Joel Klatt Unpacks the Big Ten's Reported Game-Changing CFP Expansion Proposal
Updated
Aug. 21, 2025 1:42 p.m. ET
share
x
link
At first blush, the Big Ten's reported idea of proposing that the College Football Playoff move to 24 or 28 teams might sound shocking. But for those who value the idea of the four power conferences being on equal footing, perhaps the idea is worth another look.
FOX Sports' Joel Klatt explained how a possible 24-team CFP is much more likely to be discussed than a 28-team CFP proposal.
"The model that is being talked about with any seriousness is a 24-team model," Klatt said on his podcast, "The Joel Klatt Show." "With a 24-team model, you can at least, in theory, make more sense of it. They're talking about eight teams having a bye and then having the other 16 teams play each other to whittle it down to 16 and going from there. That's fine.
"Regardless of what you think of that, I will say, it's an attempt of putting a net over all four constituents. What you're saying is, 'It can be selection-based, but there's going to be a significant amount of automatic spots.' And you don't have to say, 'Big 12 and ACC, you're less than us,' because there's enough to go around. So, as surprising as it seems, I think that's why we got it floated out there."
ADVERTISEMENT
While the exact format of the Big Ten's potential 24-team proposal isn't known yet, the 28-team model would have the Big Ten and the SEC receiving seven automatic bids each, while the ACC and the Big 12 would each receive five automatic bids. Two Group of 5 teams would also get automatic bids, and there would be two more spots for at-large bids, per a report from ESPN.
Both possible rumored 24- and 28-team formats would also come with conference championship game weekend being eradicated. If that's the case, Klatt pointed out how the 24-team model could be similar to one of the ideas being floated about for a possible expansion to 16 teams.
"The 24-team model is not all that different, in theory, than what the Big Ten already suggested with a 16-team model and attached to the play-in games on conference championship game weekend," Klatt said. "If you had play-in games in order to get to the 16, you would have about 24 teams [battling for those 16 spots]."
[Read more: How 2024-25 CFP Would've Looked Under Proposed Expansion Formats]
The latest expansion rumor comes after months of debate on how to expand the CFP field from 2026-32 ahead of the Dec. 1 deadline. While the first year of the 12-team CFP in 2024 was largely viewed as a success, some college football leaders have pushed the idea of expanding it to 16 teams. However, there have been disagreements about how many automatic bids each conference should get.
If the powers that be opted to expand the CFP beyond 12 teams, Klatt wants them to keep three objectives in mind.
"If you're going to change anything about college football, it should really achieve those things: we should be increasing value, increasing fanbase and excitement and stabilizing the sport," he said. "The 12-team playoff, with its flaws, did that."
[Read more: Tony Petitti Seeks More Meaningful Games In CFP Expansion: 'Bigger Is Better']
Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti, who Klatt pointed out is one of the two people with the most control over CFP expansion (SEC commissioner Greg Sankey being the other), told "The Joel Klatt Show" in June that he's seeking a more access-based model for CFP expansion.
"I want more teams to feel like they're chasing that opportunity to compete for a national championship," Pettiti said. "Teams can get hot late in the season. The fact they lose a game early shouldn't disqualify them. To play more meaningful conference games as late as possible."
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily .
What did you think of this story?
share
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What does SEC's move to 9-game conference schedule mean for future of CFP?
We can all breathe a giant sign of relief: Finally, the SEC is moving to a nine-game conference football schedule. Stop the presses! It only took them four years of debating, arguing and posturing. But what does this move mean for the greater landscape of college football? For one, it means fewer SEC games against non-power conference opponents in FBS and those in FCS, as the league will retain its requirement for schools to play at least one non-conference game against a fellow power league team or Notre Dame (yes, that means 10 power league games). But the move's most notable impact may lie with the future of the College Football Playoff format. Let's first start off with a fact: This may not mean anything immediately for the CFP format, and there is unlikely to be any agreement on a future format very soon. Yes, the SEC's decision may ease and make more productive conversations with Big Ten officials over a future format, but it doesn't mean Big Ten leaders will jump to agree with the proposed '5+11' format that the SEC, ACC and Big 12 have openly supported. In fact, on Thursday, one Big Ten official told Yahoo Sports that while the SEC's move is a positive step, the league has more concerns, most notably related to the CFP selection committee's criteria of choosing what would be 11 at-large playoff teams. Remember, according to an agreement that all the FBS conferences signed last year, the Big Ten and SEC hold authority over future CFP formats as long as they have 'meaningful' conversation with the ACC and Big 12. The disagreement between the two conferences lingers. One wants more at-large selections and another wants more automatic qualifiers. The Big Ten proposed 16 and even 28-team formats that grant an unequal number of AQs to specific leagues, as many as four to each the SEC and Big Ten in a 16-team model circulated this past season and seven AQs for the two leagues in a model that emerged last week. The ACC and Big 12, along with the SEC, have thrown their collective weight behind the 5+11 model, and so have the Group of Six conferences plus Notre Dame. It's put the Big Ten on an island and has resulted in an impasse in CFP format negotiations. The SEC's desire for a 5+11 format 'remains' after the move to a nine-game conference schedule, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey told Paul Finebaum on his show on Thursday. 'There are other ideas that have been talked about. We haven't taken positions on those. Lot of work to be done,' he said. The most recent 'other' idea is a 24 or 28-team format circulated last week by Big Ten leaders. While some SEC school executives are interested in exploring such a model, many others — especially the league's room of presidents — are turned off by such a large postseason field, to the point that one quipped recently, 'It's a non-starter.' Is the SEC's move to nine games a compromise to the Big Ten to get that conference on board with the 5+11 model? After all, Big Ten administrators and coaches have made it clear that they were against a move to a format with such a big at-large pool if the SEC remained at eight conference games. They believe the league would have an advantage in landing those at-large spots (they were probably right on that thinking, by the way). But it may take weeks or months for the Big Ten to gather enough support to push aside its administrators and coaches' desire to have a more NFL-like field with automatic qualifiers. However, the SEC's move to nine wasn't only for CFP reasons, of course. Money is at play here. As previously reported, the schools are in line to receive additional revenue from ESPN to play an extra conference game, as much as $5 million a school annually. At the most financially stressful time in college sports, any new money is welcomed. There's something else, too. The shift to nine provides the league with the ability to sell tickets to another SEC game, to include such a game in season ticket packages and to generate more sponsorship and advertising dollars for that game. They'll play one another more too. The nine-game schedule will follow a '3-6' model, where each school plays three permanent opponents and six rotating each year, assuring each of the 16 schools play the other at least once in a two-year span. By the way, the SEC, at least years ago when this '3-6' model was selected, planned to choose each school's permanent opponents based on three considerations: (1) primary and secondary rivalries; (2) geography; and (3) equity. How do you solve the equity consideration? It's pretty simple actually: The SEC's original plan was to use the last 10 years of win-loss records to create tiers and then pair schools that way. But the most important component, probably, is historic rivalries. Anyway, back to the impact nationally. Thursday's decision, for many, came as a surprise. 'That came out of nowhere,' said one SEC leader. 'I wonder what changed?' pondered another. Momentum grew in the spring for a nine-game schedule, coinciding with the Big Ten and SEC's discussion over the '4-4-2-2-1' CFP format that leaned heavily on automatic qualifiers. However, SEC coaches in May rejected the format, and many believed that the league would likely remain at eight conference games. What changed this week? The CFP announced an adjustment to its selection committee criteria in choosing at-large teams, more heavily weighing games against top programs. Was it enough to tip the scales among a split room of athletic directors debating, for four years, between eight and nine games? Perhaps. Either way, they got there. And now the question lingers: Will the Big Ten come around on the 16-team format that everyone else wants?
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
SEC teams must play major non-conference game: Which ones must make schedule changes?
SEC schedules are now required to get even tougher. The league announced it will finally make the move to a nine-game conference slate starting with the 2026 season, but that wasn't the only notable decision the SEC made on Aug. 21. It will also require its teams to schedule one additional "high quality" non-conference opponent from the ACC, Big Ten or Big 12 or Notre Dame each season. In short, every SEC school now will be mandated to play 10 games a season against a Power 4 team. It should up the strength of schedule of its programs, and it's no coincidence it came after the College Football Playoff selection committee announced a day prior it would put greater emphasis on strength of schedule. "The SEC has established itself as the leader in delivering the most compelling football schedule in college athletics,' commissioner Greg Sankey said in a statement. "Fans will see traditional rivalries preserved, new matchups more frequently, and a level of competition unmatched across the nation." With the non-conference schedule requirment set to be in place for 2026, it's time to look to see if SEC teams will already meet the standard, or if they'll soon have to figure out who to play. Which SEC teams have a Power 4 non-conference team scheduled? The good news is everyone, as all 16 SEC teams are scheduled to play at least four games against a Power 4 non-conference foe within the next 10 years, according to FBSchedules. However, some of them are going need to quickly figure out who to put on their schedule. Most notably is Mississippi, which doesn't have a Power 4 non-conference game in 2026 through 2031. This comes as the Rebels also don't have a Power 4 non-conference game in 2025. Another team that will need to figure out its immediate schedule is Auburn, which doesn't have one scheduled in 2027 and 2028. The Tigers also don't have any non-conference Power 4 teams set to play after the 2030 season. Other teams that have a few years to figure out their schedules in include: Meanwhile, there are some SEC teams that benefit from having annual rivalries with teams in Power 4 conferences, like Florida, Georgia and South Carolina, who already meet the requirement through the 2037 season. The Gators and Bulldogs have gone to the extreme with three Power 4 non-conference games scheduled; Florida has it in 2028 and 2031 while Georgia will do it in 2027, 2030 and 2033. Other teams that won't have problems are Alabama and Missouri. The Crimson Tide and Tigers meet the requirement all the way through 2035. SEC future Power 4 non-conference games
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Auburn on Wrong End of College Football Rankings Trend
Auburn on Wrong End of College Football Rankings Trend originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Auburn Tigers have not had the best of luck since the days of former head coach Gus Malzahn, who holds their last winning season (2020). The Tigers finished 6-5 in the shortened Covid-19 season, but the struggles go back further than that. The team's last bowl win was in 2018, and it has been 12 years since Auburn competed for a national title. On Tuesday, Auburn appeared on an unfortunate top 25 list via On3's Brett McMurphy. McMurphy labeled the Tigers as the AP voters' No. 2 most overrated preseason team since the College Football Playoff era started in 2014. The only team above them was the USC Trojans. The last time Auburn was ranked in the AP Poll was in 2020, when it started the year at No. 11. Of the last three times that the Tigers were ranked to start the year in 2015, 2018, and 2020, they ended the year outside the top 25. Current head coach Hugh Freeze is entering a crucial year in his Auburn tenure after posting an 11-14 record through two seasons. Recruiting has been a strength of Freeze's since taking the job in 2023, earning top-10 classes in 2024 and 2025 via On3 Sports. Things have not gone well in the 2026 class, however. The Tigers lost key commitments over the offseason, and the class now ranks at No. 37 overall. Auburn already received a boost recently with the addition of four-star receiver Jase Matthews. On3's Steve Wiltfong believed the potential of playing with former five-star quarterback Deuce Knight swayed Matthews in the recruiting process. He also predicted that Auburn would be flipping plenty of prospects this year if the Tigers can compete for a CFP spot. Auburn hopes to reach that level after going for broke in the transfer portal with key additions like Oklahoma Sooners quarterback Jackson Arnold, Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets receiver Eric Singleton Jr., and Virginia Tech Hokies offensive tackle Xavier Chaplin. The first game of year three under Freeze is the Baylor Bears on August story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 12, 2025, where it first appeared.
