in the film. The defendants essentially argue that Gastineau is complaining about something he contractually accepted and thus can't establish he was harmed in a way the law ought to remedy. Gastineau will have the opportunity to try to rebut ESPN and the NFL's arguments by filing an opposition to their motion to dismiss. The case is before U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Advertisement More from Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sham Yankees: MLB Suit Targets Alleged Counterfeiter With 5 Names
A man who goes by as many as five different names is accused in a new federal lawsuit of repeatedly selling counterfeit New York Yankees merchandise around Yankee Stadium. MLB Advanced Media and MLB Properties contend that Jemal Dortch—who is also called Jamal Dortch, Jamal Wiggins, Jemal Wiggins and Jamaal Wiggins—is liable for trademark counterfeiting, trademark infringement and related claims. The case is detailed in a 34-page complaint filed on Tuesday in the Southern District of New York. Advertisement More from MLB Advanced Media and MLB Properties (hereinafter MLB) own and officially license various apparel and other products that feature among the more than 1,000 trademarks of MLB and its teams. As MLB tells it, Dortch has been a serial counterfeiter and infringer who has ignored 'repeated warnings' to stop the distribution and selling of baseball caps, headwear and other products bearing MLB trademarks. The complaint, authored by Robertson D. Beckerlegge and other attorneys from BakerHostetler, refers to undercover investigators hired by MLB to pose as buyers of merchandise outside of Yankee Stadium. MLB cites 18 separate examples of Dortch running afoul of the law between September 2022 and last month by selling counterfeit and infringing goods. Despite being arrested or caught in the act by private investigators, Dortch doesn't appear deterred by the consequences. He's accused of simply trying again months, weeks, days or even hours after being caught. Advertisement For example, on Sept. 23, 2022, Dortch was arrested for trademark counterfeiting in connection with his distributing, offering for sale, and/or selling infringing goods. On April 1, 2023, Dortch was arrested again for the same offense. On July 7, 2024, Dortch was observed selling caps bearing Yankees logos. MLB then served Dortch with a cease-and-desist letter and he agreed to surrender 56 counterfeit Yankees caps. But a couple of weeks later, he was observed engaged in the same activity, leading to another cease-and-desist letter and him surrendering more than two dozen counterfeit Yankees caps and hats. MLB cites still other incidents that occurred closer in time. On Aug. 24, 2024, Dortch surrendered 18 counterfeit Yankees caps and hats. A day later there were two separate incidents. In the first one he surrendered counterfeit Yankees caps, hats and t-shirts and later in the day he was spotted again. He then turned over more caps, hats and t-shirts. The complaint's inventory of incidents is extensive and includes surveillance photos. Advertisement MLB highlights that the sale of counterfeit goods is likely to 'cause confusion and mistake in the minds of the purchasing public.' Some consumers might wrongly believe they're buying officially licensed products. MLB also points out its intellectual property and goodwill are harmed since its trademarks stand for 'the reputation for quality' that officially licensed products demand. Among the demanded remedies, MLB wants a permanent injunction to block Dortch from selling any 'any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of the MLB Trademarks to identify any goods or the rendering of any services not authorized.' The league also demands that Dortch be barred from 'making any statement or representation whatsoever' that could induce consumers into believing he's selling legit items. The destruction or 'otherwise dealing with the unauthorized products' is also demanded, as is a requirement that Dortch supply MLB 'with the name and address of each person or entity from whom or from which it has purchased any item bearing the MLB Trademarks.' In addition, MLB wants Dortch's profits and other financial compensation as well as total sales figures for any sales of unauthorized MLB items. The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska, who has presided over several high-profile cases over the years. In the late 1990s, Preska was the judge for the defamation lawsuit brought by wrongly accused Olympic Park bombing suspect Richard Jewell against the New York Post. That litigation settled out of court. Best of Advertisement Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Home Run Derby Prize Would Double These Sluggers' 2025 Salaries
Pirates slugger Oneil Cruz has 1 million reasons to swing for the fences during Monday night's Home Run Derby in Atlanta. Three of the eight contestants, including Cruz, are making less this year in salary than the prize purse of $1 million for the Derby winner. Advertisement More from Cruz, 26 years old; Nationals outfielder James Wood, 22; and Rays infielder Junior Caminero, 22, are all making between $750,000 and $800,000 this year under MLB's collective bargaining terms for players with fewer than three years of top-level service. 'When I was like 12, I did some Home Run Derbys,' Wood recently told The Washington Post. 'The prizes were like a bat, so it's a little different now.' Under the terms of the CBA, the derby runner-up receives $500,000 while the six other participants each go home with $150,000. The batter with the longest home run pockets an additional $100,000. Advertisement Cruz is among bettors' favorites for the event, along with Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh. Braves first baseman Matt Olson will be swinging on home soil, joined by Twins outfielder—and Georgia native—Byron Buxton, Yankees infielder Jazz Chisholm and Athletics outfielder Brent Rooker. Buxton has the second-biggest blast of 2025 so far, a 479-foot homer against the Rangers. Mike Trout's 484-foot roundtripper from April still leads the league. Raleigh enters Monday's competition with a league-leading 38 home runs. The derby's $2.5 million overall prize pool was increased in 2019 as part of an agreement with the players association. While then-31-year-old Teoscar Hernandez took home the prize last season, the event has otherwise been a young man's game; the winner hasn't been older than 26 since 2015. Giancarlo Stanton (2016), Aaron Judge (2017), Bryce Harper (2018), Pete Alonso (2019, 2021), Juan Soto (2022) and Vladimir Guerrero Jr. (2023) won the previous seven editions before landing even bigger paydays for their day jobs. All six hitters will likely be represented in Sportico's list of the Top 15 Highest-Paid MLB Players once Guerrero's new deal fully kicks in. Judge has said he'd only participate again if the All-Star Game was in New York City, while Shohei Ohtani, who has the third-most homers in the league, cited the current knockout structure in explaining his absence. 'With the current rules in place, I don't think it's feasible for me to compete well,' Ohtani said in June. The Japanese superstar previously competed in 2021, and the derby format was updated last year. Competitors are now limited to three minutes or 40 swings in the first round, with the top four moving on to a pair of two-minute or 27-swing knockout rounds. Advertisement In 2021, Ohtani handed his $150,000 to Angels employees while Alonso has used a portion of his derby earnings to support multiple nonprofit causes. The 2024 home run contest averaged 5.45 million viewers, up against Republican National Convention coverage. The All-Star Game averaged 7.44 million viewers. Each player on the winning All-Star Game side gets $25,000. The 2025 Home Run Derby airs on ESPN and ESPN2. Discussing his decision to join the fray, Cruz said he's in it for more than the dollars. 'I'm really, really happy, just because that's what I do,' Cruz said on Tuesday. 'I like to hit balls far. I think I'm going to enjoy it a lot.' Advertisement Best of Sign up for Sportico's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.