More than 400 actors and film industry professionals sign open letter supporting trans rights
More than 400 actors and film industry professionals have signed an open letter pledging their 'solidarity' with the trans, non-binary, and intersex communities who have been affected by the recent supreme court ruling.
Eddie Redmayne, Katie Leung, Nicola Coughlan, Charlotte Ritchie and Paapa Essiedu are among those to have signed the letter addressing the film and television industry as well as cultural bodies.
Bella Ramsey, James Norton, Joe Alwyn, Himesh Patel, Harris Dickinson and the director Ken Loach are also signatories.
In mid-April, supreme court judges unanimously ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
This means a gender recognition certificate (GRC) does not change a person's legal sex for the purposes of the Equality Act.
The ruling has been interpreted to mean that trans women can be excluded from women-only spaces like toilets and changing rooms.
The open letter said: 'We believe the ruling undermines the lived reality and threatens the safety of trans, non-binary, and intersex people living in the UK.'
It added the film and television community had previously come together in response to the Me Too and Black Lives Matter movements by 'reflecting' upon working practices and 'uplifting' a broad spectrum of voices.
'We must now urgently work to ensure that our trans, non-binary, and intersex colleagues, collaborators and audiences are protected from discrimination and harassment in all areas of the industry – whether on set, in a production office, or at a cinema.'
The letter continued: 'Film and television are powerful tools for empathy and education, and we believe passionately in the ability of the screen to change hearts and minds. This is our opportunity to be on the right side of history.'
On Wednesday, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said it is 'absolutely unacceptable' to question the validity of the supreme court ruling that the term 'woman' is defined by biological sex.
Giving evidence to the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Mahmood said: 'They obviously provided the legal clarity in their legal decision, which is exactly their job.
'I think it's disappointing since then that some individuals have sought to question the validity of the supreme court or cast aspersions, which is absolutely unacceptable.
'I think they've done their job and I think they've sought to do it in a way that recognises that we're talking about a balance of rights, but sought to give confidence to a minority community that they still have protections.'
Some trans rights groups have raised concerns about the practical implications of the ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Five years since Colston fell, there have been setbacks – but those who demanded race equality have not gone away
The toppling of the statue of the British enslaver Edward Colston, five years ago today, felt like a historic moment. Bringing down this one statue and symbolically hurling it into Bristol harbour, protesters – predominantly white – drew international attention to the barbarity of African enslavement, its generated wealth that turbocharged the UK's global power and the legacy of slavery, whose long historical tail had led to the murder of George Floyd less than two weeks before. Five years on, however, it seems fanciful that out of those protests a global reset on race could occur. Back then, structural race inequities were also laid bare by the Covid-19 virus. We watched our TV screens with dread as the kaleidoscope of Black and Asian doctors, nurses and other health workers were dying disproportionately. Those same minoritised communities were also more likely to be in precarious jobs, forced to travel to work as cleaners, care workers and security guards, and were thereby more exposed to the deadly disease. These two seismic occurrences sparked a discussion the likes of which we had never seen in the UK. Corporations held multiple staff meetings over what their response to the Black Lives Matter protests should be. I, along with other race equality activists, was often invited. The discussions would usually begin with the chief executive or a director leading the conversation, proclaiming their commitment to race equality with the usual caveat: 'But we must do better.' Then would come the uncomfortable truth, from their own Black staff, who for the first time felt emboldened to speak truth to power. 'I've been in your company for 20 years. I've lost count of how many white women I've brought in, trained up, only for them to be promoted and often become my line manager.' 'Normally we don't dare speak out. Managers quickly spread the word that Black people are trouble and are always complaining.' I witnessed one woman tell her boss: 'I don't care if you sack me. I've had enough. This charade, you being down with Black Lives Matter, is a bit like you showing up for 10 minutes to our Black History Month in-house event. It changes nothing.' These were difficult and chastening conversations, but with the prolonged Black Lives Matter protests they did bring about action that we hoped might create generational change. For example, company boards began to look at their desperate lack of Black members. Institutions appointed some Black men and women to top roles. And perhaps one of the most noticeable changes was the way that advertisers, along with TV and film producers, placed Black characters in 'everyday' roles, away from the usual villainous or holier-than-thou stereotypes. It could be argued that this cultural normalisation of Black and Asian faces on our TV screens may yet play a significant part in bringing communities closer together. Educationally too, there was the beginning of what we thought would be institutional shifts. My own university, Cambridge, under the stewardship of the vice-chancellor Stephen Toope, had already begun its first serious investigation into its own slavery roots in 2019. After the toppling of Colston, many other universities, such as University College London, Newcastle, Nottingham and Nottingham Trent, opened up their archives. Others looked to broaden their curriculums, bringing in developing-world perspectives. Yet despite so much optimism, the national momentum began to slow down, came to a halt and, in many quarters, is now in reverse. The most significant blocker to change came from Boris Johnson's government, which in the face of the Black Lives Matter protests was forced to set up a race inquiry. Led by Tony Sewell, this report into systemic racism in the UK is widely seen as one of the most flawed race reports ever written. Despite all the evidence, Sewell questioned the level of systemic racism in the UK and also claimed there was a positive story to tell about the enslavement of Africans 'not only being about profit and suffering but how culturally African people transformed themselves'. Sewell was given a peerage by Johnson in 2022. Other factors that stalled the momentum included the rightwing attack on England football players taking the knee in support of Black Lives Matter. Then came the attacks on critical race theory, which examines the structural and systemic aspects to racial inequality. Fast forward to 2024 and the climate had gone from tackling race inequality to race hatred riots that sought to firebomb Muslims and refugees. The unprecedented scenes, whipped up by lies around the Southport killer but fuelled by years of Islamophobic and anti-migrant newspaper headlines, harked back to the Ku Klux Klan lynch mobs. And this year we have a US president who demands that businesses and all public institutions abandon their diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programmes. Many of those institutions, in the UK and the US, which had been seen as allies for the Black Lives Matter movement, didn't take much persuasion to fall into line and abandon their commitments. Five years on from that momentous day in Bristol, many of the hopes of generational and systemic change have evaporated. However, we can be somewhat hopeful that, while on the surface many companies have capitulated, some are covertly continuing with their DEI trajectory. Others, such as the Co-op, where I am a director, wear their DEI credentials as a badge of honour. I think the greatest hope will come from the tens of thousands of people, Black and white, young and old, who demanded change during the longest race equality protest ever seen. They have neither gone away nor lost their ideals. The challenge, then, for this government and others, is to reconnect and empower them to demand that historical change they still want to see. Simon Woolley is co-founder of Operation Black Vote and head of Homerton College, Cambridge
The Courier
3 hours ago
- The Courier
Dundee Pride organisers 'rescind' Lord Provost's invite to lead city's equalities march
Dundee Pride organisers have told Lord Provost Bill Campbell he is no longer invited to lead this year's Pride march in the city. Organisers argue 'there has been a clear and vocal consensus that this year's Pride event should remain entirely free from political representation whether local or national, elected or otherwise'. Dundee Pride's secretary wrote to the Lord Provost on June 5. The decision comes as part of a larger political fallout surrounding a recent UK Supreme Court ruling. The ruling states that a woman is defined by biological sex at birth, meaning transgender women are not considered to be women under the Equality Act. Following the ruling, national advocacy group Trans Pride Collective issued an open letter urging Pride event organisers to 'show solidarity with the trans community.' They asked march organisers to 'ban all political parties from officially marching with you and having stalls within your event spaces.' The ban does not prevent politicians from attending Pride events as individuals, as long as they are not acting in their elected capacity. On May 25, Dundee Pride joined other Pride events across Scotland in in enforcing the ban at this year's LGBTQ+ protest. This came after local group Transdonians called out Dundee Pride bosses for not taking action sooner in response to the ruling. Dundee Pride organisers told The Courier: 'We are deeply saddened and outraged by the Supreme Court's recent decision—a ruling that once again fails the trans community and betrays the fundamental duty of those in power to protect the rights and safety of all people.' 'This decision has emboldened a wave of hateful rhetoric. We must be clear: Pride has always been a protest. 'While it's often portrayed as a celebration of 'Love is Love' wrapped in rainbow colours, the truth is more urgent—our community is still fighting for its very survival. 'This ruling has placed a spotlight on the broader struggle for LGBTQ+ rights at a time when far-right ideologies are gaining momentum. We cannot afford to be complacent. 'Now more than ever, individuals, communities, and allies must stand united in unwavering solidarity.' In accordance with the ban, Dundee Pride wrote to Lord Provost Bill Campbell to 'rescind' his invitation to lead the Pride protest march through the city. He was also due to make a speech, which he has done annually since coming into post in 2022. The organisers emphasised the decision was not personal. They wrote in the letter: 'While we fully acknowledge and sincerely appreciate your personal support, enthusiasm, and civic leadership, we must honour the values and voices of the LGBTQ+ community we serve. 'We remain thankful for your support and understanding. We hope to continue working together in other ways to champion inclusivity and equality in Dundee.' Lord Provost Bill Campbell told The Courier: 'It has been an honour and a privilege to lead Dundee Pride events in support of the LGBTQ+ community. 'However, I respect the decision made by Pride events across the country not to involve political and civic representation this year. 'I wish everyone at Dundee Pride the very best for this year's event.' The Courier reached out to Transdonians for comment via email on June 5 2025.
Scottish Sun
14 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Crass' cops slammed for playing ‘snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons
Read on to find out how playing the popular game could land you in trouble COP QUIZ FURY 'Crass' cops slammed for playing 'snog, marry, kill' with mugshots of local call girls and felons Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) LAYING 'snog, marry, avoid' with colleagues at work could be sexual harassment, a tribunal has ruled. The 'crass' and 'inappropriate' game may breach the Equality Act, an Employment judge said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up The risqué quiz involves naming three people and then asking a person to pick which one you would like to kiss, which one you would get married to and which one you would steer clear of altogether. In the BBC hit comedy Gavin and Stacey, Pam, Mick, Gavin and Smithy played a version of it featuring celebrities during a car ride from Essex to Wales. However, the tribunal found it may break workplace laws. The ruling came in the case of a police officer who sued Derbyshire Police after a female colleague involved him in the game — using mugshots of sex workers. The officer candidly admitted to the tribunal that she had 'jokingly' played the game with co-workers and included PC Shafarat Mohammed in their discussion. PC Mohammed claimed that during the discussion in May or June 2022 he was only shown images of black women and was asked what he liked about one of them. He said he was 'embarrassed' and 'offended' by the questioning and felt it was inappropriate. The tribunal judge said: 'We agree that the questions were inappropriate.' However, the tribunal found there was no racial or religious element to it as the sex workers were of varying ethnicities. PC Mohammed lost his case for racial and religious discrimination and harassment. Two top cops accused of mocking a colleague's Irish accent in 'grossly offensive' leaving video
