European shares rise to 4-month high after US-EU trade deal
European shares surged to a four-month high following the EU-U.S. trade deal, which averted a wider trade war. Auto and pharmaceutical stocks led the gains, with Porsche, Volkswagen, Novo Nordisk and Roche rising significantly. The STOXX 600 index is now within 1.8% of its all-time high, fueled by expectations of further trade agreements.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Margin management turns tricky for Balkrishna amid soft demand, new bets
Balkrishna Industries Ltd is facing earnings downgrades as the tyre maker grapples with twin headwinds: weak demand and margin compression. Its June-quarter (Q1FY26) performance was weighed down by muted demand in its key export market, Europe, and the impact of US tariffs, which have kept the ordering cycle volatile. Volumes declined 3% year-on-year to 80,664 tonnes in Q1, and the management refrained from providing a volume guidance for FY26. Revenue was largely flat at ₹2,759 crore, while Ebitda fell 8% to ₹656 crore. The 228 basis point (bps) drop in Ebitda margin to 23.8% was seen as a key disappointment. The company has guided for an operating margin of 24-25% for FY26. A base tariff of 10% applies to Balkrishna's exports to the US, and the company has been unable to pass on the entire increase to consumers. It has absorbed 40% of the impact, which is expected to persist through Q2FY26. 'With multiple US trade tariffs getting finalized at around 15% (EU/Japan), we believe India tariffs are likely to inch up from around 10%. This remains a near-term demand/margin headwind for Balkrishna," said a Nomura Global Markets Research report. It has cut its FY26 Ebitda and earnings per share forecast by 8% and 16% respectively. While raw material costs are expected to remain stable sequentially in Q2FY26, margin pressures are likely to continue. Balkrishna, which has a niche in the off-highway tyre (OHT) segment, recently announced plans to diversify into domestic tyre categories including truck and bus radials and passenger car radials (PCR). The concern, however, is that this expansion could be margin-dilutive over the medium term, given intense competition from established players. Balkrishna would launch commercial vehicle radial tyres by Q4FY26 and PCR tyres by Q3FY27.A capital expenditure of ₹3,500 crore has been outlined for the next three years. 'Considering the higher upfront investments in the new tyre segments which have higher competitive intensity and lower margins than the company's core business, and the lack of visibility for business normalcy of its core business, we remain cautious," said HDFC Securities. After hitting a 52-week low of ₹2,152.05 apiece on 7 April, following the Liberation Day tariff announcement, the stock has recovered to ₹2,746. It now trades at an undemanding 25x FY27 earnings estimates, according to Bloomberg. However, Balkrishna has yet to prove itself in the new segments, and striking a balance between gaining market share and protecting core returns could be a significant challenge.
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's new trade order is fragile
President Donald Trump has achieved the remarkable: raising tariffs by more than the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, while—it appears—avoiding the destructive trade war that followed. Including the deal struck over the weekend with the European Union, the U.S. will impose an effective tariff rate of about 15% on its trading partners, by far the highest since the 1930s, according to JPMorgan Chase. Japan and the EU have together committed to investing $1.15 trillion in the U.S. Europe also agreed to energy and military purchases. And what did the U.S. give up in return? Nothing. So Trump has hit his goals, for now. But these deals don't yet represent a new trade order. They are sort of a way station, more fragile and with less legitimacy than the system they have supplanted. The formula for this achievement was distinctively Trumpian. The president calculated that others had more to lose from a trade war than the U.S. He picked off each trading partner in turn with the prospect that failure to strike a deal on his terms would result in worse treatment later. Among American allies, only the EU has the heft to inflict enough pain on American companies to change Trump's calculus. But despite drawing up plans for retaliation, it never pulled the trigger. Along with the economic pain of a trade war, Europe feared Trump would abandon Ukraine and perhaps NATO altogether. A one-sided deal was the price of keeping, for now, Trump committed to the trans-Atlantic security alliance. Of the major trading partners yet to strike deals, South Korea, Mexico and Canada can likely expect, like the U.K., Japan and the EU, to give up plenty and get nothing in return. China, the only country to have broadly retaliated, might fare differently. Trump has avoided a trade war, but it remains to be seen if the trade peace will last. Since the 1980s, Trump has believed that other countries have ripped off the U.S., producing deep trade deficits. His solution: charge for access to the U.S. market and the protection of its military. Others have now accepted his terms for access to the market, while NATO partners have agreed to boost defense spending to 5% of GDP. This seems to have softened Trump's prior antipathy toward the alliance and Ukraine. On Monday, he shortened the deadline for Russia to agree to a cease-fire with Ukraine or face sanctions. It might be too soon to announce 'mission accomplished," but it certainly looks like Trump has begun rebalancing the relationship between the U.S. and its allies. 'The two concerns Trump had about Europe is that they were free riding on the U.S. security umbrella and their trade was unbalanced, with their market a fortress," said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at Eurasia Group, a consultancy. 'On both, Trump has implemented a shakedown." The 15% baseline tariff and 5% military commitment represent Trump wins that put the trans-Atlantic alliance on a 'slightly more solid" basis than in February, he said. Whether tariffs achieve Trump's economic goals remains to be seen. In a recent speech, Trump's trade ambassador, Jamieson Greer, set three benchmarks: first, reduce the goods trade deficit; second, raise after-inflation incomes; and third, boost manufacturing's share of gross domestic product. The incentives in these deals to reshore production and purchase American goods should help meet these relatively low bars. As for how much of the tariffs consumers will ultimately bear, the jury is still out. From 1947 through 2012, the U.S. presided over a steady fall in trade barriers and growing economic integration. It came through painstakingly negotiated pacts. Everyone gained something and gave something up and were thus invested in the pacts' success. Such pacts 'require Congress to approve them, are deep and substantive, take a long time to negotiate, and last a long time," said Doug Irwin, a trade historian at Dartmouth College. 'They are a binding commitment on the U.S." By contrast, Irwin said, these latest agreements are 'handshake deals" with a president who isn't legally bound to adhere to the terms. Trump is at liberty to threaten higher tariffs again for any reason, from wresting Greenland from Denmark to protecting U.S. tech companies from European taxes or censorship. Europe, having foresworn retaliation, has few chips with which to bargain tariffs down, under this or a future president. Trump acted entirely without Congress. Indeed, one court has already ruled his use of a sanctions law to impose across-the-board tariffs was illegal. Should an appeals court uphold that finding, the legality of those deals would come into doubt. (Trump could turn to a different law that limits tariffs to 15%, for 150 days.) The one-sided nature of these deals also makes them more fragile. Other countries will be less willing to comply with something they don't think is in their economic interest, especially with so many details unsettled. Already, Japan has cast doubt on Trump's interpretation of its $550 billion investment commitment, and the Europeans' $600 billion pledge seems similarly vague. Deals made under duress are politically unpopular and thus less durable. Especially noteworthy was the negative reaction of far-right populist leaders who are already hostile to the EU and trade deals. Marine Le Pen, a leader of France's populist right-wing National Rally, which is slightly favored to win the presidential election in 2027, called the EU deal a 'political, economic and moral fiasco." Alice Weidel, leader of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany, wrote on X, 'The EU has let itself be brutally ripped off." Trump got his deals because of the leverage other countries' deep economic and security ties gave to the U.S. In coming years, that leverage will wane as those countries cultivate markets elsewhere and build up their own militaries. The resulting international system will be less dependent on the U.S.—and less stable. Write to Greg Ip at
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
UK equities mixed as investors assess slew of corporate earnings, US-EU trade deal
(For a Reuters live blog on U.S., UK and European stock markets, click or type LIVE/ in a news window) * FTSE 100 up 0.4%, FTSE 250 down 0.3% * AstraZeneca rises after Q2 profit beats expectations * Greggs falls on lower first-half profit * Entain rises after BetMGM raises FY outlook * Inchcape slips on HY profit drop July 29 (Reuters) - London's main stock indexes were mixed on Tuesday as investors assessed a spate of mixed corporate updates as well as the fallout from the newly signed U.S.-EU trade deal. The benchmark FTSE 100 rose 0.4% as of 0934 GMT, while the domestically focused midcap FTSE 250 index was down 0.3%. Healthcare stocks led the sectoral gains, up 1.8%, with AstraZeneca rising 2.8% after the drugmaker beat second-quarter revenue and profit expectations. Chemical stocks lost 2.5%, dragged down by Croda International, which fell 5.1% after the chemical company reported first-half sales below estimates. Industrial miners lost 1%, tracking lower copper prices. Glencore and Anglo American fell 2.4% and 1.2% respectively. Among other corporate updates, Games Workshop surged 6.3%, to top the FTSE 100 index, after the miniature wargames maker reported a nearly 30% jump in annual pre-tax profit. Entain rose 1.4% after the company's U.S. sports-betting joint venture with MGM Resorts called BetMGM raised its full-year 2025 revenue and core earnings forecast. Inchcape lost 9.6%, top loser on the FTSE 250 midcap index, after the car distributor reported a 4% drop in first-half adjusted pre-tax profit at constant currency. Greggs fell 4.9% after reporting a 14% fall in first-half profit. A survey showed British shop prices rose by the most in more than a year in the 12 months to July and food prices grew more strongly. The Bank of England is expected to cut borrowing costs on August 7 for the fifth time since August last year. Meanwhile, investors weighed the impact of a new 15% levy on most European Union goods, which is significantly higher than pre-2025 levels. Ahead of the August 1 tariff deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump said a blanket 15% to 20% "world tariff" rate would be extended toward trading partners who do not negotiate separate trade deals with the U.S. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials resumed their trade talks for a second day in Stockholm to resolve economic disputes, while seeking to extend the previous tariff truce by three months. (Reporting by Sukriti Gupta in Bengaluru; Editing by Shreya Biswas)
